CANADIEN

If someone was starting a thread on the well-documented cases of heterosexual men and women now rotting in jail for purposely infesting others with the HIV virus, you would be the first to point out that there are gay men doing it too. So spare us the whining, will you? BTW, nobody here is saying that trying to infect others on purpose is ethical or moral. And nobody here is portraying homosexuals as being inherently better than heterosexuals, like you seem to say I do. As for my posts, they will concern what I believe to be relevant to the issue at hand. But, since the article you quote in your initial post does not even mention words like ethics and morality, why don't you follow your own advice and refrain of mentioning them in your postings?

You got it. Is it also true when it comes to hetersexuals doing it, and if so, why the whining when I pointed it out?

Hatred for homosexual is alive and well in our society. It does not need huge numbers. It just needs enough people saying often enough that gays and lesbians are lesser people, that they are a threat, that they should live in fear and self-loathing.

Stating that Jews and Muslims can all kill each others and that anyway less of them will mean more converts is not showing concern for them. And God has not stopped, is not stopping and will not stop showing concerns for all sinners; that is all of us. I for one will at least try to do the same.

Saying that people can just kill each other, and that anyway that will result in less non-Christians, is not just a bit blunt, it is showing the lack of care for others that is at the core of the Christian message. As for Jews and Muslims not abiding by Christ's teachings, it does not exempt Christians from abiding by them.

News to you. Nobody is being fooled. The full and sole intent of your initial posting is to spread homophobia. And to you, responding to your posting can only mean agreeing with your homophobia. If you can't deal with the fact we all know it, tough. That being said, I can see why you don't like to be reminded that both SOME gays and SOME heterosexual engage in unprotected sex, some with the intent to make others sick. It derails the homophobic train.

Homosexuality the manifestation of an inner self-hate? What a load of c**p. True there are many, far too many, homosexuals who hate themselves, but it is primarily because of how often they're told they are somehow less valuable annd less humans because of who they are. If anything, it is the homophobia and the other forms of bigotry that are in many response a response to an inner sense of inadequacy.

You sure you know what the topic is? In another posting you claimed it was about homosexuals, meaning all of them. But since it is about homosexuals who spread HIV purposely, mentions of the fact there are heterosexual men who do the same are very much on topic. They bring the whole issue into its true perspective, which is the lack of concern of too many people in our society (both homo and hetero) for their own health and the health of others. Anybody has claimed here that there are no homosexuals purposely spreading HIV? No. Now, if you believe that no heterosexual does the same, please show your proof.

Shall we start with the homophobic postings, the postings stating than less Jews and Muslims means more opportunities to convert souls, or the postings about immigrants and how it is OK to want to have nothing to do with people who are different? Does this means that you will no longer talk about things like "rampant" homosexuality, drug uses, addictions on this thread?

News to you There are huge numbers of heterosexual people who engage in unprotected sex too (and yes, they should be engaged iin sex with one partner in marriage). And there are heterosexual people who will try to infect others. As for the idea that there is a significant number of people who are TRYING to get AIDS, give me a break. The lack of concern by people for their health is disturbing, and so are attempts to inflict harm to others. That includes immoral and unethical attempts by so called Christians to use everything and anything to advance their twisted hateful agenda.

God has no love for racism, bigotry or opinions like "the less Jews and Muslims, the better" either.

:lol:

Jesus directed us to go and convert nations, not to sit back with a grin on our face while the heathen kill each other. He called on us to love our neighbours like ourselves, and that all humans were our neighbours, not that we should see the misfurtune of others as an opportunity. He demanded that we treat others the way we want to be treated by them, not that we hide behind excuses like "that's what they'd do".

I gotta laugh when I read the words "rampant homosexuality". And seriously, who here is advocating drug and alcohol abuse, open drug use in front of kids, or passing condoms to 10-11 year old? Response: virtually nobody. And BTW, do yourself a favour and don't try the "socialist secularist" on me. I am a Christian, including (unlike you) understanding that God's message is about love for all.

They're not Christians therefore their life have no value. Keep digging.

So, it is not true that there immigrants to this country in jobs far below their skills? that there are Canadian-born with jobs they are not suited for? That there are employers and professions who will put obstacles in the path of qualified immigrants/ Stick with arguing that First Nations didn't have languages, will you?

Nice Christian feeling again.

Immigrant failure sure explains why mutilingual doctors are driving cabs. And it sure explains all those white Canadian-borns and bred who can't put a coherent sentence together in either English or French even with a high school or university degree. Or get promoted at work despite a clear lack of sufficient skills while immgrants with better skills and education get shafts to the lower ranks... Or those who will grap at any straw in futile efforts to put a veneer of logic to their prejudice...

Nice to see that you don't mind artists losing their JOBS because of the current government dislike of any artistic expression that fails to meet the approval of the bigoted. I am surprised you don't propose enslaving them.

Humans need more than just food and shelter, and yes it includes the arts. And artists too need decent places to live, enough food to eat, and to keep their jobs.

Interesting choice of comparison... After all, the institution of slavery and its defense where, like homophobia, rooted in the notion that some people are less human than others.

I for one must applaud such fine display of Christian love... Sorry for breaking this to you, but (unlike you), Jesus was not and is not a small minded-racist... And true Christians do not hide behind him like cowards when spewing their hatred.

You object to preventing French-language legislation? No wonder people think you cannot write in English :lol: There would be no reason for English-speaking Canadians to be reduced to second-class status, and if you had a clue you would recognize that equality of rights is NOT second class status for anyone. Why? Because you keep saying that English should be made the sole official language of Ontario, complete with it being the sole language of commerce. I didn't know that pointing to what you say is a proof of hatred towards English Clue to the clueless. What you write is not English. Of course I know it. You keep arguing that there should be one. I know those policies are not corrupt, and that they override nobody's freedoms. it's closer to 23% According to your voices. In the real world, it is NOT discriminatory. The numbers warrant government services in English and French, which is what it is about. BTW, are you saying that French-speakings Canadians should blame themselves for assimilation? You have proved to be very entertaining, but for the time being I decided to go away and do things more useful than reading your drivel. So bye bye loser, I may think of you next time I access government services EN FRANCAIS.

Which is that English should be imposed as the sole language of commerce. Thanks for confirming that I'm right about you. No surprise there, since I have nothing against the English language. While I am waiting for the Englsih translation... nothing in the Constitution mandates the delivery of provincial services in French in Ontario. Equality important, nothing fobitds it. And even more important, the ELECTED legislature of Ontaro decided to do it. You don't like parliamentary democracy, your problem. By "we", you mean yo and your voice... Let's see... federal government services are available in French amd Englsih throught the country, as it should be. Which means that french-speaking Canadians are no longer second class citizens. I call that success. I don't care what anyone from France is supposedly trying to do.

He was wrong, and so are you. But it is nice to see how you express how proud you are at being Canadian.