Infidel Dog
-
Posts
5,868 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Infidel Dog
-
-
And apparently Food Processing plants weren't just being sabotaged and destroyed in 2022.
They still are under attack.
I'm telling ya...you'll own nothing and you'll eat bugs.
I heard another one. Not sure if I trust it though. The claim is Karl Schwab of the WEF is telling his followers to push Pedophilia. Apparently it's good for society in the long run. Victims are less likely to have children according to the guy I don't necessarily trust who says that's according to Karl.
You see the population needs to be controlled. There are too many people. There won't be enough food.
Cause "climate change."
-
I just saw one this morning that's kind of connected to the coming food shortage prediction.
Big food is able to manipulate public perception of foods so that we're to see unhealthy foods as healthy.
It's Big corporate forcing sugared manufactured foods down the public gullet right now but when Frankenfoods catch on that's what the practice will target. In fact Big Food's refined foods and Frankenfoods will become the same thing.
-
I think there will be an effort to replace the Covid scamdemic with something else.
What they call "Climate Change" would be my first guess but no, that won't work. Much as they'd like to they won't be able to sneak up on people with that one. Too many are getting wise to the "sky is falling" Bullshit.
So not "climate change" but something they can connect to it...yeah, maybe.
My best guess would be a food shortage.
They've been doing their best to manufacture one for a number of years. The attack on GMO foods, now nitrogen fertilizers. Cow farts were supposedly a thing. We laughed. Then you couldn't afford a steak. The weekend roast became a thing of the past. But it was OK you could still afford Pork then pork chops were priced out of reach except for special times. Now it's Chicken. Soon it will be eggs. And dairy. And not to worry vegans, you're next. They'll connect all of it to what they'll still call "climate change."
Are food processing plants still mysteriously catching fire? For a while they were becoming like a trailer park in a tornado. They seemed to be getting hit first.
Bill Gates has been buying up ranch and farmland. I don't think he's working it though. He seems more interested in manufacturing something some of us are starting to call "Frankenfoods."
So yeah a food shortage. If not this year, the next one. And somehow they'll blame global warming and it will be necessary to put the average guy under greater restrictions so they can monitor his carbon footprint. Something like the vaccine passport or the Chinese Social Credit system but for climate criminals.
Because that's what they do. They create a problem then they present themselves as having the solution. And the solution bends you over a chair and reams you.
You will own nothing and you will eat bugs. That's my prediction.
-
Just like any other citizen. Donald Trump doesn't want his tax returns made public either.
Where's Nancy's? Those are the tax returns I'd like to see.
-
3 hours ago, Rebound said:
Well, they got his tax returns in New York, put his CFO in jail, and the Company was just convicted of 14 felonies or so.
You mean back in 2021? Keep digging eventually you're going to discover what everybody else knows. Trump has been charged with nothing regarding his current revealed tax returns.
It's another big fat nothing-burger.
Didn't the straw-man (Used correctly. Feel free to save it for your records so you'll know how to do it) you're trying to dig up have something to do with hush money paid to that anal porn queen Donald had an affair with?
-
6 hours ago, Rebound said:
Trump was charged, twice. That’s what impeachment is.
He hasn't been charged for anything regarding his tax returns. That was the claim.
But hey, seeing as you want to talk about the Dummycrats two impeachment attempts...those were also examples of your "experts" being wrong.
That was the R&R claim, wasn't it? That this whole quest of Trump's tax returns, shmozzle wasn't just another big fat nothing-burger because your "experts" said so?
Anybody who wants to see what masters of being incorrect leftie experts are should tune into a panel discussion on MSNBC.
Oh...come to think how did your "experts" do with all their claims about the trouble Trump would be in for refusing the unselect committee's subpoena? No need to answer we already know. Another in a never-ending list of leftie "experts" being wrong.
-
2 hours ago, robosmith said:
I told you what tax experts have found in the short time since his taxes were released.
And I told you Trump hasn't been charged. And until he is all you've got is a big fat nothing-burger.
-
22 minutes ago, robosmith said:
IF you had evidence of ^this, you could post it. But you don't.
Go ahead, and POST YOUR evidence that taking huge expense tax deductions for companies that have ZERO revenue is legal.
I won't hold my breath.
By all means, please do hold your breath. Hold it until I can figure out what you're talking about. It's going to be a while, I think.
Evidence of what? That Trump hasn't been charged for anything regarding his tax returns. That was my claim. I'm not interested in what you'd like to believe my claim was. I'm telling you what it was. Trump has not been charged with anything. So you would like me to find evidence of nothing for you then, would you? You do understand why that doesn't make sense, I hope?
If you have evidence Trump has been charged for something regarding his tax returns, let's see it. That would be possible...if there was any...but there isn't, because he hasn't been...so it's not.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, robosmith said:
You guys don't even know what's in them. Experts do, and they're saying that numerous instances of VERY LARGE expense deductions with no income are ILLEGAL.
Charge him then.
But they don't.
Would you like to know why?
Just like you, your "experts" got nothin'.
-
Quote1 hour ago, Rebound said:
You have not explained how someone can be both a Communist and a Nazi.
No, but I did illustrate that it happens.
If you're wanting more then as I suggested before ask the Russian Nazis in the Wagner group.
-
9 minutes ago, Rebound said:
In WW II, the Nazis fought the Communists. Over 20 million were killed. So explain how someone can be a Communist and a Nazi at the same time. Thanks.
You could ask this guy:
QuoteAlexey Milchakov is a Russian neo-Nazi, suspected war criminal and co-leader and co-founder of the DShRG Rusich of the Wagner Group
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexey_Milchakov
This Ukrainian newspaper claims Russian neo-nazism is a thing.
QuoteNowadays nationalist and neo-Nazi movements are on the rise in Russia. According to Russian experts, the number of such organizations has reached 53 and most of them are functioning in Russia legally. This list can be divided into moderate (23 organizations), radical (22 organizations) and forbidden (8 organizations).
One of these organizations, ethnopolitical union “Russkie” (Russians), claims that Russian people are special because they are carry phenotype and genotype of the White Race. Members of this organization demand to specify in the Russian Constitution that the Russian Federation is a successor of Kyivan Rus and the Russian Empire.
-
59 minutes ago, herbie said:
Says someone who can't tell a burglar from a rapist?
Seek help, sociopath.
Hang on...
You can tell a burglar from a rapist?
Cool!!! Tell us how you do that. Interview them, maybe, as their crawling through the window. Is that it?
How would that conversation go, anyway?
"Hey Bud, will you being needing to rape my wife and daughter, possibly me, or are you just here for the china?"
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/rape-burglary-and-opportunity
QuoteAnnotation:Although rape is commonly viewed as a street crime, a substantial proportion of rapes occurs inside homes following an unlawful entry. Because rape and burglary share a common locus in the home, it is hypothesized that they will exhibit a similar opportunity structure. -
-
4 hours ago, Aristides said:
Like I said, it hasn't been resolved,
In your mind maybe. It's concluded to anybody who understands the meaning of the word "concluded."
Apparently...and did you hear? According to the Federal Ethics Commissioner your girl broke the rules.
-
1
-
-
21 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:
I'm going to make a guess that you liked Trump, the strong man, who rewarded the elites with lots of deficit dollars...
Prove me wrong.
What would it prove if you're right? Your mindread said I only want strong leaders. Not sure what would the problem there. If I say you only want weak leaders like say Biden or Trudeau would that make you superior in some way? I don't see it.
In any case I'm currently a DeSantis man. But if it's Trump in 2024, yeah, I can live with that.
-
27 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:
1. I'm smug because you people were talking about Agenda 21 years ago. What came of it? A Carbon Tax? The horror...
2. Yeah, I got that. Now you're all warning us about a woke takeover.
Actually quite a lot came of it. You didn't notice up there in your ivory tower of smugness. That's on you. Not me.
A lot of Agenda 21 was about moving people from the country and suburbs into the cities. Then they want your cars.
Did you know the largest owner of ranch and farmland now in America is Bill Gates? Did you know in America investment companies like Black Rock and Vanguard own the majority of suburban property that has been for sale over the last 5-10 years?
A lot of Agenda 21 involved a ground action where municipal laws were manipulated to make it harder for the individual to acquire or keep private property. However that one required a certain amount of 'under the cover of darkness,' so to speak. Grassroots organizations started shining the light on them and fighting back. I suspect that's one of the main reasons they changed the name from Agenda 21 to 2030 agenda.
Wokeness is just another tool to disintegrate the existing society. It's just a thing. It isn't THE thing.
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:
1. My eyes are open, and the so-called elites have done a great job of enlisting conspiracy folks like you to vote for more government money and deregistration for corporations.
No conspiracy needed.
2. As long as a strong man is the leader you'll be fine with that.
Stop pretending you read minds. You don't.
-
18 hours ago, suds said:
Can anyone explain to me what Tom's little rant has to do with the timeline? At 1:49 pm the Capitol Police request assistance, and then shortly after 3 pm the DC National Guard are in full mobilization. Dealing with a chain of command, re-deploying the Guard from traffic duty to the Capitol, receiving/assessing advice/information from all other organizations involved, and then coming up with some sort of plan... isn't normally done by someone simply snapping their fingers. Does the timeline concerning the Guard sound unreasonable to anyone?
Well if one strips away the rhetoric from Tom's OP. All he seems to be saying is Trump wanted the National Guard to assist in security for the capitol but they worried Trump might use it to complete some sort of dastardly coup.
I'm not sure why he'd want to push that theory. Isn't he pro Nancy and the Swamp? That one doesn't make them look good. Lax security because they have a conspiracy theory?
Myself I believe there was a Swamp contrived plan for an entrance to the capitol building by attendees of the America First Rally in Washington. A central part of the plan was a depletion of security at one particular gate. A national guard presence would have put the kibosh on that one.
Try this one to see how that one lays out:
https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/
The title gives the impression it's just about Ray Epps. It's not. There's a lot more to it.
And yes Tom, that's also a conspiracy theory but it's simply a case of mine versus yours.
-
It's starting to get humorous how important it is to some Canadian lefties that nobody pay attention to the fact the Ethics Commissioner has come to a conclusion on this case.
-
2 minutes ago, Aristides said:
It hasn't been resolved.
"
International Trade Minister Mary Ng apologized Tuesday after the federal ethics commissioner concluded she broke the rules by awarding a contract to a friend -- opening the door for the Opposition Conservatives to point out that it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings."
Notice that word in the quote above? Concluded. Look that one up if you're having trouble with it.
-
2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:
Why don't YOU want to talk about NWO and Agenda 21?
What do you mean? I'll talk to you about them. I just won't pretend they're a contemporary thing for you so you can do sneer and smug.
They've been rebranded. The NWO is now called the Great Reset. Agenda 21 changed its name to 'The 2030 Agenda.'
With the NWO I think it's a case of they no longer care what people think because they believe the people can't do anything about it so they came out from behind the curtain and went public.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:
The fact that they're publicizing it means they're trying to influence people. So these are ideas. If you have a problem with improving the environment, working on global problems etc. in a democratic framework then you could just address them instead of scare mongering.
None of the conspiracy theories you espouse, like the UN wanting to take all of my possessions, have any internal logic that makes sense.
You keep trying to minimize what I'm saying. I won't let you. You should give up on that.
I'm not saying the UN alone wants to take all your possessions. I'm saying there is a movement of thousands of elitist and elitist entities moving to a society where they gain greater control over the individual. If you were allowed to open your eyes to the obvious you'd notice it's already happening.
The ultimate and obvious endpoint is the only right the far fewer individuals will eventually have is the right to serve.
-
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
Old news.
It's old and been resolved in the mean time.
No. The Resolution is not old news. No more than a conviction to a charge is old news because the offence happened 1 or 2 years ago.
You don't seem to want people noticing the Ethics Commissioner did not decide in your girl's favor.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:
New World Order nonsense you can blame everything on...
Why do you keep wanting to go back to old Proggy, branding terms?
You don't want to talk about the "Great Reset."? I can understand that. "They" flat out told you that's what they're up to. A great reset. Anyway, as I understand it what they used to call the "New World Order" is indistinguishable from the "Great Reset."
Hey, seeing as you're trying so hard to avoid discussing it I'll show people why:
Prediction of Important events for 2023.
in The Rest of the World
Posted · Edited by Infidel Dog
It's more facts that attract attention.
A lot of food processing plants burned down or blew up. No evidence of sabotage. I've seen estimates of 100 in 2022.
Seems like a lot. Most likely great reset talk of coming food shortages have people looking, so every time a food processing plant catches fire or explodes it gets called attention too by some websites.
It seemed to be calming down. Then this recent one resparks interest. Food processing plants have gone up in smoke in previous years. It's possible that this year was more a case of increased attention making the destruction seem unusual.
Interesting though. My mind is open to being proved wrong by 2023. If the destruction of food processing plants increases that would perk my interest up like little bunny ears.