Jump to content

Marocc

Member
  • Posts

    1,121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Marocc

  1. 22 minutes ago, -TSS- said:

    It is no surprise when there is a war despite being numerically outnumbered the Israelis fuck the Arabs in the arse like 10-0. That's why the Arabs haven't tried a war against Israel for some time.

    That is because the Israeli army is a real war-machine but also because their enemies are the worst possible soldiers  imaginable. 

    Similar with immigration into the western countries. It is all about numbers. 

    Arabs will never carry out any armed coup or an overthrow of the regime. They are simply too inefficient to do someting like that.

    It is all about numbers for them. The more Arab-immigration the more it is towards their rule. 

    eif

     

    So much hate and ignorance.

  2. 11 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    Your question is pretty self evident.  2 consenting adults doing something that doesn't harm anyone else shouldn't be banned.  I've never seen evidence that gay marriage harms anyone else, such as their children.

    Pedophilia harms children.  If you want to kiss your sibling whatever, if you want to marry your sibling whatever, but if you want to procreate with them that should be illegal as it is physically cruel to the child.  I'm not saying anything new

    I asked you why incest shouldn't be similarly permitted, but now, you're giving the impression that you would give premission to Incest so long as there willbe no children.

  3. 36 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    Your support for pedophilia, incest, and homophobia has been noted.  At least I respect you for being honest.

    you can't explain why you think the way you do, yet you have the arrogance to think you're right and others are wrong. Then you falsify my statements to direct attention away from your inability to answer simple questions. You're a hypocrite.

  4. 9 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    Because adults can exploit and manipulate children,

    They exploit and manipulate adults all the time.

    9 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    adults shouldn't be having sex with minors. 

    Why do you think so?

    9 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    and if a brother and sister marry and have sex and get pregnant

    I said, if they can't/won't reproduce.

    9 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    I don't see any major social or physical harm from gay people marrying.

    I do.

    9 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

     

     

  5. 5 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    Because they've been denied the legal ability to do things that non-LGBT people have always been able to do, like get married.  Not to mention being socially stigmatized and made to hide who they are for most of human history minus the last few decades.  Hence, Pride parades and flags.

     

    Why don't you say the same about pedophilia? Why shouldn't pedophiles have equal rights to marry children for sexual gratification? What about Incest? If we make a law, they can't reproduce, why can't a brother and sister marry officially — wouldn't that seem just fair to you?

  6. 11 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    I don't care if they agree with it or not.  They represent me and the people of Canada, they're my b*tch, they work for me.  So as my b*tch and my employee they will STFU and *gasp* recognize the humanity of gay people.  If they don't like it they can quit like any employee.   Canadians should demand no less from their Prime Ministers.  I have to do things at work I don't like and that I don't agree with.  I think you're confused on who the superior and the inferior is here.

    *backs away quietly

    • Haha 1
  7. 23 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

    No, every single person regardless of religion who believes that gay people are evil sinners and would deny them basic human rights is a homophobe

     

    And also any minister who doesn't go to gay pride parade? It's sad when you insist your superiors should kiss their inferiors ass — yours, and you're willing to then pretend their "gesture" was genuine, after you forced them to do it.

     

  8. 18 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

    People who don't like Muslims engage in the following circular logic:

    I don't run into such people much. If someone has a clue about the contents of the Qur'an, they likely have a clue about the contents of the Bible too. Christians debate against Islam on a very different manner; typically accusing them of idol worship, their prophet of misdemeanor or their scripture of having been forged. Most of them don't touch "those" verses at all.

    19 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

    Cherry picking translations of the Quran won't save you..."annoyed" is the nice translation...

    Abused, hurt, harassed, molested...all words used instead of annoyed....

    The point is in the underline parts. What do you mean with that it ćapplies to non-Muslims"? Obviously a woman who covers herself is less likely to be abused, harassed, hurt, molested and annoyed. Everyone knows that. But that is not the point, so answer the question instead of avoiding it.

    22 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

    So girls...according to Islam, wearing the veil stops men from molesting you. Not wearing the veil allows men to molest you.

    A third topic. Maybe take it to the religion section. For now, let's focus on your first claim.

  9. 1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said:

    'Drawing down the veil' is ordained in the Quran to prevent abuse. Trouble is...this extends to non-believers of Islam.

    24:31"And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests"

    33:59 "O Prophet! Tell thy wives and thy daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them (when they go abroad). That will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed. Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful."

    What are you talking about?

  10. 9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

    Remember people, if something hates all Muslims it's incorrect and actually impolite to call them a racist.

    The two go hand in hand frequently. I don't know why people keep lying it isn't so. Racism is a form of hate and prejudice. There are other forms of hate and prejudice. People who want to do nothing about either, want to argue over what each should be called. So now there's a lot of proud people saying, "I'm not a RACIST — I only hate x."
    Racism has never been about race to begin with. It's called racism because that way it's easily categorised.

  11. 9 hours ago, Argus said:

    and gave precedence to immigrants from English countries.

    Maybe you mean English speaking countries? Or just the English? I imagine there to be no question of whether an English man can go work in Canada. Any white fellow with an education should get there with no trouble. So why "give precedence" to someone who doesn't need it? Do you also donate money to the hungry in UK in preference to those is Africa?

  12. 14 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:

    Those FOBs that do manage some English...do so in pidgin fashion. Do they plan on speaking English perfectly? I highly doubt it.

    English is one of the easiest languages in the world. What are you complaining for?

    Btw, it helps them learn if you're not a racist ass, but be polite and talk to them. Can't learn a language without practice.

    Perhaps while you're at it, you learn that they're human.

  13. On 11/4/2020 at 7:58 PM, Moonlight Graham said:

    How would you feel if the entire Muslim world was trending towards extinction and was slowly being replaced with Asians and white people and their cultures?

    Awful, but there is a prophesy about that and as the prophesy goes and as you can see now, the amount of Muslims increase all the time, it is the white folk that are facing the threat of extinction.

    I have no idea why ask, but there you go.

    • Like 1
  14. On 11/14/2020 at 6:17 PM, scribblet said:

    Finally, they are taking some action, Austria will make it a criminal offense to

    It says:

    On 11/14/2020 at 6:17 PM, scribblet said:

    Kurz said the measures, which will be brought before parliament in December for a vote

    EU is not that prone to discrimination. Macron is there doing his best of course, but he has his opponents there doing their best. Let's just pay attention to what Macron's choices have led to in the past, the distant past as well as the near past.

  15. 27 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    You support those who do.

    Who?

    28 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    You think that someone who has their head cut off for showing school children a cartoon brought their fate upon themselves.

    Actually, I never said that. What I said was that the action was foolish.

    29 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    Your view of immigrant families shows that you don't meet your own posted definition of decency, either.

    What is my view of immigrant families and why does it make me indecent? I didn't post my own definition of decency... I linked to a dictionary.

    30 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    I don't support all freedom of choice for children.

    How remarkably irrelevant.

    30 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    I think they should be able to choose not to be married if they don't want to be, though.

    I suppose you think Islam doesn't allow that, for 10 years you haven't bothered to find out and now you think you sound smart.

    32 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    Neither of us has a say if someone else decides to make that choice.

    Also known as free will — not created by secularism..

  16. 2 hours ago, bcsapper said:

    It is entirely unacceptable to impose your religion upon someone else.  Indecent then.

    But I don't do that.

    3 hours ago, bcsapper said:

    Would you suggest all immigrants from Muslim societies should conform with generally accepted standards of respectable or moral behavior in the countries they move to? 

    You think your generally accepted standards of morality are respectable? Canada needs a mirror — bad. No, I don't think it okay for you to brainwash little children to be the way you prefer just because they're from an immigrating family.

    3 hours ago, bcsapper said:

    Hell, in France that could mean adultery.

    A Canadian claiming moral high ground. "I support abortion, sodomy, alcohol, fornication, hate speech, libel and for children to be allowed to choose their gender before they're allowed to choose their bedtime — but adultery, well, I haven't seen anyone do it so...let's just say it's immoral."

  17. 17 hours ago, Argus said:

    Also, cultures change over a century of time. Quite a bit, in fact.  I've seen other studies which suggest high immigration is one of the reasons for the low birth rate. With a low birth rate, and without immigration, parents would be fairly confident their child would thrive and prosper and have many job opportunities - which is not the case today.

    "I won't have kids because the immigrants would make them failures."

    You usually just hear: "I want to focus on my career and hobbies" and "I have a lot of friends"

     

    external-content.duckduckgo.com(21).jpg

×
×
  • Create New...