Infidel Dog

Why?

Was there any doubt who you'd vote for? 

OK...for sure, now I really am on my way out the door. I swear it. 

It's real simple for me. I can do the South Park thing and vote between a giant douche and a turd sandwich...

Or I can vote for Max. I'm voting for Max.

And now I really am out the door.

If Ontario and Quebec want to give us Bumblenuts for another term or his wannabe clone in the Prog-Cons there's no more the rest of us can do about that than we could last time.

No wait, there is one thing. This year they fixed the debate by not letting Max speak. If we can get Max just one seat they won't be able to do that next time. It's about growing the party and yes there will be some growing pains.

For now I'll be no happier with the Toole than I will be with Castro's kid so whatever the guys over on the other side of the country decide to gift us with this time I'll be saying the same thing I did the last time...

"Don't blame me. I voted Max."

 

I'm on my way out the door to go vote for Max right now.

Noticing you're nuts isn't gaslighting if you really are nuts.

Qanon? Is that even a thing anymore?

Outside of Bubberworld, I mean. In this reality. The one the rest of us call 'the real world.'

You're having problems discerning reality again, Bud. Get help.

Stop it, Bubber. Get some help.

Tell you what Bubber, here's a chance to prove Shady wrong and stretch your satire muscle. In this way you can prove you have one. OK, ready, set...chuckle:

"It is true that losing nearly 3,000 American lives to weaponized passenger jets was pretty bad, but I think we can all agree that this pales in comparison to the earth-shattering terror we all experienced when watching footage of wingnuts wander aimlessly around the Capitol Building for a few hours."

No police were killed. Swamp agents did kill 2 patriots on January 6 though.

As to GW's remarks, Broadcaster Mark Levin had this to say:

"

George W. Bush, what you should have condemned today was Biden's disastrous Afghanistan surrender where Americans and allies remain hostages, and the grave national security situation in which he left our country; or condemned Obama, for his release of 5 of the worst Taliban terrorists on the planet, 4 of whom are now running the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

But he didn't have the guts to do either.

And too bad he didn't condemn the violent extremism our nation experienced all last summer."

I hear Nancy is having the barbed wire wall put up around the Capitol again. 

I imagine GW - or as he's known around my house, the RINO in chief - is pleased with that.

You know I was thinking about that Bubber and you did the broken clock thing. You're right for your first click around the dial.

Pardon me. It's not that you're totally right but you're not wrong. I do fight like a prog. But I'm more a counter-puncher. Don't start nothin' there won't be nothin' but once you do it's on and I'll use all your dirty tricks against you. 

I kind of remind myself of Candace Owens. For the longest time I didn't trust Candace Owens even though she's a conservative. She totally fights like a prog. Then I realized I do that too.

I excuse myself though and here I'll play with a metaphor to explain why.

Do you know that one about how arguing with an idiot is like wrestling a pig. You just get dirty and the pig likes it?

Well yeah...but I'm noticing too many on my side take that approach. 'Let it be and it's not worth my time.'

As a result they're getting creamed. The pigs are taking over the farm. Somebody's got to put on his overalls, jump the fence and start smacking pigs on the snout before they break the fence. 

So I do and I notice there can even be my fellow farmer on the fence with a straw in his mouth thinking 'Kinda dumb, do me a favor and don't help me."

But then I look over and I see Candace Owens and the other odd freedom lover standing in the muck, in their overalls smacking prog hogs around and every once in awhile looking like they're pushing back the herd. Then I notice something else...

Actually...the pigs don't like it.

Good enough for me.

You argue like one. Smear n slur with nothing backing it up but up the butt claims. Slivers of facts presented as over-reaching truth.  And i see who just thanked you. Ever hear the one about quacks like a duck and hangs out with other ducks. 

Understand when I say 'Prog' I'm not being fooled by the Wikipedia definition of Progressive. I can't think of anybody who fits that definition. I'm talking about the regressive misfit who puffs himself up as standing on the high ground of virtue and intellect but he's never shown any evidence of belonging there. Mostly these twits self-identify as something they call "Progressive" but you'll see them infiltrating all ideologies for reasons known only to them.

I don't think any of you lovers of the progressive left even know what you mean by "far right."

You just think it's a convenient smear so in Prog world that means you think you've made a point.

And that would make you and yours this thing we call stupid.

And I rate mediabiasfactcheck leftist tripe who in this case would be calling  the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group publishing in The Lancet "Far Right." That's where the study was they linked to.

So whatever MBFC is calling "Low Credibility" they can put themselves a couple levels lower if that's the best they can do.

But what about the study in  the OP from Medrxiv? What? Your lefty smear and slander site wouldn't give you any love on that one? Pity...maybe you should report them to Soros or something.

Quote

It's factually accurate, but it requires context. 

Oh now you want context, do you?

Me too, that's why I suggested people read the whole article in Nature rather than be deceived by your deceptive clip quote.

Quote

I think we need to move past the idea that reducing transmission is the goal. If you're vaccinated, it probably doesn't matter if you're infected, the vaccines will likely keep you from getting sick. 

Except you and yours don't feel that way when you're trying to explain why you want to lockdown, mandate useless masks and get everybody on vaccine passports.

You tell us you have to do that because the unvaccinated are infecting people. So do infections matter or don't they? Make up your mind.

Yeah, cause we're that stupid, right?

We can't see you wanted us to believe that some independent researcher had stepped up to critique the study by noting the small study size, cause we're that stupid, right?

But no...turns out it was simply one of the study's authors qualifying the results by explaining the range was between 6 and 13 but the highest result was from a small sample.

Nice try, Bud.