Hodad

Those are your people, dummy. That insane rant about the round Earth conspiracy is exactly like your insane rant about the climate change conspiracy. You are so wildly divorced from reality, it's farking nuts.

Now it's a race to see if frogs are smarter than "conservatives." Who will jump out first?

She just happened to be a vastly better option than her opponent. And, as you refuse to acknowledge for purely partisan reasons, the economy was strong under Biden--the envy of the world--and dramatically better than the mess he inherited from Trump. I guess because you don't like trans people (or whatever) you have to pretend it was a bad economy. Doesn't make sense to me, but you persist.

There’s an entire global network of elites—scientists, governments, media moguls, and even space agencies—working tirelessly to maintain the lie that the Earth is round. This isn’t just a mistake; it’s a deliberate effort to keep people under control and distracted from the truth. These powers are using propaganda to manipulate the masses and hide the real nature of our world. The space agencies, especially NASA, are the biggest culprits. They’re behind the so-called "space missions"—Apollo, Mars rovers, you name it. It’s all fake. The moon landing? Totally staged. The photos from space? Photoshopped, every single one of them. They manufacture evidence to make it seem like we live on a spinning globe, but the reality is, the Earth is flat. It’s a flat plane, and all the "images" from space are part of the illusion. Governments are in on it too. They have a massive interest in keeping this truth suppressed because, if people knew the Earth was flat, everything would change. How? Think about it: new geography, new science, and the real reason why Antarctica is off-limits. It’s all connected. They can’t let us question the fundamental structure of the world because that would lead to massive upheaval. And then there’s the media—movies, TV shows, books. They reinforce the globe narrative with every opportunity they get. Take any blockbuster movie, and you’ll notice the subtle nods to the "round" Earth. They’ve been pushing this agenda for centuries, making it look like the idea of a flat Earth is something of the past, when in fact, it’s the real truth. So, yeah, the round Earth narrative is one huge global conspiracy. They want you to trust their "facts" and look at the world through their lens. But don’t be fooled! The Earth is flat, and the powers that be are doing everything in their power to keep you from realizing it.

Right? You can watch the wannabe wildcat twist his shit inside out from the second post in this forum to the one two up from yours. You can watch the transformation in real time. It's fascinating--and pretty sad.

Really, really impressive. Couldn't cite evidence for any lie and completely ignored the question. Added random internet speculation as if it were actual information. Deflected to a completely (and wildly) unrelated Biden criticism. And then claimed--amidst this tragicomic disaster of an episode--that the perpetrators are the "adults in the room." Really top notch work. Checked all the boxes on your greatest hits. Hegseth quality bullshit there. You're ready to squeeze into the clown car. -- I bet they'd at least add you to the group chat! Jeebus.

Why would I--or anyone--want to side with either of Grok's 5th grade essays? To what end? And you did not post your prompts, just the output. So why do you think we would notice how you tailored your "query"? I did, however, talk about where AI gets its data and why that's problematic. Look, Grok is a half-baked also-ran in the AI space. It could get better someday, but demonstrations like these just highlight the danger of spammy AI. And I have no idea why you posted it or what you wanted to "discuss" because you made no effort to communicate that.

Hey! You're almost trying to turn that into a coherent point. Do you have any information on when that statement (a total lie) was made relative to when the article was written? And let it not be overlooked that in that whole goddamn clusterfark of a scenario, your objection is that he did claim not to have done something that we all know he did. Can't make this stuff up--but you do keep trying.

Are you farking nuts. You don't think the timings, sequence and methods of an upcoming military strike are classified? Jeebus. That could literally get people killed.

Unlikely. You post a lot of things that frankly don't seem to have any purpose. Random shit from twitter. Random shit from Grok. And often without even trying to make a topic of conversation of it.🤷‍♂️

I didn't post a lie, dumbass. Nor can you point out any such thing. You posted a video of Hegseth lying through his teeth and trying to deflect from the issue with an angry tangent. He's not very bright, if you haven't noticed.

I'm not sure anyone is that dumb. He's out to deliberately hurt average Americans. BBC US President Donald Trump has announced new import taxes of 25% on cars and car parts coming into the US in a move that threatens to widen the global trade war. Trump said the latest tariffs would come into effect on 2 April, with charges on businesses importing vehicles starting the next day. Charges on parts are set to start in May or later. The president claimed the measure would lead to "tremendous growth" for the car industry, promising it would spur jobs and investment in the US. But analysts have said the move is likely to lead to the temporary shutdown of significant car production in the US, increase prices, and strain relations with allies.

While you're shilling for your Orange Jesus and his incompetent disciples, why don't you show us where it was approved for classified information, hmmm?

Why did you post that? Jeebus, that is one dumb farking frat boy--and he's lying right to your face. If you believe him that a detailed timeline of the attack doesn't constitute classified "war plans" then you're even dumber. If they had added the wrong person to that chat it could have compromised the mission or cost lives.

Folks on this forum regularly progress through these stages in any given thread--and some just live on 5. They really don't care a bit about America as a concept. It's just a geographic designation at this point.

Yes, I did. Why?

Adding the journalist was surely an accident, but choosing to have this kind of group chat--with top secret information--on an unapproved publicly available app is sheer incompetence. That, they all did knowingly. At this point it would be an upgrade if they were just using a private server.

I don't have any idea what point you're trying to make or the point of this thread is beyond an AI experiment, but this is an example of why generic AI isn't very good. It's trained on the internet, where dummies like you pretend there is a debate on anthropogenic warming, rather than training on scientific literature where there's really no debate left. The science is settled. The world is just waiting for you conspiracy kooks to catch on so we can do something about a very real problem.

Well that's worth a read. Jeebus. Hegseth has refused to say whether he posted classified information on Signal. He is travelling in the Indo-Pacific region and to date has only scoffed at questions, saying he did not reveal "war plans." Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday that it was up to Hegseth to determine whether the information he was posting was classified or not. What was revealed was jaw-dropping in its specificity, and includes the type of information that is kept under wraps to protect the operational security of a military strike. In the group chat, Hegseth posted: "1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)" "1345: 'Trigger Based' F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)" "1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)" "1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier 'Trigger Based' targets)" "1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts — also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched." "MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)" "We are currently clean on OPSEC" — that is, operational security. "Godspeed to our Warriors." Sure, he didn't share war plans, just the what, where, when and how. -- The only thing he didn't do was dox the pilots.

Bad AI trained on internet junk and 5th grade essays. Sigh. The future looks bleak.

I did include it in the OP. lol The "lock her up" crowd were foaming at the mouth over a private server--half the people on that Signal chat called her a criminal--but now that they've been caught in a far more compromising situation it's a "tsk tsk."

I am indeed using the term correctly. The claims needn't be untrue, the galloper simply has to not care about the truth of the claims because volume is the point, not substance. You didn't vet the claims. You didn't even watch the videos. You simply Googled "Biden lies" or some dumb shit and threw up some links. And you know that's true so stop pretending that you were making a serious or principled argument. You were just making noise. And I take it as such. 🙄

No, they are very much a Gish gallop of deflection. If you want to debate some specific claim, feel free to raise a topic elsewhere. Likely lying? No, blatantly. Well, unless he got blackout drunk and forgot that he did those things. And he's unlikely to learn anything. As part of the Fox News machine he's been casually lying to you people for years without consequence, so he's unlikely to find a conscience now.

Doing it was a screw up. That's a mistake, albeit a monumentally dumb and embarrassing one. Blatantly lying, denying that it happened, when you know it happened is an entirely different matter. And no, I've done no such thing. You throwing up a Gish gallop of shit media clips is neither conversation nor debate, and I did not watch or remark on that nonsense.

Nobody is right all the time. Not everybody is in agreement on the facts or perspective. Those things don't necessarily undermine trust, unless they are frequent and persistent. A lie is making a statement you know not to be false or making things up entirely and stating them as facts. Instead of being pissed off that Pete Hegseth lied casually about something that had already been confirmed, you want to deflect and make it about someone else. That's why this is the post-shame era. As a defender of a POTUS who is a pathological liar and the similarly morally compromised yes-men (and women) he appoints, all you have is deflection. Pathetic.