gatomontes99

We've seen him before. He has ideals that he wants to protect. Those ideals must stand, so all information to the contrary is a lie. Anyone that delivers that information is [insert derogatory term] in his eyes. That allows him to dismiss anything and everything in support of his ideals.

It is funny how @robosmith could see all my posts until I posted definitive proof that Mr. Goldman was wrong. Then, magically, he just stopped responding.

So far away from him that it hit him.

Lmao...that is just some dude saying "No NAZIs didn't say it but it sure sounds like something they would say." It proves nothing.

No. Under Biden we know that certain cities did not report their crimes to the system. That is why the numbers fell. The numbers were skewed: https://www.themarshallproject.org/2023/07/13/fbi-crime-rates-data-gap-nibrs We also know cities like DC lied about crimes: https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-police-commander-suspended-crime-statistics/3959566/ So, no, I don't give Biden credit for something that was not real.

Fify 🤣

Google AI used the opinions of self-described critics. The slogan is of no historical significance in NAZI Germany. I posted a left wing website that says so much. Here is another lwnj admitting that the phrase has nothing to do with fascists: https://brendonbeebe.substack.com/p/one-of-ours-all-of-yours-origins "The phrase “One of ours, all of yours” recently surfaced in U.S. political discourse, sparking controversy for its authoritarian undertones. Though no historical evidence ties this exact wording to fascist regimes, its underlying logic—" He goes on to say it feels like it should. The moral of the study is that @robosmith is a LIAR.

Will @robosmith take responsibility for the next Chatlie Kirk?

Lie. For one, she turned right. Two, she hit him.

Not a NAZI slogan: Unpacking claim that 'one of ours, all of yours' phrase on Noem's podium is Nazi slogan We found no evidence confirming the phrase appearing on a lectern originated verbatim in Nazi Germany, as social media posts suggested. LIAR

Only if they give us reason to. Or they could get a free ticket and $1000 to go home.

No. We are not giving you jackasseṣ another way to bypass the law through delay tactics. No it isn't.

Still 0 for. Let's say ICE knows 80% of employees are illegal aliens. If they detained a couple that aren't illegal but release them after the facts are gathered, is that wrong? Hell no. It happens all the time. It isn't convenient. But ot is legal. More fear mongering. None of that happened. Some lwnj news sources must have told you it did. But they lied. It never happened. The twisted part was telling ICE they can't do their job as written in the law. SCOTUS got it right.

I was talking about pre nobamacare. Nobamacare created forced limits. Another reason plans that used to be $400 a month are now over $1000.

These people have never been in a high stress situation.

Jack Smith Admits Making False Claim to Court In Trump Case ‘No white knight’: Jack Smith’s record rife with mistrials, overturned convictions, judicial rebukes

You are on the wrong side here.

Lmao...they guy that is a proven liar and has a demonstrated past of using the legal system for political gain says it is so? Why are you so gullible?

Still 0 for. The video does not show what led up to him being detained. It just shows he was detained. He also admits that he was released at the site. Local NBC "Garcia said he was released from the vehicle where he was held after he gave the arresting officials his Social Security number, which showed he is a U.S. citizen." DHS maintains he got in the way. It was also a job site raid and citizens do get picked up in those raids. None are held any longer than it takes to verify citizenship. Based on what Garcia said, it sounds like he was there less than 15 minutes. Now, you said SCOTUS gave Trump a ruling to go arrest people based on skin color. That was a lie and I definitively proved that. Don't back out like a chicken shit. You lied. Own up to it.

No. The ACA (aka Obamacare) failed because it removed the final consumer from the cost, added government beaurocracy to an already bloated insurance beaurocracy, added subsidies (subsidies always raise the final price) and added unnecessary procedures (i.e. pap smears in men's unsurance). Obamacare was designed to make health insurance more profitable rather than health care more affordable. As such, health care costs have out paced inflation and health insurance companies are reporting record profits. That was all by design. The plans I support cover nothing until a deductible is reached. Then, they cover everything. For example, in the early part of this century, my health insurance was just under $100 a month. It covered me after $3,000 up to $2 million and then 90% up to $10 million. It also included Rx discounts. Contrast that with a $500 deductible that costs $400 a month and pays 90% up to $5 million and has co-pays for routine visits. My plan was a minimum of $1200 a year. The comprehensive plan was a minimum of $4800 per year. For $2 million in expenses, my plan would have cost me $3,000 + $1200. The comprehensive plan would cost $199,900 + $4800. The problem is we have been told that comprehensive plans are cheaper and we believed it because we don't see the cost on everyday purchases. If you actually do the math, you are getting fuçked hard.

No one is above the law...unless they hate Trump. They are above the law.

👆👆liberal fantasy/fear mongering 👆👆 👇👇Reality👇👇 SCOTUS Blog Moreover, Kavanaugh added, although “apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion” for an immigration stop, reasonable suspicion can rest on the “totality of the circumstances.” You would do well to quit now. Your guy was arrested for interfering. Your only claim he wasn't is his lawyer and orange man bad. Your SCOTUS case that you claim let them stop people by race explicitly said they can't. You are 0 for 3. You can try to make it 0 for 4 or 0 for 5 or 0 for 10. But you will always be 0 for x because you have fantasy on your side.

I am on ignore because you know you can't keep up with me. I provide evidence that your bullshit is bullshit. Like this: Just because you walked away from a car accident feeling great doesn’t mean you’re out of the woods yet. Adrenaline does strange things, and one of them is hiding injuries until later. It’s not uncommon for car accident victims to feel pain and other symptoms hours, days, or even weeks after an accident. "Internal bleeding is caused by the blunt force trauma of a car accident and is often accompanied by abdominal pain. This could even be caused by your seat belt, which may be forced into your abdomen, causing muscle injuries and damage to your internal organs. All types of internal bleeding are a medical emergency and potentially life-threatening. If you experience dizziness, fainting, severe bruising, or confusion, seek medical attention immediately. More specifically, the bruises you see from internal bleeding aren’t the same as those from scuffing your knee. These bruises are more extensive than average and extremely dark. Unfortunately, internal bleeding could mean one of your organs or a blood vessel has been ruptured. Note that internal bleeding may not manifest itself until days after your accident."

White House: The Great American Health Care Plan That is a list of bullet points is in the link above. I haven't gone through all of them. The big change is the use of HSA's rather than comprehensive plans. The HSA can be used to buy a comprehensive plan, a high deductible plan or pay cash for care. I like this provision as it will connect the consumer to cost. Obamacare mandated comprehensive plans that remove the consumer from the cost aspect. When the consumer is onnected to the final cost, they make more efficient choices. I would love to see this plan go further and deincentivize comprehensive plans. High deductible plans eliminate the need for medical billing codes for much of the process. That eliminates a wasteful cost and brings down the total cost to consumer. It would also make the final consumer more attached to the final cost.

Dan Goldman is a politician in a political setting. He is not giving legal advice. They do not have a legal status. They have a stay of deportation until their claim is heard. That does not make them here legally. It prevents them from being deported until their hearing. The problem occurred when Joe Biden's council of Presidents determined that they should just let asylum seekers go rather than have their case heard within 3 to 4 days (as was the norm). Many Asylum seekers did not return for their hearing and had rulings against them. I haven't looked up the number, but the asylum denial rate is in the 90's. All lf the asylum seekers under the dark years of Biden should have been detained until their hearing. Releasing them was and is a violation of immigration law.