Black Dog

A slip of the tongue by a 50 year old is a wee bit different than the growing body of evidence showing Trump is in serious cognitive decline.

No I'm mocking your boomer emojis, boomer. It's not. A poster asked for proof of your claim and this was your response. Same crybaby, chickenshit dodge you tried here, because you're nothing if not predictable. Yeah and it's not REASONABLE to expect someone would have seen a link in a different thread than the one the conversation is happening in dummy. The content of the person's social media posts is not common knowledge since no one has actually seen them, but you still framed your claim as a fact when it's not because you're dishonest. It wasn't even me asking, stupid, it was a different poster you were pulling this shit on. Proof and evidence aren't the same thing dumbass. There's evidence you are a pedophile, but the proof is on your hard drive. But we haven't seen it, we don't know what it is they say, just the word of a biased third party: in other words, it's hearsay that contradicts the FBI's statements. You could still include a transcript of what you saw or heard, you dumb ape. LOL whether it's in the affidavit or attached to it, the point stands, there's no actual detail to corroborate the claims despite there allegedly being literal recordings. As usual you get hung up on autistic pedantry and miss the forest for the trees which is you're a gullible dupe for thinking this shit is real. Now post the crying emoji you dumb b!tch.

Copemoji fest. Which is wild that you couldn't provide a link in the exchange I mentioned. Kinda hard to pretend it's about you not wanting to waste your time when you will spend ten times as much time whining about how unfair it is to be asked for a link than it would take to post a link in the first place. It's not reasonable to assume that someone has seen every single post or thread on the board when literally dozens of new threads pop up every day. I never said it wasn't evidence, I said it wasn't proof you id!ot. And it's not. We haven't seen the posts in question, it's literally hearsay. lol this absolutely does not preclude including an account of a conversation that is relevant to the claims being made since that would fall under "what you saw or heard." (eg. "On x date at x time I witnessed so-and-so from ABC telling so-and-so from the Harris campaign 'we will only fact check Trump'") This is my entire point you dimwit: the "whistleblower: claims to have detailed information based on conversations they witnessed (and recorded) first hand but no actual details are included. This Twitter post also doesn't have an attachment of a transcription of the alleged recordings either so that's out the window as well.

With the alternative being a old, senile piece of shit? Sure, most sane people would make that choice. Someone who is repulsed by your very appearance.

It's a Canadian board numbnuts. Not a mindreader? You can't even read words. A woman is a person whose touch you will never know.

lol you're constantly crying about how no one wants to talk to you, take a hint you f*ckin' loser. Or better yet, KYS.

You've posted at or about me a dozen times in the last 24 hours you psycho loser. DIAF.

I'm Canadian you pants pissing m0ron. Christ, you're dumb. A woman is someone who crosses to the other side of the street when they see you.

LOL nope. This isn't true of course. And judging by your cope emojis, you know it's not true too. Lol putting this in the middle of a screed when you're clearly triggered by being called out for being a bullshitter is *chef's kiss* 1. you didn't provide that link in the exchange in question where you made the claim 2. saying "other people have posted about this" is a chickenshit dodge 3. Actual proof would be the actual social media posts the guy made, not third party hearsay. Prove it. The fake-ass affidavit makes specific claims about conversations the fake-ass whistleblower claims to have witnessed and recorded, there's no reason details from those conversations could not be included (eg. "On x date at x time I witnessed so-and-so from ABC telling so-and-so from the Harris campaign 'we will only fact check Trump'" But this fake-ass "affidavit" doesn't even do that. It's a sworn statement of something this person claims to have witnessed yet you think they can't include details of the thing they witnessed for some reason. FOH dumbass. Projection again.

This is the equivalent to someone arguing cars catch fire using the Pinto as evidence.

I posted a clip yesterday where he was calling migrants "animals" and it was so clear how much he's declined, slumped over the podium, slurring his words, rambling wetly. And his schtick has gone stale too, even MAGA people aren't responding like trained seals anymore. The other day he was rambling about TV and how they need to bring back Johnny Carson (who died in 2005) and you could see the audience behind him visibly switch off.

lol what do you know, you live under your bed because you're terrified of the world. "TDS isn't real, I know what a woman is and I'm not voting Harris, but keep trying, dipshit. I'd get better insights and more lucid thoughts from conversing with a bunch of grapes. The only possible way anyone would find you clever or insightful is if they slammed their head in a car door a few dozen times. You are completely useless a waste of space, oxygen and genetic material. You won't even make good fertilizer.

LOL From the article: "Scientists have found evidence that some face masks which are on sale and being used by members of the general public are laced with toxic chemicals." From the article your article references: "Top German scientists have found that wearing certain types of face masks for long periods of time could result in potentially hazardous chemicals and harmful microplastics being inhaled deep into human lungs." So not masks in general, specific shitty made in China fabric masks.

Pretty great actually: for starters, I'm not a mental dwarf like you. Honestly there's stiff conversation on here for Stupidest Right Wing Dipshit, but when it comes to being the most useless you've got that locked down.

Yeah you do this all the time to: say some dumb bullshit and then when pressed to back it up, handwave it away by pretending its common knowledge when usually it turns out to be absolute horseshit. Because you're a liar, a shitty debater and a giant b!tch-ass loser. Ok IMAX. You did this exact thing in another thread recently when you claimed Trump's would-be assassin had online posts strongly supporting Biden and then puss'd out when asked for proof. You got nothing, you're a chickenshit b!tch. Go post more boomer emojis. LMAOOOO what the f*ck are you talking about? An affidavit is nothing but a sworn statement. if someone is swearing that they saw or heard someone say or do something, then there's nothing preventing them from including information that supports that such as a transcript of a relevant conversation, the date and time of said conversation etc, none of which this fake ass document includes. You are incredibly dumb! You literally can dump anything into an affidavit if it's part of your statement. I'm trying to move away from calling people retarded but you are literally retarded. Ok schizo.

"Masks are unhealthy" lmao you guys are the biggest rubes the world has ever seen.

Let's out it this way: I bet he's a shitty poker player.

That's it? That's your gotcha? Seven claims of which only one turns out to be inaccurate? Whoo boy you guys are cooked. I could be more like you and not offer any coherent arguments at all but unlike you I'm not senile.

You're doing the meme again. You literally posted a whopper here ("its [sic] absolutely verfied [sic] and agreed by all parties that they did fact check trump but didn't fact check her") without any evidence to support it. It's another pattern of yours, like posting emojis when you're furiously losing an argument, that the bigger the lie you're trying to sell, the less likely you are to try and cite a source for it. BTW you figure out what a transcript is yet?

Except it clearly worked, you're seething. You might be less of a laughingstock around here if you actually bothered to provide sources for your claims once in a while. You've never heard of a transcript?!?

The fact they claim to have secret recordings that blow the whole thing open but don't include any of that in the actual "affidavit" is just one of the many clues this is bullshit.

lol so you have no idea why he was there what his condition might be (or maybe he was just seeing someone who was already in the treatment area) but you're 100% sure it was wokeism because he was native. You are deranged.

I don't think OP has a job.

Yeah I thought since you like to make shit up about people altering other people's quotes I'd give you something real to cry about for a change and you didn't let me down. You are incredibly easily played, you know that?