LonJowett

So then why build it if it's already there and working?

Confirmed liars should always cite their sources

It was fake news that, once again, you and Trump fell for.

https://www.myajc.com/news/you-hate-america-how-the-immigrant-caravan-story-exploded-the-right/cDIv1Szmvhpxr2krat4VCP/

Yes, what about when Hillary banged a porn star, paid her off, and sent a guy to threaten her for talking about it!

I agree that nobody ever had any illusions that Trump was a decent person. 

Your whatabout Bill Clinton makes no sense in this context. You are commenting on the lack of media coverage of Trump's affair. There was no lack of media coverage of Clinton's affair. Your whatabout Bill has become such a reflex, you do it no matter what.

Besides, not everybody thinks using campaign funds to pay off a stripper you banged while your wife was pregnant and then lying about it is virtuous compared to getting a blowjob from an intern.  Normal people think that both actions are sleazy.

But the Benghazi situation was investigated and they found nothing. Yet you still lie about it, exploiting the deaths of those people for partisan purposes, even though you know there was nothing there. Maybe you want to complain about the lack of coverage of Seth Rich too?

Mainstream media reported the facts of the story. There are no new facts to report. Sorry they don't beat shit to death like your fake news sites, even when it's been proven there's nothing there. How many times can you say he banged a stripper, got her to spank him, used his campaign funds to pay her off, then lied about it?

But...but Hillary's emails that we illegally hacked! But Benghazi! Let's talk about that for the next six months, even though there's nothing specific we can talk about!

Why are you convinced there was no collusion, babbling one?

Funny how he said it was all a hoax last week when he was aware of all this evidence. Why would he do that?

Better delete this question quick, right? Lol

Uh...because he's owned by Russia. You really don't get it? I understand Russian trollbots don't have a problem with it, but actual Americans who are really living there do. You just wouldn't find anybody like that on this forum.

Especially when one friend has a video of the other friend engaging in pissing sports. 

The problem isn't whether you think it's a bad thing or not. The problem is that Russia owns him because of it. He will never say a bad word against Russia, even as they hack the 2020 election, and neither will you.

You never heard about Fusion GPS, the corroborated dossier, and Trump's prostitutes pissing on Obama's bed?

No, it's based on directly sourced tweets and sourced, recorded, undenied quotes. But he ran because he had no choice (see "piss tape").

Does anyone have a link to the forum where everybody went?

Or he knew what he was talking about and you don't. Inflation rose nearly 19% in those years. Check for yourself: http://www.bankofcanada.ca/rates/related/inflation-calculator/

I've been looking at this forum for years and occasionally posting. I think it's about reached the lowest point I've ever seen it. As I checkout again, I would recommend disabling animated emoticons. I can't see they have any other purpose but to annoy people.

Just out of curiosity, how old are you?

And I'm not necessarily lying when I tell people you are Lucifer's servant. I mean well but I'm maybe relying too much on dubious evidence. Nonetheless, hail Satan!

Read my posts again. I've already pointed out the similarities. Trump's DOJ admitted Trump made accusations with no evidence. I at least have evidence you love Satan: you support Trump defying God's laws. It's not great evidence but it's better than Trump had against Obama.

So dubious evidence is fine? You show evidence of subverting God's law against lying by making excuses for those who do it. Therefore I see evidence you are working for Satan. I proclaim you Lucifer's servant.

And when you know you have no evidence to support it, it's a lie. Otherwise I can tell everyone you're loyal to Satan and that's not a lie, I guess. I would say it is, but you may differ.

How can you know something to be true without evidence? To say it is true without evidence is lying. Look it up.

The lack of shame is apparent. You don't have to admit to it for it to be obvious.

If Trump can't produce evidence to support his statement, will you say that he's lying?