Marocc
-
Posts
1,121 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Marocc
-
-
2 hours ago, dialamah said:
Why not? There are extremists in Islam, as you well know. Why would you automatically assume this isn't true? At least you should provide some contradictory evidence.
It's actually for Robert Spencer there to provide evidence. I looked it up. Two sources 1. Robert Spencer 2. Never heard. If the woman was dragged a km and got her hand ripped off, I would have found an article or two more.
-
1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said:
Never happened.
-
20 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:
Again...the "Palestinian Cause" with its non-stop war on Israel was a creation of actual Nazis. For a while, the Arabs thought that the path to victory. They had large brand-new Soviet supplied armies. Surely they'd win against a tiny pack of....Jews.
Wrong...
Nobody likes the PLO & Hamas...not even other Arab countries.
I didn't realize the topic was whether someone likes PLO & Hamas or not.
-
41 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:
The Nazis thought the Soviet & French Partisans were terrorists as well.
Okay? A lot of people can be terrorists at the same time.
-
IDF is a terrorist group.
-
2 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:
Sweet, i've been accused of favouring the Palestinians and the Israelis in this one thread.
Again, I literally don't care. I have no skin in that game. That conflict get WAAAAAAYYYY too much international attention anyways compared to other conflicts going on in the world.
You and Dog are so full of angst you're LOOKING for fight, you two are putting people on sides they don't even want to be on so you can attack.
Perhaps we detect hypocrisy.
When you see terrorism and you do not object to it, you are supporting it.
Example: if you see a parent abusing a small child everyday and you do nothing, will the law see you as innocent or guilty?
-
2 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:
Oh yeah? Where do I say that?
Would you like continuous oppression of the weak?
-
6 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:
As usual, you make no sense.
Hamas & the PLO are terrorists with their roots in Nazi Germany. Support them...become them.
Their roots are in Israel's terrorism.
-
On 9/11/2020 at 10:37 PM, DogOnPorch said:
Ah yes...Hamas elections. A bit different than ours.
It's sad how far you have to go to try and find something worse than your own..
-
On 9/11/2020 at 9:10 PM, Moonlight Graham said:
Muslim fundamentalists, now and then, are murdering savages. Most Arabs living in Jerusalem are not Islamic fundamentalist ISIS members. ISIS is the enemy, not your average Arab who just goes to work to feed their family like you and I.
ISIS members are not islamic fundamentalists. They don't follow the fundamentals.
On 9/11/2020 at 12:56 AM, Moonlight Graham said:I don't favor either Israel nor Palestine in any way whatsoever. I literally don't give a crap.
On 9/11/2020 at 7:32 PM, Moonlight Graham said:and make it belonging to neither,
Then you favour Israel.
More like, make it belonging to US aka Israel. You favour Israel again.
-
1 minute ago, Argus said:
I don't know how stupid you are... though your post certainly gives some mighty clues... so I'll try to speak in very simple terms.
I don't much care about abortions one way or the other. It's not my issue., I can recognize rank hypocrisy when I see it, though.
I see. It's not about the lives but about the money. Of course.
Similarly as with being a witness to a murder, able to prevent it and not caring to, being indifferent to abortions is practically the same as supporting them.
-
59 minutes ago, Argus said:
I'm not playing the race card. I'm showing the irony and hypocrisy of the anti-abortion Republicans. They desperately want to save black babies! They just don't want them to vote. Also, they don't want to pay for their health care, education, food or shelter.
I don't know exactly how racist you are, so..do you think the "black babies" should be aborted or do just hate people who hate abortions? The reason black women seek abortion more often is probably that they tend to be poor and in America there's this idea that if you're poor and get preganant, instead of getting money or waking up to this life in general, you're supposed to kill the baby.
Probably the media's fault.
-
What's with the KJ version?
I don't know of any woman in the bible taking it upon herself to end her blessed pregnancy. It is in fact against a woman's instinct.The question is, how come it is so difficult in the "glorious" America to practice a) birth control, b) restraint from immoral sexual activities or c) to have the baby once pregnant?
The pro-abortion people say, "but what about rape, what about health risks?"
Lets see the stats:
WHY DO ABORTIONS OCCUR?
-
In 2004, the Guttmacher Institute anonymously surveyed 1,209 post-abortive women from nine different abortion clinics across the country. Of the women surveyed, 957 provided a main reason for having an abortion. This table lists each reason and the percentage of respondents who chose it.
Percentage Reason <0.5% Victim of rape 3% Fetal health problems 4% Physical health problems 4% Would interfere with education or career 7% Not mature enough to raise a child 8% Don't want to be a single mother 19% Done having children 23% Can't afford a baby 25% Not ready for a child 6% Other
https://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/
-
In 2004, the Guttmacher Institute anonymously surveyed 1,209 post-abortive women from nine different abortion clinics across the country. Of the women surveyed, 957 provided a main reason for having an abortion. This table lists each reason and the percentage of respondents who chose it.
-
On 8/4/2020 at 7:29 AM, Scott Mayers said:
By the way, on the 'children' part, I also think we place too much emphasis on assuming them more valuable as though being naive and relatively stupid is itself a virtue!
It is instinctive for humans to protect the vulnerable. The more vulnerable someone is, the more protected he/she often is and should be.
-
Why is it more bothersome? If you're going to say something can be hidden under clothing, you would have to acknowledge you suffer of an irrational fear.
-
I always thought this was for political discussion related to religion. In practice it's also for religious topics.
-
1
-
-
16 hours ago, bcsapper said:
If a mistake is made, all it takes is for the one making it to stop and that's the end of it.
They teach in school that you need to ask verbally. They say it isn't sufficient to assume, but you should ask clearly and receive a clear positive answer before you go on.
-
15 hours ago, Independent1986 said:
A couple of months ago I offered a woman a seat on the TTC, she gave me a look and said "What is wrong with me standing?". I did not get upset 1 bit because yes, she is an individual that can do whatever she wants, I asked she said no and I sat down. Life goes on.
Maybe she isn't use to men being polite. It puts some people on guard and causes irritation for no other reason but that it is not common to them.
-
16 hours ago, cougar said:
You can respect all you want, but someone has to make the first step.
If it's the woman , that is OK, if it is the man it will be either verbal harassment, inappropriate touching, or sexual assault (kissing).
What is in the movies is not quite what one finds in real situations.
What?
If you're in an appropriate situation and ask, 'would you like to have sex,' that is not considered harassment. It's also one of the few normal obvious ways to approach the situation. Isn't this obvious, what I'm saying? (I hope it is)
-
13 hours ago, scribblet said:
Just curious, do you think this is acceptable
No.
-
15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:
1. Whose goal ? Do you have an example of the MSM covering this story, maybe where they spell out who has this goal ?
No one in particular. If you need a name, let's say, the msm.
15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:it's someone's free speech anyway.
Is all "free speech" acceptable to you?
15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:3. Yes -> you don't like it.
I was thinking of the bigger picture; societies, the world as a whole. It isn't about me liking or not liking it, but God has commanded some things and prohibited others.
15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:4. No, because you can't 'convert'. That's why conversion therapy is a bad idea.
That doesn't answer my question properly. I asked, is it bound to cause more harm than good? You say it is not because a homosexual cannot stop being homosexual — if I understand you right. That is like saying: no, it isn't bound to cause more harm than good because it is inevitable.
-
If one was to take the msm at face value, it would seem that it is no longer the goal to make being gay acceptable, rather the goal seems to be to encourage people to be gay. Is that acceptable? Does it cause issues? Is it bound to cause more harm than good?
-
1
-
-
On 6/1/2020 at 12:00 AM, French Patriot said:
As scriptures say, he was mentally and morally blind without it.
Where do you see the scriptures saying that?
-
This week in Islam
in Religion & Politics
Posted
A woman existed? How could it be?!