Search the Community

Perhaps this is in the wrong sub-forum, but this is a pretty solid follow-up to a lot of the discussions that we've been having here confirming a lot of what I, and others have been saying. Please note that the article isn't flat out denouncing man-made climate change. It's merely pointing out some of the giant gaping holes in current climate arguments (ie the planet hasn't warmed for heading towards 20 years) and that the claims that green house gases are responsible for more, and more damaging, extreme weather events are bogus. Here's the article: http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/11/29/open-climate-letter-to-un-secretary-general-current-scientific-knowledge-does-not-substantiate-ban-ki-moon-assertions-on-weather-and-climate-say-125-scientists/ Of note is the suggestion that any attempted reductions we're making today are going to be grossy expensive and almost entirely ineffectual, and to abandon the current course and move towards mitigation rather than prevention with currently available data.