Black Dog

Then Google it, you already have a nurse to wipe your ass for you. Neo Nazis are right wingers dipshit. Danforth shooter is on there, which only killed two people and is not known to be politically motivated. Not sure which van attack you're talking about; the incel guy? Your source lists 6 deaths by Islamists compared to 11 killed in two anti-Muslim incidents. you're huffing lead paint again. Gibberish. That's not my standard or the FBI's you dumb cracker. More gibberish. Insane ramblings now. https://www.newsweek.com/las-vegas-gunman-was-trump-supporter-happy-stock-market-701597 wah wah

Does that include the many killed by right wing counterprotestors?

Links are all in there, dummy. Nope. It's all right wingers, including the neo Nazis targeting Jews. 10, actually, not that it matters. There's only 7 on that list in that timeframe, none of which involving more than 3 people since that matters to you. More Muslims have died in Islamophobic attacks in Canada in the last 10 years than non-Muslims killed by Islamists. you can't be racist against crackers. LOl are you claiming every murder of a white person by a black person is racially motivated? LMAO. The Vegas shooter was a conservative but it's unlikely the attack was politically motivated. Ws 9/11 within the last ten years?

Do you know what a continuum is? Republicans and Islamists are on the same one. Not yet but i'm positive you guys would love it to be so.

Not really, no. Everyone knows right wing islamist terrorism is a global concern but that's not the subject of this thread. Thread is about the FBI and political violence in the USA. Stay on topic. Nah, that was Republicans who, again, are ideologically closer to the mullahs of Iran in their religious conservatism than secular lefties. Cope.

1. That's for the entire world, not the USA which is the subject here. 2. Islamic terrorists are also closer ideologically to Republicans than lefties.

Source: Year Occurrence Location Victims Wounded* Victims Killed* 2023 Jacksonville Dollar General shooting Jacksonville, Florida 0 3 2023 Allen, Texas outlet mall shooting Allen, Texas 7 8 2022 Buffalo supermarket shooting Buffalo, New York 3 10 2020 Boogaloo murders Oakland, California Santa Cruz, California 3 2 2019 El Paso Walmart shooting El Paso, Texas 26 22 2019 Poway synagogue shooting Poway, California 3 1 2018 Jeffersontown Kroger shooting Jeffersontown, Kentucky 0 2 2018 Black man burned by White supremacist Murfreesboro, Tennessee 0 1 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 7 11 2018 Murder of Blaze Bernstein Orange County, California 0 1 2018 Murder of MeShon Cooper-Williams Kansas City, Missouri 0 1 2018 Murders of Danny and Deanna Lorenzo Lee County, Florida 0 2 2017 Murder of Richard Collins III College Park, Maryland 0 1 2017 Car-ramming attack into counter-protesters at the white nationalist Unite the Right rally Charlottesville, Virginia 28 1 2017 Portland train attack Portland, Oregon 1 2 2017 Murder of Timothy Caughman New York City, New York 0 1 2015 Shooting at a showing of the film Trainwreck Lafayette, Louisiana 9 2 2015 Planned Parenthood shooting Colorado Springs, Colorado 9 3 2015 Charleston church shooting at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church Charleston, South Carolina 1 9 2014 Attack on Pennsylvania State Police barracks Blooming Grove, Pennsylvania 1 1 2014 Ambush attack on Las Vegas police officers Las Vegas, Nevada 3 2014 Overland Park Jewish Community Center shooting Overland Park, Kansas 3

I thought you dopes didn't like big government and excessive regulation but here you are pushing for government to waste its time on purely performative legislation.

Here's the link since the OP is too stupid or lazy to figure out how to put one in. The big takeaway here is that median voter is a m0ron with no coherent political beliefs and utterly disconnected from material reality. Like come on: These are not people who are engaged with policy in any way, they are plankton drifting along with the tide without a brain in their heads.

Standard cop behaviour but at least they went to the right house. Kentucky police fatally shoot man while serving warrant at wrong home New Mexico family sues police after man was fatally shot by officers responding to wrong house Mississippi officers justified in deadly shooting after police went to wrong house, jury rules

I don't think US statistics on interracial acts of violence tells us jack-all about racial attitudes unless you're digging specifically into hate crimes. Slavery stopped because a small group of loud and obnoxious people constantly nagged or lectured people until their view became more accepted and widespread it was not a spontaneous organic social change. And women got the vote the same way. So on the one hand you're talking about past social changes that occurred because of people nagging and lecturing (and much more) while decrying that same thing when it happens in a contemporary setting. Preferential hiring does not preclude having the necessary qualifications. I've seen white people who've been hired for jobs they weren't qualified for because their dad was buddies with the ADM, but you wouldn't know from looking at them, while I've worked with excellent people who are members of a minority group.

He doesn't use the word lawfully. Good lord, I quoted the entire thing and you're still denying reality, this is pathetic. Here it is again FTR: Do you genuinely think peaceful and lawful are the same thing in the context of the military storming and occupying government buildings? LMAO. And it wouldn't be a reply from you if you weren't peddling an extremely easily disproven lie. Sad, delusional man. You're already dead and you don't even know it. LOL your puritan whinging about anything with a slight sexual connotation will never stop being pathetic, but I was referring to your excessively self-absorbed and self-indulgent posting which only gets worse the deeper you dig yourself into a hole, as your last several posts show. Project more, IMAX. Too bad for you anyone with eyes can just look at the last few pages of you making an utter buffoon of yourself and draw their own conclusions. You said you read the manifesto yet were ignorant of its contents, then you said you didn't say you read the manifesto, and then you say the manifesto doesn't say what it actually says it clear and plain English. What are you gonna do for an encore, slam the fridge door on your head a few times? I'm still torn on whether you're binging on copium here because you know you f*cked up and are trying to wriggle off the hook because you're a sad loser who can't admit he's wrong or if you genuinely believe this garbage you're saying. Because if it's the latter there's no hope for you until the sweet embrace of the grave.

That doesn't answer my question, which was how is this any different in practice than racism based on the belief on inherent racial hierarchies? I already understand how the rationales differ, but when it cme sto how that plays out in the real world, it's a distinction without difference. And we did this all by ourselves? People who went around saying racist things and telling racist jokes woke up one day and just decided to stop all on their own? Nonsense. All this stuff was real bad until, I'd say, the early '90s when the first wave of "political correctness" came along and people were quite literally lectured and nagged about not being racist (or bigoted if you prefer). You know this because I'm sure you complained about it then too. Well theres a strong correlation with all that stuff you're kvetching about and the decline of open racism in our society, so there's that. Quick question: how would you as an outsider know when someone was getting unfair and unjustified preference due to their minority status versus being actually qualified?

Aw honey, it's ok, you can't win them all. Or ,in your case, any. Military: check. Immediate action: check. Purge: check. He also doesn't say anything about "lawfully" only "peacefully" which is not the same thing. Quotes or gtfo.

uh huh sure dude. Well they are almost the only ones who carry out politically motivated acts of mass violence in America.

Do I have to do everything for you dummies? -LINK Well, you're taking about like three people versus the dozens of right wing terrorists. I doubt they consider it a serious call to violence any more than your insane ravings on here are. Crazies gonna crazy. LOl no one needs this manifesto for that.

I quoted you in the response where i provided the link, holy sh*t dude, this is just sad. Still going, huh? OK, I'm happy to keep kicking you around. Here's what I posted first: Then you replied an hour later (I had logged off at that point because i have a life): Then there was some back-and-forth with Chrissy1979, to whom you replied: When I logged back on on Monday, I saw your first reply to me from Saturday and posted this: I didn't even see the post where you claimed to have read the manifesto until after I posted it. So that's your goes your whining about me not providing a cite or refusing to do so dealt with. I said "The guy quite explicitly said it was a "wake up call" to start a purge of Democrats by the military." Here's what his manifesto said: So I'd say I summed up the contents quite accurately and you haven't proven otherwise. That's a complete fiction, I'd ask for a quote to prove your claim here but we know you're a lying old b!tch. Fact is only one if us said they read the manifesto then turned around and said they didn't say they did. That was you, the lying old b!tch. It's funny you seem to think being liked is a concern of mine when I wouldn't cross the street to p!ss on most of the people here if they were on fire. This masturbatory nonsense is extra pathetic when everyone can see how you done f*cked up again here. I brought receipts, you should try it sometime, loser.

One of the smallest popular vote margins in modern history, but go off.

You c*nts spent the last four years whining about stolen elections and a rigged system but as soon as you squeak out a win, everything's fine. I love when people say this, it means you can immediately dismiss everything they have to say about anything at all.

I see: because you're a loser who never logs off you assumed that I must have seen your reply at 6 p.m. on a Saturday night and ignored it when in fact I was doing what normal people do on a Saturday night and not looking at a message board full of mentally ill people (which I know is a foreign concept to a no-life loser like you). I logged on on Monday, saw both your replies including the one where you claimed to have read the manifesto, and posted the link right away. I never "refused to provide a cite" but did so as soon as I saw people asking for it once i was back online But one thing that's a little odd to me is why you would have needed a cite from me to begin with given you said you read the manifesto already. So perhaps you were lying about that. Oh no grandpa are you getting confused? Should we ask the nurse to bring your brain medication? I posted some excerpts earlier, Chrissy1979 did as well, but I was the one who posted the link to the document. Which said exactly what I said it said. Nothing is as hilarious as watching you flounder around like a fish on dry land trying to invent a new reality when it's all here in black and white: you said you read the manifesto but somehow missed large chunks of it and then came up with an insane and ridiculous re-interpretation of a pretty straightforward call to action (but not before lying about saying you had read it). Someday maybe you'll learn that it's far more adult to just admit you were wrong instead of twisting yourself in knots in a pathetic attempt to salvage what's left of your dignity. (which, let's face it, is already in short supply). Right except I quoted him directly saying what I said he said, which was calling for the military to purge the state of Dems. For once in your sad existence just learn to take your L like a man.

Oops lmao except I provided the cite when asked. If the tables were turned you would have gone on and on about how it's widely available and all over the news and easy to find and not bother actually posting a link. I didn't do any of those things but I can see why you're trying to deflect from your incredibly stupid misinterpretation of the dude's manifesto. Loser.

Great but what does that have to do with your claim that people can't be racist when there's no one to be racist towards when by your definition, racism is a belief in the superiority of a given race not an action or actions. Is there a practical or functional difference between "i hate Black people because I think whites are inherently superior" as opposed to "I hate Black people because of rap music and baggy pants"? It took a long time and din't go away on it's own.

No, you were wrong. The 17,000 figure was the total for the entire country, the vast majority were in B.C. because of the f*cking railroad. Nope. My claim was that immigration was restricted to Northern Europeans for most of Canada's early history and that's absolutely true. Yes it is. And the people who created the policy knew it was, which is exactly why they did it. You're correct: 83 years is actually more than half of a 150 year history. LOL. The first wave of Chinese immigrants were brought in to exploit. The Head Tax was brought in to curb their numbers and then the Chinese Exclusion Act banned them outright. In 1908, the Canadian government banned immigrations from India. The Immigration Act of 1910 expanded the list of prohibited immigrants further to include any race thought to be “unsuited to the climate or requirements of Canada” (IOW any non-white person). These are just a few of the official restrictions applied to non-European, non-white immigrants you claim did not exist. Now go put on your floppy shoes and red nose you f*cking clown.

No you're a dumbass for claiming to have read his (extremely short) manifestos and somehow missing the parts where he calls for a purge of Dems from the military and government. even though it's right up in front and it's only like 100 words long. also lol at you of all "people" crying about unsourced claims. LMAO Nothing about voters, legal means (he says peaceful, which is not the same thing), nothing about this being a last resort. A call for an immediate purge of Democrats led by the military, with violence if necessary, which is exactly what I said it was. I have no idea how stupid or dishonest one would have to be to read all of that and think "this is a call for voters to peacefully change who is in government" but your stupidity and dishonest is truly unfathomable. Between this and your "there were no legal restrictions on non-white immigrants in Canada" I'm thinking you spent the holidays getting head kicked in the head repeatedly.

Then why does it matter if they were a tiny minority? People were still racist towards them. And as I said above, the fact that there weren't many racialized people doesn't preclude other people being racist. This "context" is simply irrelevant to the question of whether or not racism existed in Canada prior to 2015 or not.