gatomontes99

You are the one that lied. You said the new prosecuter was bad news when it really meant the case would be dropped.

If the intent is to cause service members to disobey orders, yes.

Typical woman.

Well, @robosmith, turns out I was right and you were wrong: NYT: Judge Dismisses Georgia Election Interference Case Against Trump The president has now seen three criminal cases against him dissolve since he was re-elected last year.

These cases were dismissed without prejudice. That means they can be brought again. It was not the case that was the problem but the way the prosecutor was appointed. That will be remedied and the case will return.

You know damn good and well that they were trying to incite rebellion in the form of disobeyed orders. When pressed, not one single member of this coalition can come up withan unlawful orders that should have been disobeyed. Quite the contrary. They refused to name a single order that should be disobeyed. They know what they did was wrong.

The f it doesn't: Wordnik-Member: One that belongs to a group or organization.

So you admit ANTIFA is an organization.

Dude, all you do is post other people's videos and then attack anyone that dares to have a counter opinion. Look in a flippin' mirror.

You should read up on Kent State if you think they were just shot for protesting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings These unarmed protestors had pelted the NG, police and firemen with rocks. They set buildings on fire and they aggressively pursued the NG when they retreated. Given the multitude of warnings (verbal and physical) and their persistent-aggressive attacks, I would have shot. And, as the court found, I would have been justified.

Again, not relevant to whether or not a service members can ignore orders. It seems to me you are just picking things you don't like and vomiting them on the screen, hoping some will stick. However, Obama did not have any Republicans that tried to convince the military to not follow orders or put terrorist lives over the lives of Americans. So who would he have called traitors? Further, Trump did not say we should kill these democrats. He said the crime was so serious that the punishment could be death. More vomit. If you are going to make that claim, you have to make a convincing argument. Like this: "By calling on service members to ignore orders that they don't like, under the guise of potential illegality, the Democrats that called upon the service members to disobey orders could be creating a chaotic situation that will harm the national security of the United States and ruin the lives of said service members." Do you see how that is done? If you are going to post some conclusion, you need to support it with, at minimum, speculation backed with reason that follows a logical train of thought. This actually is a situation that came up quite often in Iraq and Afghanistan as the terror groups over there would send children, wearing bombs, after troops. Yes, they were ordered to fire on kids. Yes, they did it. Yes, I would.

Wtf does that have to do with being partially pregnant? If you are trying to say the Kent State NG were convicted for following orders, you are absolutely wrong: ACLU That is not a thing in this place called reality. They have approval. Once designated a foreign terror organization, lethal force is approved by congress. Obama used it frequently.

That does not even fit.

You are not connecting any dots. Nor are you addressing the original point that I made. That point is, military personell should not (with very rare exceptions) disobey orders. @robosmith proved that is true, for me.

What? Does any of this drivel have a thought behind it?

Lol...if you really want to prevent more "Trumps" stop being radical bìtches that need to get the girl peepee slapped. If you people hadn't called us racist, sexist, fascist, Nazis, and so on, Trump wouldn't be President. If you had not opened our borders, stole our tax dollars, destroyed the dollar, sent our jobs out of country and crushed our health care, there would be no Trump. If you want to end Trump like candidates, be reasonable people that don't burn down cities, riot, kill people you don't like and try to destroy companies because they are not as radical as you. You got what you gave.

We don't have any fascist in the US.

Locking up the criminally insane is literal the only solution. There are 2 purposes of prison: rehabilitation and protection. We need to restore prison so that the public is protected.

Yes. But it is anti-fascist in name only. Like fascist, they use violence and the threat of violence to suppress dissent and votes.

Minnesota taxpayer dollars funneled to Al-Shabaab terror group, report alleges This is a long article with a lot of details. For brevity: A program designed to help kids with autism was used by Somali groups to funnel tax payer money to Somali families and then send it to Somalia were a terror group took a cut. Effectively making so MN tax payers were funding the terror group. DJT, in response, ended protective status for all Somalis. This is why we need a department like DOGE. The US budget did not explode from $800B a year to $2T+ because of need. It did that because there is a tremendous amount of fraud, waste and abuse in our budget and every level. This can not be fixed in one term. It will take time.

I don't think anyone follows her as such.

He asked a logical question. You attacked him. He looks far more composed, reasoned and rational than you do.

And energy cost is higher then ever while reliability is at its lowest point in decades.

You are a master baiter

Thank you for proving me right.