CdnFox
-
Posts
27,105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
283
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CdnFox
-
-
28 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:
The prosecutor didn't inflate and deflated properties for financial gain.
Donald did.
Well no, he didn't. even the prosecution and the judge isn't saying that.
Why does everything have to be explained to you 100 times?
The claim is that donald had inflated the price. The GOV"T assesses his property for taxes, donald doesn't. And the prosecutor claimed the fact the assessment was lower is proof that donald's assessment is too high. Which turns out to be not an accurate statement at all.
Now - i've explained that to you. Others here have explained it. Yet you keep repeating the lie.
Do you feel the need to lie because you know you're in the wrong? Is that it?
Wow - looks like even donald haters like you know there's something wrong here if you feel the need to lie to cover their tracks
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, taxme said:
Can your beloved Israel be trusted ever?
But you're on their side right? FFS.
-
20 hours ago, herbie said:
Like an employers right to hire scabs benefits you HOW?
It forces the workers to keep their demands reasonable - which benefits me by not having our gov't or businesses pay 1diotically inflated wages and benefits that were extorted from the taxpayer by threat.
Which is a good thing - both sides need options. Workers can strike, the people can hire temp replacements. That's not ideal for either side - which is balance.
-
44 minutes ago, eyeball said:
I don't see what's wrong with having a better handle on a narrative
It allows them to lie in a fashion that creates greater divides for political and ideological reasons. All people who question the vaccine are bigots and evil people who want to kill your grandmother, you should hate them. All truckers are being paid to protest by far right americans and russians, you should hate them. Danielle smith wrote emails we can't show and never saw, you should vote against her. Anyone who says parents should know what's happening with their kids is homo and trans phobic and should be locked in jail. Jews are all evil and love to slaughter babies.
And so on.
That's what's wrong with it.
-
3 minutes ago, suds said:
"Hitler may have had his faults, but he did have the right idea." ????
This proves what a certifiable nutcase you really are.
This is the same guy who said there's no evidence he's on the side of gaza or against the jews.
-
44 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:
It's funny how Donald is claiming the judge is the one victimizing him, but the judge didn't write the lawsuit against him.
No, the prosecutor did. WHich is interesting in and of itself - he's not being sued by anyone involved in the loans. They're all happy. This is a lawsuit by the prosecutor alone.
But - the judge DID allow it and he has agreed to assume donald is guilty without that part going to trial. Because it's a civil trial they don't have to prove he's guilty so the judge just said fine - lets just assume he's guilty without any trial or arguments from trump. Now we'll see HOW guilty.
So from that perspective the judge is being pretty unfair - didn't even listen to any arguments about whether the info he had been presented was correct or accurate
-
1 hour ago, taxme said:
You have to be one stupid arse hole? How many more times do i have to repeat myself here before you get things right? I am on the side of the innocent Palestinian people that are being bombed and massacred by Israeli bombs? NOT HAMAS.
I'm certainly TALKING to one stupid arsehole. How many times do you need to be told that parading around the dead bodies of the people Hamas MURDERED glorifies their actions and SUPPORTS HAMAS?!?!
Yet you keep demanding it. You're a liar one way or another, either you DO support hamas and want those bodies paraded around on the internet or you aren't in which case why are you demanding it?
SO RIGHT THERE YOU SUPPORT HAMAS. EVERY TIME YOU DEMAND THAT THE BODIES BE DISPLAYED FOR THE PUBLIC YOU"RE SUPPORTING HAMAS.
You are easily one of the dumbest posters on this board and that was up against some pretty stiff competition. You pretend not to support the terrorists and then support them 100 percent with your demands.
-
8 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:
Do you think anyone who criticizes Israel is a Muslim?
Ahhh - more dishonest questioning.
Do you think NO ONE who criticizes isreal is muslim?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, West said:
The lawsuit is ridiculous. That's WHAT I AM TELLING YOU.
They've got a partisan attorney and a partisan judge imposing DELUSIONS on the public.
THat's not hard to do in a civil case.
And the anti-trump media outlets tend to leave the 'civil' part out and make it sound as if he's being tried for actual fraud, which is an entirely different beast.
A bias judge can decide he's committed civil 'fraud' just because his name is trump. It's not like a criminal trial.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:
Asking questions isn’t discussing?
Asking dishonest questions isn't discussing.
If i ask you have you stopped beating your wife yes or no, that's not honest discussion.
Everyone here gets that you're being dishonest and attempting to put a veil of legitimacy on it. But carry on - we all know you're a scumbag so it hardly matters.
-
5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:
Again, just read the lawsuit
Talking with you is like talking to a petulant toddler
Trump’s loans were not approved through the same method as your house or commercial property where the bank’s appraisal is the most important factor. Paragraphs 563 and 564 of the lawsuit explain why:
563. Starting in 2011 the relationship with Deutsche Bank was revitalized when Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization initiated a relationship with bankers in the Private Wealth Management (“PWM”) division of Deutsche Bank, which enabled them to obtain more favorable terms than they could have received through the CRE division by having Mr. Trump personally guarantee the loans based on his net worth as reflected in his Statements of Financial Condition.
564. In essence, rather than obtain credit facilities through the wing of Deutsche Bank with an expertise in commercial real estate, Mr. Trump began to seek funds from a wing of Deutsche Bank focused on servicing ultrawealthy clients. Hence, Mr. Trump’s personal guaranty, and his representations regarding his finances that backed up that guaranty, featured prominently in Mr. Trump’s loan transactions through the PWM wing of Deutsche Bank.
This wasn’t like any bank loan process you’re familiar with, so you can’t assume it works the same way.
The banks were approving loans based on all his holdings and the claims he made about them — not just on the property he wanted a loan for.
The banks were not doing their own appraisals on every asset and liability Trump had anywhere in the world, they were relying on other appraisals he provided, and the financial statements he provided. This is where many of the frauds occurred.
Barbie - i've already explained why you're wrong in detail.
Now - this is not a criminal trial. This is a civil case. So this isn't criminal 'fraud' we're talking about, this is different.
So the only difference here is the bar the evidence has to reach. A judge just has to be convinced that the charge is likely true. This is often referred to as balance of probabilities or preponderance of the evidence, i don't think it even needs to meet "clear and convincing" and is miles away from 'beyond reasonable doubt"
But the judge does have to conclude that trump did not believe that the figures he presented were true.
-
16 hours ago, Gaétan said:
There isn't much Gazans can do to protect themself because Gaza is overcrowed and israelis army shoot anywhere
The number one thing they could have done to protect themselves is tell hamas not to do that after the LAST time this happened.
The other thing they can do is avoid where hamas is - because that's the ONLY place isreal shoots.
But yeah - when you let hamas spend years building tunnels under your hospitals and rocket launchers on your roof tops and actively support their efforts to pick wars with israel - it's too late when the war starts to try to fix things.
So - they'll get pounded into dust, many many will get killed because of their own choices in the past, and all we can hope is that they learn and never allow their gov't to start a war like that again.
-
1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:
I've heard a load of far right zealots
Which for you means they're right of Castro.....
Quoteclaim that since Donald "believed" his property valuations were correct, then Donald cannot suffer legal consequences.
Fraud does require mens rea. You have to knowingly misrepresent something. So.. while you're being a little general there it's true in as much as he has to believe ALL the information passed over was substantially accurate. If he does then it's not fraud.
QuoteTo be clear, the issue is that Donald inflated the value of his properties to get loans, then deflated those same values come tax time.
No, that's not the issue. That's already been proven beyond a doubt - the taxable amount is not calculated at ALL the same way, it will be radically different Also the tax assessment comes from the gov't not from trump.
The issue is that he provided information about the value, including the valuation and data about the property, which may have been inaccurate. Certainly the size of the property is. It was noted that the tax assesment was smaller which was presented as evidence that his valuaton was too high but every expert has said "of course it was".
QuoteSo, no.... It doesn't matter what Donald "believes".
It entirely matters. Sorry kiddo
The valuation itself is pretty hard to argue. Normally you would value it by looking at what comparable properties actualy sold for - but this proterty is unique and that's not possible.
Things like sq footage are far less 'etherial'. It's been said he gave false sq footage. That can absolutely happen by accident and that's something we see ALL the time in real estate markets - it's not like he would have gone and measured himself. But - having said that if he had been reasonably informed that the nubmers were wrong and still kept putting them out then that's an issue.
And of course there's whether the banks were given a chance to verify. There is a reasonable amount of due diligence expected in a transaction.
Now - lets remember this is a zero harm case. Nobody is complaining, the lenderwas paid back on time, the lender is not questioning the accuracy and was happy with the valuation.
So what this is would be a democrat friendly prosecutor digging and looking for anything he could possibly twist into being a crime and then charging for that.
Whether he's guilty under the laws of that state will be a matter for the legal system to decide. But its highly questionable if he was guilty at all, and certainly this trial isnt' about him committing a 'crime', it's about technical violations that have no basis in the real world.
Now - i know that's a lot of words for you so i'll keep it simple here at the end - You stupid, trump has to know to be guilty, this is witchhunt
-
1
-
-
20 hours ago, robosmith said:
Dunning-Kruger in action. Thanks for demonstrating that research valid AGAIN.
OH NOOOOOES!!!! It's the return of "dunning kruger" !!! LOL! We haven't heard you say that for a while, for a week there virtually everything was dunning-kruger this and Dunning-Kruger that and PP is too Dunning-Kruger and my breakfast was ok but a little Dunning-Kruger
it was your favorite
Nice to see a blast from the past like that
-
3 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:
See below halfwit
First, Gov. Reagan signed the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act in 1967, all but ending the practice of institutionalizing patients against their will. The number of mentally ill people entering the criminal justice system doubled the first year after the Lanterman-Petris-Short act
So it WASN'T regan who let them out. He just said they can't be institutionalized against their will. Which is more like not letting people be stuffed in. And that's California ONLY.
And then a bunch of people in a democrat controlled house kicked them out. So... not regan.
LOL - you know you're a loser when you post the proof you're wrong in your own post
And as you previously posted - this all started long before regan came along. In fact there had been a 40 percent reduction in institutionalization in Cali between its height and when Regan got elected. So - regan actually did far less as governor.
LOL - i don't really get why lefties do this. I see it a lot and not just with me - it's like you're so blind in your ideology that you can't even see you just proved yourself wrong. That's what you get for using 'muh feels' rather than your brains. Which is why nobldy trusts the left anymore.
Regan didn't "let the crazys out" - Apparently you got out when the democratic house voted
LOL!
-
4 hours ago, Rebound said:
There have already been a boatload of convictions related to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Not really. A few russians - but the vast majority of charges outside of that were actually nothing to do with russian collusion.'
The fbi has a trick and they've been caught discussing it - where they interrogate someone and maeuver them into saying something that's not true. It doesn't have to be a crime or anything. Then - they charge that person for lying under oath to the fbi.
For example:
On Sept. 7, George Papadopoulos, a former campaign adviser to Trump, was sentenced to 14 days in prison. He had pleaded guilty in October to lying to FBI agents about the timing and significance of his contacts, including a professor who told him the Russians had “dirt” on Trump’s Democratic presidential rival, Hillary Clinton. Now - nothing about that meeting was illegal. But - they tricked him into "lying" - and that's what he was charged with.
Flynn was the same. No actual crime but "lying to fbi"
Or they would catch them on things completely unrelated to russian influence. Tax evasion. Campaign finance violations.
There really wasn't anyone who was close to trump that was actually convicted of anything to do with russian interference itself.
Sorry - no american convictions related to russian interference. Just some russians.
-
Not respecting states rights is always a mistake.
It can cost you an election in CANADA to ignore provincial rights - in the states it's 10 times worse. Might as well kick 'em square in the constitutional amendments.
-
26 minutes ago, robosmith said:
You know NOTHING about it, but still STUPIDLY pretend you"re "sure," as USUAL.
Thanks for demonstrating just how stupid you are. LMAO
Oh noes!!!!! Robodolt is angry again
I know all about it. And i know you only act out like that when you know others are right. Which is most of the time.
Should we start calling you RoboWrong? It does seem pretty automatic with you
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, TreeBeard said:
It actually needs to be explained to you why Nazis can’t be trusted to give accurate history? LOL
You really take advantage of the lack of moderation on this site to troll hard, eh?
Actually you're quite wrong. (shocking i know).
The nazis were typical germans in that they kept METICULOUS records and journals during the war. Whether it was flattering or not they wrote it down as accurately and in as much detail as they could in most cases, and we actually learn more about many parts of the war reading german accounts and records than we do reading russian or other allied accounts including our own
Of all the forces in world war 2 - the nazis are actually the most reliable and consistant source of info there is,
-
2 hours ago, Mako said:
You poor dope don’t you realize you and your murderous playmates are the Nazis?
We know who the nazi's are. I'm quoting one right now.
I'd rather see no one die. I'd rather palestine laid down it's arms and agreed to live in peace with the jews, they'd have their own state in no time.
But - if someone is going to pick a fight and go into someone else's home and slaughter women and burn children alive while scum like you cheer them on - then i would expect israel to defend itself and i would HOPE the lesson would be SO PAINFUL for the nazis' who started this war that they never ever thought about doing it again. And that othes thought twice about that kind of thing too.
That's the only way to deal with people like this. They should never have started the war and you're a coward for supporting it then crying about how people who hamas hides behind die.
-
1 hour ago, Mako said:
CdnFox, in his spare time, enjoys goose-stepping, attending rallies, and murdering children.
https://www.newsweek.com/holocaust-historian-israel-committing-genocide-raz-segal-1835346
LOL too cowardly to even address me directly any more i see
Well that's just like you terrorist lovers isnt it - always hiding behind other people
-
2 minutes ago, herbie said:
And this one, I do not understand at all.
You never understand anything anyway, so this isn't much of an announcement.
It's pretty simple. He supports the right of workers to collectively bargain but not to the point where it's unbalanced. Lets face it - sociopathic socialists would love nothing more than to have laws that force the tax payers to pay whatever they demand. However there has to be balance - it can't all favour the employed.
Of course - as a socailst you wouldn't think that way but if you don't want to do your job then you have no right to it, and someone who does want it should be allowed to do it
-
4 hours ago, robosmith said:
LMAO. I discussed this extensively on ANOTHER forum (which has since shutdown),
To keep you from posting your stupidity i'm sure
-
1 hour ago, Mako said:
Your genocidal frenzy and bloodlust seem to have
Blah blah blah i hate jews kill more civvies but just not palastinian ones. blah blah.
Stopped reading there.
You celebrate the death of israelis who were targeted but are horrified when palestinians are killed standing in front of military targets. Happy as a claim when israelis get killed but 'oh noes' - when gaza civvies who elected and supported hamas die because hamas hides behind them while still shooting rockets at israel.
No calls for hamas to surrender from you - no calls for them to get civvies out of the way and fight in front of them instead of behind them. Oh no.
Kid - you're a monster and a joke. I 'm sure you can find some other nazi's to play with
Quebec so far this week: • Synagogue firebombed • Imam says Jews should be exterminated • Pro-Palestinian screams "kike" at Jewish student • Professor calls Jewish student "a whore," says go back to Poland • Two Jewish schools hit with gunfire.
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
LOL - your antisematism makes it apperent why everyone thinks you're a loser
And we all know 'mocking' the right isn't popular anywhere - the left of every persuasion is basically just a bunch of hate filled lunatics at the best of time.
According to canada - "isreal = right and gaza = left". Gaza slaughters innocent people and burns babies because 1948. Isreal tries to aviod civvie casualties whereever it can.
Sounds like you're on the wrong side kiddo.