CdnFox

SUre - it satisfies justice. IF - and it's a BIG if - if the person they kill is the right one And you can NEVER KNOW THAT. The state has falsely accused SO MANY people it's not funny - deliberately screwed with evidence, HID evidence proving innocence, etc. There are MANY cases. VERY many. In fact the last man executed in Canada was later found to be innocent. There is NO Justice in a system that kills innocent people. None. So if even ONE person is killed who was innocent then the system is unjust. So it is MUCH better to "kill" them with old age. Death penalty should mean "you stay in jail till you die, no faint hope or anything else, and no contact with the outside world other than your lawyer and we'll leave the tv on." THat way - if evidence does appear to show he was innocent as it did in milgaards case then at least we can undo some of the harm done.

ROFLMAO - well there's no point reading beyond this The guy got arrested - you can claim he didn't if you can find a source that says that but he did. Sorry. If you disagree with the source then it is up to YOU to prove the source is wrong So - once again you admit you're dishonest. You know it's true but try to dodge it by claiming the source is the problem ,NOT that the source printed something that wasn't true. So you've exposed yourself to everyone as a liar. All you're trying to do is browbeat and muzzle people who's opinions you don't like through lies. Like a typical Facist.

Nobody thinks it's the jews. Sorry that's a total red herring. IF anyone hates the jews it's the marxists and the left these days.

Sorry kiddo, There's no point arguing that the sky is blue. Socialism has been tried and mostly failed and communism is an abject disaster. Socialism at least can survive for a little while, depending on HOW strict a socialism it is Communism has no redeeming qualities whatsoever But sociasm can work in limited fashion. The problem is it doesn't scale. A family is usually set up in a communist or socialist fashion - and families work. The Adults earn and control prodcution, the chidlren contribute as they can, everybody chips in and takes what they need . From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs . but - make that 5 families and things get problematic. make it a country and things get far worse till it all falls apart. Sorry - they've both been tried AND AT A LARGE SCALE as well as small and they both fail except in the smallest examples. They're not 'archaic - they're dysfunctional. The principles they were built on are utterly flawed and unusable. which isn't to say you can't have a LITTLE of the underlying philosophy integreated into your more practical model. But not much.

Man i spend a lot of time fixing your literacy issues Markets crashed that is true. And i said some people's stocks fell by up to 50 percent. You said show me the 50 percent. Sigh - only a liberal complains when you give him what he asked for LOLOL I know math is hard for you - but it fell down to 10 k from 16. That's not 25 percent. I can tell you how much it is if you like or would you like to try again? LOL But lets put a pin in it for a moment - lets use 25 percent. That is a monumental crash overall. That is the entire stock market losing a quarter of its' value. That is hundreds of billions of dollars taht just went 'poof' in a very short time So that's a crash. Stock markets don't normally do that every year Do they. In fact - the last time we saw a drop as large as that was in the great recession of 2009. And the time before that was the crash of the 2000 tech recession https://www.macrotrends.net/1320/nasdaq-historical-chart So yeah. Crash. holy shit kid - if you're going to post the stats at least post ones that prove me WRONG! Proving me RIGHT is supposed to be MY job HAHAHAHAAHAAHA - god you're a riot to talk to But hey, thanks for saving me the hassle of looking it up for you LOL - got any other sources to prove me right? Or are you done looking dumb for the day?

I think it's more likely that you're perfecting your skills at self delusion but, potato potatoe No, you were the one who claimed that. You said they should be arrested on charges of 'something'. What i said is that they're not doing anything illegal, and mentioned a few laws i'd like to see.

Well maybe - they DO say ignorance is bliss so i might like it. You could say something useful with thinking. why should i follow YOUR dreams? ROFLMAO sure kid, that's why you respond so often LOL! I can understand why you'd wish intelligent people who can make actual arguments would go away - that whole truth and facts and thinking thing really cramps your style

Because quebecers know how fast a gov't can become corrupt and they're not nearly dumb enough to give a gov't power of life and death over them as a result.

So we point out that you said something that made zero sense and somehow that's us cheerleading for ukraine I suppose that would be true if you were a russian plant or something spreading disinformation, then disagreeing with you would sort of be like supporting the ukraine but that would only make sense if you were.... oh wait...... gotcha. Well - you have a good day comrade

No, that's what it' about. But what are they supposed to be paying attention TO? The media? the gov't? Where are they focusing their attention to get real information about how serious it is? Oh just charge them with 'something' I hear you can get 7-10 years hard time for 'something' these days I think you're going to easy on 'em, we should charge them wiht 'because reasons" instead. Way longer penalty. currently writing a news article isn't a crime, even if it's factually incorrect. A fact the CBC proves daily. So correcting that is going to take a bit more effort. Well you haven't of course, you've just said go arrest reporters and gov'ts for 'something'. Not helpful. But in fairness yeah, it's a tough question. I guess the answer is removing any gov't influence or involvement with the media and fostering news and media groups so that both sides of the spectrum are covered. I wouldn't mind seeing penalties for stories that are either deliberately misleading or too strongly state things they have no evidence for without hammering that home.

LOL - awwww muffin, couldn't come up with a single example? Poor guy So do you even know what ad hominem is without looking it up? Stock portfolios. You see, when people like those i mentioned buy stocks they don't buy a whole market, they just buy some and we call that their 'portfolio'. And to answer your question: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-06/number-of-nasdaq-stocks-down-50-or-more-is-almost-at-a-record?leadSource=uverify wall Whooopsie, yew fudged yerself again it would seem Facts and reason. Try it.

So an ex british soldier goes to help out on his own accord and that's somehow the 'warmongers taking us a step closer'. I wish i had two heads like yours, i could have endless fun banging them together.

Some can. And apparently some can't.

I might concede russia, but china? Nope. Trump was not only harder but clearly steering a path to be even more confrontational unless they opened up their markets. Biden is their bestest buddy pal in comparison to trump.

Paying attention to what? The gov't and it's media minions haven't exactly been allowing that kind of story to get out there. And when it does it's portrayed as an isolated case where the people involved are all gone now. pay no attention to the man behind the curtain

I don't think the average person knew that it was this serious. Further historically people tolerate a little abuse but when it gets serious they get angry. Everyone knows the liberals have always been corrupt but the sponsorship scandal set people off with it's scope and brazenness. I think this would tend to fall under the same thing normally, Give me a dodecahedron and 20 push ups and we'll call it fair Bent enough to speak out about it and not vote liberal next election and even better let some liberal mps know how you feel. And let the party you do vote for know you expect them to get to the bottom of this. The pay off is that while you're not going to stop this kind of abuse entirely you can seriously curtail it. which is good for our democracy. The pay off is that if enough do that then the libs will suffer at the polls and realize that

Well that's partly because you refuse to see things that don't fit your narrative, and partly because ALL gov'ts during covid overspent to keep their public safe, but if you look closely you'll note inflation has not been the same everywhere. And that's fairly reflective of how they chose to handle things. THe countries with the worst inflation tended to all spend a great deal on 'covid support'. Countries that didn't excessively spend in that department like Sweden and japan all have much lower inflation. Countries that did such as Canada, the us, uk, france, greece, spain, all have much higher inflation rates. And of course some European countries were a little more dependent on russia and ukraine for food and oil and were affected a little more strongly than Canada was by that war. Not only that but canada entered it's high inflation cycle much earlier than most - and because inflation is compounding that makes the effect of the current inflation much worse. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/inflation-rate- Further - food inflation is worse in canada than most countries, https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/food-inflation Canada is VERY high in food inflation - and yet this is where most of our food is made. So it's not 'supply chain issues', that's for sure. Canada SHOULD be on the lower end of inflation. We SHOULD be closer to japan. But like the US we went insane with spending and made bad decisions and now there's a price. Imagine that. no, most countries are still solid. And while canada is in a much worse position than it was in 2015, if we stop being braindead about finances we'll still recover. All of them. This may shock you but it's not aliens that drive up food prices. It's not some small group of people who are making our housing market unaffordable. This is the NATURAL AND PREDICTABLE effect of dumping unearned money into the economy. This is what happens, and if it's not countered then it becomes a disaster. So interest rates have to go up to prevent an exponential runaway like we saw with the last trudeau and that hurts the economy and causes people to suffer more, and causes rents etc to go up - AND then there's less money for social programs so you either borrow more and drive things up again or let people suffer - it's all kinds of fun. No aliens required. Virtually every time there's a shortage of cash and people get pissy. We god away with it in the wars only by introducing income tax and radically increasing people's tax burden. Well you can't do that forever. WE already tax about half what the average person makes or just over, you gotta leave them something. Later, we saw disaster. The rampant spending of the 70's led to massive financial hardships and problems in the 80's. THere was DEFINITELY a shortage of cash and MUCH pissyness. We've seen the same several times since as well. And every time we come out slightly less able to cope. And again - greece. Spain, Venezuela. Now france is teetering, Every time you think you can spend whatever without consequence the country winds up imploding. Nope. Sorry - but the 'science' of economics such as it is is completely bound by human nature. Generally you cannot create a system that is not in keeping with human nature and expect it to survive for long. THats' why strongly socailist or communistic type models always fail, and why capitalism is effective. At the end of the day there's really not a massive magic wand when it comes to economics - there's no silver bullet or the like. I've heard similar things about the asteroid belt and such - i have no doubt one day we'll wind up mining the hell out of space. Plus - mercury is mostly iron. Seriously - who'd miss it?

The Globe is knocking it out of the park with this issue. Normally they tend to the left but at the end of the day they need revenue same as anyone else and print what is popular. I don't know how you can read this as a Canadian and not be concerned as hell.

Seeing this is about canadian sovereignty why don't you leave it to Canadians to discuss. You can go back to your drivel elsewhere.

Well this is the thing. And you can do MUCH to reduce the influence if that's what you want to do. Laws requiring agents of other gov'ts to register, laws about foreign nationals donating to political parties, etc etc They all help make it less worth the pain. And public shaming of any candidate who accepts such donations - keeps them from soliciting it. So far tho - doesn't sound like trudeau wants to do anything

You probably don't - over time eventually one group will come to dominate and become the gov't one way or another. But while i feel for your family the best thing for us is to stay the hell out of it and let nature take it's course. Otherwise we'll just wind up with two fists and a foot stuck in that tarbaby and we'll get dragged down with it.

this is the other lie that the left tries to perpetuate - "true communism has never been tried!" It has. This is how it ends up, how it will ALWAYS end up, how it has to end up. It corrupts itself almost immediately.

https://nypost.com/2021/03/18/man-arrested-for-discussing-childs-gender-in-court-order-violation/ There's that guy. And of course plenty have been threatened - i told you about the Sheppard case. But i'm sure you'll try to claim somehow those or any others i post don't count because 'reasons', it's getting pretty questionable if you really care about the truth. We'll see That is a blatant lie. And the school got sued over it and lost. She didn't do anything wrong and the school authorities immediately acknowledged that when she went public The president of the university herself appologized and said that should never have happened. Remember what i've told you - if you have to lie to make a point you probably don't have a very good point. They threatened her with it. That was part of the whole deal and was a big component of her complaint. Sounds like you're just making bullshit up to be honest. And if anything the 'boshavists' were more of the gay haters than the nazi's. Nope - still calling bullshit there. Show me the interview where he says that it's specifically marxist to use the media to spread blah blah blah. I will bet you can't. Your problem is that you have no credibility. For the things i know about in detail, i can see you're frequently blatantly falsifying the facts. SO when you talk about something i don't know that well, it's impossible to take anything you say seriously . It seems just as likely you're lying there. Like - claiming Lindsey was being transphobic? That is beyond dense. She played a segment of a university sponsored discussion between two university professors which was sanctioned by the university discussing the very subject she was going over with the class and EVERYONE agreed SHE presented it in a completely neutral fashion. So i know you lied there. So when you say petersen claims that specifically marxists want to spread blah blah blah and that makes him a nazi supporter if not a nazi - it seems 99 percent likely you're full of it. So lets see your proof. We'll go from there. But i'm no longer interested in your opinion without proof, you lie far too much for it to be interesting.

Nope - he said he screwed up before that. And he's admitted those are factors but not the only reason for our inflation. Justin's monetary policy and carbon tax play a large roll. Politics is a real world experience. Like - how do you not get that? Attacking your arguments with facts and reason. Which is not ad hominem. And yes ad hominem is bad, I guess i should have mentioned to you that lying is bad too. So many character faults to fix with you, so little time. Yeah - ask any pensioner who had savings in it right now. It's severely down and many many are suffering and are praying it bounces back a bit. Many saw their retirement savings evaporate to about a half of what they were. I'm seeing it every day. You didn't know did you. Or you just think it's hilarious that people are suffering i guess. ROFMAO - only a liberal would think the truth and facts were 'profoundly stupid ' You're all too often on the wrong side of history, truth and facts Moonbox.