-
Posts
1,901 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Nefarious Banana
-
-
Fuel up, Jughead, Justin, and that 'wonder of wonders' . . . un-elected David Eby will smile. They're getting raises!
We're the April Fools joke here . . . . cure: tar & feathers.
- 2
-
1 hour ago, herbie said:
I used to live 4 miles from the truck crossing, went down there all the time to crab fish off the dock, shop, hit the restaurants. The dollar was 69¢ at the time. Had propane vehicles, that cost more there at the time if you could even find auto propane.
Friends would buy new tires, cruise around gravel lots dirtying them up. One got stopped at the border cuz he did that without realizing he was line of sight from the crossing! Still; had the nubs on his tires.
Our trick was to hide the booze in the diaper bag and the kids would all be tired and whiney on the way home. Almost always they just nodded and waved us through. Never once did they even go inside the travel trailer or the camper we had before that.Wow . . . a lawbreaker.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Queenmandy85 said:
When I bring up the question of Mr. Poilievre's honesty, I don't mean to infer making false promises is a detriment to electoral success. In 1980, Pierre Trudeau promised to twin the railroad from sea to sea. Stephen Harper lied about the income trust issue and stood up in Regina and bald-faced lied about equalization agreements with Saskatchewan.
Joe Clark went on the campaign trail in 1979 promising to privatize PetroCanada, move the Canadian embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and pay off the deficit left by Trudeau and Turner. As soon as he was appointed to lead a minority government, he set about keeping his promises, so the electorate defeated him. Joe Clark is the only guy who ever defeated a Trudeau, and he was brought down by Social Credit. He was defeated because he was an honest politician.
So, Pierre Polilevre doesn't need to concern himself with the accuracy of his debunked claims about the carbon tax. He will win his super majority in just a few short months and nobody will care if he lied or not.
What's your point ?
-
1 hour ago, Queenmandy85 said:
I am an undecided voter in a riding where it is a close race between the CPC, the Liberals and the NDP.
Convince me to vote CPC. What will the CPC do?
Better yet, will you continue to try and hide the fact that you've been a Liberal supporter in your every post?
- 1
- 1
-
42 minutes ago, herbie said:
I will save my concerns for those capable of opining more than "F*ck Trudeau" and "Eby's a goof".
Nice try. To link 'F-Trudeau' with 'Eby's a goof' shows the shallowness of your thought. Eby shot himself in the foot by standing with the two most dispicable politicians in Canada. Your fondness for that pairsays a lot about you . . . .
-
1 hour ago, herbie said:
Not nearly as disturbing as your propensity to lie through your teeth either by sheer ignorance or intent.
Eby's a goof . . . only popular in the LML and VI. Caters to the non-producer paper shufflers. Jughead's done in the upcoming federal election . . . dry your tears herbie, go shuffle some papers and maybe you'll feel better about your life choices.
-
2 minutes ago, herbie said:
Guessing you're monstrously stupid.
How many f*cking times do you need to hear that BC had a carbon tax long before Trudeau or Singh? Imposed by the BC (not ) Liberals!
Don't blow another gasket herbie . . . . your devotion to Trudeau, Jughead, and Eby is quite disturbing. Eby had his chance to demonstrate with his reptilian indifference to the BC voter that he cares about them.
- 1
-
Guessing BC's premier, David Eby has been given his 'marching orders' from NDP leader Jughead . . . . . 'Do not oppose the pending carbon tax like the other sever premiers' ??
Nice to see an opposing BC political party rising quickly in the polls . . . BC Conservative Party. If Keven Falcon would face the fact that he'll never be the BC premier, and throw his support behind the new party, the NDP would be kicked to the curb very quickly.
-
2 hours ago, Army Guy said:
I don't think it was about taking down the Liberals in a non-confidence vote, everyone already knew that the NDP is not ready to call an election, financially their coffers are not up to the task, neither is the Liberals . . .
This was about defining to the entire country who was willing to freeze the carbon tax as it stands right now...and the Conservatives did just that....It shows that the other parties are not interested in giving tax payers a break . . .
Now watch what happens in question period as Conservatives hammer this point to the rest of Canada . . .when things get tougher, all the other parties were in favor of raising prices on carbon which in turn will effect every product we consume.
Yes, it was a smart move by Poilievre & Company . . . show Canadians that Jughead & Justin just don't care about the havoc they wreak on the public. Well done Pierre Poilievre !
- 2
-
1 minute ago, eyeball said:
I escaped from Toronto when I was 15 and made it as far west as the 200 fathom edge. I love it out there.
Born in Calgary 1947 . . . 100,044 population.
Am a 'westerner' . . .
- 1
-
33 minutes ago, eyeball said:
How far east have you travelled - did you kick and scream every inch of the way?
We must travel in the direction of our fear
John Berryman
Toronto . . . couldn't get out of there fast enough. It's probably a great place if you've never been or lived in the west.
- 1
-
35 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:
I'm shocked.
Me too . . .
-
3 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
Nope, am from the West, worked out of Comox while in the Air Force. Also worked in the praries, down East and in Ottawa.
Just curious . . .
Where in 'the west' . . . ?
-
2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
As I said earlier, I am from the west and Trudeau Snr. turned me off Liberals way back when.
Did you state you were from the east, but had worked out of Comox for a year or two ?
- 1
-
39 minutes ago, Gaétan said:
The bosses of lobbying firms cannot take part in Poilievre's decisions because there is a conflict of interest. He is not prime minister but hopefully he will not because he is not a good man.
Are you afraid of Pierre Poilievre . . . . what is the basis of your fear?
- 1
- 1
-
26 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
You are, by far , the biggest PP ass sucker on this forum.
I defend no one, I just rub your face in everything you say...even when it is sticking out of PP's ass.
Childish behavior and post. You're bigger than that aren't you?
-
The voting Canadian public became more aware of the Jughead & Justin Selfish Sideshow . . . Pierre Polievre won big-time.
- 1
-
43 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
OOOooopsie - i've melted his brain again. Apperently realizing people wont' forget because they'll see it every time they fill their cars was enough to crack the mental engine block there
Maybe they'll forget if you post ass porn pictures you've collected again?
You're dealing with a child . . . a rather dim child at that.
- 1
-
36 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
Everybody has 18 months to forget last weeks show business LOL
Your mis-guided focus on the so-called win-lose aspect is predictable.
And you're wrong on citizens forgetting about what the Jughead & Justin Road Show revealed . . . that the Canadian citizens just don't matter to those two.
Keep on keeping on . . . . pffft.
-
Pierre Poilievre got the intended result . . . . to show Canadians that Jughead & Justin don't give a rat's azz about Canada or its citizens. A winning strategy, done well.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:
Our ilk. You mean the ones that can spin you out of your comfort circle?
Get it straight, like it or not, you need to keep up your 1diocy for another 18 months. A year and a half of arguing nonsense with folk that can spin you. LOL
Your ilk . . . .
-
23 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
You know what they say about assuming LOL
I just like playing devils advocate with you true beliebers LOL
You, herbie, and your ilk are what Trudeau, Jughead, and their ilk need for fuel . . . you're dupes.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:
In a year and a half, the libs won't care, they will wallow in their golden pensions.
And you helped them get there . . .
- 1
-
9 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
Childish grasp??
Pretty simple, you either win or lose and PP lost.
He may have been "outed" but, he still sits on top
The purpose was to 'out' Jughead . . . . it was a given that the Conservatives wouldn't win this, but the bigger win was showing the Canadian voter the contempt that Jughead and Trudeau have for them, and our country. Yes, it was a win.
16 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:Winning what? A poll that means nothing and give him nothing but a good feeling? He is still just opposition. LOL
Oh and here is another AI response in its native language "01000110 01010101 01000011 01001011 01011001 01001111 01010101 00100001"
What is funny assface, is that you keep responding to AI.... arguing with a computer...just like your hero PP, you lose LOL
AI can out wit and out last you so, you will always be a loser
^ ^ Childish grasp ^ ^
- 1
Poilievre plans to move non-confidence motion in Trudeau, despite Liberal-NDP deal
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
You're a piece of work eyeball . . . . how could any elected Canadian federal government be worse than what's in Ottawa now. PP has to do very little to be a 100% improvement over the Jughead/Justin - - Edgar Bergen/Charlie McCarthy duo.