-
Posts
4,211 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Status Replies posted by Queenmandy85
-
Just to provide some context, I predicted Turner would beat Mulroney, Secretary Clinton would beat Trump, Trump would beat Biden and I am predicting Trump will win in 2024 and Poilievre will win in 2025. See where I am going with this?
Take care,
Pete
-
Just to provide some context, I predicted Turner would beat Mulroney, Secretary Clinton would beat Trump, Trump would beat Biden and I am predicting Trump will win in 2024 and Poilievre will win in 2025. See where I am going with this?
Take care,
Pete
-
Shhhhh? Not on your life. ?
-
- 1
- Report
-
-
Kissinger was a stooge of the same people that had JFK killed.
-
Kissinger was a stooge of Lee Harvey Oswald????
-
- 1
- Report
-
-
"Eg, our government’s stance that Alberta oil needs to stay in the ground, and we can’t build a pipeline eastwards, and we will import everything we need from Saudi Arabia, ... "
I didn't want to derail the thread so I hope you don't mind me using this to ask my question. I must be missing something. If we continue exporting our oil, what plans should we have in place to ensure future generations have access to our petroleum resourses for the thousands of essential products derived from oil, particularly lubrication, without which you cannot operate any machine? The oil belongs to them as much as it does to the current generation.
-
LIFTR's won't melt down, are far more effeicient that Uranium reactors, cannot be used for weapons, and much less waste and shorter half life so storage of waste is less of a problem. The fuel, thorium, is more plentiful than uranium. Uranium still is required in the short term until the LIFTR's come on line.
It's a lot better than trying to support 20 billion people with solar panels and windmills.
Pete
-
-
"Eg, our government’s stance that Alberta oil needs to stay in the ground, and we can’t build a pipeline eastwards, and we will import everything we need from Saudi Arabia, ... "
I didn't want to derail the thread so I hope you don't mind me using this to ask my question. I must be missing something. If we continue exporting our oil, what plans should we have in place to ensure future generations have access to our petroleum resourses for the thousands of essential products derived from oil, particularly lubrication, without which you cannot operate any machine? The oil belongs to them as much as it does to the current generation.
-
And 2500 years ago, they created the technology that made all that possible, steel. The process hasn't changed much since then. Yes, they may create something to replace coal, iron and oil but are we willing to bet on it? If we start transitioning to nuclear power, specifically LIFTR reactors, we can leave the oil in the ground. We can partner with India and export the technology around the world. It is a licence to print money. In the meantime, western Canada is sitting on a fortune in uranium to bridge the gap with small modular reactors.
Nobody should be allowed to leave school without a proper education in Math, Chemistry, Physics and Geography. I wish I had.
-
-
"Eg, our government’s stance that Alberta oil needs to stay in the ground, and we can’t build a pipeline eastwards, and we will import everything we need from Saudi Arabia, ... "
I didn't want to derail the thread so I hope you don't mind me using this to ask my question. I must be missing something. If we continue exporting our oil, what plans should we have in place to ensure future generations have access to our petroleum resourses for the thousands of essential products derived from oil, particularly lubrication, without which you cannot operate any machine? The oil belongs to them as much as it does to the current generation.