Machjo

And to think Aboriginal women were being involuntarily sterilized in 1975. I was alive then already.

"I believe the conditions are being deliberately created in our residential schools to spread infectious diseases... The mortality rate in the schools often exceeds fifty percent. This is a national crime." Dr. Peter Bryce The Story of a National Crime, 1907 He was employed by the Department of Indian Affairs and had his position eliminated soon after his allegations. He was an insider and so would certainly have known something. If his opinion was that this was deliberate murder, then how can we think otherwise. And rememebr, this was 1907, when our notion of human rights was even less developed than now! If he thought it was a crime, how can we not if we are people of integrity?

If you look at the video on this site: http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx There are plenty of adults there testifying on video that as children they were 'forced' to play with kids with tuberculosis. This would suggest that the only survivors would be those who were either very lucky or had natural immunity. Even then, we knew that the proper procedure was quarantine, not purposeful exposure! This was murder.

Coverups in the new millennium: http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/intro2.html "July 22, 2002 - A gag order in the form of a defamation lawsuit is brought by the government of Canada against Rev. Annett and others through its paid agent, Chief Edward John of the state-funded First Nations Summit. The lawsuit seeks an injunction banning Rev. Annett from discussing the allegations of secret land deals, murder, drug trafficking and pedophilia made against Chief John and other state-funded native chiefs by members of his own tribal council, Frank Martin and Helen Michel. Chief John's lawsuit is handled by Queen's Counsel Marvin Storrow of Blake, Cassels and Graydon law firm in Vancouver. Storrow is a personal friend and legal counsel to Prime Minister Jean Chretien. August 22, 2002 - Although Rev. Annett was never notified or subpoenaed, the lawsuit goes ahead and Ed John wins his injunction against Rev. Annett in the British Columbia Supreme Court. The injunction is granted by Judge James Taylor, who on behalf of the Law Society of BC helped disbar lawyer Jack Cram in April, 1994 after Cram had made similar allegations as Rev. Annett concerning possible pedophilia and corruption among judges and politicians in BC involving native children. September-October, 2002 - Despite the injunction banning his constitutional freedom of speech, Rev. Annett continues to refer publicly to the allegations against Ed John and the conflict of interest of Judge Taylor, over Annett's radio program, Hidden From History, in Vancouver. October 18, 2002 - A Restraining Order against Rev. Annett is issued by Judge Taylor, who also bans native eyewitnesses Frank Martin and Helen Michel from discussing their evidence about Ed John, and strikes their statements from all BC court records. Judge Taylor also indicates his intention to seek a banning of Rev. Annett's book on genocide in Canada, "Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust". November 1, 2002 - Rev. Annett's latest book, "Love and Death in the Valley", is published by First Books in the United States. Acting for Ed John, lawyer Marvin Storrow tries to prevent its publication, but fails. Early December, 2002 - An all-party Parliamentary meeting in Ottawa discusses "Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust", and "hashes over how to deal with all the Indians who are starting to talk about murders in residential schools", according to a source who was present. December 14, 2002 - A sheriff from the Port Coquitlam office of the Attorney-General attempts to serve court documents on Rev. Annett, but is unable to locate him. The documents are reported to be either a summary arrest warrant for Rev. Annett or a more severe Restraining Order. December 18, 2002 - A spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva confirms that the Commissioner will "probably" be sending an official investigator to Canada in the spring of 2003 to examine evidence of crimes against humanity committed against native peoples. She confirms that Prime Minister Jean Chretien could theoretically be summoned to publicly answer charges of complicity in Genocide. December 28,2002: Kevin Annett is interviewed on KFI radio station in Los Angeles about genocide in Canada, and is heard by an audience of over two million people. Kevin discusses the attacks he is experiencing from the government of Canada through the law firm of Blake, Cassels and Graydon in Vancouver." If there is nothing to hide, why so many coverups?

Ottawa Citizen, 1907: Schools Aid White Plague: http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/keyn...hiteplague.html

August 2, 2004: Kevin's wife Pamela leaves Vancouver suddenly and without warning, and informs Kevin by phone that she has moved back to Nova Scotia without offering an explanation. Kevin is forced to move from his home in Maple Ridge and relocate to Vancouver Island.

October 4, 2004: Kevin and supporters resume their Sunday protests outside downtown Vancouver churches (Catholic, Anglican and United), demanding to know the location of burial sites of children who died in residential schools. Death threats against Kevin resume. Hey, what's one more death?

October 12, 2004: Kevin receives an anonymous (and untraceable) phone call from a woman claiming to work at the "E" Division office of the RCMP in Vancouver. She says that Kevin's name is on a "possible terrorist" list being compiled by Inspector Peter Montague, who engineered both the armed attack on native protestors at Gustafson Lake in 1995, and the government "spin" and disinformation campaign around residential schools since 1996. Ah, yes, the war against terrorism?

December 5, 2004: Revenue Canada notifies Kevin that it intends to take him to court for non-payment of bogus "back taxes". The same day, a caller leaves a message on Kevin's pager which keeps repeating the musical refrain "This gun for hire ...".

January 11, 2005: A forum held by Kevin in Gold River, BC is sabotaged by a non-native official of the state-funded Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council (NTC), who "orders" local native counsellor Margaret Amos not to attend the forum, despite Amos' support for it. Amos is told that she will lose her job if she supports Kevin in any way.

And why deos a Reverend of the United Church get defrocked and then harassed and attacked right up till 2005 and possibly beyond for having spoken out? 2005 is not even 5 years ago yet: http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/chro...ks.html#attacks

How do we explain that at the hight of tuberculosis, when we all knew that quarantine was necessary, that in the residential schools, healthy children were actively encouraged to play with the sick ones? How do we explain that the doctor responsible for overlooking the residential schools had his position abolished by the government right at the hight of the tuberculosis epidemic soon after his report of intentional exposure? Co-incidence? And you can't say it was a sign of the times because this was a doctor expressing concern over this at the turn of the last century.

Evidence of genocidal mortality: http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/mort_rate_index.html

Addicted to what? Being Aboriginal? So an addicted woman will go out and get married and plan to have children and a family? Think about it for a moment.

I'm sorry, but we did not have a 50%+ death rate in regular schools.

And if he's lying, then why isn't has the RCMP and the United Church not charged him with defamation of character?

So how do you explain Kevin Annett being defrocked and even harassed by the RCMP in the 90s and maybe today? Clearly there is more to or there would be no reason for him to state in his own words in video online that he has been harassed by the RCMP.

And why would Kevin Annet be defrocked and then arrassed by the RCMP and the United Church in the 90s for investigating claims about the residential schools? Why was the RCMP involved? Something to hide?

So all the first nations were deemed mentally defective? Why would the government be giving 300 dollars for every Indian woman sterilized? Sounds like good business.

"Doctor James Goodbrand sterilized many of our women... In 1952, when he heard I was going to marry a traditional chief, Goodbrand kept saying to me, "If you marry Freddie, I'll have to do an operation on you". That scared me and I tried to see another doctor, but the Indian Agent wouldn't let me. So when I gave birth to my daughter, it was Goodbrand who delivered her... After the birth, I hurt really bad and I kept bleeding. Then I learned that my tubes had been tied. He must have done it to me after the delivery when I was still unconscious. I heard Goodbrand say he was getting paid $300 by the government for every Indian woman he sterilized." Sarah Modeste, Cowichan Nation, Vancouver Island August 12, 2000 Hmmm.. The tubes just miraculously tied themselves without her knowing? Budget problems? Isolated incident? Such a large-scale operation but no one knew about it? Hmmm.... If no one knew about it, then we truly are a stupid and clueless nation.

“My eldest son got the operation first, when he was four years old, in 1975. They came and got him when I wasn't home. Then in July of 1981 they sterilized by younger son. He was nine years old. They took him to the Victoria General Hospital and held him there for days. Neither of the boys can have kids now. They did that to them because our family are all blue bloods, the descendents of the original hereditary chiefs of this territory. The government is still trying to wipe us out.” Names withheld by request Vacouver Island, May 18, 2005

And how do we explain all the stories of forced sterilization?

Just watch the video here: http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org/ It describes plenty of eye-witness accounts, in their own words, of medical experiments (hardly a budget issue), documented evidence from 1907 of one Dr. expressing concern over intentional exposure to deadly disease, and he got fired for it; and a Reverend more recently getting defrocked by the church because he'd learnt of these stories and spoke out about it in the 90's, inhis own words on-screen. When enough people make these claims, it's ludicrous and insulting to suggest that an entire people are lying. And seeing that this was across Canada, and that the RCMP was pulling the childrenaway from the children,a nd that the Aboriginals were legally wards of the state, and still are, how can we say we as a nation are not responsible? Anything to save a buck, I suppose.

And documentation of medical experiments on natives in Canada?

And how do we explain an Aboriginal woman still alive today telling the story on video online how her brother had told her of teachers at the residential school attaching wires to his penis, giving him electrical shocks, and laughing while doing it?