noahbody
-
Posts
1,872 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by noahbody
-
-
The problem is that people don't really have anywhere to turn when they're addicted either, as it's illegal. They don't want to admit to breaking the law and the stigma associated with the addiction is quite high. Decriminalizing it would allow us to turn the focus to recovery and healthcare for addicts.
Google "heroin addition help Canada" without quotation marks. There is no shortage of places to turn in Canada.
The message that it's illegal does stop many kids from trying it. It's not a good drug to send out mixed messages on as it's not very forgiving.
-
What prevention measures are the Conservatives implementing? Assuming that longer, tougher sentences does not necessarily reduce crime (As observed in the US)
Here's a good one.
http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/media/nr/2012/nr20120221-eng.aspx
-
I dont care if its pot or heroin. If a person is of age and wants to use it its their body and their choice. They can deal with the consequences to their health. The government should have no right in telling people what they can and can't put into their bodies.
I don't care about pot, but heroin addiction threatens more than the user as many turn to theft to feed the need.
-
This guy couldn't even win his own seat and single handidly destroyed the liberal party(among other issues)or at the very least could not help in any way that is evident.
Chretien killed the Liberal Party. After the sponsorship scandal, their best leadership prospects all stayed away. The leadership election process that vaulted 4th place Dion to leader buried them. Ignatieff's worse decision was supporting Dion.
-
Where does it say that Harper had anything to do with the selection of the invitees? Do you really think that's something he has time to do?
Looking at their website, maybe they were included because aside from having moral opinions, they fight for equality for women, in general, in other areas. Or maybe the group wasn't properly vetted. Don't forget the Martin government selected someone with separatist ties to be G.G.. They were selecting a single person. This involves 168 groups.
The Harper government has continued to protect the rights of the gay community - even though it's their secret agenda not to do so. They're probably just waiting to have a second majority, just to be devious.
-
It's time Canada took ownership of something other than it's maple syrup and bacon.
Our politicians are pretty good at branding all bad things "American" to use for their political advantage. They know we're proud of our national identity that is "We're not American."
I personally like "American-style dirty tricks." Yes, if it wasn't for those dastardly Americans, our politics would be as pure as the driven snow. I was hoping that when Bush left office, it would be the end of throwing stones at the neighbour. How many times did Jack Layton use the phrase "George Bush's America" for his political advantage? How many times did Martin use "The Americanization of Health Care"? If I recall, Harper claimed Martin supported child pornography. He was also a murderer, according to Layton.
It would be nice if the media stopped reporting all the rhetoric. That won't happen though, because our media is American style. Damn Americans!
-
I'd like to see some conservatives try and justify this...
I don't have a problem with the ad itself as long as it's promoting "Canada's Economic Action Plan" and it's coming from the government and not the Conservative Party. Their rationale is likely that the ads were made to instill confidence in the Canadian economy. It's the media who is characterizing it as a propaganda for Flaherty's budget, making it sound clearly partisan. That probably sells more papers than an calling it propaganda for the economy.
The media buy was higher than required in any event. It always is when the government advertises. There's a lot of waste because governments don't purchase media like a business would. If they advertise in the Herald, they're going to advertise in the Sun, whether it makes sense or not. And they'll advertise in every province, whether it makes sense or not.
-
In the case of the death penalty it doesnt save money, it does not act as a deterrent, and the people that would be charged with administering it can barely do anything right at all.
It's not the death penalty that's expensive, it's justice. Due to plea bargaining and sentence reductions, justice seems to always take a back seat. The system needs to be overhauled. There's no reason the Robert Pickton trial, for example, should have lasted more than a few hours in court.
The death penalty is a deterrent for many, not all.
-
Upgrades, repairs on existing prisons is one thing. Building new, in this economy when we need every dollar, is dumb unless some repairs are beyond prudent.
Building prisons puts people to work. Along with construction, it creates many long-term jobs within the prison. So it's actually good for the economy.
-
The question is whether this sudden influx of CO2 will have any significant effects on the earth's environment. I think that it's fair to say that we simply don't know enough about the question now to have a definitive answer.
"Sudden" has nothing to do with the greenhouse effect. As far as the amount of CO2 emitted, Canada contributes an insignificant amount on a global scale. If we reduce our emissions to zero, it wouldn't affect a thing, except make some people feel all warm and fuzzy.
Canada can, however, have a great impact in reducing global CO2 levels because of the oil sands, if a pipeline is built to China. If China uses our demonized oil instead of burning coal, that will have a huge impact on CO2 levels. The evil villain becomes the hero.
-
How the issue of a gun registry that originally seemed to be about preventing guns from falling into the hands of the insane,
Lepine wasn't known to be insane. Perhaps we need an Insane Registry.
All we'd have to do is pass a law requiring everyone who thinks they might be insane to register. Easy peasy.
-
All of this for 40,000 people is not necessary. I mean, most of us aren't criminals so we don't need to be tracked
If that statement was about the long gun registry, it would start, "All of this for 12 homicides a year." And the "Cons" are still tracking guns... just not long guns, that criminals don't use.
-
The Tories have high hopes of eventually winning the Mount Royal seat, which was once part of Pierre Trudeau's riding. A victory there would give the party their first Montreal seat in a quarter-century.
I've seen this repeated in the media a few times. Without this angle, there isn't much of a story. The angle might be believable if one more seat actually had meaning, but with the Tories already having a majority, the only reasons to believe offered by the columnist are that it was Trudeau's riding and it's a seat they haven't held for 25 years. That's not really convincing.
-
A majority government is not license for a dictatorship. Roughly 24% of all eligible voters cast a ballot for the CPC. About 61% of those that voted had voted for other parties. The appropriate thing to do is let those parties have a say and come to an agreement. Otherwise, they might as well shut down parliament for the rest of the CPC's term and just let them draft whatever legislation they feel like.
It's a license to do what the majority of Canada (based on our system of ridings) has voted for. That's how it's always been in Canada. Nothing new. He did run on a platform, so following through is better than do something completely different, which would be more dictator-like, wouldn't it?
Yes, 61% voted for other parties. And this is a thread about Harper adopting Liberal amendments.
-
In this case the HarperCons, like the HarrisCons, will be backtracking repeatedly, because the extreme ideas are just wrong.
Can you list some of these extreme ideas?
-
Canadians deserve passionate, yet reasoned legislators that are willing to compromise.
Compromise is something you need to do in a minority government situation. I don't know if you have any experience working with committees, but they're ridiculously slow and ineffective at solving problems, because they try to make everyone happy. As for the current government, they are passionate about getting things done, which, IMO, is a refreshing change from the Liberal years, when very little got done.
-
I'm interested in seeing how the other NDP members will vote on this. It appears to be a very self-serving bill, put forth by an NDP MP who won the last election with 50.1% of the vote. Maybe he's thinking it's his ticket to a nice pension, who knows? In any event, it will be difficult for NDP MPs to support this bill and then turn around and say at 16 you're not old enough to know that murder is wrong.
-
Edmonton has to perform unnatural acts to get a fraction of what should be their share.
I think you're taking "Edmonton sucks" out of context.
I think they are being punished for electing a NDP MP. Twice.Edmonton did get $200 million for transit in 2009. What's their fair share? Also which cities are getting more than their fair share in your opinion and how many NDP MPs to they have?
-
do you know any con who wouldn't love to put a liberal in their place?
That's what his response did... he brought up the Liberal record on the environment. That's politics in Canada, unfortunately. It's a political game; hard to stomach, but nothing new. It's childish enough as it is, without "joke" questions.
the man didn't answer it cause he couldn'tIt's a fact that you don't know that.
-
If he did know he would have thrown the answer back in the liberals face
Honestly, after watching the youtube clip, the whole premise of the article is ridiculous. He didn't dignify the, as Trudeau put it, "joke" question with an answer.
There's a big difference between "didn't" and "couldn't." There is a thing called defamation of character too. I would be surprised if there isn't a retraction by the paper tomorrow. Trudeau will likely apologize as well. He is liable for whatever he says in a scrum.
-
He should have known what Ozone is... its been very relevant the last few years
According to Elizabeth May, her impression wasn't that Kent didn't know what Ozone is:
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May also weighed in. She told reporters she would be “stunned” if Mr. Kent didn’t know what ozone is. -
Absolutely we could build one....
The Keystone Pipeline is owned by TCPL, not the government of Canada. If TCPL wants to build a pipeline, they can, because Canada is a free country.
Can "we" build one? If you mean the GOC, we sold of Petro Canada years ago. Even if we hadn't, what would the purpose be to build one? You couldn't put it in TCPL's pipeline because it's carrying something else.
The pipeline creates a market that would otherwise not be there. Since the GOC makes money from royalties based on volume, the more that travels south, the more Canada makes.
As far as "who's in Ottawa" is concerned, it wouldn't make any difference if the Liberals or Tory's were in power. I'm sure the NDP would like to kick out all of the oil companies and turn Canada into a socialist nation, but that's not going to happen.
-
Well, they are just following PM Harper's example then aren't they?
Not going to Iraq was an autonomous decision. What the NDP is doing is trying to sabotage Canadian government business by meeting with and trying to influence the decision makers.
-
So representing the interests of their constituents is not democracy? Oh dear.
It's not respecting Canadian democracy, no. They're to represent their constituents in Parliament. Taking their minority view outside of the country to try to sabotage the will of the majority should never happen.
Here we go again...Tory attacks ads.
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
I would assume the motive behind the ad is because they fear if Rae wins he might attempt to merge or form a coalition with the NDP. The money would be better spent sending their "war machine" to marketing school and to buy better sandwiches for their focus groups.