Jump to content

Marocc

Member
  • Posts

    1,121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Marocc

  1. 15 minutes ago, Argus said:

    If you say anything the authorities don't like they sure are. How many people have been arrested in Muslim countries and threatened with everything from whipping to death for things they've said online? Too many to count.

    Why would I say something wrong? I know where decency starts and where it ends.

    18 minutes ago, Argus said:

    So... just keep quiet or the Muslims will murder you? Is that your point?

    Keep looking and know that you're not the only one lost.

  2. 42 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    One who feels they have the right to control the behaviour of someone other than themselves, even unto committing violence to ensure they do.

    Did I mention your lying before? Wait— you don't have any connection to Memri, do you? You'd fit right in.

    yes, if I could ban you and all you know the right to have an abortion because you "don't feel like having a child", I'd totally take that right away from you. I think most people trying to "subjugate" you like that, though, are Christians...

  3. 44 minutes ago, Argus said:

    Oh yeah, it's all the Jews' fault, right? This is the same clown who wants to kill atheists. The same clown who said wishing someone merry Christmas was worse than murder. Why do we let vermin like this stay in our country?

    “If a person were to commit every major sin — committing adultery, dealing with interest, lying, murder … If a person were to do all of those major sins, they are nothing compared to the sin of congratulating and greeting the non-Muslims on their false festivals,” the man says.

    Clearly he's YOUR kind of Muslim.

    https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/video-calling-christmas-a-false-festival-viewed-globally-1.23578412

    https://www.bnaibrith.ca/b_c_imam_calls_for_elimination_of_atheists_victory_for_jihad

    Memri is best known for continuously lying, misquoting, misrepresenting, distorting and, of course, for being funded by Jews...

  4. This forum, I hope, is not the representation of Canadians as a nation. If it was, it would be doomed as one of the stupidest nations in existence. There are no words for the idiocy present here — for the dogmatism, racism, intolerance, arrogance, pride, vanity, pretentiousness and malevolence that just oozes out of the posters, like puss from a nasty infection, when they open their  soiled mouths.

  5. 5 hours ago, bcsapper said:

    Hahaha, pot, meet kettle.  He describes himself perfectly.

    So you agree.

     

    5 hours ago, Argus said:

    Another little item from Pakistan, one of Canada's main source countries for immigrants. And a reminder that Canada does no screening for immigrants' values, views, beliefs or thoughts on things like uh, beheading those who insult the prophet. This is from a school in Islamabad, the Capital of Pakistan, not some rural shithole. Little children are being taught to behead those who insult the prophet, including Samuel Paty.

     

    It's not like you could become less tolerant, lolol, right?

  6. 6 hours ago, Argus said:

    So this is the kind of guy who gets to come live in Canada when you don't do any screening.

     

    A Jewish propaganda source posts someone saying something mean. Is that really the worst insult you've heard? You are a sensitive crowed — in contradiction to the insults you spit while you speak.

  7. 13 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

    Sure in most situations, but I don't think it is a women's rights issue over here

    Sounds awfully hypocritical, to say the least.

    13 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

    I don't see any religious requirement for wearing them.

    https://islamqa.info/en/answers/11774/ruling-on-covering-the-face-with-detailed-evidence

    12 hours ago, bcsapper said:

    No, I already had an explanation.

    Then what on earth are you asking me for? If a heart surgeon explained to you why you should have them operate on your 2-year-old, would you after that ask me why you should do that?

    12 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:

    But her neighbours what?

    I don't know. I was half expecting excuses about how they don't do this and that and therefore she doesn't think it part of Islam. Aren't they the authority on what Islam is and is not?

  8. 1 hour ago, bcsapper said:

    I am one of those who do.  I would like to know your view on the issue, if you would indulge me.

    I don't have my own view, but here:

    "Those who oblige non-Muslim women to wear the abaya and cover up may be asked: have you obliged the women of your own country to do so? They will answer yes. They may be asked: Do you differentiate between a non-Muslim woman of one religion and a non-Muslim woman of another religion? They will say: No, we do not differentiate. And finally they may be asked: Does your religion enjoin you to do this? Their answer will be: Yes. 

    Hence no one should criticize those who rule according to secularism or anything else for allowing non-Muslim women to go uncovered in their own countries, but those who rule according to sharee‘ah should not be blamed or criticized either. Secularism allows non-Muslim women to go uncovered, but the religion of Islam does not allow that, so the former allows them to do that and the latter does not. Hence wise people directed their blame and criticism to non-Muslim countries because they rule according to secularism yet despite that they ban the covering of the face, even though their own principles do not allow them to do that, let alone criminalize the woman who covers her face or those among her family who called her to do that or instructed her to do that. If that is not dictatorship or fascism or terrorism, then what is?"

    https://islamqa.info/en/answers/151261/comments-on-the-ban-on-the-hijab-and-niqab-in-some-countries-and-the-ruling-on-non-muslim-women-being-uncovered-in-muslim-countries

  9. 14 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

    My point is simply that there are many reasons and situations where a cultural or religious practice from one region might be disallowed in another that would have nothing to do with human rights.

    I'm not sure why I have to keep explaining this. It's pretty basic.

    You must be one of those who don't consider the mandatory hijab in Iran a human rights issue.

  10. 1 minute ago, Infidel Dog said:

    You won't give me a reference so I have to go on what I think I've heard.

    Weren't those rules more regional within districts of France and more directed towards dress codes designed to avoid conflicts like how some American schools ban gang gear?

    I'm not seeing a flagrant removal of basic human rights.

    I didn't say "basic human rights", but now that you mention it, covering one's head is a basic human right. I have no interest in their excuses. It is blatantly obvious that the country is against Islam and is sinking further and further into its own hatred as time goes by.

×
×
  • Create New...