Jump to content

lictor616

Member
  • Posts

    2,018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lictor616

  1. America is the last western nation with a rational freedom embracing constitution... but with the current assault on it by powerful leftist elements, will it last? here's Pat Condell with another brilliant vlog.
  2. the black... turnout in2008 was 68% white voter turnout in 2008? 58.5%... the first time in history that blacks voted in GREATER AVERAGE THEN WHITES... (wink wink,, wonder why!) http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/socdemo/vot...008/tables.html black voter turnout in 2000 was 48%. And even then, that was a record high since the NAACP launched an unprecedented $10 million voter education and registration project, and the demos bribed black communities by Democrats and unions in "get out the vote"... remember the "vote or die" schemes... get a black candidate and you get 20% higher voter turnout... and still higher unanimity, and the media gets to tar every opposing voice as racist and criminal? ... sounds like a recipe for racial oppression!
  3. because the person who won the election wasn't white? oh thank you for validating my point.
  4. I wonder what kind of mind can read a headline such as: ""Women's Vote Gives Clinton Pennsylvania Win" http://www.womensenews.org/story/campaign-...ennsylvania-win and still deny categorically that gender or race based voting counted for anything in this election...
  5. yes it has sunken in... when you have the media TELLING YOU BY IMPLICATION: THAT GENDER AND RACE BASED VOTING WHERE HUGELY IMPORTANT FOR THE ELECTION... and that many people MADE RACE BASED OR GENDER BASED VOTES AS IS CLEAR BY DEDUCTION AND WHAT THE VOTERS THEMSELVES WERE POLLED TO HAVE ADMITTED. only a mutton head would dare suggest that race had nothing to do with this election...
  6. up here in canada, I,ve never heard anyone not take a crack at bush... I even do it... nobody gives a crap about offending bush and being labelled a terrorist by... who would even label you as such? ann Coulter?
  7. by a minority of nutty and dim bush supporters, the mass media CERTAINLY didn't refrain from criticizing him, in deed it was fashionable to criticize him, he was at the butt end of nearly every joke made by NBC, CBC et al. even to this day bush cracks still make up a lot of whats on TV. People called bush a redneck, a retarded cowboy... do you think any comedian would have the balls to call Obama a "ghetto thug" or "black criminal". not at all. but still the racism card can be flashed REGARDLESS of situation and has NOTHING TO DO with policy. there a huge difference. its a very powerful trump that Bush never could dream of having.
  8. more nonsense on stilts: why do you waste time trying to bamboozle people into believing manifestly false tripe? when even YOU YOURSELF don't believe what you write... his best bud Jeremiah Wright has been on record saying how Obama should get hte black vote "because he feeels black people's pain" and similar nonsense http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sfu2P6cGhWo do you expect us to believe that clinton wasn't favored by women? and that Obama wasn't preferred by blacks and non-whites generally? snip- "Just 12 days into her campaign, the New York senator and former first lady has made it clear that appealing to female voters will be central to her message" http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0201/p01s04-uspo.html "Women's Vote Gives Clinton Pennsylvania Win" http://www.womensenews.org/story/campaign-...ennsylvania-win "Most White Women Voted for Clinton White women went particularly strong for Clinton, with 64 percent backing Clinton and 36 percent for Obama." http://www.womensenews.org/story/campaign-...ennsylvania-win I mean deny gender/race politics all you want dancer, everyone with half a brain knows what the deal is... 96% of blacks vote for the black candidate... a record high in unanimity in ANY US election... and we're not supposed to draw the obvious and inescapable deduction? stop it... please.. .preserve what little face you have left... just concede already.
  9. i'm sorry to say that I actually giggled reading that bit...
  10. vitamin D deficiency (from lack of sunlight!) I remeber reading in a recent study that also burkas are making women sick throughout the arab world. 99 percent of women in a showed a deficiency of vitamin D. http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/...R56610220070625 which can lead to breast cancer and a wealth of serious illnesses. don't tell me you didn't suspect that turning women into mobile Tarpaulin beehive like creatures wasn't a safe thing to do!
  11. ahahhah don't tell me you're foolish enough to believe a liberal... and expect him to live up to his own code of conduct.. AND be honest on top of it!| cmon everyone knows that blacks are "more equal" then lowly tax paying white swine.
  12. have you ever heard of rafter seats? for 20-40 bucks you can get a nice nosebleed section that lets you see the action just as well.
  13. illogical to your clotted mind maybe. well let me take you by the hand and run it by you again... I'm saying that many people are defending obama, even to support him ... and that many others refuse to criticize him (for fear of being labelled a racist) BECAUSE HE IS BLACK... not REGARDLESS of it. In fact i'm quite sure that if obama were white... that no one could say that opposition to him was because of "racism" and that many blacks would be FAR LESS sympathetic to him if he were white. If obama was white, those blacks at the inauguration wouldn't have been crying and going haywire. For instance did you ever hear of anyone calling Bush critics RACIST? if you didn't support Bush... you were fine... if you don't support Obama... you're a racist... is it sinking in finally?!
  14. !?!? what a strange way to approach this? Do you really believe that Obama was not a favored candidate in the Democratic committee? Do you think he got there despite not being nominated by the party? what are you talking about?!? for god's sake!
  15. excellent! here they allege that Treblinka's Belzec camp used motor diesel engines... that's right DIESEL ENGINE... which emits very small amounts of carbon monoxide (which is what this website says was the preferred method of execution)... strange since it doesn't support the widely held view that the nazis used the pesticide Zyklon B to kill jews. let's delve into a key quote: "On Wirth's instructions I travel led by truck to Lvov and collected a gassing engine there, which I transported to Sobibor. In Sobibor... [we] unloaded the engine. It was a heavy Russian gasoline engine [probably a tank or train er.gine] with at least 200 h.p. [V-enginel 8 cylinders, water cooled]. We stood the engine on a concrete base and connected the exhaust to the pipe conduit. Then I tried out the engine. To begin with, it did not function. I managed to repair the ignition and the ventils so that the motor finally started. The chemist, whom I already knew from Belzec, entered the gas chamber with a measuring instrument in order to test the gas concentration. Next, an experimental gassing was carried out. I seem to recall that 30-40 women were gassed in one chamber. The Jewesses had to undress on a covered piece of wooded ground near the gas chamber and were driven into the gas chamber by... members of the SS as well as by Ukrainian volunteers. When the women were locked into the gas chamber, I, together with Bauer, operated the engine. Initially the engine idled. We both stood next to the engine and switched from free-exhaust so that the gases were conducted into the chamber. At the suggestion of the chemist, I adjusted the engine to a certain number of revs per minute so that no more gas had to be supplied. After approximately 10 minutes all the women were dead. The chemist and the SS-Fu"hrer gave the signal to switch off the motor. I packed up my tools and saw how the corpses were removed. Transport was by means of a rail-trolley which ran from the gas chamber to a distant area. (StA Dortmund AZ:45 Js 27-61 )" hmmm wow ! so a captured russian lorry engine was the only way the germans could figure out how to produce carbon monoxide! (who were a the time at the apogee and apex of science and technology). no the germans couldnt have just used a simple wood burning furnace which produces carbon monoxide at about 10 times the rate of a gasoline engine... why design it like that? and what about the gas chambers themselves? this is the reinhard camp http://www.deathcamps.org/Reinhard/pic/bigcommand06.jpg "In place of the three old ones which together measured 48 sq.m., the area now covered was 320 sq.m. The new rooms were 2 m. high, i.e., ca. 60 cm. lower than the old ones." funny the individual chambers were 12 feet by 12 feet large and barely 6 feet high... 12X12X6... and apparently 200 to 300 people were gassed in such rooms in 10 minutes FLAT!!! I quote again: "After approximately 10 minutes all the women were dead." 10 minutes !? anyhoozle who cares right? believe the holocaust but deny the Holodomor... pffff
  16. etymological fallacy? that's large! words are sounds that are used to communicate. Usually created to mean what one can hear them to be. anti-semetism to a newbie would unambiguously mean to any marsian observer: antipathy towards semetic people... and we all know Jews aren't the only semites right? if what the word really means is HATRED OF JEWS... then the term should be revised (quite obviously!) to "anti-jewish" or "anti-judaic" or any number of similar clear unambiguous terms. The fact that the term is considered sinful, is widely accepted and drummed into the heads of every featherless biped should tell you something about the double standard we are talking about here. We know anti-semitism because of the holocaust... and the term elicits such venomous and angry responses (just look at you hand wringing posts) that they prove that the holocaust has a very deep emotional significance to you... but .. again put the shoe on the other foot... when dancer denies the Holodmor, you come to his defense and are utterly unmoved... and you think you have the moral high ground... unfortunately your obvious hypocrisy and bias is present in every line you write.
  17. toadbrother... you realize that i'm using official holocaust scholarship right? If you have a problem with the fact that Treblinka is based on eye witness testimonies of 3 jews (this is in the official transcript of the Nuremberg trails incidentally- which is illegal to deny in certain countries) and that Nazi's used I REPEAT AGAIN: captured russian diesel submarine engines: to gas jews, then take it up with the ADL and Bnai Brith... don't get angry at me...
  18. ahahhahaaha what the hell is that link? what is that coupon all about?... is that what you're going with? then you should have no problem believing the nazis used a captured russian submarine engine (a diesel engine at that!) to gas 750 000 of god's own then... as the official story tells us. anti-semite? if words are not to become mere babbling to excite the glands of liberals... anti-semitism can only logically mean ANTIPATHY TOWARDS SEMITES.... Which is a deceitful term because Semites are not necessarily JEWS. In fact the most ardently "antisemetic" country in the world right now is (Israel) who is in the process of liquidating OTHER semites it could be argued!
  19. i'm not sure I follow... you see your statement is only correct if you (like the nazis mind you) consider Jews a race... do you? Do you Dancer, consider Jews a race? how could calling into account evidence available to everyone (in this case the use of submarine diesel engines of captured russian subs) possibly be considered "racist" ? That's the official story! Is it racist to talk about russian sub engines? oh but of course it isn't racist to minimize the suffering of Ukrainians (as not as bad) because the people who died in the holodomor were only Ukrainians... and, there were more Ukrainians... and at least the ukrainians died at the hands of communists who spoke a similar language... so it doesn't really matter.. its not HOW MANY deaths that count ... its how many relative to the total population... beauty! fantastic logic there...
  20. OH SO NOW we're all angry at denying mass murders!!! You people don't seem phased at all when Dancer downgrades the holodomor (with random non specific round rejections). But if anyone calls the holocaust to account.. all bets are off... and its mud slinging time! LOL. beautiful! yeah there really is no double standard... why don't you try addressing individual claims I made yourself instead? technically if I refuse to believe that 750 000 Jews in Treblinka were gassed with a RUSSIAN SUBMARINE DIESEL ENGINE... I'm a holocaust denier and subject to imprisonment in some European countries... Yet if someone roundly denies the Holodomor as "russian unreliable info" what are the consequences? nothing at all of course! yes that's right the double standard goes so far that DENYING in the case of the Holocaust CAN MEAN JAIL TIME! and you people don't see the gap ?!
  21. Well for Treblinka it certainly is... there isn't any physical evidence of an elaborate death machine... so 750 000 casualties in treblinka rely on eye witness testimonies of 3 people. That actually show many logistical problems like the ones I mentioned. Moshe Perlman, The Capture and Trial of Adolf Eichmann (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1963), pp. 300-302. R. Auerbach, "In the Fields of Treblinka," in: A. Donat, ed., Death Camp Treblinka, pp. 19, 69, 71, 72.
  22. Saying this could get the ADL to call you a Holocaust denier by the way... THe holocaust is seen as ONLY what happened to the Jewish people... everything else IS NOT THE HOLOCAUST. in that number: about 200 000 gypsies, gays? about 60 000, Communists 1.3 million... how on earth do you get to the 12 million figure...
  23. HAAHHAHAAHAHAHAHA omg... that's a list of Ukrainian productions... do you dare insinuate that these compare to the massive internationally popular big budget Hollywood productions like Schindler's list?! by the way the only film on the subject of the holodomor is the long out of circulation Famine-33, directed by Oles Yanchuk in 1991. I don't suppose you saw it did you? Why? BECAUSE NOT EVEN 100 000 UKRAINIANS SAW IT! seriously though the gall of just picking up some random list of samll scale bs ukrainian productions ... UNRELATED TO the holodomor... is simply astounding... do you have some sort of beef with ukrainians? tell us about the hatreds that fester in your mind Dancer... I think this is your own personal problem...
  24. well the holocaust wrest 100% on eye whiteness testimonies... many contradicting themsleves.. the only reason we know about treblinka for instance is from the eye witness testinomy of 3 .. that's right 3 alleged survivors. and there are many logistical problems with the official story... one Nuremberg sworn testimony (that is technically illegal to deny in certain countries) is the notion that Germans gassed jews at treblinka with used captured soviet submarine diesel engines. Which doesn't make sense for many reasons: first diesel's gas is particulate... it is largely soot, and not effective for gassing people to death quickly, additionally, submarine engines are very complex machines that requires constant water cooling... which wouldn't work for outdoor gassing... on top of that there were never any captured Russian subs ... because subs don't tend to GET captured... since they usually sink when hit... add to that the fact tht germans would not have had the necessary parts and repair instructions to fix any problem... other testimonials include electrocuted floors as the preferred method of killing inmates in Auschwitz... oh and need I remind you that the official number of dead for Auschwitz was revised in 1992 from an original 4 million dead ... to a paltry 1 million... and no effort has since been made to locate where the other 3 million died... then you have the frightfully problematic cremation process in Hilderberg and you see that the scholarship supporting the Holocaust is far less satisfying then the one supporting the holodomor.
×
×
  • Create New...