West

1. And the CDC or those "experts" we all listen to get a good bulk of their funding from tax payers. Hard to separate the fact that this so called "science" may actually be heavily influenced by political parties hoping to win elections. What i see is those who say "listen to the experts" are good at pointing out when those darn Republicans may be "influencing science". Not so good when it's their side that is doing it (confirmation bias). 2. He said they may stop a droplet or two but aren't an effective tool against the spread of Rona. He was right initially. The only "studies" that show mask effectiveness should be taken with a grain of salt given the political element and the "we hate Donnie" nonsense. 3. So you finally see the issues with the whole thing. Pandering to big pharma should be considered a factor when you look at why we are forcing people with zero risk to take a covid vax.

Most of these organizations are more interested in political statements than actual science. It's evident. A few weeks earlier Fauci said masks were basically useless against Corona. Pelosi and the rest of the leftist cronies wanted to make a statement that masks meant that you care and if you didn't wear a mask you hate science and probably loved donnie and Putin. Immediately Fauci says that the masks are the savior. In mask we trust. ?.. but SCIENCE lol. In the vp debates, Harris said something to the effect of she was skeptical of the vaxx because of the limited research done on it. They finally win and automatically saying the same thing as Harris did would land you in the "anti science, pro Putin" camp. Docs who disagreed with the "consensus" had their licenses threatened. No conspiracy theory. Just reality there.

Most of the information comes from centralized authorities like the WHO or the CDC. There are certain people called "influencers". Yet you are the one peddling the conspiracy theory that every doctor is getting together and developing consensus ?. Your understanding on the role of government institutions and licensing bodies is astounding.

I always find people who argue this are the ones where they were able to work from home and didn't miss a paycheque. If you were a small business owner who was forced to close down, a clergyman who missed several months pay because government threatened to board up their building if they dared showed up to the building, a parent who's child suffered from extreme anxiety, isolation or suicide attempts because they were isolated, etc then maybe you'd understand. To say no freedoms were curtailed, frankly, those people don't live in reality or don't care to acknowledge the very real societal impacts lockdowns and restrictions had on people.

The "consensus of experts" act within an echo chamber and utters ultimatum and threats to anyway who strays away. I guess if leveraging power over licensing bodies etc to get their way builds consensus, then so be it lol

His statement is factually correct

Many Germans believe Hitler was just protecting their safety as well.

"Climate science" isn't a real thing. They are a bunch of left leaning political activists trying to drum up some "emergency" to make themselves relevant, and gain access to research grants. The "science" community is less about actual science now with big time beaurocracy tying grants to the end of a stick to enforce compliance. You try and pretend like grant money is free of any political interference but we know that's not the case. Doesn't mean you are a flat earther or alien apologist to point out the obvious. Just because someone can regurgitate what a university professor tells them doesn't make them intelligent.

I'm always suspicious of folks who tout their intelligence. Whether it be Klaus Schwab telling us he alone is going to solve "inequality" and "climate change" or the liberal arts major telling you they've got all the answers to the tough issues (which involves a magical money tree) and that the right kind of communism hasn't been tried yet therefore we must silence everyone but them because they are the voice of all virtuous things. Yeah I don't buy it.

Moonshine has a liberal arts degree. He's smart.

Disgusting place.

There's a few leftists like that on here. Moonshine is another one. Loves to let you know about his liberal arts degree but doesn't actually have a lick of knowledge about the topic and then spams different threads. Pretty common.

Moonshine is a grade a troll. Best to let him be in his own little universe.

You are arguing against your shadow there little boy.

Your lack of understanding of stakeholder capitalism is astonishing. I'm not gonna write a 15 page essay on the WEF core values and beliefs. If you are actually serious about having a conversation like a big boy, maybe look into the topic first before spamming a thread.

It's called an example. You aren't serious. Your a full time troll. Sad and pathetic one at that

The accountant had his account locked. The fact that any bank can be pressured to close down bank accounts without a warrant or due process over a political dispute should be troubling to any Canadian. Though I get you hate people and that gets in the way.

Are you trolling? Not interested. Grow up.

Your joking right? A prime example would be the banks. They can lock down your account without any sort of due process. People during the protest had their accounts locked down for the crime of giving to a charity that the government doesn't approve of. So if, say, they ask for access to your Facebook, your Gettr, your Gab for "safety" and maybe you made a comment about Trudeau being a man-child and they see that as an "unacceptable view", what's stopping them from locking down your passport and not allowing you to leave? They'll claim its not a "charter violation" because companies can set their own terms of service...

I'm worried about any third party being the gatekeepers to international borders. Why would you not be?

Why is the WEF involved at all? Poorly explained eh. No you just lack any ability to think critically

Are you serious? A third party, at the direction of the World Economic System would control the development of a third party Digital ID system for travel. An organization that believes that race based hiring and wealth redistribution are essential are going to control a system which allows people to travel. After what we've witnessed where corporations can develop one sided "terms of service" why should we not ask the basic questions?

Job losses due to government overreach are more my concern, not General Motors not being able to get cheap car parts from Mexico.

I dont really care about Ontario. Whether full or partially blocked, don't really care. Politicians down there have been blocking critical infrastructure for decades. Not a big deal to me if they have to drive an hour to the next crossing. I used to commute an hour and 20 to work every day. Not a huge deal.

Young Tory as in guys who don't think the laws of supply and demand exists and they alone are smart enough to fix the world's issues?