Jump to content

West

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,776
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by West

  1. 7 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

    Lol so as usual I dismantle the bullshit claims in your OP so you come back with some gibberish nonsense insult that has nothing to do with the thread you created and doesn’t even make sense. 
     

    It never ceases to amaze me how intellectually deficient you crackpots are. 
     

    From what anyone can understand of your idi0tic post, I can promise you that as an atheist I fully support keeping religious bullshit away from everyone. Too bad your bible-thumping Christian Taliban conservatives can’t promise the same. 
     

    While my wife I are quite happy with my junk, it will greatly disappoint you to learn that you don’t get any say in what I chose to we do with it….fascists like you always try to control other peoples’ genitals, another vulgarity you share in common with the Taliban 

    You dismantled nothing 😆

    • Like 1
  2. 45 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

    What a load of dishonest crap from you

     

    First All religions say those same things. 

    Second Most of the Ten Commandments are about forbidden religious rituals like worshipping idols and false gods and have nothing to do with things that are actual crimes 

    Speaking of worshipping false gods the the you worship is guilty of adultery at the very least and I would argue “thou shalt not steal” also covers his attempt to steal the 2020 election.  Does the 10 commandments cover failed attempts?

     

    All this law does is once again prove that Republican claims to be the party of freedom and local decision making is 100% BULLSHIT:  the highest level state politicians in the far away capital mandate that the display of a religious text is now the law of the land under threat of legal punishment by the state.   Republicans sound more like the Taliban every day. 

    Look. 

    Keep your religious woke bullshit away from my kids and I'll let you mutilate your junk if you choose to do so. 

    Deal?

    • Like 1
  3. 1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

    I don't really approve of religious symbology in schools, but then again I also don't really approve of other special interest groups symbols in schools either. How do we say that it's okay to fly the Pride flag but the ten commandments are just intolerable? I would rather see that kind of stuff on both sides kept out of schools. But if we're going to allow the one then we have to allow the other or else we're just teaching people how to hate and be divided

    The only way to solve it is through individualized schooling and school choice

  4. 5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    The indoctrination is the minor point. What they clearly want is for this to go to this twisted SCOTUS in the hope of weakening or defeating the establishment clause. Mandatory religious messages in classrooms is the gateway to mandatory religious messages and rituals elsewhere/everywhere. 

    Yes, I "demand" you accept tolerance. You know, so other people are allowed to live, and whatnot. 🙄

    Big picture it's about detaching school oversight from the federal government and returning it back to local school boards

  5. 7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    No, each teacher is not a king in their classroom. You don't go to math class to be told that Yahweh is the one true god and then turn up in history class to be told that Mohamed is the one true prophet, peace be upon him. 

    Freedom of religion means freedom from religion as well. The Muslim kid should feel comfortable in math and the Christian kid should be comfortable in history. And the atheist should be comfortable everywhere. 

    That's why we keep religion out of schools. Attendance is compulsory. Everyone has to go, so it should be a place where everyone can feel comfortable, rather than being singled out or excluded or targeted because of religious messages. 

    The Muslims and Jews both believe in the 10 commandments as well.

    Seems better to tie your beliefs to something than whatever the new marketing scam is. 

  6. 3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    You shouldn't have to. The whole point of a constitutional system (as opposed to a pure democracy) is that core values are safeguarded from the whim majority. The establishment clause is there for a reason. We shouldn't roll over to extremists. 

    America has been doing that since 2008. They've brought back election by skin color and wokeness has infiltrated like a cult

    1 minute ago, Hodad said:

    Lol. Sorry, but other peoples gender transitions are not about you. They are not targeting you. Just let them live their lives.

    Okay but my kids shouldn't be subjected to this belief system in public school

  7. 45 minutes ago, User said:

    I have mixed feelings on this one. 

    The Constitutionality question is 50/50 here. There are some precedents against it in the past already... including a previous SCOTUS ruling but they were a 5/4 decision then on a questionable legal theory test that this court might flip on... 

    That aside though, there are so many more important things going on that this is just a political stunt for the most part and I don't like using classrooms as political proxies like this. 

    There shouldn't be any of this garbage in a public school classroom, for the same reasons why I adamantly oppose the liberals shoving their crap like the LGBTQ flags into the schools. 

    Either way, all the more reason I support school choice. So much power over children in such a monopoly is wrong and ripe for abuse like this. Parents need a way out. 

    To me I don't care if the 10 commandments are up or not. Either you allow the woke mumbo jumbo in schools and the ten commandments or you don't allow either. 

  8. 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    When Kevin Clinesmith intentionally altered an email, changing it's meaning to the exact opposite of what it said, and gave it to the FISA court as evidence, he was convicted of a felony but still kept his license to practice law. 

    So a convicted felon can be a lawyer, and leftist lawyers can opine on whatever they want, but if a conservative dares to speak out loud they lose their license....

    The bars are run by DEI cultists now. Truly wicked people have infiltrated 

    • Like 1
  9. 4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    I would be concerned if this nonsense video were true. 

    Personally, I don’t think foreigners should be able to own US real estate period. But good luck getting Republicans to ever agree to something like that. But if foreigners are allowed to own real estate, then unless these new owners are actually doing something nefarious, there is nothing the President can do. 

    Individuals yes. Communist governments no

  10. 1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

    He's also glossing over the fact he's supporting the current canadian gov't which incidentally whose  leader has been found guilty of a crime (taking bribes) and appoints all the judges :)    And that's after dismantling the previous gov'ts very fair and balanced program for appointing judges that involved all parties, some lawyers and police to avoid bias. 

    As is often the case, this type is FINE with what they perceive as corruption or partisan behavior as long as it's in their favour. 

    Add to that wokeism ie ESG has basically monopolized all professional associations like the bar associations and when historians look at how this new wave of authoritarianism has crept in they'll be able to identify how this all went down. 

    • Like 1
  11. 1 hour ago, herbie said:

    You can't have a Court that's not corrupt if you start by appointing the Judges by their politics.
    And to think almost half the current court by a now convicted criminal.

    Well back before Harry Reid eliminated the filibuster making judicial appointments strictly along party lines you used to need 60% of the vote to appoint a judge. This meant you needed to appease the moderates. 

    Now the moderates need to appease the fringe of their base to appoint a judge 

  12. 31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    They couldn't weasel 4 extra Democrat supporters onto the SC so now they're trying to undermine the court's authority. 

    It's literally the last major hurdle to clear to achieve the Dems' goal of one-party rule. 

    Harry Reid ended the filibuster on judges which basically eroded the major safeguard to stacking the courts with partisan activist judges. Honestly it's scary what's become of the US since Obama basically went nazi 

    • Like 1
  13. 2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

    Not necessarily.

    If the guy gave the reports to the press, we're names and personal info redacted?

    See...if he gave unredacted info to the press, then he has committed a crime. If he redacted the personal info then he might be inline for disciplinary action by his employer...but nothing else.

    But the greater crime which the Democrats have called "legal" is genital mutilation. 

  14. 51 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

    The same people who are claiming the Supreme Court is corrupt are the same people that say you are horrible people who hate Democracy if you even question the motivations of the judges and prosecutors in New York against Trump.

    They know they've stacked the deck with judges willing to do lawfare against conservatives so it's basically just projection

  15. 1 hour ago, Hodad said:

    He stole the medical records of minors and gave them to a journalist, in a severe violation of patient privacy laws. 

    Crimes of relativity. I see the greater injustice being the mutilation of children not yet old enough to drive a vehicle, smoke cigarettes or engage in coitus but old enough to decide to have their bodies butchered as the greater crime here

    1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

    Hang on.

    Did the guy give or publish the names of the kids being mutilated?

    You aren't supposed to let people know that kids are being mutilated. That's hush hush

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...