Posts posted by Moonbox
Is there a point you're trying to convey with that video?
49 minutes ago, blackbird said:
I expect Romanists will downvote and disagree with my views on Romanism, but I am simply stating the facts of how I see it. If you can produce any reasoning or evidence on how I am wrong, feel free.
You're not stating many facts here, Father Brimstone. You're just obnoxiously mouthing off.
11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
From what I understand so far, the dam is only partially damaged.
Oh gosh, partially damaged?
That ain't partial my man. That's a full and catastrophic failure.14 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
The reservoir apparently provides fresh water to Crimea. Now why would the Russians want to cut off fresh water to Crimea?
They don't want to cut off water from Crimea. They want to keep Ukrainian troops from crossing the river, and also the dam (which was also a road bridge). Tucker didn't talk about that, did he?
As for Ukraine, if they wanted to cut off fresh water to Crimea, they'd blow up the fresh water channel to Crimea, not the bridge/dam.
36 minutes ago, Aristides said:
HIMARS doesn't carry a warhead anywhere near large enough to take out a concrete dam.
I was going to say something about that, but figured it was going to be wasted on anyone whose knowledge of history and whose reasoning skills are poor enough to believe Russian propaganda.
The Allies needed 9000 pound special-designed bombs that detonated underwater and had to be carried by converted super heavy bombers.
The HIMARS payload is a precision weapon with ~200 pound warheads. If you needed any proof that Russia is lying about this, it’s that they are claiming a weapon that can’t do the job, did the job.
A dam is a reinforced concrete fortification meant to hold back millions of tons of water.
I don't think NDP voters (whoever and wherever they are) care much how you characterize it. All they care is that the NDP got some results for the first time in a long time after the last election.
16 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
Yet he'll do nothing with it. The guy is a political flop. I have no love for the NDP but...Singh and his advisors are not seeing the big picture here.
The big picture is that when the Liberals are toppled or they are voted out, the NDP will no longer hold the balance of power.
17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
The "value" here, is the potential for Singh to finally make a real statement and be taken for more than Justin's lap dog. But he missed the boat.
I would like to see an inquiry, and the argument that it can’t be done without giving up state intelligence secrets is bogus.
That being said, Singh holds the balance of power right now and that’s the best position the NDP has ever been in.
If his house was broken-in, a self-defence argument could have been made (and they usually succeed). You can't blow a guy away on your driveway with a shotgun for trying to rob your car.
37 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
I mean you're funny - but you're just kind of slow. He actually performs on command and he always knows to come when you call. it's like having your own pet monkey
Yet we can type one-liners to elicit multi-paragraph rants about how intimidating you are and how crushed and dejected you've decided your opponents are.
Hate to tell you, but you're the one performing on-queue. 👌
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Says the guy who follows me around going "yup ok" 10 times in a row on demand ROFLMAO!!!
You tagged him into this thread, you donkey.
2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:
Quoted for truth! The above post was Downvoted by Putin apologist @taxme but is now yet another accurate statement proven true despite the denials from the liars and propagandists on the right. When will Putin’s gullible “useful id1ots” face reality?
Getting downvoted by taxme is a sign of intelligence.
If the dam had been blown in Spring 2022, the Ukrainians would have been a fair guess. Today, at the beginning of their counter-offensive, it's exceedingly likely to have been the Russians. You blow up dams to keep people out and/or cover a retreat. That's land-war 101.
3 hours ago, impartialobserver said:
How do you think I know how the nuts and bolts of how they do it?
I don't know, but modeling what we're talking about here would would be of limited usefulness. There are too many variables and (I suspect) too little past data to build something that would be even remotely accurate.
4 hours ago, impartialobserver said:
If you use a modeling software package, how you would do this is as follow
Economists already model this stuff out regularly. The problem is the competing priorities.
Some immigration is good, but too much is a problem as well. I don’t know what the right number is but Trudeau’s approach seems to be that it’s just going to…balance itself?
17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
"One" is not a lot Unless we're talking about murders.
Wooopsie - triggered leftie got triggered I know how much you hate being shown how ... ummm.... less than smart you are. I really shouldn't do it to you so often.
But - i do find it highly amusing that you missed the clueless irony of accusing me of clueless irony for pointing out your clueless irony LOL!!!!!!
Stay classy big guy
Triggered? 🤨 There's that projection again.
The only thing more pathetic than a no life loser wasting his day trolling internet forums is when he's not even good at it.
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
You realize you jumped into that conversation to whine and mope and generally complain, right? Just sayin'
For someone who argues I follow him around on the forum, you sure do respond to a lot of my posts. 🤡
Your mountain of clueless irony grows.
1 hour ago, myata said:
Right, you don't even need a flash moment's thinking. Talk about mental laziness)
and you think your posts here are examples of intellectual industry? 🙄
Whining requires zero effort. It just needs a bad attitude. Nothing is easier than moping around and vaguely/generally complaining about everything.
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:
Not them! You wanna pay for this insanity...do it. But I think every dime spent on this fiasco is dumb dumb dumb.
Ahhh!!! Russia's comin' to destroy civilization! Ahhh!!!
Thankfully nobody gives a shit what a deluded smooth-brain thinks or says. "Aaaah! Make-believe bioweapon labs! Tucker Carlson said so! Europe's going to freeze! Neo-Nazis AAHh!"
All we need to know about your viewpoint on this is right there, clown.
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:
Yup...I knew you'd fail, because I have said over and over...I have zero affinity for either of them. All I care about is that thousands don't die and thousands more don't get their limbs blown off...for some farce of a war.
Yet we'll always have this to go by:
It's comically dumb to have you say shit like this, and spend as much energy as you have criticizing all of Putin's enemies (while offering not a single criticism for him) and then tell us that you're impartial.5 hours ago, Nationalist said:
Biden keeps throwing billions at it and the course never changes. Why? Because its a real military facing a bunch of neo-Nazis and kids they grab off the streets or right out of classes now.
You talk about reality and then natter off deluded nonsense like this. 🤡5 hours ago, Nationalist said:
But you're to simple to fathom that. To a simple mind...its a simple choice. One side or the other.
Your 10-IQ take. 🤡
Thanks for the laughs, you absolutely mind-warped clown.
7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
OK...you peter off and come back with a quote from me that says "Putin is the good guy!"
I don't need a direct quote. The fact that you've spent the last year blaming everyone but Putin for his invasion of Ukraine, parroted his absurd propaganda and gleefully cheered for Ukrainian suffering is all we need:
That you're too much of a coward to actually admit it is on you, but it does match your ignorance and foolishness with an obvious weakness of character.7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
Or...trash your account and leave with your lyin' ass tail between your legs.
Lets see if you have even an ounce of honour.
You don't even know what honour means, clown.
5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
Ya...I realize that dopey simpletons might not be able to distinguish between facing reality and simple binary choices. But hey...y'are wut y'are...right?
Reality? What does that have to do with your worldview?
Trump won the election!
Putin is the good guy!
Bioweapon labs in Ukraine!
Syrian, Iranian and Lebanese news are reliable sources of information!
-Nationalist, dopey simpleton of 2022-2023
Statistics Canada reports are not usually to be relied on for these sorts of things. Leading private/corp economists may look at the data, but they're always digging deeper. Statistics Canada is not the one to call a recession. Look at this:
TLDR of this chart is the outlook for corporate executives on whether they expect to be expanding and hiring in the near future vs the opposite. Green is good, red is bad, and if we're not in a recession already we probably will be soon.
That being said, it's probably going to be a really light one.
Singh says NDP won’t trigger election over Johnston, interference. Why?
in Federal Politics
I'm not talking about the seat count. I'm talking about the dental funding.