CdnFox

Well there's not much in there i didn't know already - most of it's been known for quite some time. There's the usual interesting points - we've got about 20 years of boomer baby bubble to get through before we stop being topheavy, we need immigration to hold our population levels and definitely to have growth. The statistics aren't hitting on teh important stats tho, such as what percent are able to fluently speak one of the official languages (i understand that's getting better) and what's the dollar figure being spent to upgrade housing and education and medicine to deal with the increased population. Speaking english or french is noted in research as being the single most significant factor in how fast newcomers will close the income gap between what immigrants get paid and what natural canadians do . Employers prefer natural canadians for several reasons and it takes time for an immigrant to be thought of that way - speaking the language helps immensely.

And he was very clear - and it was clear from his quote - that he was not talking about people but the politics around it But of course you HAVE to lie to make your point.

I'm quite correct. And lets take a look at the garbled nightmare you present as your 'evidence'... So it's known for more than one thing. AND -nothing in there suggests that anyone never mind rural people vote for them at all based on immigtation. So - basically you're just lying at this point. This is a very popular cheap debate trick with the left, just a bit of bait and switch non sequitur logic. You make the claim that rural people vote for this party because of immigraiton, then go on to prove something entirely different and claim victory. My my - with skills like that you must just dominate elementary school playgrounds. In fact i also mentioned pelosi by name but - as per usual you prefer to lie rather than be truthful. Typical - if the facts and evidence don't support you then just ignore them right? It's the left's mantra.

Have you even read marx? the circumstances weren't there for what he wrote about in ancient greece. Next time you run into a good book try not eating it. Good thing seeing as you don't even know what one is. But - we already knew that. You're a fascist. That's different.

And yet we know there are a significant number of incidents where gender-inclusive bathroom policies have been abused to assault women and also to take pictures and other such activites. So the research appears incomplete. Or possibly bias. I'm not sure i'd want to be the researcher who released a report saying there was a problem. Probably be the last research grant he got.

Sure i can but whenever i give examples you just pretend i never had any. I mention several people and in the next post you claim i didn't come up with any. Your definition of 'deflect' seems to be when i tell truth's you don't like. The only one deflecting here is you mirror girl. When you accuse others of it we pretty much know you've realized you've lost the discussion point. Anyone with three seconds and an internet connection can find examples - AOC is NOT a nice person. So look a few up yourself and stop hiding behind your lies. OR - just accept that i'm right and accuse me of 'deflecting' with the truth yet again

Well that's not a good look

Well more than that actually - the app created a disaster the moment it came out. So basically it buggered up our system for more like 2 years. But hey - whats a year or so when you're busy apologizing for your favorite corrupt hero Yeap - it was so poorly designed and user unfriendly that staff spent most of their time dealing with in stead of speeding things up it slowed things down. It was trash. But - trudeau wanted to be able to track everyone even more like any good dictator would so we got the app. But that's why he couldn't keep it mandatory. It was just screwing too many people up. Bad design. Riiiiiight you never mentioned the word provincial, of course not! You certainly didn't claim the airports problems were provnicial or anything How silly of me And? What's your point. The airports were completely screwed as a result, the staffing problems we did have got worse and the problems linger to this day. That's how bad trudeau screws up our nations.. A service that's run well for as long as most people have been alive completely brought to it's knees, and the system still not fully recovered. And still a spill over from the previous mess. Customs people still in short supply as a result, etc etc. The baggage issue is minor at best. 2 plus years - trudeau cucks up the whole system - ExFlyer "DON"T LOOK DON"T LOOK DON"T LOOK". 2 months it's SORT of ok - ExFlyer "OK - LOOK NOW LOOK NOW LOOK NOW!!1" Dude - they were still strugging at the federal level at christmas this year. And that's before we even get into the feds and their failures to hold airlines accountable when they cancel flights and such - a thing that they've been promising since they first got elected and again in 2019 - but it's STILL a mess, so people got screwed over hardcore at xmas and the gov'ts like "ohhh - we should probably do something about that one of these days.... " Everything is still a mess. The fact that its less of a mess is nice - but it doesn't change the fact. Hell the gov't is still talking on it's website as of today about what Its doing to unscrew the parts it's screwed up. Except now? You're trying desperately to do so at the moment. THe airport delays were his fault. The passport offices were his fault .The problem with customs was his fault. The problem with air travel rights is his fault. But - you want to blame EVERYONE but him. Oh it's the users - they're terrible. Oh it's the provinces, they're the culprit. Oh it's canada post ... Please - you couldn't BE defending him harder if you were being paid to do so. These are all areas of responsibility that not only is he in charge of but that he received warnings about that there were going to be massive issues with if ignored, and he ignored them. There's simply no getting away from it.

Well of course that's not true. It does mean something, It's not the factor we choose who runs the place on exactly but it does mean something. What it means is the majority of voters didn't want justin. No, he's the pm that onatrio wanted. Ontario voters are fond of corruption. You sound pretty ok with corruption yourself, so i suspect you're struggling by End of day, most prime ministers get two full terms in office. Justin will get that, just as Harper did. Then PP will get in. And it'll be payback time.

https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2022/06/27/arrivecan-customs-officers-canada/ https://ca.news.yahoo.com/arrivecan-app-travel-canada-problems-183254148.html There were tonnes of stories on this. The app glitches causing problems. The customs people need to spend a lot of their time showing people how to use it which causes delays. Etc etc. It was massively expensive and slowed airports down. Sooooo once again - are you claiming the arrivecan app, which was a major contributor to delays, is provincial? Sorry kiddo - trudeau gets to wear the airport mess as well as the customs mess as well as the passport mess as well as the immigration mess and all the other many messes he caused. I'm sure he appreciates your dedicated efforts to try to excuse the inexcusable but... it's still inexcusable.

Actualy they didn't. He lost the popular vote. The riding system chose justin. And it's because toronto and parts of quebec are quite comfortable with corruption and division. "no better alternative' is just the excuse liberals use to justify their support of corruption and graft. It's kind of their go to.

That's about where you should have stopped. Did the local authorities develop the Arrivecan app? No? Oh imagine that. Did they short staff the customs offices? No? Hmmm The issues were not flight cancellations and baggage handling. Airports across canada didn't suddenly forget how to handle luggage all at the same moment. They might have minor glitches that add to the problem but the problem was security screening and the app - both of which suffered from horrible planning and execution. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/flying-canada-rules-long-lines-1.6438750 You can excuse trudeau all you like but those are 100 percent in his control. People coudln't get processed, it wasn't their luggage. I don't know why you're being an apologist for that scumbag. Nope. Sorry but manageing to keep up for like one week is not 'back to normal' again after 2 and change years of screwing it up. IF they can keep it up for 6 months then they can make that claim. But i bet you anything it bottlenecks again. And it still wouldn't excuse the fact that they chose to let it fall apart for 2 years. A liberal like you can always find an excuse for trudeau. Be a man and own what your dear leader has screwed up. As to your tracking - please. You get a little notice saying "delayed due to canada post'? What a lie. I get plenty of international shipments too and none ever said that.

I've heard of being an influencer - would this be an effluencer?

I'm sorry but you're not correct. They operate under the offices of the federal ministry of transportation. And the customs and security people are all federal as well. While the buildings and such may be locally controlled etc the actual things that are causing the airports to screw up are indeed federal. Sorry if you were unaware but this is most DEFINITELY a federal problem. Sure it is. It's just better than the complete disaster it used to be. And that's after years and years of warnings and begging the trudeau gov't to take the necessary steps to avoid the disaster in the first place - which out of incompetence and indifference he chose not to. Is it - or is it the customs people. I bet if we looked into it we'd see they're the bigger issue on international shipments.

Well at least it's not a player piano - if it was they'd have seized it for being a dangerous 'full auto".

Well it's actually going to help. The issue is that until yesterday the law said that a refugee fleeing oppression must stop at the first 'safe' country they encountered and not proceed to another country's border checkpoint. Which allowed canadians to turn them back at the border crossing BUT - it didnt' say anything about crossing the border NOT at a border crossing. So if they snuck across they'd have to be treated as refugees. SO this will allow the rcmp to arrest or turn back people if they show up away from the border crossings and still allow for them to be turned back to america at the regular crossings. they can still apply for immigration but not as refugees.

All I"m saying is that it's hard to believe Justin Trueau is the best we could do with 4 billion years of evolution to work with.

These are the people who took 7 years just to buy the same airplane they cancelled 7 years ago. Frankly, considering their track record we're lucky it got closed before we evolved into a higher life form.

Still gonna die tho Either of old age or another liberal's knife in his back.

And typical CBC - the story is all about how terrible this is for those who were happy to break our laws and not a peep about how illegal immigration affects canadians who don't have enough housing or medical services. Trudeau will try to sell this as a victory and an accomplishment, and in a way it is but his base won't see it that way and many will look at him the way this CBC article is, and those it WOULD impress already hate him tremendously. At any rate - it's good that it's finally done.

No, i mean eventually he'll die of old age....

Tell me you have no idea what communism is without telling me. If you mean in the general sense that people work hard and share what they have sure it has - that's what a family is. Bur even the greeks knew it absolutely didn't work on any scale larger than that. Wealth cannot be distributed. Wealth is not a material you can collect and hand out. There's no such thing as 'wealthonium'. Wealth is a result of economic activity. Owning land isn't wealth - growing food on the land and selling it to someone else is wealth. Creating something of value that you can use or trade is wealth. The whole commnist socalist thing was that only the elites had any means of creating that activity. But - those days are LONG gone. Anyone at all can be rich. Most rich people come from poor or middle class families. Anyone can earn a good living and be middle class. So the ability to create wealth has ALREADY BEEN distributed more evenly. There's nothing left to do there.

It is true that the most effective way to ensalve a person is to provide for their every need. Then they're too afraid of what would happen if you weren't there to do that, and they'll do whatever you want.

I'm sure that's true in your mind - you have a habit of editing out what you don't like to hear. Most do. Problem solved. Well there are many - how about the time when she was asked about the violence and destruction from the riots in the states where 4 billion dollars of damage were done and she replied that this was proper, that protests are SUPPOSED to make people uncomfortable and scared like that. That chick would happily take a flame thrower to people who disagreed with her if she could get away with it. I did name some. So - i take it you're just lying to try to make yourself feel better that you're wrong. As i noted MANY if not MOST dems especially farther to the right call for violence and support violent protest. The left wing is very very violent and hate filled. But - as noted the left LOVES to accuse others of what they do themsevles as some sort of weird cover. it's like a defense mechanism.