lictor616

Islamic extremist group given £113,000 Government grant to 'teach five-year-olds their ideology' Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12...0#ixzz0VMeHIFKp <A militant Islamic group was given more than £113,000 of taxpayers money to run a nursery and two primary schools. Members of Hizb ut-Tahrir used the cash to teach children as young as five about their beliefs. The group - which Tony Blair promised to ban after the 7/7 attacks on London - were given £113,411 to provide the three educational centres in Tottenham and Slough.> Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12...0#ixzz0VMeagPOg diversity is our strength ...

you hardly know what your talking about or who's talking about what most of the time... in fact I won't bother replying to you anymore... all that ever comes out of it is confusion and you spewing REAL hatred like how the Ukrainians deserved the holodomor and having 3 million of their children die and saying how your personal hero is "Yezef" Stalin.

I don't need any other hypothetical arguments to illustrate the point further... the parents, put this terrible burden on their own child out of a religious catechism and orthodoxy ... nothing else. Without their interpretation of the old boob book the bible, none of this would be happening ... I'm astonished that you fail to grasp this.

as if there wasn,t any double standard in what constitutes "hate speech"... a black person is absolutely permitted to say that she is proud to be black, invert the races an employee saying he's proud to be white.. and know what happens... The Hypocrisy and Double Standards of Canada's Hate-Speech Cops Mark Steyn recently wrote about how Canada's Human Rights Commission refused to take any action against a man with a Muslim-sounding name who advocated killing Canadians and, especially, Jews [h/t to Eva]: .... if you're Salman Hossain and you want to expound on the benefits of killing Canadian troops and shooting Jews, party on: 'I hope the German brothers were gonna blow up US-German bases in their country. We should do that here in Canada as well. Kill as many western soldiers as well so that they think twice before entering foreign countries on behalf of their Jew masters,' he wrote... In addition, he singles out Jews, writing: 'When do I get to shoot a few Jews down for attempting to blow up dozens of mosques in America right after 9-11 - why f---ing target the Americans when the Jews are better?' Also: calling people "kemosabe" in the workplace can lead to serious law suits... Is "KEMOSABE" Racist? ("[Canadian] Highest court asked to rule on old Lone Ranger term") CBC News ^ | 12/22/04 | CBC News Posted on Thu Dec 23 2004 12:03:24 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) by dangus Highest court asked to rule on old Lone Ranger term Last Updated Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:07:01 EST HALIFAX - The Supreme Court of Canada is being asked to hear arguments on whether the word "kemosabe" is racist to native people. The request comes from the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, which is dealing with a grievance dating back to 1999. ''We think it's time to … have some ground rules so people know what's permissible and what isn't.' – human rights lawyer Dorothy Kateri Moore, a Mi'kmaq woman working at a sports store in Sydney, N.S., had complained that her boss, Trevor Miller, referred to her and other workers as "kemosabe" – the term used by the 1950s TV character Tonto, the Lone Ranger's sidekick, to describe the masked cowboy. Moore said Miller told her the word meant "friend." But she claimed it was a racial slur and that its repeated use led to a poisoned work environment. Last February, a human rights board of inquiry ruled Moore was not discriminated against because she hadn't shown she was offended by the word, nor did she ask her boss to stop using it. The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal upheld that ruling in October, saying Moore had not shown the term was "notoriously offensive." For the first time in its 37-year history, the commission has asked the Supreme Court of Canada to appeal a decision of the province's Court of Appeal. Commission lawyers say they will argue employees were afraid to speak up to their employer and they want the Supreme Court to draw the line on what language is acceptable in the workplace. http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/2216/128/ 'Here’s what I suggest we do … just throw out the Jews (by religion or blood) out of the instruments of mainstream media, finance/banking, government/politics, and the intelligence/secret services.' 'That’s how the Muslims have done it in the past, especially when they were in power and glorious. Leave behind the token Jew here and there just to appear non-discriminatory. 'Then send the Jews packing on a different ship to their own territory or maybe the South Pole to live with the penguins. Do this before they claim we gonna do another ‘holocaust.’ There’s no Jew better than an exile Jew.' Feel free to quote Mr Hossain all you want. Unusually for Queen Jennifer's realm, these sentiments are entirely legal: 'The OPP reviewed the case with Crown counsel. As a result of that review, it was determined that insufficient grounds existed to support willful promotion of hatred charges,' said Detective-Sergeant Brent Young. a white person expressing those views would have had a very different reaction: again the words of Daniel Hannan ring true... :

swine flu conspiracy: "Ret Chief medical Officer for Finland condemns the Swine Flu issues and explores other related matters. Excerpt from The Researchers series, BASES 5. " http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=185HKE2c5Gg

and yet if anyone else would deny a child blood transfusions for anything other then religion... they would be dubbed INSANE and disgusting.... and the parents would likely be put in jail and loose custody of the child... THAT IS WHAT I'M ATTACKING... HELLO!??!? read the thread title over! julianna's parents are unstable... and judging by the clips I've been shown, not terribly bright... julianna has not given up because she has no idea what's going on... she lives in a world that doesn't exist.... but as she grows... so will her understanding of her plight... and that's not a good thing.

her biggest one not being me or likeminded people (which doubtless number in the tens of million)

still its nice to know that the government is so busily regimenting our interactions with other people, telling us how to act, what specific words to say and even go so far as doing us the service of punishing transgressions by suing, firing or imprisoning people don't follow the governmental guidelines.

so if a kenyan has a perfect running machine its somehow still not acceptable to call him a superior runner ... gotcha... very sensible.

no no, i'm pretty sure her biggest barrier is figuring out how she'll breathe when her second tracheotomy hole becomes unusable... and actually, I,m confident that finding a place for herself in the world as something other then "biggest freak in the US" ranks a bit higher then people (like me) who are dastardly brazen enough to call an apple an apple... and describe her as the abused, torture shell of a human she is. its because of people like you that her suffering is permitted to continue...

what are you serious!!? do you think your blarney imposes on anyone?... so now you think its "ok" to preserve the life of a suffering wreck of a human being for "studying" a condition? Either way, TCS is GENETIC... its not "curable"! once a child has been conceived WITH IT. worth trying? WHAT??!?! there is ZERO ... repeat ZERO chance that Julianna will ever have a remotely normal looking face. And I mean "remotely" in the most extreme way... julianna looks WORSE NOW then she did 2 years ago... you really are being willfully obtuse? the girl has 2 tracheotomy holes in her gullet and throat, soon she'll be getting a third! After that what? And what happens when her body stops responding to anti-biotics (which is already happening in her case) and painkillers? why not put her on a "Chinese Tiger Bench" as additional torture while we're at it!? http://photo.minghui.org/images/persecutio...tiger_bench.jpg maybe burn her with some cigarettes? I mean what else can we do to satisfy you self-righteous bleeding hearts out there? Maybe we can get some of Julianna's DNA and try to produce more kids like her... so as to "study her condition"... pfff what's amazing is that I'm being made the "heartless nazi guy" in the middle of this... unbelievable.

well you know dancer, its obvious that your only interest is in insulting posters you don't like, and legitimizing your obvious transgressions of forum rules and minimal civility, but I'll assume you're being honest and truly believe that these parents are preservig the horrid life of julianna "out of love"... a mere moment of thought suffices to see that the parents (who despite being told many times by doctors, that their child would be badly disfigured, badly handicapped and not make it past 20, who still opted to engender julianna despite these clear indisputable warnings, and STILL decided to inflict this poor child with her current condition, DID SO not out of LOVE, but out of a catechism, out of what they thought a tattered old book was TELLING THEM TO DO).... if this didn't occur to you, then I'm sorry for you...

no mine WAS an argument... were talking about the dangers of letting a population drift into religious knavery... and entertain illusions about the sanctity of human life... which you responded by calling me an idiot, and in other threads..."gay", and worthy of death... its pretty easy to an unbiased observer to see who is the one flinging ad hominem muck around and who is actually making an attempt at reasonable argument.

why do you all avoid my obvious central point here? The title of the thread is "THE ENDS OF RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE", what I am deploring is the state of affairs which tolerates and even encourages attitudes such as that of the parents of Julianna Wetmore... the growing lunacy that ordains that every human is somehow a miracle and gift of god, and that we're all the same inside, and that we should never opt for abortions. That's what I'm attacking here... there was scarcely any talk of murdering, killing anyone... my point in creating this thread was to show what happens when fevered liberal/egalitarian minds are permitted to display their irrationality and (in this case) cruelty. I don't know how this got twisted up into a semantics debate, in which people tried to make me call her a specific name for some random reason... or how we drifted unto me personally...

so far no one defended the opposing argument.. that's what's annoying.

I am... i'm saying that this state of affairs is grossly unjust and an insult to rational people everywhere... any system that gives a mangled mess 5.8 million dollars for NO REASON at all... while children with REAL potential for getting better are rotting in their midsts, is simply sick. and anybody who thinks Julianna deserves it also.

5.8 million for what Dancer... for what? why? what's the point?

oh puuuuhlease! Thom Wetmore is a cargo plane pilot... doubtful if that and a deformed child is worth 5.8 million...

oh so perhaps we could talk about ancient egypt... or dinosaurs now... while we're "on the subject"...

yeah she's written up a 5.8 million dollar medical bill (and growing)... too bad those same doctors couldn't find that same "time and effort" for all those dead kids who had treatable asthma, bad kidneys, and bad medical insurance... unbelievable...

negative evidence is not evidence silly. its impossible to show proof of something that never occurred...

oh wow! boo hoo, and Spartans didn't even have affirmative action or black history month! could you please be reasonable... this was in 500 BC... sorry they didn't have all the apparatus of a liberal democracy.... jeez... ps: THREAD DRIFT THREAD DRIFT THREAD DRIFT THREAD DRIFT THREAD DRIFT

apparently having no vocal chords, no lower jaw... being partially blind and hideously disfigured ... is "superficial"... if only Julianna's doctors knew that... save a lot of trouble.

ahem, cough cough, pardon me... are you suggesting that the way julianna looks is "superficial" again just so we're clear.

they did, however democracy and philosophy would have ended with Athens were it not for Sparta (as well as other states) in the battle of Thermopyle thread drift btw. lets try to get better at this.