Jump to content

Newfie Canadian

Member
  • Posts

    618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Newfie Canadian

  1. Second case of mad cow disease confirmed

    It'll be interesting to see where this cow came from. If I recall correctly, when the first case was discovered in Washington State, they knew rather quickly that the cow came from Canada. (Again, if I recall correctly, Canada has a better ID system).

    IMHO, I think this will be bad for Canadian ranchers.

    If this is, for want of a better term, an American cow, countries like Japan will probably continue their ban on US beef, which means there will be a further need on the behalf of US ranchers to rely on their own domestic market.

    This will lead to more protectionism by groups like R-Calf.

    EDIT- FoxNews is reporting (so it must be true ;) ) that:

    Tests have confirmed mad cow disease in what appears to be the first case in a U.S.-born animal, the Agriculture Department said Friday. Officials would not specify where the case turned up, but Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns said there is no evidence the cow was imported.
  2. Nice post JS.

    I confess, when I first skimmed your post, I wasn't sure what you were saying (my bad), but when I really looked, well, nice post.

    However, i just feel that alberta is the most fascinating and interesting province. the only province i would miss if we ever separate

    I'm sure Newfoundlanders and Labradorians will try not to take that personally Bakunin. :D;):lol:

  3. Depends on the game August.

    The only thing that surprised me about all this was the belly-aching by the CPC after the vote, accusing the Liberals of making a deal with separatists to get it done, while only a few short weeks ago they were pretty much trying to do the same thing.

    I'm a little surprised that after all that has happened, Harper isn't a little more cutthroat when it comes to Parliamentary divisions.

    To me, this is a further indication that Harper needs to shake up his inner circle of advisors and his staff. In Harper's defence, it does appear that this time allocation motion is rarely used, but you would think that someone in Harper's staff would know about it.

    On a side note, the motion to extend parliament's sitting passed, meaning the SSM vote will come up soon (next week I believe), and the way it looks now, it will be another disaster for the CPC.

  4. I found this forum by doing a google search for political forums. Found it. Liked it. Stayed.

    I first came to here to give my opinion and to see the opinions of others on issues of politics. I don't try to change anyone's mind, I'm not sure I really want to.

    I post because I have something to say. What that is depends on the topic.

  5. Well GostHacked, looks like you're at odds with the newest Liberal MP, who is from Labrador, Todd Russell.

    Labrador's new Liberal M-P says his beleaguered constituents will take any jobs they can get.

    So Todd Russell is all for a proposed new radar facility in Labrador, even if it contributes to U-S missile defence. Raytheon Company hopes to set up its ``X-band'' radar technology in Labrador.

    I'm not sold on the BMD thing, but it looks as though the US is going to ahead with it anyway, like Iraq, and if they are going to go ahead with no matter what, we might as well get what we can, even if we still don't sign on.

  6. Isn't that stating they think Canadians are stupid?

    Hardly, and this is where you've got to give the Liberal party machine some credit. They've done a good job of portraying Harper in a negative way (whether they are right or wrong I'm not saying). They sensed that Canadians were dubious of Harper and yes, even a little afraid of what he may do as PM and they jumped on it, especially at the right times.

  7. What is it about Canadian politics that provokes this spirit of "boo-yah!" combativeness?

    Alas kimmy, I don't think Canadian politics has a monopoly on that attitude. Multi-party cooperation appears to have gone the way of the Great Auk just about everywhere.

    I suspect the root cause is that which makes the world go around: money.

    To win you need money, to stay in power you need money, stay in power long enough, you'll have money, or the means outside of politics to get it. Witness Brian Tobin for example.

    With such a prize, is it any wonder politics has degenerated into the petty and sometimes juvenile circus that we see every night on the news?

    I digress. :)

  8. You're right IMR, it's in the report.

    Two researchers from the University of Windsor performed the content analysis. One researcher conducted the text search, compiled the statements on America, and provided an initial categorization and assessment of “spin.” A second researcher also categorized the statements,

    acting as a second opinion on the “spin” of the statement. In other words, all statements were categorized by two people working independently. Disagreements

    were noted and, if agreement could not be reached, the statement was identified as ambiguous.

    I stand corrected.

    As I said though, an intriguing article.

    I even took the opportunity to do a little research on Northrop Frye.

    Interesting guy.

  9. I assume that this is google's "search programme" visiting the site and collecting data.

    Yep.

    Googlebot is Google's web-crawling robot. It collects documents from the web to build a searchable index for the Google search engine.
  10. Did you read the Fraser article Newf? It seems to support the conversations you and I have had before on this topic. That anti-Americanism is more a product of Southern Ontario rather than regions like the Maritimes and elsewhere. Pretty interesting that it supports our own anecdotal experiences.

    Yes, finally, after a missing cat and my daughter's kindergarten graduation.

    I found the report intriguing, especially the notion of the Garrison Mentality.

    I can agree with parts of it, like the difference in attitudes of Canadians in different parts of the country towards the US, but I believe that the numbers have to taken with a grain of salt, because the methodology used and materials used have to be subjective. There can't be a hard and solid line to differentiate between positive, negative and neutral.

    For example, how negative does it have to be to be negative?

  11. Perception, perception, perception.

    All that this whole fiasco has shown, so far, is that the Liberals play politics (some would call it dirty politics, but really, is there such a thing as clean politics?), and the perception is there once again that the CPC has something to hide. And I'm not talking about Grewal the MP, the party. First they hold onto the tapes and release tidbits and parts of conversations. They finally release the tapes (some?) and they appear to be altered (whether or not they have been doctored may never be known, unless the Mounties get involved), all the while defending the MP who started this mess while quietly keeping him out of sight.

    What perception does this instill in the populace?

    Even if the tapes are technically damaging to the Liberals, realistically the damage will be worse to the CPC because of the way it was done and handled by the CPC.

    At least that's the way I see it so far.

  12. Perhaps he gains nothing, August, except getting out of a government that he feels is missing the mark on SSM.

    A CBC article says:

    O'Brien had been hinting at leaving the party last April. But he said at the time he was convinced to stay on after being given assurances by Prime Minister Paul Martin that full and fair hearings would be held over same-sex marriage.

    ...

    "I had assurances it would be meaningful and fair from the prime minister. That's not what's happening, in my judgment," he[O'Brien] said.

    He complained that the hearings have been given an artificial and unnecessary June 14 deadline. He said witnesses are only given 24 hours' notice to appear, are often berated and insulted by members of Parliament on both sides of the issue and that too many witnesses are being grouped together in one session.

    Ontario Liberal MP to sit as Independent (CBC Article)

    Could just simply be a matter of O'Brien feeling Martin had given him the shaft, much like Kilgour thought Martin's Darfur pledge wasn't enough to get his vote for the budget.

  13. Liberal MP leaves Grits over same-sex bill

    Liberal MP Pat O'Brien, who opposes his party's position on gay marriage, says he's quitting the Grits to sit as an Independent.

    The move comes less than two months after he held a news conference in April to announce he was staying with the Liberals despite misgivings.

    Another independent MP.

    Interesting.

    I'm not shocked by this, I'm more shocked that he stayed after the last time he went public with his dissatisfaction over SSM.

  14. Chretien drops Gomery challenge, Da Little ____ from Shawinigan relents.

    Not so much.

    Chretien to launch new challenge to Gomery

    The lawyers are expected to table a 97-page motion tomorrow demanding that Justice John Gomery ban any attempts by his four commission lawyers to influence the final report.

    They argue that the former prime minister has the right to defend himself, and that he would be unable to do so if inquiry lawyers plead their case privately in written submissions.

    I thought he gave up too easily.

  15. It all comes down to the realities of the Canadian political system.

    People generally vote for the party that they would like to represent their riding, while at the same time and perhaps more importantly, put an MP into the HoC from the party that they would like to see form the government.

    That's the whole point.

    Using the Stronach example (only because it was the most recent) the majority of Newmarket-Aurora voted for the CPC candidate, no matter who she is. Now they are represented by a Liberal, and they didn't get to exercise their constitutional right to make that decision, the decision being what party is going to represent their riding.

    Having said that, I also vote primarily for the person, but I still look at his party affiliation too, after all, the party he's in says something about them too.

  16. Personally, I have no complaint about the prospect of a gay wedding on TV. I have no plans to watch it, either. I can't really see why any wedding should be on TV; unless perhaps it were Prince Harry.

    The gay wedding won't even be the most offensive thing on TV on the day it airs

    As usual, kimmy gets to the heart of the matter.

    In a free abnd democratic society why should it not be permissible? Just as they should be free to air it, we should be free to not watch.

    They are, and we are. I've got plenty of other channels to watch.

  17. IMHO, how youth are treated at home and in school have a lot to do with their behaviour.

    These days, parents aren't allowed to discipline their children, for fear of being reported as an abusive parent.

    And it is worse in schools. My wife works in a school, Their was an incident a few days ago where a student had become physically abusive towards faculty and students. The principal asked my wife if another faculty member had their Crisis Intervention course. She did, but she isn't allowed to use it. That's a wonderful system.

    I agree with geoffrey. Deterrence for youth (and even adults) at this time, isn't really a deterrence at all.

    They do the crime. They're treated with velvet gloves. Their identities are protected. They get a slap on the wrist, and their records are sealed and eventually expunged.

    While I appreciate where you are going with your post cybercoma, you can train a puppy to do it's business outdoors by rubbing it nose in it when it pees indoors (I know this from experience). If you show a youth what jail is like (rub it's nose in it) don't you think they would wan't to avoid it in the future?

  18. I'm not sure there was a deal for his vote, perhaps more like Sparhawk's goodwill scenario.

    Optics are a funny thing. On the surface, it looks like th Liberal's bought his vote. Later on, after the image of the budget vote fades away, the Liberals will look like they cooperated to get some very important work done.

    And, even if it was a deal, it's not like Cadman got something for himself, like an appointment to a plum post or anything. Some very important work for Canadians will have gotten done. It is just a little sad it takes so long to get something this imoprtant done.

×
×
  • Create New...