Legato

Now explain why that particular server was/is vulnerable. Hearsay or Heresy, which?

Reduce severity yes. Reduce the likelihood of spreading no, those vaccinated can become infected and spread. The latter happened in my family.

Why bring up information about those teeth you lost to the tooth fairy.

The Covid vaccine does not prevent someone from becoming infected.

He went to Wakanda but Thanos had confiscated all the caps.

Payment in kind.

A snippet here..... However, these subsidy amounts will not meet climate goals. It seems that the higher the subsidies for and dependency upon wind and solar become, the more outlays from the government and consumers are necessary to reach “net zero.” Rising electric rates from wind and solar power and government expenditures also lead to stifled economic growth, which thwarts economic investment, now seen throughout much of Europe. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/renewable-energy-received-record-subsidies-in-2024/

If you read the bottom of your beercan it say's....open other end. Buy bottles instead and keep the caps you always need them. Don't buy you beer from remote corners of the city.

Yes it is, however I will formulate the question "are you in favour of flag burning"?

That's exactly it "noticeable change". I guess any future polls will give more insight.

"This" being what? I would like to see some positive movement from a technical standpoint. Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and bioenergy are all we have (except nuclear). These sources are heavily subsidised already and are only a half baked solution.

Once again they're progressive dates. They are dated from June 4th upto 17th August and show an essentially flat trend up until recently.

It's a progressive date list. So you did not.

Alternatively, investing 1% to 2% in mitigation and adaptation would limit warming to 2°C, reducing economic damages to 2% to 4%. One might ask on what is involved in the mitigation and adaptation.

Do you ever analyse your own posts?

After you.

Nice selfie there herbie, who's your makeup artist?

Not even close with the selective quote but yes.

Stephen Harper acknowledged climate change was a serious, real problem facing humanity but focused on a cautious, economically driven approach, prioritizing the fossil fuel industry and opposing regulations like carbon taxes. While he made pledges for emissions targets and cap-and-trade systems, his government also faced criticism for weakening environmental regulations and undercutting climate science research. n summary, Harper's position was complex: he recognized climate change as a significant global challenge but placed the economy and national energy interests at the forefront, often clashing with stricter environmental policies and the scientific consensus on the urgency of climate action.

Cmon Mike here's a fact.... A conservative wouldn't post any of the points you're trying to push.

Irony? More like rubbery.

You have no evidence that it's a fake, where's your proof. You Dunning Krugered a logical fallacy so your opinions mean nothing. Duh and a secondary Duh [LMAO}See, no caps.[/LMAO}

Why are you arguing? Must be the temperature or something Tax and Tariff are not the same, that's why the description requires two different words.