CdnFox

Oh but we are. Energy is an export (did you forget?) China is a country we trade with and we're talking about trade. And YOU were the one who brought up that we need to address the loss of trade with the states by getting other partners, to which i pointed out correctly that we can't and we'd be better off trying to improve our INTERNAL trade. So when you say "stay focused" what you REALLY mean is "For gods' sake quit bringing up all the crap that proves me wrong!!!!" LOL oh dear, i see we're reviving your old habit of chasing me around the forum yapping like an irate Chihuahua every time you lose an argument with me LOL You are one damaged little man

Because YOU say so. Its pretty obvious from your posts. And for some reason you seem to need my approval and attention. There there.... you're a good boy, i'll put the picture you made on the fridge

Every time you say that I turn out to be right But I don't mind making fun of you again, let's take a look So in other words when I said it was non-military I was correct. So in this case I showed my ignorance by... being absolutely right. Uh huh well that was predictable. If you take a broader look at things sure, coast guard is "defense" in the sense that it protects people. So we should count the fire departments and police too right? That WOULD help our nato spending but... it's not new military spending is it. Could you point to where i said they were claiming past fiscal years? Nope? So again you're making something fake and arguing against it. They ARE however including amounts that were announced and budgeted before these programs became part of the military. So to claim now that they're "Military" spending would be stupid. So in THIS case i showed my ignorance by.... you making something up that i never said and arguing against it. LOL gotcha Well don't you look like a twat now. So I was correct and it's not new military spending, and I was correct that program spending that was announced originally as part of a different program which is now being included in the military spending is not new military spending.

No there isn't. Not when it comes to surgeries and permanent chemical castration Sorry, but if anything the evidence is now strongly the other way And again what I posted was medical studies a clinical assessments. What you posted was two opinion pieces. Most of the European countries and America have recognized that transformative care and minors is a great mistake and a horrible idea vast majority of cases A couple of flat earthers who think differently is of no interest. The actual scientific studies prove otherwise and I've posted that already You are denying the science and accepting the idea of hurting children to support your ideology and that's disgusting The science is simple. The downsides are providing such care to children greatly outweigh the upsides So you, who were just railing how terrible people were were for not following the science and the experts just a couple of posts ago are now ignoring the science. What does that make you besides a hypocrite

Theoretically that's true, but of course as we have discussed elsewhere they're not actually doing that. They're taking existing spending and Relabeling it as "military". The coast guard? Now it's military. Trudeau's tree planting program? Totally military. Etc etc. In fact we barely increased military spending at all and somehow magically it are 2% 😛 A lot of things with the liberals are smoking mirrors and I suspect in the end this project will be the same. You will not get the happy ending you think you will and a crap ton of money will wind up in the hands of liberal friendly people Rolling stone gathers no moss, look before you leap, etc etc. There's no substance to what you're saying. Having a positive vision will not change our financial picture. Now if you could somehow provide actual reasonable evidence that suggests this will in the long run improve our economy more than it drains from our economy then that's a conversation we could have. But all indicators suggest the opposite. This will not make anyone's lives better. Or certainly so few people that it doesn't justify hundreds of billions of dollars. You want to make people's lives better? Reduce their taxes by $100 billion. Make everyone's lives better and actually do something for economy with more people having disposable income to buy things. Instead you want to raise taxes so that a small handful of people can use something that will not make their life substantially better for the most part. We have doom and gloom because we listen to the liberals and let them make this kind of decision for us. We have doom and gloom because people without a brain actually believed Trudeau when he said he was investing in infrastructure and that it would make us all kinds of money. All you're doing is guaranteeing more doom and gloom for the future. What people are really sick of is the failures that the liberals have brought to this country for the last decade and your proposing we continue You want things to be positive? Make positive proposals. All this does is rob children of their future for something that nobody's going to benefit from

That's not possible, carney said we got "The best deal in the world" on our tariffs And it doesn't matter. Mexico was able to find ways to address the issues and reduce the tariff burdens on their industries and negotiate something that worked for them reasonably well. And we were not. And now we're falling behind and becoming less relevant. Mexico had their version of that. But at the end of the day, the 'buy Canadian' thing should have HELPED our trade deficit with the US. If we buy less from them and they buy the same from us, our picture actually gets better. But the fact is we're selling less and less. At the end of the day this hurts us badly especially going into cusma negotiations.

Because it's true And it obviously hurts your feelings that it's true Sorry iittle guy, but to everyone else you just look like a weak little person who yaps at his betters. Nobody cares about 'post count' but you.

I don't think so. Although I'm sure you'll be saying the same thing a few years from now when carney turns out to be just as much of a disaster. "huuuuh, i never liked THAT guy you're confused! I only like the NEW leader we just elected who's bound to be just what this country needs!" Uh huh.

Absoutely nobody other than you thinks about how much anyone else is posting. And frankly they think less of you for whining about it. I posted the statistics for you before. This is actually not that much, it's just that I don't post anywhere else. But the average person between all their social media actually posts more than me. But let's face it. Intellectually I make you look stupid every single time you post. You can't form an argument, and when you try you wind up proving yourself wrong 90% of the time we're screwing up the math so bad you look like a complete twat So all you've got is my postcount LOLOL how utterly pathetic is that

And true! Unfortunately both him and you are restricted and how much you can post by the fact that you have to mouth each word as you're typing

In other words it's not military. And it looks like it was ordered long before the coast guard became part of the military But despite the fact that the money was spent before the coast guard became military and it was ordered before the coast guard became military and will be performing non-military functions, you will insist it's new military spending that has never been there before Sigh. This is why we can't have nice things.

This from the guy who said that Justin Trudeau was an awesome leader who would lead us to prosperity and kept voting for him Sure kid.

no you're pretty clear that you'd be just as happy to see all of the Jews killed in the name of what you perceive as justice. Sometimes the truth just leaks out with you and that's one of them .

Blah blah blah a rolling stone gathers no moss, look before you leap, etc etc Not a single fact or figure showing that a single thing you're saying is correct or that this train will solve it. We. Cannot. Afford. This. And it will NOT solve ANY ,,, AND I DO MEAN ANY... of our transit problems. It will make them worse because we won't have the money to do anything else. No, you won't preserve the greenbelt and trying to do so will just add to the pricetag. I would be happy to agree to disagree but you're selling out the children's future. If you were paying yourself and that was it that would be your choice. BUt you're going to rob a generation of it's quality of life and you just don't care. Just like you and your kind did with justin trudeau despite being warned again and again and again.

Sadly true. Just me and anyone with a greater than 6 grade education who isn't a member of a political cult. Ever stop to think another country might choose to exploit that? Ever think they'd use the opportunity to increase their secretive influence and hold on that country, a thing they'd been caught doing by csis already? Ever think that trade would then give them MASSIVE leverage over that country in the future? Like... a million times more than just threats to canola? Were you stupid enough to think China was our "Friend" and would treat us nice just because? I don't think you understand what those numbers mean. What those numbers prove if you actually understand them is that there is no possible way we can replace what we've lost with the us by increasing trade elsewhere. At best it's a minor bandaid. Maybe over the next 20 years or something... but that'll be too late. And trying to replace an unreliable partner with an even MORE unreliable partner is just absolutely stupid Our solutions have to be internal for the most part, except for increasing our ability to bring energy to market. We have to massivley increase trade within canada, attract as much investment here as possible, get more people buying canadian and more people MAKING canadian, and building major projects that will actually improve our economy nationwide ANd what is carney doing? He's selling us out to china while getting in the way of every major project he can. And the one project he'll get behind is a rail system that won't help more than a tiny handful and will cost us 90 billion dollars that we'll never see again, which will keep the jobs going for the finance minister's wife.

There's absolutely consensus. There's a handful of flat earth types who still deny the science for political and personal reasons but the world has come to a decision. Canada is just about the last hold out and it's fading fast. Let me guess. You also believe the earth is flat, there's no such thing as climate change, and the moon landing was faked. The science is not only mature on the issue with several papers and research docs out there, but it makes sense. ANd there's a tonne of anecdotal testimony on top of it from people who changed too early and then came to regret it. But you will apparently put children at risk and do permanent harm to them to satisfy your own delusions. What kind of person does that make you.

Heard it from you for well over a year. Since back when you said that hamas was exercising his human rights when it's slotted civilians I suppose technically you said that here too so maybe you're right

Well that would be fine if it was just a big conspiracy theory that I had Unfortunately many experts have spoken out and my opinion comes from their concerns CSIS says China is more of a concern in the Arctic than Russia | National Post Liberals’ Enthusiasm For China Trade Deal Should Raise Alarms - USW Canada And then there's THIS guy Carney says China is a foreign interference threat In fact I can fill a pager to. Experts around the world agree that canada's new deal with china is extremely dangerous for Canada But it will make lots of money for carney and his friends. And that's why we did it

True. They seem more interested in lining their own pockets. Which is kind of what you expect from a banker incidentally. And everybody you just mentioned was a banker Meanwhile security services and others who actually worry about such things are raising the alarm left right and center. So the people who will make billions are all for it. The cops who fight this kind of thing think it's a bad idea Are you figuring this out yet? Do you need me to make it jump a little higher for you?

I'm sure you daydream about loss of possible scenarios.

Why are you denying the science? I provided a ton of it. The vast vast majority agree with what I've said and what I posted. You would have to be extremely dishonest and Hate trans people to pretend that the tiny minority who think it's worth considering a more likely to be correct than the vast majority that does not Based on science. Which is pretty cut and dry. Almost all the countries around the world have had their medical professionals come back and say we shouldn't be doing this to children. There might be one or two really rare extreme cases where it's a good idea but everybody's saying it isn't I'm relying on the science. Why aren't you? You have no experience either, you're just some TWiT on the internet who can't read a science paper to save her life Pot meat kettle. Kettle pot. And it's not done in Kruger if all I'm doing is quoting the actual experts who say you're nuts You mean you don't like being wrong and I prove you wrong every single time. The fact that you're a lying sack of shit that actually hates trans people but enjoys virtue signaling to pretend that you are disgusting Proclivity to hurt children is somehow justified does not dictate my actions You are the worst kind of enemy that trans people could have. So much so that as I said before I honestly think you are a false flag agent a lot of the time The last scientific consensus is that we shouldn't be doing hormone therapy or transition surgery for children. It's harmful. Now explain why you want to harm children so bad?

No, it's because you're simply not that bright my pointing that out has nothing to do with it. In this case it suggests that you believe that lying and extreme exaggeration are suitable replacement for intellect and reasoned discourse. But we knew that I'm able to post a lot because I'm smart and voice dictation lets me type it about 70 or 80 words a minute. It seems like a lot to you because you just used two fingers and it takes you 4 hours to think of a reply I hardly ever rage bait, I mostly just laugh at you guys Right punkin? How's those math lessons

Whereas you were hoping it was true because they'd use the nukes on the israelis. From the river to the sea, amirite?

That's obvious, the question is why not. They do not appear to have the best interests in Canada at heart

Just kind of a big deal, I don't think people get how serious our situation is getting. We are becoming less and less relevant and it is really hard to ever gain that back