CdnFox

No it's somebody's fault. Successful negotiating is in the arts a finding a way to work with the person you're negotiating. Carney completely blew his position and now he's got nothing to negotiate with and he's handled it badly so as a result america feels that they're going to get what they want and there's no need to negotiate. Which is exactly what I said was going to happen last year. Now the question is is whether they'll be a Cusma at all

Dude you turn out to be wrong more than 99 percent of the time when it comes to legal stuff did you mean 'shutting down' or "causing great amusement for"?

You realize those designs have absolutely nothing to do with modern modular nuclear reactor styles right? You're pointing at ancient technology and trying to claim that's why we shouldn't use modern technology today

I was addressing your point. Are you saying you didn't HAVE a point? That's possible, you often come across as pointless You cannot look at china and claim they have a good environmental record. Which is what you were alluding to.

You voted in a new PM because the OLD PM that YOU voted in ran off with his tail between his legs after running the country into the ground following the advice of .... the 'new' PM. If insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result, you people are bat crap crazy

It's literally what you called to happen

Well you're wrong, they do. That was the sound of your credibility flushing down the toilet All suddenly you believe the federal government is involved at all. Amazing reversal of opinion there in 3 seconds But you're still wrong. Whether a pipeline gets built for example is 100% federal government. Mines another issues, fisheries and salmon farms, the feds have a major say in all of it You telling me the federal fisheries don't play a Majority role in fish management? Thought you said you worked in the industry. Rather surprising to see you be so wrong

Ah yes. That makes you sound MUCH wiser and more relevant.

You were literally the one that called for the United States and Israel to take out Iran. That was literally your official position for weeks and weeks and you said anything else was just 'Mowing the grass ' So it's a little late for you to be complaining about it now

No connection to truth or reality, and he's a liberal. But there's no need to repeat myself This is what he's like. He's still over in another thread demanding I provide him with facts which I already provided half a decent times and half of which came from him "I DEMAND YOU PROVIDE THE FACTS I"VE ALREADY PROVIDED!!!" I mean what do you say to that?

Then why did I have to explain it to you? The ones I already presented and in fact also the ones I borrowed from you and you're still crybabying about because you look like a twat? There right where i left them the first time kiddo

No I'm not come up there exactly where I left them before Yours too. Which I also used to prove my point It is truly pathetic and desperate to be a sea lion. I've proven my point a dozen times over with facts, numbers and even graphs, and even pulled from data YOU provided to prove it LOL what a sad and bitter little man you are Life in canada, even in vancouver, was affordable under harper. Even by 2015 it was expensive but affordable. Now, it isn't. The average couple eanring average wages wouldn't be able to buy a home suitable for raising a family and it's much harder to afford food. THat's life under the libs. Cry harder, that won't change.

So your claim is that the federal government does not set or influence Environmental Policy, land or natural resource use? Kid. I'm well aware you're not particularly well versed politics and there's no particular shame in that. But even you must be aware of this stage in your life at the federal government does in factplay a primary role in all of those things.

You're referring to Exflyer? I mean.... you're not wrong but odd time to bring it up.

No not really. The reasoning for moving to clean energy is the fact that they can't get enough energy in the old school way it's not altruistic. Supplementing their existing systems with solar is also an inexpensive way to stretch out what they've got. You do the same thing, but for them it's even more important because they simply don't have access to the power they need But at the end of the day they're still the biggest polluters. For ages they've been increasing their pollution output by the same amount of Canada's entire output once every 15 18 months. If a guy cheated on his wife with 10 women this month and only eight women next month and tried to be proud of the fact that he's leading the world in Transitioning to non-adultry, either the world or his wife is going to buy that

Short but that's not hard if you're actually trying. The problem is people like you who are more interested in protecting their little faith times and taxing everyone the poorest of Canadians. The primary regulators for those things are the federal government. They were not responsible for those trade barriers And regardless it's what has to be done. Of course you would ,that's why you keep voting the people who pass the most red tape and regulation into office. I mean, you trusted the carbon tax to solve global warming 😆😆😆😆 But the whole point is to remove them from the process by reducing regulation and their involvement. If they do less their chances of screwing things up diminish. So everyone's happy.

Based on recent military actions what would ACTUALLY happen is the us would try to bomb our maple syrup supplies and miss, and then grant us the right to charge for passage to any ship transiting the straight of georgia.

They also lead the world in pollution. So there you go

But it was you who won. You had 11 years to basically do whatever you wanted with global warming with a global warming friendly government in power. And you went with the carbon tax and that turned out to be a massive failure and it trashed the economy That was your plan. And it failed

The libs are supposedly admitting it but I noticed that every action they take in fact tends to move us further away It was crystal clear that the pipeline country's and other investors were prepared to take Canada seriously if we got rid of the bad legislation that prevents business, specifically the no pipeline bill and the tanker ban And carney left them in place deliberately. He created his magic fairyland bill which nobody believes in to give the appearance that he was going to play ball with them but they didn't believe it for one second. And even the ones who did believe it are now in the minority Energy industry losing confidence new pipeline will be deemed a national priority: Survey | Globalnews.ca He's pretending but he's still doing the things necessary to prevent that kind of business from happening

You and I have both mentioned it in various threads. I just don't understand how other people can see this and not be severely concerned

The pendulum tends to swing. For a long time the government in power refused to do anything about immigration issues even though it was a major problem for a lot of people. They even encouraged it and claimed anyone who didn't like it was a bad person In order to address that the people voted in somebody who was considerably stronger in that regard and now things have gone the other way. That tends to be what happens politically regardless of the topic, if you allow a problem to fester unaddressed then you tend to get an 'overcorrection' the other way to 'right the ship' so to speak. It's not great poitics. It's better when gov'ts address problems and concerns and take them seriously instead of polarizing them and creating a flash point This will eventually swing back the other way and hopefully the next gov'ts of either stripe will work towards more moderate solutions that address the issues.

This certainly isn't the first time it's been brought up. And Embridge for example was quite direct, stating that they would not consider projects in canada under the current regulatory framework. PP campaigned when he became leader on the idea of getting rid of the beurocracy and 'gatekeepers'. The liberals have choked the life out of businesses federally with excessive regulation, and there's a few provinces who's gov'ts are almost as bad. If we actually got rid of the unnecessary regulation and inter provincial trade barriers canada would boom economically and would be vastly less dependent on international trade

So we can't even speak about it unless our new chinese masters agree. Well. This is going great so far isn't it?

Aw muffin, can't thnk of a rebuttal so you rely on insults again? LOLOL Triggered leftie is triggered The kick in the teeth is that's how much left canada... how much more on top of that would have COME to canada had the liberals had pro business and investment policies? They've probably cost us closer to 1.5 - 2 trillion between what we lost and what we could have had.