lictor616

I used to think that sending people like American Woman over to Somalia for a year to live among the people there would probably do wonders to change their thinking... But I no longer beleive that... For some people the implanted politically correct hallucinations are so well embedded that they cannot be broken... I'm not even sure that a good brutal gang rape and female genital mutilation session would be enough to persuade them of the error in their thinking. Before she'd be released from the hospital, American Woman would have figured out that what happened to her was a mere chance encounter (and that a person of any race had equal an chance of committing the awful act against her) and that the people who raped and "circumcised" her were victims of white racism and bigotry or something of the sort and then she would have urged everyone NOT to draw the obvious and inescapable conclusions and stereotype the poor dears who raped and mutilated her. At worst she would have welcomed her new body modification as some sort of "cultural enrichment". When I read such comments as the above quoted... I can only say of them that they are Orwellian double think... and they are insane. Look at how MUCH MORE concerned American Woman is about the potential labeling of black men then she is about VICTIMS OF RAPE... What kind of creature does it take to take the rapist's side and making sure the rapist is not "defamed" and "stereotyped"... That's bordering on evil... It is proof of a mind animated by malice and hatred of justice... whether that mind knows it or not.

anyone concerned about the plight of our agriculture should see this most excellent documentary "The Future of Food": here's a link to the entire film: http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/the_future_of_food/ I urge you all to watch it. This really is a vital piece of documentary... If I could I'd make it mandatory visioning for all Canadians. It does great in explaining salmonella and other such dangerous afflictions.

Its another deliberate misrepresentation... South Africa is part White, part asian, part Indian... East Africa doesn't have the jungle or similar geographical conditions. West Africans are different from east africans, and have admixtures of Mediterranean, arab, north African etc. To sample how prevalent it is in "Mediterranean" people living in the US: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/22..._Greek_ancestry 1960 Sickle cell anemia in an American white boy of Greek ancestry Authors: J J Campbell, F A Oski Journal: American journal of diseases of children A 7-year-old American white boy of Greek ancestry had sickle cell anemia. The disease in this patient was not accompanied by painful episodes or recognizable hematologic complications, although he did demonstrate considerable delay in skeletal maturation. The patient sought medical attention for a dermatologic problem that was ultimately diagnosed as pityriasis rubra pilaris. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstrated example of sickle cell anemia in a white male described in the United States. American journal of diseases of children (1960). 01/03/1977; 131(2):186-8.

In essence the professor is taking the "exception-as-rule" logic... all of this is very deceiving... Yes sickle cell is majority black... but since greeks can also have it... we're all equal... Yes west africans are 90% lactose intolerant, and nordic europeans about 1% ... but some nordic europeans can be lactose intolerant... hence we're all exactly the same. Yes one black in about 12 million can develop blue eyes... hence we're all equal and the same. Yes the drug bidil was designed for applications to specifically black patients seeking treatment for heart ailments, but since 1% of the patients using bidil are hispanic... we're all equal. In essence he makes the typical and recurring liberal mistake, he takes REAL measurable RACE BASED differences, and simply SAYS that because some exceptions occur that the differences aren't real... its called the discounting game... its on par with saying ... "hey we humans all bleed red... so we,re really all the same inside"! its nonsense on stilts, its unscientific, and if he was talking about any other phenomenon that wasn't race based he'd be laughed out of the room Pretty soft headed stuff...

empty piffle.... all of this.. The question I posed is very direct and needs not much circumlocution I'll repeat again: ARE BLACKS "BLACK" AND HAVE SUCH FACULTIES AS BLACK SKIN PERMITTING THEM TO RESISTS BETTER AGAINST THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF THE SUN AND OTHER SPECIFIC ILLNESSES BECAUSE OF THEIR GENES... OR BECAUSE OF WHITE-RACISM AND POVERTY AND SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS... If you really think that race is some sort of optical illusion maintained by some silly social construct and has no basis in reality, and that the reason black people resist skin cancer better is due to the placebo effect of racism or something of the sort, then say so... that way we can spare each other much heartache and needless head scratching.

*repost*

your statement is only correct if you really believe that IQ doesn't measure any type or degree of intelligence... IQ is a very valid method of ascertaining intelligence. Is the most accurate way of knowing if a person has the right mental faculties to succeed in certain societies. And with very tiny exceptions, IQ is generally correct. Many leftists reject IQ since it conflicts with their religious doctrine of "equality"... but most of the opposition to IQ testing is weak and ridiculous

I get a feeling you made an effort to misread what I wrote... I said that Russia was not 20% asian/oriental... our friend griz was under the impression that Tatars, Chuvash and other minorities were somehow non-white as well... I corrected that mistake. Chuvash people for instance are often blond and even look nordic, thye resemble the Finnish Sami in some aspects as well. calling them "non-white orientals" is nonsense. And the Japanese are actually a very GOOD example, very little crime very HIGH social cohesion, Japan is remarkably polite and even more so to tourists and strangers... Japan probably has the best service economy in the world, and the Japanese who minister to your comforts really do believe in providing the BEST service for their customers for no other reason then to be the best. Japan is not xenophobic, it is VERY open to foreign influences, Japan has extremely capable opera companies, conductors, orchestras, Rock Bands, Rap biddies, Techno, Trance, Goa etc ... Including to their rich, diverse and very creditable cuisine, Japan has all manner of foreign restaurants... Japan has sumo, but it also has excellent baseball players to the point where it sends many players to the major league in the US... Japan have many fashions and extravagant designers respected worldwide. To say that Japanese are xenophobic is to show one's own ignorance of that country. Japan is a very "achieved" country, who is not at ALL afraid of foreign influences... not in the slightest. Anyone who says different is simply ignorant of reality.

First off, Russia is not 20% oriental/Asiatic... Russia is ethnically Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, Bashkir 1.2%, Chuvash 1.1%, other or assorted eastern European and non identified at 12.1% only the Bashkir and tiny slithers of half mongols are non-white... the rest of russia is about 95% homogeneous and is a "white country" if we have any reasonable definition of what that is. Secondly no one even talked about "purity" anywhere in these posts... i'm not even sure how we would define that... but say you were talking to a a person who wanted to aim for a "pure" nation... what's your argument against that? that no nation will ever be 100% pure? consider this analogy: when we shower, we are always left with small traces of dirt and bacteria (under our fingernails, between our feet, on our hair and scalp) so by your logic you would say ... what the point of cleaning yourself?... whats the point of showering? You'll never be 100% clean anyway so the whole thing is useless.. Also being "diverse" is not necessary to "living together in harmony"... A nation of 98% homogeneous people such as they have in japan can be harmonious without importing 1 million Nigerians... if living in harmony is the objective how is mixing people who think, act, look talk differently a good means to that end? Where is the evidence? In fact the evidence points out to the contrary, whenever people are killing themselves most violently and atrociously and often its usually because of issues of diversity... none of what you say makes sense. your argument is pretty feeble.

probably right.

Yeah, but gloss over the fact that Bush was the most criticized and demonized president in US history. That can't happen with BO because of his skin tone and the liberal media (far more influential then Fox) covering for him. You could debate pro-bushites pretty easily... but you can't debate with someone who calls you a racist... that accusation is meant to END debate and dissent

Let us remember that ours is a world in which 3 billion people live with less than a dollar a day, where the richest 2 percent of adults in the world own more than half the world's wealth and where by contrast, the bottom 50 percent of the world's adult population owns barely 1 percent of the world's wealth. (according to a new study released by the Helsinki-based World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University). The world wealth gap and its consequent ills have all been borne out of the WW2 and liberal ideology- an ideology supposedly based upon equality (human and otherwise). These regrettable developments and further inequities and life quality index drops have increased dramatically since the 40’s, and demographers and scientists alike, are predicting that these problems will continue to worsen, and what is more, overpopulation, nuclear proliferation, pollution and other environmental problems may very well end humanity or “species survivability” in this century. The study's authors say their work is the most comprehensive study of personal wealth ever undertaken. They found the richest 1 percent of adults owned 40 percent of global assets in the year 2000, and that the richest 10 percent of adults accounted for 85 percent of the world's total.

well when addressing the mainstream average voter, you have to dumb down your spiel quite a bit, but it put things clearly.

the percentage of arable soil has decreased since the 80's ... http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=A...c832de29f1f9e25 61% of european arable land has been deemed "over fertilized" The fact is our ability to increase food output will be capped in the next few years... and then what?! lol I simply cannot understand people's optimism in all of this... we'll soon be 7 BILLION people... 7 BILLION! And btw china's Yang Tze river has been dubbed terminally polluted... meaning it will never become viable again... or at least in the next 400 years... and this type of terminal pollution is happening increasingly and with nearly irreversible effects ALL OVER THE WORLD. The US already has 43% of its water surfaces that are unfishable unswimmable... and this too, will increase. please view this:

hahaahah, as if we did'nt know the democrats would try to get their detractors on the run with the race card... Its pretty frightening, governments capable of silencing dissent by accusing everyone of racism... "what you disagree with glorious comrade Obama's policies?, you must be racist and an enemy of the people!" Imagine if Bush used the same nonsense! sickening, DISGUSTING double standard... Political Correctness is now a threat to democracy.

http://www.worldhunger.org/articles/09/edi...vanderslice.htm http://www.chrismartenson.com/forum/wealth...llapse-us/24520 even here in canada the income gap: http://www.growinggap.ca/node/183 "Hunger In America Rises By 43 Percent Over Last Five Years" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/...51029093925.htm There were 923 million hungry people in the world in 2007, an increase of 80 million since 1990. http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0291e/i0291e00.htm ^ Food and Agriculture Organization Economic and Social Development Department. “The State of Food Insecurity in the World, 2008 : High food prices and food security - threats and opportunities”. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2008, p. 2. “FAO’s most recent estimates put the number of hungry people at 923 million in 2007, an increase of more than 80 million since the 1990–92 base period.”. also these hunger stats are misleading since since the 70's, the West has dumped TRILLIONS in financial aid to "underdeveloped countries" which actually artificially decreases the number of hungry... the number of dependent and unviable people in the world is doubtless MUCH higher.

indeed, any plan, any scheme which is based on an every increasing population in order to work, is fundamentally flawed and eventually will come to grief... Its planned failure, and a rational society would aim to have a sustainable near zero growth population.

surely you could expound on these... instead of your usual rejection out of hand...

what's the bleeding heart hand wringing about "famine" then? At first you sound off like a militarist praising warfare, then you go soft and bemoan famine (often caused by wars)... seems quite ridiculous. on top of it you reference the quote from MAO of all people... who was neither an intelligent military strategist, and actually used famines to control his people... i couldn't help myself, I had to comment.

Completely false, famine has INCREASED since the beginning of the cold war... and that everywhere in the world just sa the wealth gap has in parallel.

ahahaha there you go flip flopping... so now you concede that the canadian charter is RACIALLY BIASED and ANTI-EGALITARIAN AND VERY MUCH ANTI-WHITE! thank you!

that mainly happens in integrated schools, where every ethnicity is pitted against the other... I would wager that such incidents are far less likely when under the tutelage of a discipline and eduction first type environment... not one that teaches political correctness first.

Lol, a sinocentric or japanese-centric school... gosh I think I'd send my kids there in lieu of the festering, violent, "metal detector", victim-mentality brainwashing ,PC edumacating, diversity ridden idiot hatcheries that are the norm in canada. They might actually learn about things that matter (science, math and literacy), and benefit from having to compete with disciplined, well mannered and intelligent Orientals!

the problem is that regardless if technology can feed us and sustain us (which at present it cannot), what is obviously more important to sane people is having a pleasant world to live IN ... feeding the whole world and having western nations foot the bill to sustain the billions of mouths worldwide so they may perpetuate and accelerate their misery as they multiply like guinea pigs is clearly not the way to go. What do you propose that we continue feeding the human offal of the world so they can continue multiplying until there is standing room alone in the world? Quality is so often inimical to quantity. Personally if I had to choose between a sustainable world of 1 or 2 billion humans, with plenty of space, plenty of resources and a human global plantation of 30 billion, where people are crowded together like animals in pens... i'd rather live in the DEPOPULATED world. The obscene and insane left minded irreconcilables who usually write editorials filled with passionate yelps that the "rich nations" (that means us, suckers!) must reduce their own standard of living so that they can give trillions of dollars to the "poor nations" (which means billions of muslims, chinese, Africans, south americas... who aren't all that fond of us to begin with) to help them "save the planet" (by multiplying as like rabbits). The main pollution from which the planet needs to be saved, the horrendous overpopulation by billions of vocal anthropoids. Either way, having more people in the world will only increase competition for the world's dwindling resources... which will activate the territorial imperative that is inherent in every self respecting and sane population. The blind forces of biological evolution compel us to own land to be happy and survive. To live against the territorial imperative is to revolt against nature. The laws of nature are absolute and from them there is no escape. They laws may be broken... but never with impunity. The ultimate and unavoidable penalty for all is death.

Yes of course, communism (being a conspiracy, not a political ideology) can never be carried out, which is why the venal communists of today all repudiate Stalinism as some how "not really communism"... Communism is as versatile as evil itself: it is all things to all men... communism preached independence and racially homogeneous societies to the blacks of Africa in the 60's 70's and 80's.... while simultaneously preaching INTERDEPENDENCE and "bortherhood" to the idiots and suckers in the US and Canada. Communism (be it maoist, stalinist, Pol potist, cuban etc) leads to but one end: misery and death. It is an "ideology" of anti-humans. Communism comes from the primeval abyss of savagery and ignorance, far from being the "futuristic" ideology it claims to be , communism is the most primitive of human society craft... our ancestors homo-habilis and homo erectus where communists (ie lived in communes without such notions as private property or currency and in the state of indiscriminate equality) Hierarchy and division of labor is a faculty of civilized society. Also both varieties of fascism in Europe were DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED... that cannot be said of communism. and to number the total victims of communism at a conservative glance is roughly 119 million (RJ Rummel) people in this century alone. Far far beyond anything fascists ever did (most of fascism's victims after all were mere communists)