Accountability Now

Yup...Chris Landsea is my guy. I didn't realize you were a fan. That's good because you will enjoy these Landsea beauties. Or how about this one.... Ouch that one hurts...hey. Landsea and all the other professionals agreeing with little ol' me? The data used back in the day is FAR from being complete. My word...sounds like an echo going off here. I actually put Landsea in red because the paper they refer to in that quote is linked below. It is a paper based on the uncertainty even in today's technolgical era. http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/landsea-franklin-mwr13.pdf I know you like to pretend you are a global thinker so lets shift over to the North Pacific where the ESCAP/WMO released The Second Assement Report on the Influence of Climate Change on Tropical Cyclones in the Typhoon Committee Region. Lets look specificially at Chapter six where it again addresses Uncertainties. Oh...but it gets better... There you have it waldo. All experts from the reputable organizations that you admire agree that at this point there is just TOO MUCH uncertainty which is why they will only say warmer oceans COULD cause fewer hurricanes. But of course, don't let me stop you from disagreeing with Mr. Landsea et al. But you wouldn't be that pompous....would you? Would you? Is this where we see the infamous "Catch you on the flip side MLW"?

You'll check back....that is of course if your parents let you.

Like I said waldo...this is a written forum where everyone can go back at any time and read what was said. I am 100% positive that my 3 and 0 record would be supported. But...you say what you need to make yourself feel better. Tell your parents i say hi.

bully? what are you in grade 2? Of course you said increase....well at least the post you offered up with zero words of your own which makes me have to believe that you back everything it says it. Remember the ditty below where you posted that this was the most active decade since 1855. So most active decade doesn't mean increase to you? Tropical cyclones: Between 2001 and 2010, there were 511 tropical cyclone related events which resulted in a total of nearly 170,000 persons reported killed, over 250 million people reported affected and estimated economic damages of US$ 380 billion. According to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2001-2010 was the most active decade since 1855 in terms of tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic Basin. Stop flip flopping around.

Exactly....you have no clue with either. Both of which added to my 3 and 0.

Do you mean like the NOAA numbers, Environemnt Canada numbers....anything else you would like?

Again with your deflections. I have outright said that I don't approve of the examples they use. They called hurricane Katrina an extreme event when its clearly not. You then went on a tirade trying to prove the increase in atlantic hurricanes and it took me two seconds to realize that isn't true either. My entire point all along is that activists much like yourself try to use individual examples as scare tactics when even those examples aren't extreme. Of course you just don't have the capacity to understand.....

You're right...you have no point in continuing as you should have realized that you were fighting a lost caused from the begininning. You can't fight facts waldo....but like I said...keep reading your Where's Waldo books and one day you can compete at my level.

The report which uses local events to try and make a claim? The report which you submitted but of course offered zero insight for?

Yup....I did. It sucks that little ol' me was able to put a big hole in your theories, hey? How are you going to sleep tonight?

3 and 0.

Then why do you keep bringing up regional examples?

Yup personal attack noted. Constant deflection also noted.

3 and 0 waldo. 3 and 0

No...it appears I am taking up my logical, fact based numbers up against your dillusional reality. Yup...that is what it is.

Whoa....slow down with the personal attacks. I'm glad that you are trying to deflect me to ask these tough questions to the WMO or the IPCC as its apparent that you lack the capabilites to do so.

How do I even offer something on the nothingness that you provided. At least say something. I know you are a little gun shy after going 3 and 0 but if you're going to be here then you'll have to try. Otherwise it will be a "catch you on the flip side MLW" event again.

Haven't ignored anything. There has been no increase in severity or intensity as shown in both failed attempts with the Calgary floods and now with the hurricanes. I have shown you the data from Environment Canada and NOAA but you simply choose not to accept it. I can't help you with that. Contrarily...I have asked you why those so called extreme events happened in the past and yet you offer nothing. Complete nothingness. Keep deflecting.

Insight would be words of your own whcih you have offered....hmmm...let me count your post.....zero! Now...if you are claiming that you have offered insight on other threads, then I would advise you to stick to those threads to discuss as that would be against forum rules to just troll it here. But don't let me stop you from pretending you are offering insight.

Again....you post a bunch of info and offer zero insight of your own. Is that your thing?

So seriously....why did all these events happen in the past but yet activist keep using similar events from today as if its the end of the world? I need to know these things waldo. Why? Why? Why?

You provided the claim and I asked you questions. You just have zero ability to answer them straight up. Go on and deflect again....

What challenges? I've already answered everything that you asked. Unlike you....I'm still waiting on answers on this thread to the questions:

3 and 0 baby....woot woot.

Its all there waldo....go back, take some time. Soak it all in and try to educate yourself.