Jump to content

CrakHoBarbie

Member
  • Posts

    2,843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by CrakHoBarbie

  1. Well let's try. Have one of your halfwit friends choke you, and see if you can chirp out a vocal response. I'll bet you'll be able to make enough noise to get your point across Watch the video of Floyd's murder. Floyd complained he couldn't breath, Chauvin could of given a f__k less, then Floyd died. That's why that murderous piece of shit is in prison.
  2. You are an id iot. Floyd even told chauvin he couldn't breathe, Chauvin continued to choke Floyd until it was to late. That's manslaughter. I know... " Manslaughter" is a big word for your tiny mind. Regardless, with all the money we put into incarcerating the masses, it's rediculous we can't keep our inmates safe. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-george-floyd-autopsy-new-892530421961&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi_yZjvjOKCAxVSLkQIHRopD8kQFnoECAEQAg&usg=AOvVaw225DB3OlFrZfur0F7xW2mF
  3. Actually, Pope Francis is trying to save the church from itself. In 2013 he stated: "the Catholic Church must find a balance between "small-minded rules," like doctrines against abortion and homosexuality, or risk the the moral edifice of the church falling like a house of cards". And he's right. Keep demonizing homosexuality and contemporary man will continue to leave the church.
  4. There have been over 2000 God's created by the imagination of Man. Tell me how your God is the one true God.
  5. If you love me, it's ok to just say so..... But I fear your love will perennially remain unrequited.
  6. Your devotion to a raging piece of shit like Donald is heartwarming.
  7. The prosecutor didn't inflate and deflated properties for financial gain. Donald did. Don't worry. You'll see the outcome even though, like a child, you can't grasp the ramifications of donalds actions.
  8. It's funny how Donald is claiming the judge is the one victimizing him, but the judge didn't write the lawsuit against him. Donald knows he has already lost this lawsuit. It's a done deal Thank you for sharing your opinion.
  9. Again, just read the lawsuit Talking with you is like talking to a petulant toddler Trump’s loans were not approved through the same method as your house or commercial property where the bank’s appraisal is the most important factor. Paragraphs 563 and 564 of the lawsuit explain why: 563. Starting in 2011 the relationship with Deutsche Bank was revitalized when Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization initiated a relationship with bankers in the Private Wealth Management (“PWM”) division of Deutsche Bank, which enabled them to obtain more favorable terms than they could have received through the CRE division by having Mr. Trump personally guarantee the loans based on his net worth as reflected in his Statements of Financial Condition. 564. In essence, rather than obtain credit facilities through the wing of Deutsche Bank with an expertise in commercial real estate, Mr. Trump began to seek funds from a wing of Deutsche Bank focused on servicing ultrawealthy clients. Hence, Mr. Trump’s personal guaranty, and his representations regarding his finances that backed up that guaranty, featured prominently in Mr. Trump’s loan transactions through the PWM wing of Deutsche Bank. This wasn’t like any bank loan process you’re familiar with, so you can’t assume it works the same way. The banks were approving loans based on all his holdings and the claims he made about them — not just on the property he wanted a loan for. The banks were not doing their own appraisals on every asset and liability Trump had anywhere in the world, they were relying on other appraisals he provided, and the financial statements he provided. This is where many of the frauds occurred.
  10. So you think the Judge manufactured the evidence that got Donald indicted? You poor gullible buffoon. You are completely delusional. Read below to see how indictments really work you incompetent pinhead https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/charging
  11. Trump’s loans were not approved through the same method as your house or commercial property where the bank’s appraisal is the most important factor. Paragraphs 563 and 564 of the lawsuit explain why: 563. Starting in 2011 the relationship with Deutsche Bank was revitalized when Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization initiated a relationship with bankers in the Private Wealth Management (“PWM”) division of Deutsche Bank, which enabled them to obtain more favorable terms than they could have received through the CRE division by having Mr. Trump personally guarantee the loans based on his net worth as reflected in his Statements of Financial Condition. 564. In essence, rather than obtain credit facilities through the wing of Deutsche Bank with an expertise in commercial real estate, Mr. Trump began to seek funds from a wing of Deutsche Bank focused on servicing ultrawealthy clients. Hence, Mr. Trump’s personal guaranty, and his representations regarding his finances that backed up that guaranty, featured prominently in Mr. Trump’s loan transactions through the PWM wing of Deutsche Bank. This wasn’t like any bank loan process you’re familiar with, so you can’t assume it works the same way. The banks were approving loans based on all his holdings and the claims he made about them — not just on the property he wanted a loan for. The banks were not doing their own appraisals on every asset and liability Trump had anywhere in the world, they were relying on other appraisals he provided, and the financial statements he provided. This is where many of the frauds occurred.
  12. You poor gullible fool. Donald inflated the values for loans and deflated the values for taxes. These are documented facts. See below: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/tto_release_properties_addendum_-_final.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjMrZXFw7yCAxXDOEQIHXN3Ah4QFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw1tmFfPnRxzGKwNUnMmCWha
  13. He has roamed the halls of justice with impunity for soooo long. But, sadly for him, all things must pass. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/tto_release_properties_addendum_-_final.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjMrZXFw7yCAxXDOEQIHXN3Ah4QFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw1tmFfPnRxzGKwNUnMmCWha
  14. I've heard a load of far right zealots claim that since Donald "believed" his property valuations were correct, then Donald cannot suffer legal consequences. To be clear, the issue is that Donald inflated the value of his properties to get loans, then deflated those same values come tax time. So, no.... It doesn't matter what Donald "believes". He is guilty as sin.
  15. See below halfwit First, Gov. Reagan signed the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act in 1967, all but ending the practice of institutionalizing patients against their will. The number of mentally ill people entering the criminal justice system doubled the first year after the Lanterman-Petris-Short act Then, in 1981 President Ronald Reagan, who had made major efforts during his Governorship to reduce funding and enlistment for California mental institutions, pushed a political effort through the Democratically controlled House of Representatives and a Republican controlled Senate to repeal most of MHSA. So, throughout the years, Reagans actions inadvertently led to the homeless problem we have today.
  16. Ahhh, nice artists rendition of both your personalities.
  17. What a boatload of dumbf__kery. You don't even know the difference between a fetus and a baby.
  18. So many paragraphs..... Your desperation is showing. that's fine. All y'all halfwits are so predictable.
  19. Newsom will most likely become POTUS within the next 10 years. He has my approval.
  20. It's good that you're admitting I'm right. We're making real progress!! I guess you're having issues with reading comprehension. Here it is again. Suck it up pinhead. First, Gov. Reagan signed the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act in 1967, all but ending the practice of institutionalizing patients against their will. The number of mentally ill people entering the criminal justice system doubled the first year after the Lanterman-Petris-Short act Then, in 1981 President Ronald Reagan, who had made major efforts during his Governorship to reduce funding and enlistment for California mental institutions, pushed a political effort through the Democratically controlled House of Representatives and a Republican controlled Senate to repeal most of MHSA. So, throughout the years, Reagans actions inadvertently led to the homeless problem we have today.
  21. First, Gov. Reagan signed the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act in 1967, all but ending the practice of institutionalizing patients against their will. The number of mentally ill people entering the criminal justice system doubled the first year after the Lanterman-Petris-Short act In 1981 President Ronald Reagan, who had made major efforts during his Governorship to reduce funding and enlistment for California mental institutions, pushed a political effort through the Democratically controlled House of Representatives and a Republican controlled Senate to repeal most of MHSA. So, throughout the years, Reagans actions inadvertently led to the homeless problem we have today I get it. Reality confuses you. A lot of far right zealots have this problem. From what I can tell, the ailment is not curable.
  22. Great. At least you're admitting that Donalds "probably" gunna be convicted. Such an important breakthrough for you!!
  23. Those are called "citations". It's what competent posters provide as proof of their contentions. Remain ignorant. It's all you know, halfwit.
×
×
  • Create New...