Jump to content

Goddess

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,303

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    78

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Goddess

  1. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    24 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    I wonder if the jab actually does protect people from something, but that 'something' hasn't been released yet.

    Quite a few scientists wondering the same thing:

    Have we been CRISPRed for the coming Cas-9? (substack.com)

     

    I have two questions in my head. How readily would integration events with PAMs occur in any given transfected cell, and did anyone actually have this in mind? If a Cas-9 protein were to be instructed to be made as part of another ‘vaccine’, would the interaction with the Cas-9, the sgRNA (also introduced exogenously) and the integrated fragment result in cutting? Or is this about gene silencing or activation? Theoretically, you could introduce stop codons or alter a mutated gene using this method. You could also add transcriptional activators to the Cas-9 to activate transcription machinery of specific genes, ie: the modular aspect I mentioned previously. You could also inactivate transcription to physically block a gene. The possibilities are wide-ranging.

     

    Questions to ponder: Why is this conserved fragment (1252-1289) in all of these products/vectors/sequences? Why are they sitting upstream from a PAM (CGG)? Could they be a target DNA for subsequent gRNA-Cas-9 system administration?

    Pretty dark questions. What would possibly be the purpose, if the outcome of ‘installing’ this hardware in the genome - logistically - could never really be predictable or reproducible? Is it not predictable/reproducible?

     

    With regard to using the gRNA-Cas-9 system to get rid of HIV, you can also use it eat certain bits of the integrated HIV-1 genome to disable it. Take that, HIV. In a paper published in 2013, a codon-optimized gRNA-Cas-9 system was used to target the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of HIV-1. The designed gRNA was complementary to the LTRs. Using transfection, the gRNA along with a humanized Cas-9 was introduced into mammalian cells using plasmids.19 This idea is reminiscent of the trojan horse technology of the LNPs that, according to recent findings, also contain plasmids and plasmid DNA fragments.

    The gRNA-Cas-9 system can also be used in the context of the ‘shock and kill’ strategy to eliminate HIV from the system. In this case, the gRNA-Cas9 system is used to activate latent HIV-1 viral reservoirs so that drugs (antiretroviral therapy (ART)) can be used to kill latently-infected cells. Kind of like smoking out the bees. A paper was published in 2022 entitled “SARS CoV-2 mRNA vaccination exposes latent HIV to Nef-specific CD8+ T-cells”, where the authors describe what sounds like an unexpected shock and kill result (strategy).20 Basically, the COVID-19 modified mRNA injections shook up (productively-engaged) HIV-Nef-specific CD8+ T cells - the ones that kill virally-infected cells - and resulted in a reduction in cell-associated HIV RNA, which is a measure of HIV persistence.

     

    There has been a lot of HIV-related ‘stuff’ in the woodworks with regard to the COVID-19 saga, and it has really left me wondering why. And how. Besides the fact that the spike protein is structurally and compositionally similar to gp120, why was there a specific test group in clinical trials for people who were deemed HIV positive, and why were people being encouraged to be screened for HIV post injection?22 It has been reported that other vaccines can induce increases in cell-associated HIV RNA, and it has also been reported that increases in cell-associated HIV RNA can be accompanied by modest and transient increases in HIV-p24-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, so does this explain why?2324 Were certain people in these fields just curious to know the effects of this new, experimental technology on HIV? Maybe.

    To me, there seems to be a lot of ‘surprising’ overlap. I mean, yeah, regular screening was probably reduced because of the psychotic 2-weeks to fatten the wallets thing, but still. The aforementioned paper actually states that the “rate of acute HIV infection (AHI) diagnoses per day was significantly higher during the pandemic compared with the prior 4 years”. I personally don’t buy that this is due to higher frequency testing exactly because routine HIV screening in health care settings was reduced (these likely would have balanced each other out, if anything, in my opinion), so what’s with the higher frequency HIV diagnoses? We’re talking about acute infection - the beginning; new infections - so, what is going on here? Maybe more people were being promiscuous? More IV drug use?

    • Downvote 1

  3. Pro-Hamas Rallies in Canada

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    I have a friend in the US who, for many years, has been very 'Free Palestine".  I have always kind of avoided any discussion with her on the topic because in her view Israel = evil, Palestine  = 100% innocent angels.  And I've always suspected the truth lies somewhere in between there.

    The question for me is "What does 'Free Palestine' mean to the government and people of Palestine?"

    These demonstrations and rallies in Canada and the US, in my opinion, show that to Palestinians - it means the eradication of Israel as a state and the killing of Jews worldwide.

    I am upset to see these ones openly chanting about killing Jews and watching gov't and authorities do next to nothing about it.  In Canada.

    • Like 1

  5. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by Goddess

    18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    The covid10ts here all have Stockholm Syndrome.

    They still love the people who lied to them and forced them to take it up the arms, and they're mad at us for proving that they were lied to. 

    A couple months before my ex-hubby passed form the heart attack, he had visited me and told me he has not felt good since he got the jabs for work.  He mentioned the heart attack studies and said, "Those jabs will likely give me a heart attack."

    At the time, I told him not to talk like that, then a few months later, he died of a heart attack.

    I'm furious for him.  He knew what was going to kill him.

    The doctor told us that his heart misfired but that they had no explanation for why - no blockages, nothing to indicate any heart distress.

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1

  12. Canada needs a female leader

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

    This is a very sexist remark. Shame on you and the board which allows you to be here to spread anti feminism and make chauvinistic comment. This is how you view women as vaginas? You only see the vagina part not the rest of 99%. SHAME ON YOU. 

    I think the person is referring to a recent Supreme Court of Canada justice who said women are to be referred to as "persons with vaginas."

    • Like 4
    • Sad 1

  16. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by Goddess

     

    1. Faksova, K.; Walsh, D.; Jiang, Y.; Griffin, J.; Phillips, A.; Gentile, A.; Kwong, J.C.; Macartney, K.; Naus, M.; Grange, Z.; et al. COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals. Vaccine 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.100.
    2.  
    3. Krumholz, H.M.; Wu, Y.; Sawano, M.; Shah, R.; Zhou, T.; Arun, A., S; Khosla, P.; Kaleem, S.; Anushree, V.; Bornali, B.; et al. Post-Vaccination Syndrome: A Descriptive Analysis of Reported Symptoms and Patient Experiences After Covid-19 Immunization. medRxiv 2023, 10.1101/2023.11.09.23298266, 2023.2011.2009.23298266.

    The toxic character of SARS-CoV-2 SP, despite its inability to replicate, is of more than theoretical concern. The newly published biochemistry paper reviews clinical studies that tracked markers of microvascular occlusion, including retinal vascular density and myocardial FDG uptake, with significant abnormalities persisting months after COVID-19 vaccinations. It also references a study of the health records of 99 million COVID-vaccinated individuals conducted by an international collaboration of 24 institutions, which found significantly increased incidences of myocarditis, pericarditis and other serious conditions [5]. Serious adverse effects were observed as well in a Yale study of 241 post-COVID vaccine syndrome patients [6].

    On the other hand, the three generic drugs that gleaned the most attention as therapeutics for COVID-19 had a sound biochemical basis for efficacy, each significantly reducing RBC aggregation. The most distinct clinical benefits were observed for ivermectin, which neutralizes the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 SP by strongly binding to several sites on its N-terminal domain, competitively inhibiting its attachments to host cell glycans. In vitro, ivermectin not only blocked the SP-induced formation of RBC clumps, but it disaggregated such SP-induced RBC clumps within 30 minutes [2].

    Three clinical studies demonstrated this rapid normalization of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in severe COVID-19 patients within 1-2 days after treatment with ivermectin, as reviewed in the newly published COVID-19 biochemistry paper and shown in the figure below, from that paper.

    public

    Compounding the confusion about the biochemical mechanism of ivermectin, as the paper also notes, was the vulnerability of medical science to commodification, a subject that has engaged the contributions of some of science’s most distinguished scholars. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet, for example, wrote in 2015 that plagued by “flagrant conflicts of interest,” “much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue” [8].

    The rapidly expanding use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 worldwide faced two streams of pushback by early 2021. One was a flurry of fabricated reports of ivermectin poisonings in the US reported in the major media worldwide, debunked and retracted, as exposed by the Washington Post [9] and other sources [10,11]. In one of the more imaginative of these fabrications, “gunshot victims” who were “left waiting as horse dewormer overdoses overwhelm[ed] Oklahoma hospitals” were shown waiting in line wearing winter coats, when temperatures that summer day ranged between 80° and 95° F.

    The set of charts and graphs below, based on data from the COVID-19 biochemistry paper and other sources [13,17-20], provides a reality check on COVID-19-related deaths before and after the nationwide deployment of COVID-19 vaccines in the US, and for those trends in Peru and Uttar Pradesh following the widespread distribution of ivermectin for COVID-19 prevention and treatment.

    public

    A month before the US nationwide release of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines on December 14, 2020 [19], the efficacy of both was touted to be 95% [21]. Yet COVID-19 deaths in 2021 actually increased by 18% from their 2020 total [17,18]. Excess deaths in the US were an identical 16% over projections from pre-pandemic levels for both the years 2020 and 2021 [13]. These data align with a conclusion expressed in a 2023 paper by Anothy Fauci and two other NIH scientists, that “none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses,” including coronaviruses, “have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines” [22].

    In Peru, excess deaths decreased 14-fold between August 1 and December 1, 2020, concurrent with a massive, nationwide distribution of ivermectin that began in August 2020. Then, after a new president was elected on November 17 who restricted the use of ivermectin, excess deaths increased 13-fold from December 1, 2020, to February 1, 2021. Although correlation does not necessarily imply causation, a rigorous state-by-state analysis of ivermectin use in Peru’s 25 states using national health data that aligned with WHO summary data (the same data source as for the chart above) showed that in this case, ivermectin clearly caused the reductions in deaths observed. The analysis found a correlation between the extent of ivermectin use and reductions in excess deaths, by state, with p < 0.002, and no indication of any significant effect by several potential confounding factors considered  [20].

    In Uttar Pradesh, the largest state in India, having a population of 229 million, COVID-19 deaths fell by 97%, between May 7 and July 7, 2021, after a mass distribution of ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc with vitamins and acetaminophen tablets that began on May 5, 2021. The cumulative total of COVID-19 deaths per million population in Uttar Pradesh from July 7, 2021, to April 1, 2023, was 0.27% of that figure in the US for the same period [20].

    In conclusion, when claims that ignore fundamentals of biochemistry but remove barriers for profitable new therapeutics are advanced in the name of science, not only public health but the fabric of civilization is undermined. It is hoped that the lapses illuminated here can be rectified and associated opportunities embraced.

  17. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

    With no data, no information, no effort. Hatred for the sake of hatred. That's the left these days.

    Before my recent hiatus from here, he did confess that he is only here on this forum to troll, that he gets a huge kick out of it.

    Sad and empty person, best ignored.  He adds nothing to any discussion.

  19. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    Stop me if any of this starts to sound familiar. 😄

    It's 1918, and the Spanish Flu seems to be killing otherwise young and healthy people (especially soldiers) in a matter of days. They would be a bit sick, then suddenly die of massive organ failure and “wet hemorrhagic lungs.” The progression was incredibly fast, seemingly irreversible, and was stacking people who really ought to have been low risk in mortuaries like cordwood.  If it could do this to a soldier in his prime in a matter of days, every last one of us should be terrified.

    But did you know......?  There is actually quite a lot of convincing evidence that many of the “young, healthy deaths” of Spanish Flu were iatrogenic?

    image.png

    Iatrogenic death is when the doctor kills you. And there is a long and unpleasant history on that one - from Benjamin Rush bleeding George Washington to death, to killing “witchy” cats to stop a plague carried by the fleas of the very rats they were eating, to (and especially) new “wonder drugs” that are poorly understood but that rapidly go into widespread use.

    And one of those drugs - during the time of the Spanish Flu - was aspirin.

    Aspirin had just come into widespread availability in 1918.  And Bayer was rushing it to market for the pandemic. It was the new wowie-zowie drug and doctors (and especially militaries) all over the world fell in love with it. They prescribed it widely to those with Spanish Flu. In doses ranging from 8 to 31 grams per day. Oopsie doodle.

    A typical aspirin today is 325mg and max dosing per day is ~4 grams.

    A toxic dose is about 20g for a 180 pound person.

    31g is “you’re going to die really, really fast and there is not a damn thing anyone can do to stop it once you take that dose.”

    This is why incredible caution should be exercised around large departures from tested and true medical practice and new pharma modalities and products.

    image.png

    This case fatality rate has never looked even remotely plausible for flu. You simply do not get a respiratory disease like that in a modern (or possibly any) society, especially not in young, healthy people. It’s just not a thing.

    But widespread poisoning by well meaning medical professionals who have no idea how dangerous the products and procedures they are playing with - is.

    "Official recommendations for aspirin were issued on 13 September 1918 by the US Surgeon General [64], who stated aspirin had been used in foreign countries “apparently with much success in the relief of symptoms” (p 13), on 26 September 1918 by the US Navy [29], and on 5 October 1918 by The Journal of the American Medical Association [31]. Recommendations often suggested dose regimens that predispose to toxicity as noted above. At the US Army camp with the highest mortality rate, doctors followed Osler’s treatment recommendations, which included aspirin [48], ordering 100,000 tablets [65]. Aspirin sales more than doubled between 1918 and 1920 [66]."

    image.png

    Consider the below quote from HHS (1918).

    image.png

    And this is not some “quaint delusion of doctors that wise men of modern medicine have exceeded and no longer fall prey to.”

    This EXACT mindset was a massive killer in covid: VENTILATORS.

    “Vent early, vent hard” - It ran riot in New York and many other parts of the world. It was used not just to treat patients but to “protect doctors” under the misbegotten theory that an intubated patient would not spread covid and that “doctors needed to be protected.”

    There was a whole national campaign to build more ventilators. Patients were intubated when they should not have been. When this failed to work, they kept turning up the pressure on the vents.

    And this killed people wholesale.  Ask the frontline nurses and doctors who quit or were fired because their consciences would not allow them to continue killing people and no one would to listen to them.

    image.png

    That’s not covid death.

    That’s iatrogenic death.

    Once NYC figured out that vents were killing people in droves and switched to proning as others had done, this death rate dropped. But an awful lot of people had lost their lives by then. And, as in Spanish Flu, this high death rate was used as a pretext for more aggressive and ill considered actions that drove more iatrogenic death. It’s a vicious cycle and once it gets going, it’s self-feeding. Every time you inadvertently kill people out of ignorance or fear, it makes the purported pathogen look more deadly and drives you to new “reactions” and mis-calibrations where you once more kill people. 

    It’s not like this was unknown or unknowable. But most countries just plain forgot and did the wrong thing, despite what they knew. Sometimes failing the Asch Conformity test is fatal to those around you.

    But once you lose your mind, start over-reacting, and act from fear or twisted interest, it takes on a life of its own.

    We really need to stop presuming that high excess death = proof of bad virus and start asking the serious questions:

    • how much of it was iatrogenic?
    • how much came from the insane policies of scaring people away from doctors and medical treatment?
    • how much from barring access to longstanding effective drugs and treatment in favor of new ones that mostly failed spectacularly and killed people?
    • how many deaths of despair were caused among the alone and isolated in care homes?
    • how many deaths in hospitals because patients were denied the ability to see family and perhaps more importantly because friends and family were denied the ability to be there for their loved ones to serve as advocates and organizers? (if you have ever been in hospital or been there to protect those close to you from one and make sure sound and sufficient care is supplied and applied you know what i mean on this. a hospital is no place to be alone and helpless.)
    • how many killed by vents, by bad nursing home policy, by putting “saving hospitals” above “saving people” and by “wonder drugs” that failed to live up to billing and whose side effects were not taken into account?
    • to what extent was the “covid pandemic” just a replay of spanish flu where much, probably most of the fatality rate was from bad response rather than truly bad virus?

    Please don’t misunderstand: I am NOT arguing that covid did not kill anyone or at least pull forward some deaths that likely would have occurred soon afterwards, shortening lives by weeks and months (but not years) and thus causing spikes in deaths.

    Many other flus had far higher CFR than covid did. The Asian flu in 57-8, the Hong Kong flu of 68, the flu of 76 (whose vaccine was such an infamous problem), H1N1 in 2009 - none of these were more than a tiny ripple.

    Not zika, not dengue, ebola, or bird flu. None of it.

    Every couple years, a new one is trotted out in search of a crisis. It’s a gold mine for Pharma.

    And it will be trotted out again.

    image.png

    These were all spectacular nothing-burgers. Sure, sometimes we get one that’s a bit worse, but even a “bad pandemic” really does not move the needle much in the antibiotics era.

    Never has.

    The only 2 really nasty ones in Amercian history were Spanish Flu and SARScov-2 and both appear to have had an awful lot of their excess death toll driven by bad response rather than bad virus.

    We know covid was circulating in late 2019. It was a nasty bug. getting it was unpleasant. but it wasn’t killing people in unusual numbers until the panic started.

    Then, suddenly, it was.

    Again, I'm not saying it would not have led to any excess deaths had we not panicked and done all manner of poorly conceived things that led to iatrogenic deaths. The question is “how much?” And the answer might well be “quite a lot less than people commonly suppose.” The answer might well be “so little that had we not named and obsessed over it, few would have really noticed.”

    It's the desire to “do something” and “appear active and on top of it” that crashes into a horrifying tendency to crisis profiteer, where we suddenly lose our collective minds and run off in wild directions embracing terrible ideas and eschewing those long shown effective that does this.

    And that’s how people die. Needlessly.

    If we would not re-live this in the future, it is in the resistance to fear that our resiliency lies.

    This is why the exploration of just what was done, by whom, why and to what effect is vital.

    But historically, pandemics in the modern age simply are not dangerous.

    Unless you panic.

  20. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    47 minutes ago, Goddess said:

    Consider yourself "acknowledged."

    You, too, Moonie.

    When studies are posted that show the spike/LNPs in the ovaries and testes and adults discuss the possible implications of toxins navigating their way to human reproductive organs, you two HAHAHA'ing about it, makes me pity you.

    It must be hard going through life without the intelligence to comprehend the implications of things like that.

    • Haha 1

  21. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    On 4/20/2024 at 3:42 PM, CdnFox said:

    ROFLMAO!!!! The only one ranting here kiddo is  you :)  Everyone can practically hear you drooling and foaming from here :) 

    ExF and Moonie always remind me of those annoying kids who run around screaming and yelling and knocking shit over: "Everyone pay attention to Meeeeeeee!"  while adults are trying to have a conversation.

    • Thanks 1

  22. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    ExFlyer, I'm sure you think by putting the HAHAHA emoji on everything I post, that you are somehow "getting to me".

    You're not.

    I kind of think of you as the mental patient sitting in the corner, rocking and giggling, too unintelligent to understand what's going on around him.

    I know you do it for attention and acknowledgment.

    Consider yourself "acknowledged."

    • Haha 1

  23. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    On 4/21/2024 at 4:15 AM, Venandi said:

    ...what if this gets exponentially worse over time? What if it just continues in a linear manner?

    That's the million dollar question.

    We don't know.  And the scientists and researchers who are trying to find out how bad it is, so that we can work on finding help for people, are continually being shot down and silenced by media, gov't, Big Pharma and their useful idjits like the ones here, who are against finding out.

    What we do know - excess deaths in highly vaxxed countries are far more than covid deaths ever were and this is being ignored.  The #1 reason for death in Alberta is "unknown cause".

    We do know the spike and the LNPs are settling primarily in the ovaries and testes.  What that means for future generation's fertility, time will tell.  But it's likely not good.

    • Haha 1

  24. 85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    On 4/19/2024 at 8:39 PM, Venandi said:

    Now I’m curious if the presence of lipids will allow penetration of the BBB?

    It does.

    I posted links to these studies in the Trickle thread.

    I'm impressed you know to ask about this - crossing the BB is a HUGE no-no and yet when it was reported - there was a collective "Meh...."

    On 4/19/2024 at 8:39 PM, Venandi said:

    Take the off label use of Ivermectin for example, a cheap, readily available and innocuous drug. If you understand how it works (in basic terms) then you would likely accept the idea that it needed to be prescribed early; at the very first sign of symptoms. You would also expect it not to be effective with high viral loading if prescribed too late in the process. But come on now... screaming Trumper, "tin foil hatter” and chicken dancing in a t-shirt that asks “are you a horse?” didn’t address the issue at all. The noise meant that none of those high school questions had a hope of being answered. 

    Ya, the war on IVM was astonishing to me.  I had been given a prescription for it years ago, during my traveling years.

    There is quite the story about how its use was demonized and suppressed- if you're interested, (let me know if you can't find it through Google) you should check out these names:  Dr. Tess Lawrie, Andrew Hill, Andrew Owen.

    On 4/19/2024 at 8:39 PM, Venandi said:

    It doesn’t jive with my recollection of high school biology.

    I find you very refreshing.  Not many people questioned anything.

    On 4/19/2024 at 8:39 PM, Venandi said:

    possible future prion diseases and brain interactions (with the protein), I don’t know the answer to that either.

    Wow, you've hit nearly all the major issues.  Again, I tackled prion diseases and posted the studies in the Trickle thread.

     

×
×
  • Create New...