Infidel Dog

"You should get your news from someone other than Elijah."

That wasn't news. That was data. You wanted data. I gave you data. Now you want to whine about the guy who collected it. What a Prog.

What successes? It doesn't even immunize. It decreases the severity of the symptoms in many cases but only briefly. What vaccine? It's a therapeutic. And it remains to be seen if it's a good one.

Elijah of the blue checkmark you mean?

Quote

Introduced in June 2009, the Twitter verification system provides the site's readers with a means to distinguish genuine notable account holders

Yes, Elijah of the blue checkmark tells me he has data showing something so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt until somebody can prove him wrong.

I've heard that personal attack strategy used against The Expose in the UK too. Argus can find you a website that will tell you, you're not allowed to read it because they don't like them, but I read them anyway.

If you can show me how the data they present below showing:

Official Data shows many more people have died due to the Covid-19 Vaccines in 8 months than people who have died of Covid-19 in 18 months for Scotland is wrong, I might even take you seriously. Can you? I doubt it, but I bet you have a snarky trollish comment you're proud of.

Ho Hum...go ahead then, lay it on us.

Tell you what Boges seeing as you want to strut around and puff yourself up about your superior ability to rationalize when correlation is most likely causation...

Last estimate I heard adverse reactions from Covid were 5 times those of all other vaccines combined. Also it's estimated that people are less likely to report Covid than they were others. And the estimates I've heard for that one are there may be 10 to 100 times the likely hood that the adverse reactions from Covid are not reported. So let's just say 10.

Compute all that and give us the odds that these adverse reactions are quite likely connected to Covid.

BTW speaking about correlation and causation weren't you the guy who was convinced the Lytton town fire this summer could only be caused by what you were calling "climate change?"

Didn't click the video, eh?

They interview the parents and they go step by step through what happened to their daughter.

Here ya go:

https://rumble.com/vm7uzj-b.c.-vax-pass-punishes-young-health-care-worker-who-cant-walk-following-mod.html

Try again.

BTW the way concerning the fact there are more adverse affects from the vaccine than just the heart enlargements and blood clots you may have heard of, would you like to see some of those?

I've got a really good one in an interview with a nurse who started experiencing steadily increasing neurological disorders "shortly after" receiving the shot. There's a few more horror stories you won't want to believe either. Might be safer for your peace of mind to stick with your Big Pharma supporting spin sites.

And if you're wondering what I mean by "shortly after receiving the shot," it wasn't far removed from this one in England:

Again you miss the point.

They're suggesting Tenley, who I, Rebel, she and her parents say has legitimate cause for concern based on the fact she went lame shortly after getting the first shot should not be mandated to get a second in order to qualify for a vaccine passport so she can live what's left of a normal life.

Well if you want to talk about the socialist government of BC now maybe there should be cause for exemptions. Like for example...

Quote

British Columbia's provincial health officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, proves once again that her words don’t always align with her actions for the public.

In May,  Dr. Henry promised “...there is no way that we will recommend inequities be increased [through implementation] of things like vaccine passports for services, for public access here in British Columbia.” Yet, come September 13, increasing “inequities” is exactly what the provinces' “proof of vaccination” passport will do.

Especially for people like Tenley Csolle. 

Csolle’s life has been turned upside down since having her first and only Moderna shot back in December 2020. The once vibrant and active 22-year-old rehab therapist assistant immediately fell ill after taking the jab and lost the use of her legs two weeks later.

To this day, Csolle is still trying to re-learn how to walk, and yet Dr. Henry, Health Minister Adrian Dix, and Premier John Horgan, have allotted no exemptions for people like Csolle, who must potentially put herself at risk by having a second Moderna injection in order to qualify for a vaccine passport.

Worse still for the recently engaged Csolle is that she can't enjoy shopping and planning for her dream wedding due to these restrictions.

On September 13, British Columbia’s illogical mandate will forbid healthy and asymptomatic citizens who have not been inoculated for COVID-19 from entering “non-essential” businesses like restaurants or a movie theatres.

Watch my video to see Csolle’s parents, Barbara and Rob Mallach, react to the extreme mandate, as well as Csolle’s story, which includes the stigma that some of those injured after taking these over-politicized injections face when trying to tell their story.

https://www.rebelnews.com/bc_vax_pass_punishes_young_health_care_worker_who_cant_walk_following_moderna_jab

You can see the video here:

B.C. vax pass punishes young health-care worker who can't walk following Moderna jab

Some of those have been around a long time before legalized abortion. It makes me wonder.

As we've already seen drug pushers in the bureaucracy of medical organizations don't hesitate to spin as far as use of fetal tissue goes so we don't really know how the Conway Regional Health system of wherever might be spinning that info.

Quote

Then the form asks that asserters of a religious exemption from the covid vaccine on the basis of fetal-cell use attest with their signature that they haven't and won't use any of those drugs either.

That's kind of like asking if lying is against your religion.

For the moment, according to a hospital spokesman, all employees asserting a religious exemption are given the form to sign, and those who decline to sign but continue to cite a religious objection are allowed to continue working on a provisional basis, which means subject to further action.

So, it may be that the document's main value will be the exposure of hypocrisy and the providing of education, if, that is, hypocrisy and education are even things anymore.

https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2021/sep/15/test-of-faith-in-exemption

but as to the ethics it's worth hearing from the other side:

Quote

Morality is rooted in actions and intentions, not physical artifacts. And so any morally relevant connection with the evil of abortion must be traced, not through cell lines, but through the series of actions and intentions these cell lines represent. It is important to recognize that any potentially related abortions were done for reasons unrelated to scientific research. It was gravely unjust, but there was no intention to kill children for science. On the other hand, the decision to use the fetal remains of children who were aborted—not only without consent, but when proper consent was hardly possible—is condemnable. HEK293 was derived under these circumstances whether or not the line itself came from an aborted or miscarried child.

https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/does-the-origin-of-the-cell-lines-used-to-test-covid19-vaccines-make-any-difference/

But I'm not sure any of that really matters because it ignores the main thing the Whistleblower was upset about. Pfizer was trying real hard to keep the information out of the public eye.

So if they wanted to hide that what else are they hiding?

In fact, seeing as you prefer websites to video evidence, Bubber, here's one from North Dakota to add a little info to yours from Minnesota:

Quote

The use of fetal cell lines is a very sensitive and important topic within some faith communities and among individuals with concerns about the ethics of using materials derived in this way.

https://www.health.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/COVID Vaccine Page/COVID-19_Vaccine_Fetal_Cell_Handout.pdf

From your link:

"Fetal cell lines are cells that grow in a laboratory. They descend from cells taken from elective abortions"

 Spin that any way you like fetal tissue was used and that's why the manufacturers were trying so hard in their published memo to hide the talk of cell lines.

The fact that other supporters of baby murder have been perpetrating the same crime fails to impress me. I doubt it will impress Catholics claiming a religious exemption from taking the vaccines.

Speaking of Covid and religion, this is interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUXGB5FzhPc

Apparently Pfizer has been using foetal tissue, either in testing or in the actual production of their vaccine. It's not clear exactly how they're using dead babies just yet but memos obtained by a Pfizer whistle-blower show they are using them and are desperate to keep the information away from the public.

Either way this news is legitimate grounds for a religious exemption.

Quote

Are you suggesting the burka, niqab and hijab have the exact same cultural relevance? 

I suggesting nothing. I'm telling you flat out, noticing a religious parallel between the excesses of mandated practices to suggest politics is behaving like a religion when it goes off the rails is perfectly legitimate and merely a matter of pointing out the obvious. It's no kind of "racism". Pretending it is only marginalizes the seriousness of the term "racism."

In the West the Fauci-ites would like to mandate masks.

In Afghanistan there's this:

the women [are mandated to wear] "what is known as the burqa, which covers the whole body and face, but leaves a semi-transparent cloth over the eyes. The Taliban [enforce this wear for women while they are ] in power"

Hijab/Niqab. Tomaytoe/tomahto. You know what he meant.

And it's not racist to notice. It 's Vax Mandate religion non-compliant.