CdnFox

Why would they be? The oil they can Frack there doesn't work in the refineries they need it to. Nobody was interested before the ban either. People ARE signing up for this tho Canada, Nova Scotia launch offshore licensing round as basin opens for oil, gas investment Turns out there IS a rush to invest when gov'ts get rid of laws. That is a lie. The oil companies were clear that they'd be interested in pipelines under the right regulatory circumstances

No, many are born in North America. If you're born here you're not an immigrant. I'm not sure you actually understand what immigration is at this point.

I didn't give you anything for it. So it would seem that if I'm worth anything at all I'm still worth more than you LOL

Well considering the oil companies actually DO something and provide something for what they sell and the gov't does squat all for it, i'd say its less deserved at any rate

????????? That made no sense at all. Did you forget what we were talking about and just about whatever popped into your head?

Kid. This is math so easy that even you can do it. If you add billions and billions and billions of dollars in tax there's no way for that not to affect the price by an equal amount And previously i showed you how dalhousie demonstrated that most of the other 'studies' grossly underestimate the impact, and i even spelled it out earlier for moonbox in terms so simple even a liberal could get it. If it's such a tiny amount of money in your estimation, then why not simply cancel it? Get rid of it for all agricultural production and transport entirely including things like fertilizer and all of the things that support it I mean if it has such a low impact we would hardly even notice it was gone right? So what's the problem?

Were you talking to your mirror? I noted you behaved a certain way and you seem to be agreeing with me, but in an odd fashion. You're not having one of your 'episodes' are you? And carney still didn't raise actual military spending to 2 percent Sowwweee.... But cry harder, maybe it'll help

I didn't ask a question. I noted that it raised the question. I already had the answer.

Hahaha! It's so cute when he pretends to be educated (imma put the picture he made on the fridge.... )

Why are you so afraid of this guy? It's getting pretty obvious from your posts and threads he's got you pretty petrified, to the point of obsession. I get that his front and center in a lot of people's thoughts and some things he's doing may not be t your liking but this isn't really healthy

I'm sure the ones you hang out with are Or at least they were when they were alive, before that truck hit them. LOL i appreciate you dancing for my amusement, but i'm still not giving you a banana no matter how much you beg

At first glance of the headline i was "this is a little silly" and then as i read further i'm like "uuhhh .... good point actually...." Fortunately i'm here to help. The left wing definition of 'woman' and 'man' CAN be a little confusing at times. However, all you need to do is follow the simple flowchart and algorithm below and you'll finally be able to understand how the left decides who is a woman and man.

There's definitely no mystery. You are bullshiting from the get-go. I didn't even need to call in scooby or Shaggy to figure that out Further in order to be able to determine whether or not there were legitimate arguments you would have to watch the videos. And if you did you would know they would be legitimate arguments even if you disagreed with them. Legitimate doesn't mean someone's right just means they've made a valid argument and then it's up to you to refute it And finally I didn't actually say there were any legitimate arguments anywhere. So you start with a fib and you end with a fib. If nothing else your symmetric

I'm not sure you realize how 'write offs' work but that's not a good thing particularly. They still spend money on it, write offs don't reverse that they just reduce it slightly. Quiet!! (she can HEAR you. Like... from anywhere! )

That was your last comment. You haven't had one after that, your last comment was the one I was replying to. And your two right wing to be claiming that stating actual facts is a stupid game You've been reading too many of robo's posts

Give me compared to AI generated nonsense that you create in an exercise of confirmation bias? Regardless of the source either they're legitimate or they're not. But it raises the question if you were genuinely ignoring him as your post suggested, how would you know what he posted and that there was no comment? Oopsie

LOL that's awesome No you just obsess. There's no humor in your posts if anything there's anger and resentment That must be this part: Parasocial/Predatory Dynamics: If the obsession is focused on a specific, non-reciprocal target, it can lean into what is described as "person-focused obsession" or a parasocial relationship, which can become predatory or, in more extreme cases, reflect a desire for control. It sounds like your person-focused obsession with me is becoming a parasocial relationship. Is that because you feel like you have no control?

It is. THis has been explained to you in detail. And just the other day i posted research showing this from dalhousie. I know math is your kriptonite but lets go through it. Fertalizer man has to pay 5 in carbon tax. He cannot claim it back, so he adds it to his costs. He marks it up because that's how it works. So his stuff costs 45 dollars, plus 5 dollars carbon tax, He sells to the farmer for 100 after mark up, so 10 of that is carbon tax generated. Farmer pays for fertilizer and also pays carbon tax directly. now pays 20 dollars in carbon taxes, marks that up to 40, plus marks up input costs which included 10 dollars that the fertilizer guy had built in, so now 20 dollars for a total of 60 dollars in carbon tax. Supplier pays 10 dollars in carbon tax shipping to store. Marks that up to 20. Also marks up the 60 that was part of his costs from previous carbon tax. is now 140. consumer doesn't see any of this, pays much more for food. 140 + 60+20 is what the carbon tax cost, even tho it was charged less and only one time per 'step' Actual carbon tax charged, 35. Actual impact 220. Now i made that math easy for you but you should be able to work it out. Carbon taxes wind up getting built in then marked up again and again. This is economics 101. This is simple stuff. There's nothing controversial about this. You can't do math but take it from those who can, the carbon tax winds up multiplying again and again. It is a stacking tax.

Pretty bald faced lie kiddo He did deals and or substantially expanded trade with china, india european union, a number of african nations, saudi arabia, AND did the softwood lumber deal with the us which everyone thought would be impossible. He most certainly did NOT make it "hard to trade with anyone but china" in the slightest He did, and we profited from it tremendously. We got more than we gave, and that's how trade deals SHOULD go for us, either equal or to our advantage. Nope. Most of those deals were just putting the sigunature on deals harper had done. Meanwhile trudeau cost us india, got us a worse deal with the us, screwed up the last part of the eu deal and cut trade with saudi arabia substantially. which means he did nothing. All sources agree that there weren't any issues with the federal case. What he ORIGINALLY promised is that he'd work with the provinces to eliminate PROVINCIAL trade barriers. Released a report showing that this alone could replace most of the lost us trade. Then he ran away from that. Utter failure on his part What he SHOULD be doing right now is flying from province to province to solve THAT problem. It could actually make a difference. Instead hes spending billions flying to foreign countries to expand his list of contacts and bringing home bad deals.

Of course there was slavery. Slavery happened all over the world. Just not in Canada You get fixated on the weirdest things, you really need to watch that

Oh, you're doing that thing where you pretend to ignore people rather than try to address their legit arguments? Ok ,

Mine was entirely accurate. You constantly obsess over it. Nobody else brings it up. Many others have pointed out how weird it is you do. But every single time you lose an arugment you obsess over it Which is pretty much every time we talk. Would you say that's because of your compulsive behavior issues or the vacuum in your life? Just curious. And carney still didn't hit is 2 percent with new spending. Sorry. I know he's disappointing you and you're DESPERATE to change that channel but that's ANOTHER fact you'll have to learn to cope with

Sounds like your deep rooted insecurities talking And Carney still lied about increasing military spending

It certainly does, maybe you should go back to school and fix that?

Wheeee!!! Lookit her go boys!