Jump to content

hot enough

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by hot enough

  1. Quote

    They were even able to get rid of our imperial measurement system and have it replaced with metric

    Of all the countries in the world, only three backwaters still use the archaic Imperial system of weights and measures:
    • Liberia.
    • Myanmar (a.k.a. “the country formerly known as Burma”)
    • United States of America.


  2. 20 minutes ago, Altai said:

    The recent hypocrisy by US, they said that "the missiles used by Yemen against Sauidi most likely is provided by Iran. This means Iran has its finger in these attacks."

    Do you know that how many US and other Western made weapons we seize from neutralized terrorists in Turkiye ? The most recent attack was done with US made anti-tank missiles and 6 soldiers were martyred. So then we can say that US has its finger in these attacks ? Why the same officials do not admit their terrorism in other countries ? :rolleyes:

    They haven't figured out a way to have their propaganda admit that the USA is the world's leading terrorist nation/gang. 

    And who is the leading arms maker/arms seller in the world? None other than the USofA, bigger than the next two countries put together. 

    This would be the kind, benevolent, peace loving USA that has been in a state of war for 93% of its years as a "country".

  3. 1 hour ago, Altai said:

    Nope I didnt know. I just know an Asian country which was created a court and started to judge some country statesmen in absentia. Just a few months later they lost a huge passenger plane over the ocean and still cannot find it. :rolleyes:

    Yup, Malaysia held a war crimes tribunal that found Bush/Blair guilty of war crimes. As if a trial was even needed for that. 

    That will go in the Evil USA thread.

  4. Isn't it odd how propagandists point fingers and make a big deal about people choosing to block some users on the very US social media that has procedures in place to allow such blocking?

    Can these propagandists even spell hypocrisy?

    Which raises the question: Why is the USA still continuing its terrorism against Cuba, Syria, Ukraine, ... but controlling the US propaganda machinery to hide this from the world?

  5. 4 minutes ago, Altai said:

    US and many other Western countries has soo many these kind of events in their history.

    You are absolutely right, Altai. How can you be so well informed and sooooooo many of these open-minded Westerners be soooo dismally ignorant of US terrorist acts that have been going on for well over a century.

    Did you know that the USA Senate in the late 1970s tried to pass a law against international terrorism but every one they wrote was shot down by lawyers who said the USA had done all these terrorist acts? 

    Aren't they the world's biggest hypocrites? If you added all countries hypocrisy together the USA would still beat them by a country mile!!

    • Haha 1
  6. 5 hours ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    Maybe not as I explained.

    It doesn't matter what you explain, you don't possess the knowledge to make these wild guesses.

    5 hours ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    They didn't have to, thermite wasn't in their job description, their job was to fly the planes.

    I am truly puzzled as to how you seem totally unable to make logical connections. Thermite/thermate/nanothermite had no legal/legitimate reason to be at WTC, no legal/legitimate reason to be in WTC dust. 

    You continue to make the incredibly illogical assumption that there were planes, the planes alleged by the USGOCT and that there were Arab hijackers. The nanothermite, which was used to demolish the twin towers and WTC7 means there were no hijackers.

    5 hours ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    All physics laws were followed as far as I can see. 300,000lb object hits 500,000t structure at 500+mph the results are exactly as I'd suspect.

    You don't appear to possess what is necessary to do anything more than offer a layman's suspicion. The twin towers were designed for a high speed hit by a 707/DC10. 

    You yourself described the impossible collapse of the twin towers, which violated Newton's Laws of Motion. A free fall of WTC7 is also impossible. Ergo, controlled demolitions, ergo, no hijackers. 

  7. On 11/5/2017 at 10:18 PM, bush_cheney2004 said:

    "War crime" is an oxymoron.

    Then why does the USA always so hypocritically demand that "war criminals" except for the worst ones on the planet in viciousness and scope, US war criminals, be held to account.

    Why are you you being so hypocritical? Why are you defending the myriad US war crimes and terrorism that has seen so many tens of millions slaughtered by unfeeling, brutal, vicious US Nazis?

    Here is just such an evil, brutal, vicious US Nazi USAF WWII commander, Curtis Lemay, aptly named by Wikiquote as Curtis Lemay aka Dick head Lemay (USAF).jpg

    "Killing Japanese didn't bother me very much at that time... I suppose if I had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal.... Every soldier thinks something of the moral aspects of what he is doing. But all war is immoral and if you let that bother you, you're not a good soldier." 

  8. 9 hours ago, Ash74 said:

    Ugh. So everything the West does is a war crime but everybody else it is no holds barred.

    Why was it a war crime? The Axis had no problems bombing and shooting civilians. 

    Not everything. You are going to ludicrous extremes to make a ludicrous argument. Only the war crimes are war crimes. Why do you do this? 

    What you are trying to justify is that Nazis Germany was justified for doing what they did because war is hell and whatever needs to be done in the eyes of those leaders needs to be done. 

    The war crimes that the US committed are the same war crimes that many people of the Axis powers were tried and hung for. The US established at Nuremberg the principle of the "poisoned chalice". Whatever crimes the Nazis/Japanese/Italians/... were being tried for, the same poisoned chalice had to be handed to US/western lips. It never was, for US/UK WWII war crimes or for any since, crimes much much more egregious than the Nazis. 

    Unfortunately, the nature of these crimes is such that both prosecution and judgment must be by victor nations over vanquished foes. The worldwide scope of the aggressions carried out by these men has left but few real neutrals. Either the victors must judge the vanquished or we must leave the defeated to judge themselves. After the first World War, we learned the futility of the latter course. The former high station of these defendants, the notoriety of their acts, and the adaptability of their conduct to provoke retaliation make it hard to distinguish between the demand for a just and measured retribution, and the unthinking cry for vengeance which arises from the anguish of war. It is our task, so far as humanly possible, to, draw the line between the two. We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our own lips as well. We must summon such detachment and intellectual integrity to our task that this Trial will commend itself to posterity as fulfilling humanity's aspirations to do justice. - Robert H Jackson


  9. 3 minutes ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    HE, nothing is "impossible", I learned that a long time ago...

    You are wrong again, about this and about the wing tips being able to slice thru 14" steel box columns.

    It was impossible for Arab hijackers to access nanothermite. Why do you ignore this?

    It was impossible for Arab hijackers to suspend Newton's Laws of Motion. Why do you ignore this?

    It was impossible for Arab hijackers to have melted/vaporized steel, melted molybdenum, vaporized lead, created iron microspheres that amounted to 6% of WTC dust. Why do you ignore this?

    It was impossible for Arab hijackers to cause WTC7 to fall at free fall speed. Why do you ignore this?

    Why do you ignore these and all the other myriad impossibilities?

    • Haha 1
  10. 3 minutes ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:


    Arabs can't board aircraft?

    Hijackers can't steer a plane? Navigate?

    It's impossible to hit a building with an aircraft?

    An aircraft can't damage a building?

    Sorry, this among many other things is totally possible.


    You appear to be as dishonest as all the other USGOCT conspiracy theorists. You are pointedly ignoring all the absolutely impossible things the alleged hijackers could not have done in favor of these, above,  totally silly comments. 


  11. 3 minutes ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    That's what happens when an object weighing in the vicinity of 300,000lbs hits a building at about 590mph... 

    Remember what you wrote?

    You said it, it has to be true?

    Why do you pretend to be an expert when you are not?

    You don't explain how the wing, which has already disappeared into WTC2 without damaging the outside face but microseconds later, the building has a roadrunner image of an airplane. When there is nothing to have done the damage. 

  12. 17 minutes ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    The wing is still attached to the plane? It was like that when it got there? It's just beginning to enter the building what's your point?

    You have to look at the picture. The wing between the fuselage and the engine has entered the building. There is no portion of the wing between the fuselage and the engine still outside the building yet the building face is totally intact, showing no damage. 


    The description makes it sound like it should be like a bug hitting a windshield.

    It is impossible for the wing tips to slice thru 14" steel box columns. 

  13. 46 minutes ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    You have good evidence and arguments for the demolition of the towers but your aircraft argument falls flat on it's[sic] face. 

    USGOCT = United States Government Official Conspiracy Theory

    You don't say how "your aircraft argument falls flat on it's[sic] face".  The USGOCT falls flat on its face because UA175 wasn't the plane that hit WTC2. How does this escape you?

    46 minutes ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    So far I've seen no valid arguments against the chain of events that resulted in the aircraft as claimed striking the twin towers.

    The plane that hit WTC2 wasn't UA175. How does this keep escaping you?

    46 minutes ago, Thinkinoutsidethebox said:

    As far as whodunit? I wouldn't be surprised people in the US are actually responsible, a few people had allot to gain. 

    Both illegal invasions of the sovereign nations, I and A, were premised on this gigantic 911 lie. 

  14. 2 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

     I'm referring to how everytime[sic] someone points out an egregious or atrocious act by anyone who is not American or British, you immediately apply the sole defense of whoever it is by equating it with the evil the US/UK has done. 

    I agree, this does happen. Why? Because people often use these acts as reasons why we holier than thou westerners have some totally unexplained divine right to murder and mayhem in others countries. 

    You folks are big on the justifiable revenge angle but you never have any proof for it. In point of fact, you know you are repeating gross propaganda. 

    How do we know this is the case? Because you have provided no evidence or examples at all of what you are taking about. Notice how this is always the case with you folks, nebulous accusations with no evidence, proof, examples. 

  • Create New...