CdnFox

Nobody knows what you're talking about now but it sounds like you are the one making up crap Sure kid 🙄🙄🙄🙄😏 Precisely what you said Precisely what you said I get it, I'd be embarrassed as shit if I said that kind of crap too. But the allies are quite correct not to assist America in this war and that includes airspace. It's also true that they've been fantastic allies whereas you claim otherwise Sorry if that hurts your feelings

For god's sake kid nobody is claiming you said they were the same thing. But you are saying that they involve similar logic and for the last bloody time the point is they are not remotely similar in logic or reality. Don't make me get crayons and explain it to you again And my logic works everywhere. When something new is created that never existed before then it doesn't have a past history prior to its creation. That's true of countries, that's true of children, that's true literally every single thing that is created. When two people get married nothing is created. The two people are exactly the same as they were before and they existed before. Nothing new is created. When several colonies come together with different histories and different parent countries and they form a new entity, that entity is at that moment created It cannot. Something cannot be both new and old. That's literally a contradiction. Something that was just created cannot be a continuation of something that already existed. You could say it was born of those things or you can say that it is descended from those things but it is not a continuation of the same thing When a baby is born it is not a continuation of its parents You cannot have a continuity of origin. That is literally a contradiction in terms In an absolute and literally every sense. Canada did not exist in any form or shape prior to its confederation. It has never had slavery. The people that created it also never had slavery as individuals. Nor were any of the people that were associated with the previous:Ies allowed to have slaves when it was created Canada has never had slavery. That is absolutely 100% true in every single sense of the word

I don't make up any crap about you and Believe me when I say that I'm not the only person laughing at you right now Sorry this didn't go your way kiddo but everything I said was true and having a temper tantrum about it isn't like you. You complained and cried about the fact that America's allies aren't helping and suggested that they never do anything. I pointed out that you're wrong and that the allies have done quite a bit and you should be grateful Simple enough. That doesn't seem to suit your agenda today and you're having a weird kissy kid about it and it would be great if you would stop that, we see more than enough from the left America has been blessed with wonderful allies. But you can't treat them like shit and expect them to come running when you start a war

They don't have a thing that actually supports what you're saying. If they do point it out, there's nothing there That's how you lose about 90% of your arguments. All you do is highlight copy and paste without actually reading or understanding anything And that's why you can't provide any science to back up your claims. Global warming will not result in a reduction in population. Nor will it result in massive amounts of refugees. These are just lies you like to tell yourself to support your weird little fantasies

LOL that's what you're reduced to at this point? Ok well there you go

Sure it does. It points out that you're wrong. Spiders don't engage in that activity and they are in fact animals and one of the species currently on the planet. Again the point is you're trying to claim that animals behave this way and therefore humans are ethical behaving the same way. The majority of animal species do not have homosexuality. And in fact in the number of species where they have to observed what they believe might be homosexual behavior it actually often turns out not to be the case. There is no doubt that there is a certain amount of homosexual behavior that can genuinely be said to be homosexual in a large number of animal species. But no, not every species on the planet So there you go They don't in fact. As I pointed out case by case. They either don't address your statement at all or else they don't prove or disprove it one way or another Sorry, but the science you provided, and most of it wasn't science, doesn't particularly support your Statement at all

I'm starting to sound like X flyer, just repeating but now nonsense because it makes you feel better. Was that the look you were going for? Because that's the look you're getting

Awww muffin, you feeing bad that this isn't going your way and projecting your emotions on others again? LOL I made my point. Your somewhat whiny complaint that somehow the allies and Canada haven't been there for you is nuts. The world has given more to the US than it gave to the world when it comes to that. Pretty simple point And accurate. And if you feel you're so hard done by then stop. No more world policing, no more access to bases no more access to ports, stay at home. Vance would probably agree with that actually.

Actually I'm quite right and you literally posted the proof of it. The first one doesn't say that people of transgender nature's commit suicide more often at all. Says they think about it but I literally said that's exactly what the studies show that they think about it. They don't do it Your second piece isn't actually science. It's an opinionated editorial style article that is the opinion of one person but not actually researched. They simply misinterpret other people's work to their advantage. There's no science involved . And again it claims that people think about suicide but doesn't actually show any evidence that they commit suicide Your final one doesn't actually look at the study. Fortunately i took the time to find it. Transgender Identity and Suicide Attempts and Mortality in Denmark | Public Health | JAMA | JAMA Network Suicides are higher but actually DEATHS FROM ALL SOURCES is higher as well and by almost the same amount. That would indicate there are factors that affect them that have nohting to do with being transgender. There is NO information in that study that suggests they committed suicide more often BECAUSE they are transgender, just as there's no explanation given for why they were killed by other causes more often than 'regular' people. Sorry, it's just not useful. There's no evidence there that being transgender had anything to do with it, and it's too small a sample to be meaningful. You can take any small group and possibly have a number that's very different than the national average, but they didn't even correct for age. You either have to do a very large study involving many thousands in a shorter time frame or look at specific age related populations within the same geographic area or otherwise correct the study so it's apples to apples. About the only thing that actual research seems to agree on is that transgender people have a higher likelihood of thinking about suicide, but that is due to depression and stress resulting from their condition and it's the same even in supportive families. Goes down a bit if they have transition surgery but is still very high. But there is almost no evidence that this actually results in substantially more successful suicides. So, apparently you don't know what science is. The science doesn't support your claims. It DOES say they have serious mental health issues and are often very depressed but it suggests it's the gender dysphoria that is the primary culprit. Sorry kiddo. I know you want me to be a terrible murderer so you can feel better about yourself but that's just not the case. (also i don't actually dislike transgeneder people at all )

Wernt me kid. WAAAAHHHH THE WORLD HAS TREATED US SO BADLY AND NOW THEY WON"T EVEN HELP OUT WITH A WAR WE STARTED WITHOUT CONSULTING THEM!!! " Sound familiar ? LOL Joking aside you are in fact the one doing the complaining here. I'm just pointing out the facts And we act like you're allies a hell of a lot more often than you act like ours When did world war I start for you guys? When did world war II start for you guys? We came running when you needed help in Afghanistan, to Iraq Wars, and a bunch of other conflicts. When was the last time any of the allies started a war without talking to you first and then demanded you show up? When your people got stuck in Iran and they were hunting them to kill them we smuggled them out When your planes couldn't land in America during 9/11 we allowed them to come to Canada despite the fact we faced the same risk you did and we took care of your people. Whenever you ever done that for us When New Orleans was destroyed by Katrina we sent several warships full of supplies to help you out, in fact they were the first on site and immediately began distributing supplies and providing medical assistance. When was the last time an American warship helped the Canadian city? Our fire bombers routinely show up to help you guys out when you're desperate, including recently in California where Quebec fire bombers made all the difference to try and stop the spread of wildfires. Kid. You could not possibly have had better allies or better friends, no country in the history of man has ever had a better neighbor and better friends in Europe than you And as good as the Europeans are to you canada has been absolute gold. But if you feel differently than by all means fcuk right off. No access to bases, no access to military information, no access to ports and no putting your anti-ballistic missile systems in our north. Go ahead, I double dog dare you Practice you had a good and you should appreciate what's been done for you.

Fiction is usually fairly simple. If it's real then you should be able to show me the science Not if you adapt and we have the technology to adapt People adapt in place before anything else Usually? We're told that there has never been a climate crisis like this in the past so how can it be usually? In fact usually people find a way to adopt their local circumstances to allow them to remain if we're talking about changes globally that affect populations. A quick example of the 1300s will show you what I mean. They had literally everything including significant climate change. But people adapted, and they didn't migrate

Did they have a budget for this beforehand? If they did then it's not new military spending If they didn't then you might argue it is. The money they've announced for trees so far has been money that was already budgeted for and set aside for another program that they re-labeled as military How stupid do you have to be not to get your head around this? Like honestly kids in grade school can get this

Cool story. Now do bc and Alberta

So are spiders but we're not spiders. Nor could you reasonably compare a human being to a spider or it's emotional state or its activities You couldn't, for example, eat your boyfriend after sex and claim that it's natural and therefore moral because some spiders do it

Sounds like you're fine with liberals as long as the corruption works in your favor. I see things differently

You're the one who's cry babying about how nobody wants to help america now that trump's been a twat I'm just pointing out that it was to be expected. And regardless of what you've done in the past if you don't want to keep doing it then don't. The rest of the world will carry on and you will be shut out. Why are you whining about it? And while I can see your point that closing airspace seems like a pretty simple thing to leave open, you are demanding that they provide resources because allowing Americans to strike from their airspace is inevitably going to produce attacks that they will have to defend against Nobody's been abusing America. And if you don't like it take your ball and go home. Give up your position as World Police and all of the power that goes with it. You don't get to say anymore in the world scale if you don't want to. America has been doing all this because it grants them a considerable amount of influence and power around the world which satisfies its own interests. Nobody anywhere abused anybody at least of all America. But hey maybe I'm wrong. In which case just give it all up tomorrow. Take your shit and go home. Cancel all the bases cancel all the foreign deployment opportunities cancel all of the intel sharing and negotiations and go it alone. But you won't. Afghanistan. Iraq. Korea. Iraq again, most of the major conflicts have been started by America to address American interests and NATO is always backed you up big time. Maybe it is time for you to sit in your corner and be quiet for a bit and stay out of world affairs

LOL so you admit i was right and you're so embarrassed that you had to come up with this banality rather than be a man about it Honestly debating with you is like playing the tutorial level on a video game. I win a lot but it's pretty boring Better luck next time kiddo

No they're not. In fact the evidence is they're not killing themselves at all anymore than any other people of the same age. Further without the underlying gender dysphoria nothing anyone did would cause them stress. So we're right back to the beginning. Lots of people aren't accepted by people around them for all kinds of reasons. But it doesn't lead to substantially higher suicide rates. And finally you've made all kinds of suppositions about how I feel about transgender people and how I treat them and yet you've never even asked me. You just think that because eileen conservative I must hate transgender people and wish them ill and would mistreat them if I got the chance Which says that your hatred and bigotry is more of a problem here than me

Yes and no. There are many animals that are radically different than us in all of those respects. And there are no animals that actually feel the same as we do, they may have similar emotions or traits that they are not the same. I know that Disney tries to portray animals as being humans and furry form but they are not, and their intelligence and how they perceive things is radically different. Comparisons between other animal species and humans can have some value. This is why we have rats and laboratories. The direct comparisons are impossible and you need to understand that while all humans are animals all animals are not human. The funny thing is you started off defensibly, your claim that the fact homosexuality occurs in other species as well as our own does suggest it's naturally occurring and not a deviation, You blew it tho when you tried to suggest that because it occurs in nature its somehow MORAL, and that logic does not track.

well setting aside for the moment that I actually do accept them, in reality the vast majority of the stress comes from the dissonance between their physical reality and their perceived gender. That's why it's called gender dysphoria, and not Cdnfox dysphoria That is the medical condition. I mean at the end of the day you don't accept me as a person either. You've been quite clear on that you think of me as some human for no better reason than you perceive that I don't agree with you. But this causes me no pain or discomfort in the slightest. Not being accepted by someone is not it so facto a source of stress But for those who are transgender who experience disphoria they will suffer even if everyone accepts them. It's an illness. Oh you mean they asked a bunch of kids who are dead why they killed themselves. 🙄🙄🙄🙄 In fact they draw that conclusion because transgender people who are asked if they've ever felt suicidal often say yes they did. But the vast majority of them didn't even try to kill themselves. And there's actually very little information that suggests that transgender people commit suicide at any more of a rate than other people of their same age. But however you want to slice that pie the end result is the same. They have mental health issues. So what I said was accurate

Sigh. i'm not missing anything. No. you're not.. There is no logical comparison between the two. You are not applying the same "logic" in the slighest. It is completely apples and oranges. Like i said, a more reasonable application of the same logic would be to consider their child. Not mocking anything. You're displaying your shocking inability to understand basic concepts. It's not that it didn't exist under its current name. It didn't exist at all. This is not a thing that existed and changed it's name this thing NEVER EXISTED. People came to gether and CAUSED it to exist. Like two people having a baby. LOL well this isn't going to end well for you They are created by the constitution and by the process it grants. They did not exist before the creation of the constitution. So they were created when canada was created or after as part of the process canada caused to come into effect. They immiedately became unrelated to the gov'ts and country and colony they were before (depending ... remember they weren't the same colonies or even the same parent countries). So yes, they became unrelated to the countries and colonies they were before and they lost their titles and legal standing and property and eveything. And were granted new titles and property and such under a brand new country. No, they came from Britain and france and europe and first nations, so they came from many places and histories and backgrounds and gave all that up to become Canadian. Yeah that didn't go well for you at all Nope. That's dumb. Are you claiming that america is actually Britain? No label change kiddo. Sorry. That's precisely what you're claiming, that a baby owns and inherits the actions of its parents as if the baby itself didi it. There's no such thing as inheriting context. And inheriting "lineage" SPECIFICALLY separates you from those who came before noting that they are in the past and you are something different which occupies it's own space. Swing and a miss Sure it does. The baby doesn't inherently speak ANY language. It has NO inborn cultural references. IT must be taught those things. Canada 'learned' what it is from it's creators and they did not allow slavery. Canada never had slaves. Yeah, it's about trying to make canada look bad. Your argument is not rational. Yet you are a rational person by and large. Ergo, it's about something other than rational logic. This is as simple as it gets. Canada started when it was created by several nations and their people coming together to create something new that had never existsed. Those people did not believe in slavery and it was never allowed in canada. Canada has never had slavery. that isn't a "technical' truth, that is a simple fact. America was a british colony before it became america, but america is not Britain. Nor does it own any of britians actions. Canada was a british, french and first nations land before confederation, but it's not british, french or first nations even tho it pays homage to and respects that lineage the same as you might respect your grandfather. But your grandfather's actions, for better or worse, are not yours. You're just plain wrong. No law anywhere in the world recognizes a country being responsible for what came before it. you MIGHT have had a point if slavery was legal in ALL of the colonies and right up until confederaton but it had been banned a generation before. The people who created canada were not slave holders, nor did their laws allow for slavery and canada has never allowed slaves. Simple truth. You can rant till you're blue in the face but that won't be changing.

You brought this on yourselves You treat your allies like complete shit. You start a war without any consultation. You won't even share with the goal is or what the plan is. And you demand that everyone else send their soldiers to die on your whim? That's not being an ally. You seem to think that NATO is your slave. That's not how it works and you're learning the hard way but when you treat people like garbage they're not interested in doing favors for you Which is exactly what I predicted when trump started treating people poorly. You don't threaten to take over Greenland by military force and then expect your buddies to show up when you start a war without consultation And if America loses its foreign bases and ports because it decides it doesn't want to be anyone's ally anymore I guarantee you the person that will suffer the most is America. They will lose their ability to project power around the world and they will begin to lose relevance. Make no mistake. America wants to be the World Police. They want to have that power, they want to control countries and commerce for their benefit. Which is fine, but if they start acting out then they may lose that opportunity and someone else may very well take their place and that may not be in your best interest. So be careful what you threaten

So let's see the science on that. Once again you're making up fake bullshit because all the left noses fear and hatred There will be no refugees, climate change will not fix the world's population problem.

Absolutely false. The vast majority of time throughout our history ontario has been the one who takes Most of our federal money is spent in Ontario, the west is deliberately shut out of things to benefit Ontario. During covid one of the world's more promising medical labs prove that they could produce a covid vaccine extremely quickly and all they asked for was 10 million to set up shop from mass production and the liberals wouldn't even talk to them. Other experts around the world commented on how ridiculous this was because they were well known as being a top of the line lab. But,,,, they were in Edmonton. And Ontario and Quebec did not want to see the growth of a strong pharmaceutical industry in the west For ages it cost more money to ship things on rail to the east than it did to ship them west just to protect Ontario Industries Petrocan stole massive amounts of money from Alberta to win votes in Ontario and Trudeau's own people admitted that later. Dion referred to Alberta saying that "they didn't want to KILL the cash cow...." Ontario occasionally gives to Quebec but that's about it. Otherwise everything is geared towards making sure that Ontario has the resources and the money at the expense of everyone else Have you never thought that it was weird how blow the population is in the west compared to Ontario? There's a reason for that The rail line will not be paid off by users. That will never happen. Certainly not in our lifetime The Olympics were specifically designed to improve our standing on the world stage and increase the amount of business done with Canada regardless of province. And most of the money was paid for by the province that it occurred in which covered the cost of the infrastructure This will be 100% paid for by taxpayers who will never get a benefit and it will never benefit them internationally or anything of the like It's this kind of thing that fuels western separation and Alberta's desire to break away. This is nothing but theft from canadians to buy votes in Ontario and it's disgusting and you should not be supporting it. If the province is want to do it then they can

Sorry but I'm right. You just weren't paying attention I said it was deeply associated with mental health issues. Not that it was a mental health issue. And this is 100% true The vast majority of people who have transgenderism also have gender dysphoria. Gender disphoria is mentioned in DSM-5-TR and is considered a mental health issue related to stress. As one doctor says. you can't have a pathology without an illness. I merely put into words what your picture is actually say. It seem like a good idea to make sure you understood how you looked to other people And I love that you think somehow that's more strange than simply reposting the same picture over and over and over again like a toddler LOL and then try to sell the idea that you don't have mental health issues Anyway now that we've established that transgenderism is in fact deeply associated with mental health issues maybe you should think about how wise it is to prove that point repetitively with your replies?