benny

No deservingness without making real sacrifices. A rich who has "inherited" expensive tastes may make more sacrifices trying to live with less than a happy worker makes sacrifices by going to his/her work.

You are yourself very good at pinpointing Jews when you want to excuse the rich. Just recall what you wrote about Conrad Black’s Jewish lawyers.

And the human cost of Hitler's "stimulus package" is still incommensurable.

Taxes should be reduced only if people deserve to keep their money.

The money can be used to pay the tariffs. Anyway the trade war is about export subsidies.

Nobody can know the human cost worldwide of a fatal dent done to America good economic reputation.

Obama and Harper know better: political stability requires that this icon be protected.

GM is the ultimate American icon.

Money pays the tariffs.

You're welcome!

The truthful nature of sacrifices is revealed only through collective negotiations.

I see men with children-replacing dog-replacing big toys (bikes, cars, etc.).

I see people walking with their children-replacing dogs.

You would still be a slave without 18th century revolutionaries and 19th century unions' activists who have defeated Kings' armies and insisted for more proper compensation of work efforts relatively to risk-takings.

Like the US and France, the ROC and Quebec don't speak the same language when it comes to the right to subsidize agricultural productions.

Because they are not brainwashed by rightwing think tanks.

Yes because they are now exhausted.

Equalization brings freer trade when achieved by transferring the means to subsidize exports away from direct producers and towards the populations without access to the resources.

Because they are brainwashed by rightwing think tanks.

When public spending is presented as an investment, it may generate not so far down the road its own pay-back capacity.

My French perspective allows me to correct you. Very small monetary transfers to developing nation populations would allows them to reject substandard jobs.

It is not ridiculous at all to envision a circumstance - say global ecological problems that are on the verge of triggering a global nuclear war – where we may have to propose doing that.

To the benefit of all, folks around the world would become productive.

We would be invaded by the US Army.

Folks around the World would benefit; they live with less than a dollar/day.