sharkman
-
Posts
9,209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by sharkman
-
-
Hezbollah. Hamas. What is it with Iran? And they’ve been jonesing for nukes like nothing else, and that is definitely a problem. Not just because of Iran’s hate for Israel, but also because of the two aforementioned H’s. The most recent example is the billions Biden gave Iran, and then Hamas attacked, and as terrorists would.
Once Iran has nukes in its stockpile, they will end up in Hamas’s hands, just like all of the other weaponry that does. Because of those in the inner circle of Iran’s leadership that will see to it that a stray nuke will go missing somehow, or a facility be found unsecured.
Then should a nuke explode in Israel, Iran could claim innocence, or some other nonsense. Those bent on mass murder can be so creative, can’t they? This must never happen.
And so it won’t. Israel is going to bomb Iran, taking out its nuclear capacity, just as they’ve done in times past. It’s inevitable, it’s a done deal. Count on it.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, herbie said:
But PP's a miracle worker. He's gonna reduce the deficit, increase NATO funding, reduce crime requiring more cops and prisons and make everything better by starting by throwing away $12 billion worth of carbon tax revenue.
While the rest of us have trouble with grocery prices without cutting our income. .Can he turn water into wine too?He doesn’t need to do any of that. He only has to do better than the disaster that has been Trudeau and he’ll get re-elected with a majority. Pay attention now. This is what happens when one party selects an empty suit with a brand name(Trudeau) to lead them and the suit thus wins elections until something serious happens.
-
1 hour ago, Moonbox said:
12 years ago Starbucks used squished bugs to make their Strawberry Frappuccinos pink. Proof that Klaus Schwab and the WEF cabal control the world...🫠
I’’m not claiming any of that. You said there weren’t any government mandates to use bugs in food products. I said government mandates weren’t needed to start putting insects into food products and showed proof from 12 years ago.
Once again you can’t see simple concepts that run counter to your programming.
-
1
-
-
Oh cdnfx, clean up in aisle 8!
-
1
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
They're only conspiracy theories because people make them into that with goofy out-of-context quotes, or straight up make-believe.
Talking about eating ze bugs, nobody is actually mandating or pushing for it. There's no agenda to make it happen. Bug protein is just something someone talked about at some point, and the conspiracy clownosphere ran with it it and turned into something ridiculous.
As for limiting beef, do you not agree that North Americans could...uh...lay off on the McDonald's a bit?
They don't need to be mandated. The woke are so conditioned to be ahead of the 'curve'. Take Starbucks. They are using insect ingredients in at least one of their products. And if it's being reported that they are using it in one, you can be sure they are looking to advance that agenda.
Call it the tempest in the Frappuccino. Some Starbucks patrons have been distressed to learn that the chain's Strawberry and Creme Frappuccino owes its pink coloring to crushed insects.
-
1
-
-
41 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
Meh...they're doing their best to discredit the interview because...they don't want anyone to hear the other side of the story. But Carlson has more respect globally than does even Brandon. I have to imagine this drives these destructive simps out of their minds.
$250,000,000,000 of American tax money...for what?
"Putin will attack NATO next!"
LOL...they're out of ammo and now rely completely on unsubstantiated fear porn. The problem now is...they've cried "WOLF" so many times now...all dying with a whimper...that only the most limp noodle actually gives their fear porn any credence.
The interview reminds me of a move that Trump has been using occasionally with the MSM. When he wants to get a piece of news or development reported by them, he inserts a...well actually I shouldn't describe it totally. Let's just say the media jumps on it, reporting on the item that he inserted. But, the detail that he wanted to be reported on gets included in the coverage just the same.
This interview, which as you say is being attacked or 'discredited', is still getting out there nonetheless. All media attention draws views. The brainwashed aren't going to change their minds about anything ever, so what they think doesn't really matter. But it draws people who can still think critically about a given issue.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:
A slag-job on Carlson's interview. Gee...who didn't see that coming?
2,000,000,000 views.
Wow, that’s an amazing amount of views. This one interview will do more for truth regarding Ukraine than the last 2 years of Western news coverage.
Asleep Americans will start to wonder what’s going on over there, and why hasn’t their president so much as talked with Putin since before the war.
Instead he keeps sending billions to Ukraine while the American border situation has become an emergency. Illegals are attacking and murdering citizens, California cities have become homeless camps, and no solutions for that are in sight.Plus, Biden’s failing memory is now impossible to hide. The man is a mess. The Dem party is in a panic to replace him. But they keep voting for those billions to Ukraine too.
Come election time, Trump will have a field day with that Ukrainian aid. It’s now around 250 billion, depending on how much of the latest package ends up there. Every last penny of it added to the US debt which is currently 34.2 trillion. And now a trillion every year just to pay the interest.
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
The only thing that you proved was that you didn't have a good grasp of basic history. Riddle me this, what was the USSR's justification for invading Poland alongside Hitler in 1939? 🤔
Alex, I’ll take Poland signed a pact with germany a full 5 yrs before Russia’s 1939 pact, for 200.
-
1
-
-
48 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
You asked me for evidence of a Putin lie, I gave you one, and now you're asking for evidence of a planned attack on NATO by Russia?
You're definitely a Tucker Carlson fan. 🤣
Nonsense, just as I proved you were wrong earlier in the thread. You’ve got nothing so out come the childish insults…
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
And shows him to be exactly what he presents himself to be. A moderate fiscal responsible conservative.
No he doesn't. He doesn't even have little skeletons. Name a few of these 'big skeletons'.
The leadership contest was exactly as it should be (with the exception of that one debate).
Why- what's happening this fall?
Y'know - they sell tin foil cheap at walmart.
One day you may discover that it’s okay to agree to disagree with your allies instead of attacking with tinfoil hat nonsense.
Make me proud! -
11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
As i said - he's been an mp for 20 years and i'm literally basing it on his track record and performance.
as to 'rookie'
I first scrutineerd when Mulroney was running the first time. I've fought in many elections, participated in riding associations and done more than my share of 'activist' work for firearms rights and to trash the registry. I know my shit backwards and forwards.
It is dumb to say that because he went to an event once ages ago that somehow this erases all his other actions over 20 years. That's dumb. Think about it.
He will not be perfect but he will be pretty much what he looks like. A right but not far right politician who tries to keep the gov't smaller, get business going, keep taxes light and keep gov't focused on core issues. Much like harper was, but this time with charisma
Yep, he has a track record that’s been analyzed. He also has some big skeletons in his closet. The leadership contest was a farce, believe whatever makes you happy.
By the fall this will all be out and known anyway.
Whatever your Schiit is, you obviously don’t know enough about the WEF.
-
9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Your conclusion does not appear to be based on fact, reason or logic. Just that he went to wef once. Sorry but that's not going to cut it
And you are making the rookie mistake of judging a politician based on what they say instead of what they do. Learn from what the pros do…
-
1 hour ago, blackbird said:
I doubt it. The Liberals have been a total disaster for the country. The immigration, foreign student issues have contributed to the disastrous housing crisis. The ministers responsible for immigration the past eight years have mis-managed immigration, temporary foreign workers and foreign students to the detriment of Canadians who need housing.
Poilievre offers the only hope to work toward getting out of the housing crisis and mess created by Liberals.
Poilievre has some plans to deal with the issue. The Liberals created the mess.
Yes the liberals are a disaster. I’m not arguing to support the liberals post JT. I’m saying that the Tory party under Poilievre will still take the country down the same road, just driving the car on the right side of the road instead of the left.
We need another alternative, regardless of how cdnfx feels about Poilievre.
-
9 hours ago, CdnFox said:
Ok - so what makes you think that?
He’s been to the WEF, just like JT and others in our government. Every person who goes there makes agreements that change their allegiances.
Remember the conservative leadership contest? 3 people were all barred from the contest for fake reasons. They had met all of the requirements. Their platforms were all similar to Poilievre’s and would have taken votes away from him. The contest was fixed.I’m not saying the organizers of that election were WEF, but it’s easy to do favours, bribe here and there when our Media is so asleep. They don’t look into anything or conduct serious investigations these days. They just read what they are handed by their bosses.
-
I’m telling you guys, Poilievre is not what he’s presenting himself as, just like JT. He’ll turn to the left on issue after issue once elected.
-
1 hour ago, Deluge said:
Donald Trump, the Left's NEW Baba Yaga! BOO!! lol
“…with a f**kin pencil.”
-
1
-
-
I don’t know what the deal is about Taylor Swift, but all the hating on her seems nonsensical. Glad to see her with a win so the hate has no place to express itself. Other than that, I stopped watching professional sport a few years ago out of new found respect for reality.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, robosmith said:
OMG! A "hearing," and "could result in disqualification."
You don't know that MIGHT mean someone else will take over the case.
Evidence won't just disappear IF the prosecution is done by her staff.
Whatever will we do? LMAO
Let us know when you have more than speculation, k?
That wasn’t speculation. I provided a link and everything.
-
So is your typical Dem aware that Trump’s legal situation keeps improving?
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/story?id=107151886
The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's Georgia election interference case says that it's possible misconduct allegations leveled against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis "could result in disqualification," and that a hearing on the matter will proceed as scheduled on Thursday.
Things are also changing in New York and DC… -
2 hours ago, Aristides said:
When get discouraged with our choices I just look at US politics these days. All I can think is, out of over 330 million people, these two are the best you can come up with?
The system is obviously broken.
-
12 hours ago, Moonbox said:
Germany signed a non-aggression pact with Poland, which is nothing more than an agreement to not attack each other.
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, on the other hand, was a secret pact between Nazi Germany and the USSR to jointly attack Poland and divide it between them.
It was the Soviet Union that cooperated and colluded with Hitler, but that history doesn't line up with Putin's exercises in make-believe.
The timeline on this seems to bear out Putin’s version. Stalin signed the pact with Hitler in 1939. Poland signed their pact in 1934. There was a normalization of relations between Poland and Germany after that, and different forms of cooperation.
How much of the Putin interview did you take in? Hopefully you are not simply getting this from your Twitter feed.
-
On 2/10/2024 at 9:59 AM, Moonbox said:
He did plenty of exactly that. For example, despite the fact that Stalin and Hitler had signed a pact to both invade and then divide Poland between them, Putin absurdly argued that Poland collaborated with Hitler. It makes absolutely no sense, but most folks watching Tucker Carlson wouldn’t know any better and as you say, good liars bullshit eloquently and seamlessly.
What was really cringe about it was how Tucker Carlson just sat there nodding his head the whole time like a sycophantic bobblehead.
Okay, riddle me this. In 1934 Hitler signed a treaty with Poland called the, “German Polish Declaration of Non Aggression Pact”. Didn’t Germany sign the agreement with Stalin later? So Putin would technically not be wrong about that, or, what am I missing?
Yes it’s clear that Hitler was not dealing honestly with Poland, too bad that Chamberlain was so easily duped.
-
Edit: On second thought, this thread is so full of lies, nonsense and antisemitic fantasies, I want no part of it.
-
I've watched the first hour. I'm not sure what Tucker was going for with his performance, but it was not his finest hour. It's hard to say what went on behind the scenes. Perhaps he was given limiting parameters in which to conduct the interview.
I've noticed that the really good liars, or instead maybe the highly intelligent folks, the ones with a formidable intellect lets say. They can lie seamlessly. They can make you believe just about anything if you are not careful. I'm sure we can all pick our favorite politician to hate and agree that some people have turned deceiving the public into a fine art. Putin may well be such a one.
From what I've seen of the interview thus far, I simply can't spot it when Putin is lying. It kind of reminds me of Obama. Such a smooth talker, making you feel good about yourself as he pulls the wool over your eyes. I am not armed with a knowledge of Russian history, but I doubt that Putin would be so stupid to tell whoppers that can so easily be proved wrong, so his discourse on his country’s history is probably at least close, eh?
Just Say It, Democrats: Biden Has Been a GREAT President
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted · Edited by sharkman
Grammar
Hey, Biden has been an amazing president, for both democrats AND republicans. No doubt about it.
He has woken people up to the reality of the American government like nothing in history. Trump claimed there was a swamp, but his work only reached some of the Dems out there. Biden has proved beyond a doubt that the American government and ruling class has been taken over by the swamp. A billion dollars at a time.
Only the hard core brainwashed still can’t see it at this point, and that’s okay because they are the small(if noisy) minority. They will scream and moan loudly, being dragged into reality by forthcoming events like the upcoming election.
So thank you Biden. This may have single-handedly saved the nation, and by extension the free world. And the final nail in the coffin of the brainwashed will be his arrest and sentencing.