Hodad

By your logic, you can't support Israel or Palestine without "supporting" the murder of women and children.

No, dimwit. But when he realizes he's caught and makes a deal to testify against his own interests and those of his boss (your Jesus) then he becomes credible. And his testimony will now align with the facts in evidence. The fact that a grifter suckered you with all this election fraud nonsense must hurt your overinflated ego. But don't be too hard on yourself. He suckered millions of other rubes too. There is already testimony--and more to come--that Trump knew full well that there was no evidence of fraud. His inner circle told him over and over that was the case. But, like you, he has a vastly overinflated ego and may have been capable of the same degree of self delusion. But it doesn't really matter what he believed. As mentioned earlier, earnest belief that a crime has been committed is NOT a free pass to commit your own crimes.

Just go fark yourself. In the same exact way you enjoy having conversations with yourself.

Mark Meadows didn't say that their evidence wasn't accepted. He said there was no evidence. "The sources said Meadows informed Smith's team that he repeatedly told Trump in the weeks after the 2020 presidential election that the allegations of significant voting fraud coming to them were baseless, a striking break from Trump's prolific rhetoric regarding the election. According to the sources, Meadows also told the federal investigators Trump was being "dishonest" with the public when he first claimed to have won the election only hours after polls closed on Nov. 3, 2020, before final results were in. ... According to Meadows' book, the election was "stolen" and "rigged" with help from "allies in the liberal media," who ignored "actual evidence of fraud, right there in plain sight for anyone to access and analyze." But, as described to ABC News, Meadows privately told Smith's investigators that -- to this day -- he has yet to see any evidence of fraud that would have kept now-president Joe Biden from the White House, and he told them he agrees with a government assessment at the time that the 2020 presidential election was the most secure election in U.S. history." And, as always, you are lying about Russian Collusion. The FBI does not hold the position that there was no evidence. In fact, the collusion is VERY well documented. You just wave your hands about the fact that Trump's campaign was feeding intelligence and strategy to Russian operatives during the election cycle, while those same operatives coordinated Russia's interference in the US election. Those are facts. Just because in your fanboy lust you've assigned some version of papal infallibility to all Trump actions doesn't make the evidence disappear. Just because you approve of the GRU hack and leak against American politicians doesn't mean it didn't happen. And the FBI documented it thoroughly. Try reading (roughly) pages 50-90 of the Senate Intelligence Committee report.

There's no blanket answer for that. Obviously we should want to minimize collateral damage and humanitarian crisis for non-combatants, but Israel has both a right and responsibility to protect its people. When terrorists attacked the US we flew across the world to fight them. Israel can and must fight the terrorists on their doorstep.

You must be new.?

Again, that is false. I showed you the numbers. Ask yourself why you feel the need to keep lying about it.

WTF are you talking about. These people have admitted that they were lying. Meadows didn't believe it. Chesebro didn't believe it. Powell didn't believe it and defended herself in court by saying you were unreasonable to have believed her. GiuilianI admitted in court that he made false statements about the Georgia election workers. There's no mystery here. They didn't need it to be true. They just needed to convince people like you. And the case is about doing illegal shit to try to overturn the results.

You better find an adult to read that post to you. Honestly, why are you even playing this game. If she had evidence, she would have presented it. Instead, she disgraced, humiliated, almost certain to be disbarred and soon to be bankrupt from defamation suits. Why are you even bothering trying to pretend that her entire scam didn't fall apart. WTF is the point of this charade?

She sure did say that. She also said that you're an unreasonable person for falling for her lies. That you still believe them proves her right (Atlanta) - Kraken lawyer Sidney Powell admitted in a filing in federal court that “no reasonable person would conclude that [her] statements were truly statements of fact.” Powell made the filing in response to a defamation suit from Dominion Voting Systems in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. “In the face of legal action, Sidney Powell admitted that her effort to make millions lying to the American people had no facts to begin with,” said Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. “While the loss of the Senate due to her lies will have ramifications for years, I most sympathize with those who believed her in the first place and who she now considers not reasonable enough to realize she should not have been taken seriously.” And, of course, she's now pled guilty to criminal charges in exchange for testimony. Oh, and the other civil suit is still in process. She did raise millions of dollars from you rubes for her "non-profit." I hope the voting equipment companies get that too.

Hutchinson is on record with what Meadows told her. "The president's just raging about the decision and how it's wrong and why didn't we make more calls and just his typical anger, outburst at this decision," she said in testimony the committee presented on Thursday. "He had said something to the effect of, 'I don't want people to know we lost, Mark. This is embarrassing. Figure it out. We need to figure it out. I don't want people to know that we lost.'" What do you suppose someone as high-ranking as Meadows said to bargain immunity, hm? Or Powell or Chesebro? Nearly everyone in Trump's orbit has acknowledged that they told Trump that the election had not been stolen. We will see more of these conversations come out. Most of them, including Meadows, have already acknowledged that they themselves didn't believe it. Is Trump there only person dumb enough? Or did he lie and exploit the rubes for his own gain, as is his wont?

Jeebus, dude. Just read. This has nothing t to do with Clinton's server. The conversation is about the DNC hack. Just Putin helping his buddy again.

No, that's incorrect. Regardless of what Trump believed it's still illegal to strongarm and threaten local officials to change outcomes, it's still illegal to forge documents, it's still illegal to create " fake electors" etc. None of those actions hinge on belief. Belief that a crime has been committed is not a free pass to commit crime. But it's likely a moot point. More and more of his inner circle are confessing that they--and he--never believed it. That it was simply a vile, cynical attack on democracy. Aside from that, if Trump actually believed, without evidence, while everyone around him told him there was no fraud, we can add one more reason to the long list of reasons he's unfit to be president.

You have confused your twisted imagination for reality. Directly from Crowdstrike BLOG Featured Recent Videos Categories Start Free Trial CrowdStrike’s work with the Democratic National Committee: Setting the record straight June 5, 2020 Editorial Team From The Front Lines June 5, 2020 UPDATE Blog update following the release of the testimony by Shawn Henry, CSO and President of CrowdStrike Services, before the House Intelligence Committee that was recently declassified. What was CrowdStrike’s role in investigating the hack of the DNC? CrowdStrike was contacted on April 30, 2016 to respond to a suspected breach. We began our work with the DNC on May 1, 2016, collecting intelligence and analyzing the breach. After conducting this analysis and identifying the adversaries on the network, on June 10, 2016 we initiated a coordinated remediation event to ensure the intruders were removed and could not regain access. That remediation process lasted approximately 2-3 days and was completed on June 13, 2016. Why did the DNC contact CrowdStrike? The DNC contacted CrowdStrike to respond to a suspected cyber attack impacting its network. The DNC was first alerted to the hack by the FBI in September 2015. According to testimony by DNC IT contractor Yared Tamene Wolde-Yohannes, the FBI attributed the breach to the Russian Government in September 2015 (page 7). Why did the DNC hire CrowdStrike instead of just working with the FBI to investigate the hack? The FBI doesn’t perform incident response or network remediation services when organizations need to get back to business after a breach. CrowdStrike is a leader in protecting customers around the world from cyber threats. It is common for organizations to hire third-party industry experts, like CrowdStrike, to investigate and remediate cyber attacks when they suspect a breach even if they are collaborating with law enforcement. As John Carlin, former Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division at The Department of Justice, testified before the House Intelligence Committee (cited from page 21 of his testimony): “A lot of — outside of any political organization, companies, most corporations, they often would use these third party contractors, who they hired through their own counsel, and maximize the control from the point of view of the victim.” Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC? Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports. Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network. To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.” This conclusion has most recently been supported by the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issuing a report [intelligence.senate.gov] validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community, published on January 6, 2017, that Russia was behind the DNC data breach. The Senate report states on page 48: “The Committee found that specific intelligence as well as open source assessments support the assessment that President Putin approved and directed aspects of this influence campaign.” Furthermore, in his testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee, Shawn Henry stated the following with regards to CrowdStrike’s degree of confidence that the intrusion activity can be attributed to Russia, cited from page 24: HENRY: We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government. And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment,and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence.

No, no one is in legal jeopardy for asking for a recount. Read the indictments--or a news article--so you know what the legal issues are.

Oh, my goodness. Great idea. Someone should really check into the 2020 election for voter fraud. ?

No, nobody can tell you that. It's a strawman of your own invention.

They did use it, dummy. To prevent voter fraud. The same way a fire department fights fires. Produce some evidence of fraud or just STFU. You are incorrigible whiners and liars. It's pathetic.

Except he didn't say he had committed voter fraud, dummy. No more than a mayor who boasts that they have the best fire department in the state are boasting about their capacity to start fires. Literally everyone knows exactly what he said and exactly what he meant. Only you dishonest, desperate goons are trying to actively misinterpret it. Because you have no honor, no shame, and nothing to lose.

Except that he never said it. Not that it matters. You have no honor and no shame, so you'll just keep lying about it. Every audit, every recount, every court case--and there were MANY of each, determined the same thing: the voting was fair and true and Joe Biden won by a mile. And, as always, if there had been fraud, and your team couldn't produce any evidence in the most scrutinized election in history, the Republicans clearly aren't fit to lead. Either way, they've been outsmarted and beaten. They're welcome to vote in the next election, but until then they should either produce evidence or stop bleating and STFU.

^^Hey look and old man stopped ranting insensible nonsense on a street corner and decided to do deliver the same hodge-podge screed on the internet instead. We should all take this person very seriously.

Yeah, I smile to myself and to others. I'm a happy person and I'm comfortable enough that I'm not worried about the price of gas. But that is entirely irrelevant. Even if it were a crippling development in my life, it's obvious that Joe Biden has nothing to do with it. You can go on blaming him, but it's just sending up flares that you're economically illiterate. Let's revisit your silly list and stipulate for the purpose of illustration that these unsourced numbers are correct-ish. Joe Biden (partial term) — $3.60 Barack Obama first term — $3.12 Barack Obama second term — $2.95 George W. Bush second term — $2.77 Donald Trump — $2.57 George W. Bush first term — $1.59 What changed? Gas prices went up 40% between Trump and Biden and you conclude (with no consideration of the market) that it's because Biden is waging a war on fossil fuels and "stunting" the industry. OMG, gas prices went up 75% between Dubya 1 and Dubya 2. Clearly, if you were a logically consistent and honest person you'd have to say that GWB must have waged a war on oil and stunted the industry even more, right? With help from Dick 'Haliburton' Cheney, right? Was Dubya 1 twice as friendly to the oil industry as Trump? Is that why prices were so much lower? Hm, but oil production hit a pre-Biden record under Trump, and the prices were still higher. Never mind the market, it must just be because Trump is so green (orange) and just hates oil so much. Can you see how farking dumb your argument is? Probably not, but you should be able to. POTUS has almost nothing to do with the price of gas unless they have implemented new taxes or done something meaningful to the supply--and even the latter is unlikely given the size of the global market.

Let me guess, you think the "fire department" is responsible for starting fires? You think an opioid task force distributes opioids? ? How about this, regardless of time and resources (which were ample!) just as a baseline for decent and responsible behavior, don't claim massive election fraud without evidence. That shouldn't need to be said, but there are some slow folks out there--and some slow ex-presidents.

What is wrong with you, on a fundamental level? The US--and Biden-- have no reason whatsoever to apologize for oil production because of the pandemic. The US oil industry is fully recovered. Again, it's producing at record levels. It has literally never been more productive, you thick tool. But it's also a fact that global production is down, hence prices are up. This is not hard. Supply and demand is literally the most basic principle in economics. A child can understand it but, for some reason, you can't. You were right in your stump comparison.

Again, this is an absurdly stupid post hoc narrative you've concocted. It's a global market driven by supply and demand, not by your fantasies or by Joe Biden's feelings. It's a fact that domestic oil production is at record levels. It's a fact that US oil is exporting at record levels. It's a fact that our oil industry is enjoying record profits. You're welcome to blame Joe Biden for the booming domestic oil industry if you want. But you just look stupid when you try to blame him for global production that still has not rebounded post-pandemic, or for OPEC profit maximization strategies. Frankly, the situation is a stark reminder that Biden is 100% right. We need to get off fossil fuels as soon as possible so that the whimsy of billionaire sheiks half a world away isn't a factor in our economy. Or perhaps you'd like him to nationalize the industry and restrict exports? Lol