Jump to content

BeaverFever

Member
  • Posts

    4,653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Posts posted by BeaverFever

  1. You can’t make this shit up, people.
     

    Trump,the most hedonistic sacrilegious politician imaginable is now selling $60 bibles with a portion of the proceeds going to him, of course. 

    After his failed ugly$400 sneakers, too…which still haven’t been provided to all buyers BTW  

    Obviously all these cash raising schemes are just a front for various scumbags, American oligarchs and Russians to funnel him election money
     

    But hilariously there right-tards have a thread asking if Dems are a cult ans they shell out hundreds for hos scams. 

    • Thanks 1
  2. On 3/1/2024 at 3:10 PM, WestCanMan said:

    1) Fox News has never skewed a story so wildly that they convinced tens of thousands of people to riot, assault, burn, murder, and torture retarded kids

    LMAO!!!!  THE LAYERS OF LIES YOU TELL

    The riots did not occur because CNN “skewed a story so wildly” Nor was a “retarded kid” tortured, much less CNN being responsible. As for Fox News not skewing stories, has your lie-riddled brain already forgotten the nearly $800 Million Fox had to pay to Dominion for their stolen 2020 election lies?  Fox is nothing except skewed news. 
     

    On 3/1/2024 at 3:10 PM, WestCanMan said:

    2) I never said that Chauvin wasn't convicted of murder, but the unedited story of Floyd's death doesn't warrant a  murder conviction. 

    You’re already in a lengthy argument over your bogus claims of Chauvins innocence. If there was any truth to what you’re saying the Republican donor machine that rescued Rittenhouse and Zimmerman would have gotten him off on appeal, especially because he’s a cop. Contract to your vague claims the bodycam footage contained no exculpatory evidence. Your claim that rioters stopped rioting when they saw the footageis hilarious logic.  Even though Chauvin’s conviction remains. you want us to believe that all the rioters suddenly believed he’s innocent and stopped rioting on ethical principles or something after watching this body cam footage?  Footage that nobody else believes is relevant to boot. Seriously this story of yours is so f-cking dumb, how do you not see the major plot holes here?. 
     

    On 3/1/2024 at 3:10 PM, WestCanMan said:

    3) M Brown was not a gentle giant who was just randomly killed 'for the crime of blackness by a racist cop' though, and CNoN knew that, but they still pushed their CNoN conspiracy theory to incite violence.

    Whether Brown was ever convicted of anything life is a moot point, because he was caught on camera committing a violent crime moments before his police interaction, so we know exactly what frame of mind Brown was in when the cop went there. 

    The Gentle Giant narrative was a CNoN story to incite violence and riots, period. It lasted way too long after everybody knew it was false.

    He was caught on camera shoving one person one time whole running away shoplifting   That is not a violent crime nor is one incident a pattern of behaviour. It doesn’t mean everyone who knew him thought of him as violent and nobody could have thought of him as gentle. Your assertion is that you believe CNN should have censored out the opinion of the one family member who mentioned the Michael Brown they knew was gentle, in order to push a narrative that he was violent.  Your feeble mind can’t under That THAT would be the skewed story. And again, the so- called “justification ” that the opinion should be suppressed is he pushed one person one time.

    • Thanks 1
  3. On 2/22/2024 at 11:37 AM, Nationalist said:

    If anything, I'd say Putin is likely more a fascist of sorts...than anything else. Perhaps a capitalist fascist?

    He is a fascist no doubt. I don’t know if you can call the system that fascists use capitalism though. It certainly uses many superficial features of capitalism: private ownership, private profits, accumulation of private wealth, even a degree of competition. But in reality the ownership, profits and wealth are in the hands of of few powerful individuals who are closely connected to government, and who use the power of the state to eliminate competition, strong-arm other groups (labour unions, media etc) and protect their criminal activity. 

    • Like 1
  4. On 3/18/2024 at 10:29 PM, robosmith said:

    No, I said what I MEANT. Accurate information is unable to penetrate the FALSE model of reality you keep in your brain.

    That is ONE of the definitions of COGNITIVE DISSONANCE.

    The FACT is, Chauvin DID NOT conform to the recommendations of the MPD handbook wrt knee on the neck or back.

    Hey at least he admits he’s guilty of confirmation bias.  I’ll definitely agree with that!

    Hilarious he doesn’t know what the term means 

    🤣🤣🤣

    • Thanks 1
  5. On 3/19/2024 at 11:07 PM, Nationalist said:

    Brandon let millions of illegals into the USA.

    "The number of people taken into custody by the U.S. Border Patrol has reached the highest levels in the agency’s 100-year history under Biden, averaging 2 million per year."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/02/11/trump-biden-immigration-border-compared/

    In other words under the Biden admin they are arresting more illegal entrants than any under any other President in their history.  Literally the opposite of “open border”.  

    • Like 1
  6. On 3/16/2024 at 7:05 PM, herbie said:

    Not that the Starfighter was totally useless, looked sexy as hell, went like hell, basically and X15 with jet instead of rocket motor

    Personally I always thought the Starfighter was ugly. And it was notorious for being hard to fly with a high stall speed that cost a lot of NATO pilots their lives. Not sure why this particular aircraft was used by Canada and some other NATO countries for tactical strike instead of say Voodoo or other, but once upon a time in the days before precision guided munitions, very high speed, very low level attack was a thing. 

  7. 18 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    No right wing news source has ever done that to the same extent that CNN and the Dems have. 

    LMAO!!  😂😂😂More opposite-of-reality nonsense from your fake news bubble!  That’s like saying no radical Islamist websites have ever supported terrorism!  Emotionally charged language, skewing of facts, clearly one sided viewpoints, assumed motivation is ALL right wing news sources ever do!

    The cop who killed George Floyd was convicted of murder by a jury. Just because YOU PERSONALLY REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE FACTS doesn’t prove the media is biased. 
     

    Michael Brown’ did not have a criminal record and the shoplifting and pushing someone doesn’t prove his shooting was justified or that he was a dangerous criminal. Nor was CNN late to report that detail…..

     

    You are so fukin clueless it’s hilarious 

    • Thanks 1
  8. 2 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

    it's a team effort

    first the Frigate detects the submarine, often these days by Low Frequency Active SONAR

    once you have a contact, the Frigate launches the helicopter, while also engaging the target itself

    but lightweight torpedoes are often dropped on spec

    like you don't know exactly where the Russian submarine is

    but you drop torpedoes where you guess it might be

    so there is a lot of flying back and forth, from and to the  ship, reloading torpedoes

    although this is not one frigate operating on its own, it's going to be a Surface Action Group at least

    you'll have dozens of frigates, extending out from a Carrier Strike Group, trying to keep the SSN's at bay

    So then it sounds like surface ships do not hang back in safety as your previous post suggested they are in the fight chasing submarines. In which case wouldn’t helos with anti-ship missiles help defend against enemy surface ships hunting NATO subs?  Or at the very least provide a self- defence if it came too close to one of their sub-hunting surface ships?

  9. 11 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

    How exactly does it 'neutralize' drones? Spotting them is great, but shooting them down is another thing.

    Looks like electronic warfare:  jamming its communication or frying its circuits or blinding its sensors with laser. It looks like it’s a modular “system of systems” and reading between the lime it sounded like it can possibly be connected to  kinetic weapons (ie guns). 

  10. 2 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

    the CP-140 is capable of launching missiles

    CP-140 can drop bombs, torpedoes, as well as launching missiles & rockets, just like any P-3 variant

    Canada doesn't buy the missiles for CP-140

    but I'm sure the Americans would provide some AGM-84's is Canada requested them

    C’mon. I’m pretty sure it doesn’t work so simply like that. The CP-140 has evolved a lot from the P-3 base model it’s highly unlikely we’d have all the requisite targeting hardware and software and our crews aren’t trained. 

  11. 1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

    Honestly - when you read that and consider the source, i think you're doing more to spread the idea that the dems are a cult than Trump.

    Emotionally charged language, skewing of facts, clearly one sided viewpoint, assumed motivations -  it reads like a cult-y newsletter about someone they don't like rather than a factual and accurate depiction.

    I think if you're going for a 'non cultish' source maybe nbc isn't where you want to start :)  

    Oh here we go only republicans are entitled  to write opinion pieces now…

     

    I there any right wing source (news or opinion) that is NOT “Emotionally charged language, skewing of facts, clearly one sided viewpoint, assumed motivations” ????  
     

    But it’s true Trump routinely and deliberately humiliates even his fellow Republican backers who share the stage with him. Its his way of ensuring and displaying dominance over his fellow Republicans to his adoring cored who eat it up. 

    • Like 1
  12. 43 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    I don't see the operational imperative

    the main threat is submarines

    and it takes a lot of lightweight torpedoes to prosecute a submarine, since they are very capable of evading them

    thus whatever space you had available, would go to Mk.46/Mk.54

    I don't see NATO ever requesting a Canadian helicopter to fly an Anti-Surface operation

    frankly, if you wanted to do that, you'd send the CP-140's from Greenwood

     

    Is the main threat submarines though? No threat from missile-bearing ships or other surface: land-based systems?  

    And a helicopter can only carry 2 torpedoes so if it’s so hard to hit a sub why bother arming a ASW helicopter at all?

    CP-140s don’t have missiles either. The new P8s do, ….at least they do for our allies, with Canada y’never know. 

    49 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

    All I am saying is we got what we wanted for our missions.

    Pretend all you want but we got what we wanted.

    No doubt but we probably should have wanted more. 

  13. 31 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

    You can criticize all you want but the bottom line is the decisions on requirement and tasking was made decades ago.

    The procurement processes, and I was involved with them for well over 20 years is fraught with political interference, be it Liberal or Conservative and all the way down to the MP level.

    With your defense of our defence system, you must know by now we are not an offensive Military. We, Canadians and our political leaders chose a long time ago to be passive  and only when we deploy because of our commitments do we do anything offensively and then, it is with so much oversight our people are scared to do anything.

    All I’m saying is that the lack of missiles leaves the helicopter less adequate now. 

    • Like 3
  14. 32 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    I don't see what the barrier would be to CH-148 launching anti ship missiles

    it's the same NATO standard databus to connect a homing torpedo for an anti ship missile

    pretty sure you could strap a Kongsberg NSM to the BRU-14 hardpoint

    the issue is more that the RCN only intends to operate off of frigates

    and frigates don't have the room to carry anti-ship missiles & torpedoes for the helicopter

    for helicopter anti ship, you would need a larger vessel to carry & load the ordinance, like an LHD

    Assuming that’s true, MV Asterix and the future JSS would have space and it would give those ships a layer of protection. And the new CSC will also carry the NSM

  15. More cult-like behaviour 

     

    Trump’s humiliation of Tim Scott and Lindsey Graham is straight out of the authoritarian playbook

    Trump has used ritual humiliation to make the GOP his personal tool.

    Feb. 28, 2024, 6:00 AM EST

     

    Authoritarian politicians are fragile and insecure creatures, always looking over their shoulders to see who is after them. To build themselves up and deter potential challengers, they take others down in public, letting them know exactly where they stand. They apply this same vicious treatment even to their most loyal collaborators, so that no one ever feels safe and thus everyone continues to act in a slavish manner. Throughout history, such leaders have never lacked a steady supply of opportunists and profiteers who are all too willing to play this game, even to the detriment of their dignity. The Donald Trump-era GOP is the latest example.

    Trump has used ritual humiliation to make the GOP his personal tool, and the list of Republicans he has mocked publicly is long. In classic autocratic tradition, the more submissive Republican elites are with Trump — supporting him through impeachments, indictments and a coup attempt that sent them running for their lives — the more he openly scorns them, losing few opportunities to cut them down.

    Scott has been performing self-abasement spontaneously, likely to Trump’s delight.

    When Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., the former GOP presidential candidate, showed up at Trump’s victory rally after a January campaign stop in New Hampshire, he might have thought he would earn points. Instead, Trump scorned him: “Did you ever think [Haley] actually supported you, Tim?” a smirking Trump said, referring to Nikki Haley’s pledge to support Trump if he becomes the GOP nominee. “And you’re the senator of her state. ... You must really hate her,” Scott’s response? “I just love you,” he told Trump.

     

    Trump.

    “That’s why he’s a great politician,” Trump declared with a self-satisfied smile.

    Since then, Scott has been performing self-abasement spontaneously, likely to Trump’s delight. “I’m far better encouraging and being excited and motivated for President Trump than I was for myself,” Scott said after voting in the South Carolina primary. And at the post-primary rally, he assured the audience that he would keep his speech short because “the longer I speak, the less you hear of him.”

    Scott might seem to win the award for bowing and scraping. But his fellow senator from South Carolina, Lindsey Graham, is giving him some stiff competition. Graham is forever paying for the sin of criticizing Trump in 2016. “If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed......and we will deserve it,” Graham tweeted in May 2016; he also called Trump “a race-baiting, xenophobic religious bigot.”

     

    Scholars use the term “hollowed out” to describe institutions that lose their independence in autocracies when they have been purged of anyone who is not loyal to the leader. But individuals who collaborate with authoritarians can end up hollowed out, too, bereft of their morals and their self-esteem. This is what has happened to Graham.

    Graham is a former military lawyer and national security hawk (including on Russia), but his main cause now seems to be defending Trump, to the point of reversing his view expressed after Jan. 6 that presidential conduct is subject to American law. Since that opinion clashed with Trump’s claim that he should have presidential immunity for everything and anything he has done, including inciting an insurrection, Graham’s opinion could not stand.

    Politicians who play the leader’s ritual humiliation game may think that if they show him enough public support, at the right moments, their past indiscretions will be forgotten. That is never the case. Even worse, the politician can find that he or she has become the enemy of the leader’s rabid followers, as well.

    Though Graham called Trump “the most qualified man to be president,” audience members booed him.

    That’s the situation of Graham, booed regularly at Trump rallies by MAGA members, including in his home state, as though all of his slavish behavior to Trump has meant nothing to them. At a July rally with Trump, Graham was jeered and calleda “traitor” by the crowd, prompting Trump to give him a halfhearted compliment (“he’s there when you need him”) while also promising the crowd he would get Graham “straightened up.”

    And lest there be any doubts that Trump intended this display of debasement, he pulled the same move after Saturday’s South Carolina primary. Though Graham called Trump “the most qualified man to be president,” audience members booed him. The former president, playing the enlightened despot, once again assured his minions that “I love him, he’s a good man.” 

    More from MSNBC Daily

    Must reads from Today's list

    Scott may have mastered the philosophy of ritual humiliation — I am nothing, my leader is everything, and everyone should know it — but Graham’s journey provides the stuff of a morality tale..

  16. 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    I don't see any variation in the viewpoints of leftists. 

    Became you are not intelligent enough to see that Your underdeveloped childlike mind only understands binary caricatures of cartoon evil villains and cartoon flawless heroes. The fact that we in Canada have 4 distinct left wing federal parties and only 1 right wing party is ample evidence variation. South of the border if you can’t tel the difference between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders you should be embarrassed. 
     

    6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    Can you find any posts by eyeball, ExFlyer, Beave, Hodad, etc where they were skeptical at all about the safety and efficacy of vaccines?

    Vax conspiracies are a uniquely right wing feature most of society includes mainstream non-political people accept the safety and efficacy of vaccines. This is another example of this thread’s premise “the left must be a cult because they refuse to join our cult” 

    6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    Was even a single leftist skeptical about Russian collusion? 

    It’s a fact the the Trump campaign met secretly with Russian government officials and intelligence to discuss the release of Hillary’s hacked emails and to discuss Trump administration non-interference in Ukraine. It also a fact that they then lied about it to authorities. To quote one of the ridiculous comments at the start of this theory, “that meets the dictionary definition” of collusion. Nobody ever said there was no collusion. The report said the White House obstructed an investigation into whether the collusion (which definitely happened) broke any laws. 
     

    6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    Can any leftists even talk about Cuomo's covid scandal? They won't utter a word.

    That’s just an outright lie it was extensively covered by “the mainstream media” who broke the story and Cuomo was widely criticized. Not that you would know from way down in your right wing crackpot propaganda bubble. 
     

    6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    How many leftists acknowledge FBI crimes?

    We acknowledge it for what it is, and also for what it is not. It is not evidence of your deep state anti-Trump conspiracy BS

     

    6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    How many leftists lied about inflation in support of Biden?

    None?

    6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    How many leftists can admit that Biden is nearly a basket case? They all pretended that Trump was delusional, but Biden is hollowed out like a canoe. Crickets.

    Biden’s appeal to voters, his general fitness for office (or lack thereof) and his age are widely and frequently discussed.and debated by the Left. Get out of your propaganda hole. It’s hilarious because ever since Trump appeared in 2015 his supporters like can’t even bring yourself to disagree acknowledge even his minor mistakes or slips of the tongue. Remember when he altered a hurricane map with a sharpie and went on national TV instead of admit he accidentally tweeted the wrong state in the hurricane’s path?  Or when 2 weeks into covid he said he would “overrule” any governor who didn’t reopen their state even though Presidents don’t have power over governors?  You slaves fell all over yourselves trying to justify his every dumbness. 
     

    6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    The script says "Trudeau was perfect and Trump botched everything", and they all follow the script to the letter.

    Another of your lies from you clueless propaganda bubble. You find thenleft criticising Trudeau on just about any topic on just about any day. Meanwhile no conservative can ever bring themselves to criticize or question their Dear Leader du jour be it Tump or PP.   Conservatives have always had an obsession with hierarchy, with a belief that every person and group has a place in a great pecking order and a duty to kiss the asses above them and kick the asses below them. 
     

    I could go on with the rest of your batshit but this is tiring and time consuming and unlike you, my time is valuable…. to me and to other people also

  17. 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

    Look, ya gotta get over your personal desires.

    The Cyclone was designed upon the requirements the Canadian Military needed for the job it was to do.

    You may not like it but it is for the Navy to decide, not you. Second guessing on Military planning  and policy that you are not privy to is foolish.

    Well I think there’s a lit about the multi-decade maritime helicopter program that is fair game for criticism even by us outsiders. Ironically I’m usually the one defending the helicopter (but not its procurement debacle). For countries that only jave ONE type of maritime helicopter, not have anti-ship or air-surface is a glaring omission IMO especially these days. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see that at its next upgrade/replacement 

  18. Leonardo to equip Canadian Armed Forces with counter-drone technology

    Leonardo Press Release | February 28, 2024

    Estimated reading time 3 minutes, 30 seconds.

    Falcon-Shield-Counter-Drone-illustration Illustration courtesy of Leonardo

    Leonardo has been awarded a contract by Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) to provide its Falcon Shield C-UAS system for operation by the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF).

    The company will provide a number of systems and a 10-year sustainment package that includes options for additional equipment and the spiral development of new capabilities.

    First systems will be delivered later this year to the CAF, which will immediately deploy Falcon Shield to forward operating bases to protect deployed personnel.

    Falcon Shield is the UK’s operationally proven solution to the growing threat from group 1 to 3 (smaller, slower, and lower flying) UAS, which are usually undetectable by conventional air surveillance equipment. Using a mix of advanced sensors from Leonardo and industry partners, the system rapidly detects, tracks, and prioritizes threats and gives operators the means to neutralize them effectively.

    Produced at Basildon and Southampton sites, Falcon Shield is in service with the UK’s Armed Forces, is trusted by close allies on operations, and is readily available for export customers worldwide. Leonardo continues to update Falcon Shield to ensure it remains cutting-edge in a rapidly evolving security landscape.

    For its UK Royal Air Force (RAF) customer, Leonardo has delivered seven complete baseline counter-drone systems (called ORCUS in RAF service) for the service’s ‘Synergia’ research and development programme. The RAF is also employing these systems as a national standby capability in support of the Emergency Services. In this role, the RAF has operated Leonardo counter-UAS technology during high-profile events including the 2021 G7 summit in Cornwall and Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth games. During Christmas 2018, Falcon Shield was deployed at both London Gatwick and Heathrow airports following suspected drone sightings, allowing air operations to resume.

    Leonardo has also been working with the United States Armed Forces as part of the ongoing collaboration between the UK and US on counter-drone research and development. Under this partnership, the company has integrated the US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)’s NINJA technology into the RAF ORCUS system and demonstrated its ability to detect dozens of small drone platforms in the airspace around airbases and then mitigate them.

    Leonardo will be operating Falcon Shield at Canada’s ‘Counter Uncrewed Aerial Systems Sandbox 2024’ exercise, being held in Suffield, Alta., in June, where it will counter drones flown by the CAF’s “red team” operators.

    This press release was prepared and distributed by Leonardo.
     

     

     

  19. 42 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

    Halifax-class multi-role patrol frigates are considered the backbone of the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN). The ships were originally designed for anti-submarine warfare and anti-surface warfare, primarily in the open ocean environment.

    Understand that the Cyclone is a tool for the sub hunting and potentially destroying them. It is not the prime weapon systems for ASW. The ships are the primary weapon system.  That seems to be the Canadian Military doctrine.

    Adding anti ship missiles and the avionics, guidance and electronics for them would make the helicopter less operational and less ASW capable. For every 100 pounds of stuff you add, it is 100 pound less of fuel and that lessens the range. Range seems unimportant to many but really 500 kms range means you can go less than 150 kms away from the ship, drop your sonoboys and listening devices and loiter and look for subs and get back on board for fuel.

    I am not a Navy or Military planner but I do know the Cyclone is what we wanted for the capbilities that were identified by the Military. You can imagine a lot of things but there comes a point of absurdity. There is no all singing all dancing weapon system anywhere.

     

    Im not saying it has to carry missiles and torpedoes at the same time but it seems incredibly shortsighted to not have an anti-ship missile option… or any air-surface option beyond door guns really.  A surface ship is a much greater threat to a helicopter than a submarine and even though it was designed for a world where counter- insurgents/counter-terrorist was the main threat, terrorists and insurgents are far more likely to be in surface vessels than submarines 

  20. 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

    None, that is why Canada chose to have those missiles on a ship.

    I am afraid, comparing American military aircraft to Canadian design and requirement is impossible. Our policies and Naval warfare procedures are far far different from the American (or British).

    So we can’t anti-ship missiles on a cyclone because we have no doctrine to employ them?  Sounds like the solution for the new near-peer adversary threat environment would be to develop the doctrine not maintain the status quo. 

  21. 4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

    you are the last person our "cult"...if the term gives you a little boner...wants.

    Oh,  darn. What a disappointment 

     

    4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

    Let's assume both the Democrats and Republicans are a "cult".

    Why?  I’ve provided ample evidence of why GOP is a cult where is the evidence that Dems are a cult?

     

    4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

    Conservatives have a leader. A man. Flesh and blood. They want prosperity, peace and security.

    Libbies, such as yourself, want central control of everything. War all over the globe. Fear instilled in the public that the world is gonna end because of carbon and...cows, sheep, crops, even man himself.

    False.  Republicans (many of whom  don’t meet any definition of “conservative” want a one-party state which they rule with unchallenged lies and propaganda. That is why so many Republicans including you and Donald Trump openly admire outright dictators like Putin and authoritarian “democracy in name only” Orban.  Republicans openly admire Putin’s warmongering and believe he should be able to wage war around the globe unchallenged. They also support war in the Middle East against any Arab or Muslims who don’t play ball. 
     

    Meanwhile it is Republicans who want to control women’s bodies, the lives of same-sex couples, the books people can read and so on. Just liberals think corporations and things like pollution and consumer fraud (favourite pastimes of republicans) should be regulated doesn’t mean they want to “control everything”. 
     

    4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

    f I have to choose a "cult" the choice is simple. Man leading man to prosperity, peace and security. Or an idea leading to human suffering.

     

    Your choosing authoritarian dictatorship, which never leads to prosperity. Tour claim that the alternative is “human suffering” is just your made up BS. 
     

    4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

    It's all so...biblical.

    Of course it would seem that way to a cult follower. That’ aligns with the ACTUAL dictionary definition of a cult. 

  22. 6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

    Sure - that's what people said :)   ROFLMAO!!

    the premise was that dems might be a cult given their inherent willingness to blindly believe things without any reason or evidence.  And your post there was a pretty good example :) maybe don't make their case for them  :)

    But what exactly are the Dems supposedly “blindly believing without any reason or evidence”?   Whacked out conspiracies about covid, the election the deep state etc that have been fabricated by the right which the right believes without any reason or evidence.  
     

    In other words, the premise of this thread is that our refusal to believe that you’re actually Napoleon and have been taken by aliens to the lost city of Atlantis proves we are insane since we don’t have “any reason or evidence” to prove your claims are untrue.  It’s a bizarre inversion of logic that brainwashed Trump cultists can’t even perceive 
     

    The entire MAGA movement s based on blindly believing people like Trump and Tucker Carlson without reason or evidence. Trump’s speeches are practically verbatim cult leader rhetoric implicitly our future is doomed without him, that he alone can save us.
     

    I mean Trump actually has an ad claiming he was chosen by God to be President it doesn’t get any more cultish than that 

     

    He talks and act like a cult leader and his followers talk and act like cult followers   So it’s hilarious that you claim “Democrats” (and by logic the rest of the world) are all in a cult simply because they “blindly and without reason” refuse to join your cult. 

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...