I'll be at the Gay Pride Parade 2010!

[Mr.Canada]

I'll be there, Cam Corder in hand looking for public sexual acts since no one seems to believe that sex acts go on in public. I'll then edit the video and put it up online. I'll link it back here for all to see. Who knows maybe some poeple from here will recognize me. I'll be the guy filming the live sex shows that go on at the parade.

I'll then take the tape and distribute it to every media outlet I can find, every outspoken "gay rights" group, every outspoken critic of the parade. Every MP and MPP and Toronto councillor and the TPS and RCMP. Basically everybody I can think of. Then I'll sit back and see if anything happens.

But if you guys are right then I shouldn't have anything to film at all. I passed by it 10 or 12 years ago and there was sex acts going on all over the place with crowds around them watching, it was gross. Maybe it's cleaned up since then, I have no idea, we'll see.

Once it gets closer I may try to recruit people in my area or at my Church as spotters or filmers if they have cam corders and want to waste a few hours of their day.

I am imagining we will just text each other when we spot violations of the law in progress.

I should be fairly easy to spot, if you do don't be shy. I'll be the guy who doesn't look happy and isn't wearing a boa or partaking in public sex, shouldn't be too hard. Come and say hi Mr.Canada!

[Mr.Canada]

Hey, who knows maybe I'll come back enlightened.

[Peter F]

I'll be there, Cam Corder in hand looking for public sexual acts since no one seems to believe that sex acts go on in public. ...

Once it gets closer I may try to recruit people in my area or at my Church as spotters or filmers if they have cam corders and want to waste a few hours of their day

I can imagine that scene..."Hey everybody! Let's all go to Toronto and film sex-acts at the Gay Pride parade! Get your camera's! C'mon!"

[Guest American Woman]

I'll be there, Cam Corder in hand looking for public sexual acts since no one seems to believe that sex acts go on in public. .....

I suppose it depends on one's definition of "sexual acts." So perhaps you could clarify. Is simply making out a sexual act? What do you include in "sexual acts" other than the obvious?

[Mr.Canada]

I can imagine that scene..."Hey everybody! Let's all go to Toronto and film sex-acts at the Gay Pride parade! Get your camera's! C'mon!"

My goal is to embarass the public officials that support our tax dollars paying for this. To embarrass the Federal, provincial and municipal leaders and representatives who go and support such events. Also I want to show the silent majority what our tax dollars are funding.

I'll probably take out an ad in the papers as well, pointing to where they can view the evidence...we'll see.

I suppose it depends on one's definition of "sexual acts." So perhaps you could clarify. Is simply making out a sexual act? What do you include in "sexual acts" other than the obvious?

Sex acts as I saw when I passed by it years ago. Oral sex(anal or gentitalia, I saw both), Male on male anal penetration, lesbian penetration using sex toys. Handjobs, Lesbians fingering each other. I saw one guy who was continuously pinching the head of another mans errect penis through a hole in his leather chaps, I have no idea what this means but w/e.

All this and more in full view of the public. As I say maybe it's cleaned up since then, I doubt it but maybe it has.

I'll also be on the look out for paedophile activities going on at the parade. As we know that some homosexuals(male and female) are paedophiles, I'll be filming the pervert and probably end up alerting police and stopping the abuse myself. One thing I cannot stand is the abuse of children by adults.

My main goal of this is to bring it to the attention of the general public and to embarrass public officials. Open peoples eyes and stop them being led by the guilt and thought police of the left wing who have a death grip on the public.

Edited March 7, 2010 by Mr.Canada

[Michael Hardner]

You're going to spend the long weekend skulking down alleys trying to film sex acts ?

That's .... something. Even if you find something, what do you think will happen ? You will probably be remembered as somebody who tapes gay sex acts, and for that you will be able to secure a spot on any float in future parades... maybe even wearing Canadian flag shorts emblazoned with "Mr. Canada" on them.

But do you think you're going to shut down pride ?

[Michael Hardner]

My main goal of this is to bring it to the attention of the general public and to embarrass public officials. Open peoples eyes and stop them being led by the guilt and thought police of the left wing who have a death grip on the public.

From your description above, you surely had to seek out the acts you mentioned. Your description is not one of an objective passer-by who saw these things happening. As such, I doubt the neutral observer will be moved to action from your perspective.

[eyeball]

From your description above, you surely had to seek out the acts you mentioned. Your description is not one of an objective passer-by who saw these things happening. As such, I doubt the neutral observer will be moved to action from your perspective.

No doubt the neutral observer will conclude the guy with the camera is a flaming homo.

[Mr.Canada]

You're going to spend the long weekend skulking down alleys trying to film sex acts ?

That's .... something. Even if you find something, what do you think will happen ? You will probably be remembered as somebody who tapes gay sex acts, and for that you will be able to secure a spot on any float in future parades... maybe even wearing Canadian flag shorts emblazoned with "Mr. Canada" on them.

But do you think you're going to shut down pride ?

No need to go down ally's man, haven't you ever seen this thing? Sex acts are happening right on Yonge St.

No I want to stop my tax dollars funding it. Homosexuals and supporters of the parade are not the majority, regardless of what you'd like to believe. I think the majority of people would be interested to see what their tax dollars are being spent on promoting. I'm doing a free public service. Toronto is a socialist utopia, if they want to fund it that's their city councils decision to make but I don't want Ontario and Federal tax dollars supporting it.

From your description above, you surely had to seek out the acts you mentioned. Your description is not one of an objective passer-by who saw these things happening. As such, I doubt the neutral observer will be moved to action from your perspective.

Maybe you're right public apathy is very high. people are lazy and are apathetic but I still hold a belief that they'd like to know that their tax dollars are funding live sex shows.

It;s wortha try, if it doesn't work, it doesn't work. It's worth a shot. Better then doing nothing.

It worked for Rodney King.

This isn't an attack on homosexuals, I have no problem with them existing. I have a problem with my tax dollars supporting thier live sex show they put on publicly funded each year. In the privacy of your own home do what you like as provided for in the Constitution, we don't neeed to see it and we certianly don't need to fund it with out tax dollars.

Edited March 7, 2010 by Mr.Canada

[Michael Hardner]

No need to go down ally's man, haven't you ever seen this thing? Sex acts are happening right on Yonge St.

I haven't seen it and I've been to pride more than a few times.

It;s wortha try, if it doesn't work, it doesn't work. It's worth a shot. Better then doing nothing.

Well, if you feel that way then I suppose you're doing the right thing by taking action. I can't see this investigation of yours coming up as more than a footnote. For better or worse (and - full disclosure - to my mind it's better) the Toronto media is fully behind Pride, and acts as a cheerleader for the party.

[Smallc]

Oh, I can't wait until Toadbrother sees this.

[Smallc]

And no, I will be in Quebec City and Ottawa during that week.

[Guest American Woman]

According to this letter to Harper, from the national president of REAL Women of Canada, the parade is well known for public sexual acts on the street:

The Right Honourable Stephen Harper

Office of the Prime Minister

80 Wellington Street

Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2

Dear Mr. Harper:

Re: Federal funding of Toronto’s Gay Pride Parade

REAL Women of Canada is deeply offended that your government has given $400,000 of the taxpayers’ money to support the Toronto Gay Pride Parade in June 2009. According to newspaper reports, part of this funding was to be directed towards marketing and programming of the 10-day activity which, according to CTV.ca will “make sure that these events continue to be competitive on the world stage”. Why does your government regard this as significant?

The Gay Pride Parade is well known for its full nudity, open engagement in public sexual acts and its deliberate disregard of behaviour acceptable to most sectors of Canadian society. The parade is about hedonistic exhibitionism and narcissism, promoting a deadly form of sexuality. The parade is designed to shock and titillate and the week-long “celebration” has become an excuse for partying, drug use and promiscuity.

If it's true, while I completely disagree with the "deadly form of sexuality" view/comment, I do think it's a matter of tolerance being taken too far.

Edited March 7, 2010 by American Woman

[Smallc]

I was there during the parade, and I honestly didn't see any sexual acts. Who are Real Women anyway?

[Guest American Woman]

I was there during the parade, and I honestly didn't see any sexual acts. Who are Real Women anyway?

I provided a link to the REAL women website (but here it is again: http://www.realwomenca.com/home.html )

I can't imagine sexual acts on the street being tolerated, but it's odd that they would say the parade is "known for it," I thought. But maybe they are religious nuts who think making out is a "sexual act;" who knows? I just found it interesting that Mr. Canada's claim was backed up by this group. But maybe that's where he got his information from in the first place, who knows?

I think the parade looks like a lot of fun (providing there are no sexual acts going on in public), but it's not exactly G/PG rated from the clips I've seen, so I can understand some people objecting to their tax dollars going towards it.

Edited March 7, 2010 by American Woman

[Smallc]

I wasn't asking who the organization was, I was asking who they are to think that they're the 'real women'. They seem to be a fringe group of some type, raging against feminists, lesbians, and anyone else they don't consider 'real'.

[Wilber]

I stumbled across the London Gay Pride parade years ago while taking a walk. Got to admit it was a hoot but there is no way I think public money should be going toward it or any other celebration of sexual orientation.

[Smallc]

Well, if you want to go that way, no money should ever go to a celebration of ay kind. I don't think a celebration of sexual orientation is any different.

[Guest American Woman]

I wasn't asking who the organization was, I was asking who they are to think that they're the 'real women'. They seem to be a fringe group of some type, raging against feminists, lesbians, and anyone else they don't consider 'real'.

The letters "REAL" stands for "Realistic, Equal, Active, for Life," so they are using REAL as an acronym, which is different from saying they are "real women." And they have the right to form such an organization; as much a right as a gay person does to march down the street of Toronto in butt-less chaps representing "gay pride."

While REAL women obviously doesn't represent all women by any means, I'm guessing there are a lot of gays who see no pride in parading down the street bare-assed, and are frankly embarrassed by it; so the Gay Pride parade doesn't represent all gays, either.

[Smallc]

There is something implied in the the acronym though, don't you think? Yes, I agree they have a right to form such an organization (I don't think you were implying that I was saying they don't) but at the same time, I have a right to dismiss them.

[Guest American Woman]

There is something implied in the the acronym though, don't you think? Yes, I agree they have a right to form such an organization (I don't think you were implying that I was saying they don't) but at the same time, I have a right to dismiss them.

Implied in the same sense as the title Gay Pride Parade implies gays are proud to be prancing down the street bare-assed. You don't think they actually represent all gays, do you? Yet that's the implication.

And yes you have a right to dismiss them, just as people have the right to dismiss Gay Pride. There's really not much difference.

By the same token, one can support equal rights for gays and not support the Gay Pride Parade, or support their tax money going towards it.

[Smallc]

Yes, all that is true, it's simply that Real Women gives me a bad feeling.

[Michael Hardner]

I can't imagine sexual acts on the street being tolerated, but it's odd that they would say the parade is "known for it," I thought. But maybe they are religious nuts who think making out is a "sexual act;" who knows? I just found it interesting that Mr. Canada's claim was backed up by this group. But maybe that's where he got his information from in the first place, who knows?

I think the parade looks like a lot of fun (providing there are no sexual acts going on in public), but it's not exactly G/PG rated from the clips I've seen, so I can understand some people objecting to their tax dollars going towards it.

Real Women can claim that it's "known for it" by Mr. Canada's assertion alone.

I'm sure that public sex acts happen at Caribana, Pride, and probably Canada Day too. I haven't seen anything beyond some furtive groping.

And for the record, I have seen lots of people bring their children to the event.

My perception on the event: Gayness=accepted Public Sex=not accepted

[Michael Hardner]

I stumbled across the London Gay Pride parade years ago while taking a walk. Got to admit it was a hoot but there is no way I think public money should be going toward it or any other celebration of sexual orientation.

Public money goes to all kinds of large public events and all kinds of groups - however you want to define that.

It's about the money and the votes. The money comes in the form of tourist money (lots of it) and hotel tax money to the city (lots of it).

If you want to take money and the human element out of the equation, submit an alternative such as "no funding to any groups or events".

[Guest American Woman]

Yes, all that is true, it's simply that Real Women gives me a bad feeling.

And Gay Pride gives other people a bad feeling. That's my only point. There's really no difference.