Legato

The point is you did not have a point. It's still ducks in a row.

Sorry, convincing is not something you excel at.

If?

The delay is so Brookfield will have time to get their ducks in a row.

To do what with the ports, create a White Star steamship line? More empty words from the empty word grand master.

You mean like Hillary's server, not visible on a cloudy day. Who would you want to administrate a data collection operation..... Google?

Hayzeus man that article just says if you don't have Covid you can't pass it on. If you have been vaccinated you can still catch Covid and pass it on.

t has been assumed that the COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of transmission to others. Results during the delta predominance show that the viral load in the vaccinated population is not consistently lower compared to the unvaccinated, and during the omicron predominance, the viral load was even somewhat higher. Levels of infectious SARS-CoV-2 were partly lower in the vaccinated population. Viral loads were mostly lower in re-infections compared to breakthrough infections. Viral clearance including the detection of infectious virus has mostly been described to be faster in the vaccinated population suggesting a shorter duration as a possible source for transmission. The epidemiological relevance of this finding remains uncertain. Approximately half of the transmission studies found lower secondary attack rates from the fully vaccinated population, but the results are probably best explained by the vaccination status of the contact population. Public health data from the UK show that the number of COVID-19 cases is higher among the fully vaccinated and boosted population who might be possible sources, in contrast to lower case numbers within the first three months among the vaccinated obtained in phase 3 trials on symptomatic cases. Overall, there is no convincing evidence that the COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduces the risk to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39283431/

Now explain why that particular server was/is vulnerable. Hearsay or Heresy, which?

Reduce severity yes. Reduce the likelihood of spreading no, those vaccinated can become infected and spread. The latter happened in my family.

Why bring up information about those teeth you lost to the tooth fairy.

The Covid vaccine does not prevent someone from becoming infected.

He went to Wakanda but Thanos had confiscated all the caps.

Payment in kind.

A snippet here..... However, these subsidy amounts will not meet climate goals. It seems that the higher the subsidies for and dependency upon wind and solar become, the more outlays from the government and consumers are necessary to reach “net zero.” Rising electric rates from wind and solar power and government expenditures also lead to stifled economic growth, which thwarts economic investment, now seen throughout much of Europe. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/renewable-energy-received-record-subsidies-in-2024/

If you read the bottom of your beercan it say's....open other end. Buy bottles instead and keep the caps you always need them. Don't buy you beer from remote corners of the city.

Yes it is, however I will formulate the question "are you in favour of flag burning"?

That's exactly it "noticeable change". I guess any future polls will give more insight.

"This" being what? I would like to see some positive movement from a technical standpoint. Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and bioenergy are all we have (except nuclear). These sources are heavily subsidised already and are only a half baked solution.

Once again they're progressive dates. They are dated from June 4th upto 17th August and show an essentially flat trend up until recently.

It's a progressive date list. So you did not.

Alternatively, investing 1% to 2% in mitigation and adaptation would limit warming to 2°C, reducing economic damages to 2% to 4%. One might ask on what is involved in the mitigation and adaptation.

Do you ever analyse your own posts?

After you.