Jump to content


Senior Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by CdnFox

  1. 1 hour ago, taxme said:

    (1) Terrible comeback, comrade. Anyway, I only have a fixation on women's panties.

    Ahhh - you prefer your men to wear womens' panties.  Got it.

    1 hour ago, taxme said:

    (2) I don't know why? There are plenty of innocent people dying in Ukraine these days. You must be a sadist? Zelensky asked for and got his war. Now his arse is getting the boot from the Russians. Ha-ha.

    That's  exactly what's happening -  If you're delusional :) LIke i said, obviously i broke you :)

    1 hour ago, taxme said:

    (3) I do not have a mustache. Serious, dude. 

    Ohhh - so it's a glue on.

    1 hour ago, taxme said:

    (4) Sure it matters who wins. If Putin wins, it will be peace for Ukraine once again. In war, there are plenty of casualties on both sides. The loser in this war is Nazi Zelensky. Live with it, lefty. 

    Putin lost the war back when it went on for more than 10 days. He's lost a fortune, all his military gear, an insane amount of people, all his international prestige, and he's got an arrest warrant.

    Now it's just a matter of how badly he loses. And thats'  not looking good for him,


    1 hour ago, taxme said:

    (5) Russia is getting plenty of help from other countries. Putin can keep the war going for as long as it takes to defeat the corrupt Nazi Zelensky. Poor old Zelensky has a big problem on his corrupt Nazi hands. 

    nope - all turning him down. Sorry.

    1 hour ago, taxme said:

    (6) Who says they are all dead?

    The russians.  LOL :)

    1 hour ago, taxme said:

    (7) Seriously dude. The only thing that I can see that I would like to do to your lefty liberal butt is to give it the old conservative butt kick. ?

    I love how you pretend to be a conservative to hide the fact you're a commie :)  It's cute :)

    Say hi to your buddy putin for me next time you go get your paycheque from him :)  Tell him we appreciate all the comedy he's providing :)

    • Haha 1
  2. 1 hour ago, taxme said:

    It would appear as though you live in that weird Japanese anime world.

    So you admit it WAS  a weird japanese anime laugh  :) LOLOL  !! 

    Well there you go. I recognized it from when i was younger :)  Very strange but hey, you do you.

    • Downvote 1
  3. 2 hours ago, Rebound said:


    Who are the people continually pursing legislation to limit the civil rights of minority groups?

    Is it the jews? the last time i heard someone talking like that it was the jews according to them.

    But just for fun -  what legislation are you talking about.

    2 hours ago, Rebound said:


    Conservatives.  Who continually speaks out in opposition of the efforts of minority groups to seek equality

    It depends how you define equality. If you mean equality of opportunity Conservatives consistantly speak out in favour of it in  large numbers. In fact look at elected female leaders around the world, and they tend to be conservatives, and  i mean elected by their own conservative parties as well. The conservatives in Canada have put forward a female leader for prime minister and came close to doing so again -  how many have the libs put forward?

    If you mean equality of out come conservatives are against that and should be.

    Fact is - most of what minorities have are a result of conservative efforts.

    And the left lies about their own activities in that regard quite a bit. Remember how the border was on the news every day when trump was in? The children living in cages, the tents, families seperated etc? Remember that?  I'ts worse now. Every bit as bad or worse. But  how often is that on the nightly news?

    So again - sounds like you think all conservatives are white (they are not) and that you hate all of them as evil subhuman oppressors, which they also are not.

    and that would make YOU the intolerant bigot here. Wouldn't it.

  4. 35 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    I do like muffins

    Welll duhhh who doesn't. They're great!

    35 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Not begging you

    of course you are. Trying to put a brave face on it doesn't help. You might as well have said "PLEASE SIR, DON"T PICK ON ME ANY MORE!".  Kinda sad.

    35 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    I've been here over three years have 400 posts, you've been here two months have 2000. 

    Yes - i type with more than one finger and i can think at speeds in excess of 1 word a minute so i leave you in the dust. I'm sure from your intellectual level it's very impressive.  For me it's meh - I do it when there's little pauses at work when i'm on hold or the like.

    35 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Why would I waste my time on someone who doesn't seem to have a life? I work, volunteer, play sports, engage in social activities etc.., you argue with people on an  anonymous forum. 

    You're literally arguing with someone on an anonymous forum.  And judging by your reply that's what you came here to do.

    Soooo yeah. 

    I do those other things too, Like i said you're just slower and less intelligent. People with a brain can manage both.

    35 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    In my experience people that have something to contribute to society do , those that don't spend their time trying to prove to  random strangers how smart they are.

    you're literally trying to prove to me how smart you are :) LOLOLOL  -   the good news is nobody's buying it i guess :)

    35 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Scare me? Please you're not even clever enough to get under my skin, pity would be the closest thing to my sentiments for you.

    Sure kiddo :) whatever you need to say to yourself to help you sleep at night. :)   little dogs like you always like to bark from the other side of a fence ;)

    No wonder people like me scare you.

  5. 46 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    Just cause your cognitive dissonance kicked in and kept you from even attempting to understand what was said does NOT mean the "post lacks any coherent thought."

    It just means you rejected it without understanding it.

    No, @Legato got it right. Your post lacked any coherent thought. Just the usual "right man bad" blather that the average parrot could be trained to do as well or better.

    If you don't want to get called out for being dumb... try not being dumb.

  6. 58 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Always with the adhoms,

    Says the guy who started with the insults.  Is hypocrisy a full time job for you or is it just a passionate hobby?

    58 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    but I'm not intelligent

    Well, hopefully you're pretty.

    58 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Ok kiddo, go play with someone else 

    Awww muffin - sounds like you need a cookie and a nap.:)  Always entertaining when you get to the 'beg me to leave you alone' stage. Didn't mean to scare you.

  7. 8 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Hmmm ? Title written in the first person and the post just bashing Trudeau, maybe less reading comprehension and more poor writing skills.

    Everyone else got it. Speaking of blaming others for your own deficiencies.....

    8 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Forgive me for assuming you were poor, it's just with the time you spend on a pointless Internet forum picking fights lead me to believe your earning potential wasn't very high 

    It's fine. You're obviously not very intelligent, so certain allowances have to be made. It's not like anyone expects you to be right very often.

  8. 9 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    Fox News felt they were pushed into a corner as a direct result of Donald Trump’s election lies. Plain and simple.  

    Nothing is ever plain and simple, except for people who claim things are plain and simple :)  LOL

    Joking aside i don't think they were pushed into anything. They were increasing their viewership and business in leaps and bounds and got carried away and went a bridge too far.  In fairness they are worth more than most of the other major news agencies such as cnn and nbc news combined.  With the kind of growth they've been having and their success it's not hard to lose sight of things and go too far.

    All the news agencies lie, they all get sued, but honestly this was easily avoidable and i think they got swept up in the situation and just couldn't manage to reach those breaks.

  9. 18 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

    Well duh. There aren't any politicians I'd ever be 100% happy with. But Bernie would unquestionably be much better than most. 

    But as an enlightened centrist, I know you have to pretend that Bernie and Trump are basically the same.

    ROFLMAO - I love how now being an 'elightened centrirst' is an evil thing in your books ;)

    Bernie would have been 20 different kinds of horrible. The Dems knew it - that's why when he started to win they stepped in and kicked him out of the way and put biden in his place. It's not that they thought biden would be good, just that he was less damaging than bernie.

    Honestly not a lot of really good looking choices on the right or left in the US right now.

  10. 4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    You just gotta hate somebody, that’s all.  Gays, Jews, blacks, immigrants, trans… you guys always organize yourselves to hate minority groups. 

    Sounds like the only person being a hate filled bigot is you.

    Some say that people who make accusations like that are really just covering up for their own racism, bigotry and intolerance.  Is there something you want to share with the class?

  11. 21 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    You're now the second person I've seen on here blaming " voting Liberal" or Trudeau " for your poor financial situation

    Mine?  Who said I have a poor financial situation. 

    21 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    Maybe get off your ass and work a little harder, make better financial decisions and stop expecting the government to take care of you ( though I do find it humorous that you're doing exactly what the right says the left does, ie needing gov hand outs)

    I think you didn't read that carefully enough.  I'm actually doing pretty good :)

    21 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    I'm in my late 30's, I'm a foster kid that was homelessat 15 and dropped out of highschool and I don't need anything from the government. I have my own home, run my own business  and have made my own plans for retirement (at 55 if all goes well).

    Good. Proves that these millennials are crybabying for nothing.  Although your lack of formal education seems to be showing in your reading skills :)

    21 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

    But you keep telling yourself you're poor because of that meany Justin, hopefully I'll be walking down the street you're pan handling on and I can kick you down a few bucks of my hard earned money for you to eat

    Dude, i'm pretty well off and i own my own home. Almost paid off.  I don't know how you managed to read it that i was complaining about MY situation ;)

    But honestly the kids today are going to be at a disadvantage and they DO have the libs to thank for that. THe higher interest rates, the low business engagement and lower paying jobs, the very high inflation, and a debt that has doubled and then some - all of that is going to be like an anchor to the ecomomy and their prospects for at least the next decade, probably more like 2.

    And the immigration compared to new home construction is going to keep their rents sky high and ownership out of reach.

    Sad situation

  12. 1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

    f I were a Roman official, would award you, times are tough though, inflation is not good, so all you get is the picture above. 

    Dammit !  I was hoping for at LEAST a compimentary t-shirt. Or - if we're going roman- a loincloth. Preferably with the faces of my defeated foes printed on the inside at the back (kiss my gluteus maximus!)

  13. 27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

    No I’m more of a liquor and mixed drinks guy, I stopped buying beer except on the rare occasion a few years back.


    27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:


    I never said anything about myself.

    Your writing speaks volumes about you.

    27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

    You’re the one who said people are having a problem drinking beer now that they’ve heard that people they don’t even know recently talked to a tranny they’ve never heard of.  


    Really.  Where did i say that. 

    Why does your kind ALWAYS have to lie to try to make their point. I can make all my points well using nothing but truth facs and logic - don't you feel bad about yourself for having to lie to make your point?

    27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

    Definitely conservatives are transphobic and would be deeply ashamed of getting “caught” being attracted to trans people.

    Sorry to burst your bubble kiddo but there's a pretty healthy number of trans people who are conservative.

    Sounds like you're the bigot and hater here.  You're the one whos suggesting people should be ashamed of having transsexual feelings. THe only shame is on you.

  14. 32 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    at the end of the day tho

    Multi Domain Operations is simply a 21st century version of Blitzkrieg

    it's a lightning war by coordination

    and that is the primary weakness of the Russians

    they don't fight in combined arms

    perhaps the Soviets could have, but these Russians just ain't the Soviets

    the Russians don't fight as a coordinated force with all their assets coming together with synergy

    and that is how the Ukrainians are able to thwart the mass of the Russians

    the Russians don't have the training, technology, nor leadership to overwhelm their opponent in one fell swoop

    hence they have been diverted into a stalemate quagmire in the trenches

    and there is nothing the Russians can do to fix it

    their training is more like hazing than training, they conscript cannon fodder by design

    their technology is 1980's tech, forty years out of date

    their leadership does not allow mission command, everything is run centrally from the top

    the Ukrainians meanwhile, are learning and adopting NATO doctrine at a rapid pace

    the Ukrainians have the training, they have the leadership, they have the mission command

    but they don't have the technology, which is the only reason the Russians can impose a stalemate

    the Ukrainians are the true Cossack nation, they are the better warriors by far, it's not even close

    So you're saying you don't understand it and you couldn't answer me.

    Fair enough - i think everyone knew you didnt' know what you were talking about.

  15. 33 minutes ago, reason10 said:

    If in the future I see an announcement in the  media of a FETUS SHOWER, I'll save the link and send it to you.

    Well that's a pretty rational response isn' t it.  Nobody's going to think you're nuts now.

    33 minutes ago, reason10 said:


    For the rest of us who do not goose step every morning after getting out of bed, it is a BABY.

    Actually most people don't think that a fetus is a human at the moment of conception. Most choose a later date and support our current canadian practices on when it's to be considered a 'person'.



    33 minutes ago, reason10 said:

    Science says life begins at conception, because it can begin at no other time. 

    Life isn't the issue. We kill lots of things that are alive. CANCER is alive. Being alive doesn't mean it's a human being.

    The issue is when does it become a human being.  Before that it has no rights and after that it does have rights. Pretty simple.

    33 minutes ago, reason10 said:


    What has to get past you Adolf Eichmann types is that point in time when life becomes human life that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.

    Yeaahhhh no. It's not.

    So here's the fifth amendment:




    Amendment V

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.




    Could you show where it says that a fetus is a person?

    33 minutes ago, reason10 said:


    At what point do preborn Jews...uh... BABIES deserve protection

    When they become people.  And are you suggesting that jewish babies don't deserve the same rights as anyone else? Don't tell me you're anti-semetic?

    33 minutes ago, reason10 said:

    The discussion is over.

    It's over when i say it's over Jr.  YOu don't get to cancel me. Sorry. You can beg and cry to your heart's content, i'll tell you when i'm done talking. Now - speaking of abortion you'd help your case by NOT being an example of why it might be a good idea in some cases.

  16. 11 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    the land taken did not alter the course of the conflict


    Of COURSE it altered the course of the conflict.  My god how can you be that daft?

    Do you need me to explain it to you or are you going to retract that obviously stupid remark.

  17. Uh Oh ....  TOM has spoken!


    Tom Mulcair: Why all the fuss about Twitter's description of CBC?


    Some interesting quotes:

    As someone who represented a different party, the CBC’s treatment of the Liberals is something I’ve witnessed up close. In the run-up to the 2015 campaign, in which I’d be facing off against Stephen Harper and Trudeau, it was frustrating to say the least. Some of our best communications folks cautioned me (correctly) that it was a mug’s game to complain. You can’t beat the house! I’d have to put up and shut up.


    I have searing memories of interventions by a small number of CBC/Radio-Canada reporters during the campaign, several of whom went on to become Liberal staffers.


  18. 17 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    it wasn't massive amounts of territory

    More than Six THOUSAND square Km.  Dozens and dozens of towns and cities retaken. Sorry sparky. that's massive.

    And that does NOT include the later kherson victories which were substantial.

    The fact you would pretend that much land is just insignificant, and that taking kherson means nothing, shows you're utterly unqualified to speak on military matters.

  19. 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

    there's no fluidity without air superioty

    Of course there is. It shows a complete lack of education for you to say that. They didn't have air superiority during the last ukrainain offensive and they took back MASSIVE amounts of land and destroyed or captured a huge amount of russian equipment and supplies. It was EXTREMELY fluid.

    So was the whole southern region around kersk for quite a while.

    Since day one it's been very fluid, it's just the last few months over winter that things were more static and that probably wont' last long.

    1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

    it's still a victory for Ukraine, considering the Russian objective was to annex Ukraine in it's entirely

    Arguably true - although many on their side would say losing that much land still a loss, it's just a mitigated loss.

  • Create New...