poochy

Ah revisionist history, they never became hated, they were hated by most of the same people who hate them now since even before they were elected. They were hated for the evil agenda narrative, though none of it was true, and even though it wasn't, people like yourself tried to ascribe almost anything they did to that narrative. What exactly did they do, not the things you imagined, not the things you feel, (though we know that's what is most important, how you poor dears feel) but what exactly did they do to this country to change it into something so terrible? It's all bs, but there are enough simpletons out there that really believe it, and that's all that matters to the liberal brain trust. No different than the idiot in line yesterday that was ranting about the dictatorship, or the idiot i saw on line today crying about federal health care cuts, these lies have been told over and over by unscrupulous people, so long that people who might have been thinking about change decided that things were so bad we absolutely needed change. What we got is a sophomoric PM that copied Obama's path to victory, promising everything, promising to make it all better, kiss the booboos away, what we will get is liberal graft and care taking of a country that hasn't much changed at all. O but I know, the conservatives were mean, and you're pretty sensitive, so something had to be done. They for example, expected people in Atlantic Canada to work a little more instead of just working at scamming the Ei system, o but those liberals, they will make those expectations of self reliance go away, kiss it all better. Frankly I don't much care if the liberals are in charge, aside from the increase in taxes i will pay over the conservatives, i don't think much will change, but that's mostly because I think the country is stronger than any moderate change they may make, just as in reality, it was with the conservatives, and im not an idiot, unlike those who have been claiming we have lived in some sort of dictatorship for the past 10 years, those people, are idiots. I am however embarrassed that our PM is a man child, who speaks less intelligently than my 16yr old son, and who has convinced the country, with nothing but touchy feely platitudes and promises of someone elses money, to vote for him. If he impresses you, you are the problem, and you like him, probably still have some growing up to do. It's a good thing he plans to rarely attend question period, and we all should know why that is.

Wait, aren't we going to figure out how much of a percentage of the total eligible voters they got and then disparage them for that low number for the next 4 years? Isn't that how it's done now?

Considering the way things normally work in this country im not sure it matters, all Trudeau has to do is spew empty platitudes for the next 4 years and he is almost certain to be reelected. The natural governing party is back in.

I make a little too much to receive the middle class tax break, and i lose income splitting, which will cost me thousands, but hey, im sure someone else needs it more than my two very close to university age children, of course this isnt even to mention how emboldened Wynne will become after this result, so I expect my provincial taxes and just about everything else the government controls to rise. I suppose i could work less hard and be less productive and get a 1.5% tax cut, and still lose thousands.

Yea, all of those idiots out there referring to the conservatives as fascists, or dictators, those people were "nuanced".

I guess that's why Trudeau is going to take more money from me, the middle class and redistribute it, the system is rigged in my favor.

An the American constitution seems to give them unfettered access to firearms, whoopity do. It conveniently justifies his opinion, thats the only reason.

#7 A minimum IQ before people are allowed to vote.

I take it you didn't listen to his speech? This could be entertaining. But then again, maybe the people who voted for him won't get the jokes.

Yea, those poor people who didn't like having to o i dont know, support themselves most of the year, I know a lot of your don't understand this, but the thing you are cheering on isn't a good one, people voting liberal to avoid personal responsibility over their own well being isn't a good thing. Most of my family lives in Nova Scotia, and im sad to say they are guilty of this too, i left, haven't been back there much for 20 years because i needed to take care of my own, they decided to stay where we grew up, and it's people like me who pay them to do it, and you cheer for that. They in many ways have been 'institutionalized' by the system, and now they don't know any other way, there's no question that some of you here are the same. it's a very sad way to live when there are options, im living proof those options exist.

You missed the Simpsons reference, which might be because you didn't watch it, or you're too old, or because it's been on so long, too young. "I used to be with it, but then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me, and it'll happen to you, too."

You just threw your vote away!

I expect a slim majority for Kang, but don't blame me, I voted for Kodos

Yea, he might be average, he is quite capable of speaking in broad, cuddly generalities, and yelling over people in debates, i'll give him that. It won't be long, assuming they win, before he has to stand on his own merits, before his election handlers can't drill him relentlessly on what empty thing to say in every likely scenario, and just as happened since he was leader, before the election, he will make a fool of himself, he will eventually be an embarrassment.

It's obviously in direct response to this quote from the person he was responding to, "You Muslim haters out there, you can thank Mr. Harper and the conservative party for this with their divide and conquer policy to get the haters' votes." In other words this happens, and has happened before today, and to other identifiable groups, there is no real reason to think this is only happnening becuase of the current debate, the point was clearly made, and you seem to be choosing to ignore it while trying to make some other point, which might be why some of us have you on ignore.

How can you endorse conservative policies, while believing the leader has complete control over every aspect of the party, and not endorse it's leader?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/top-business-stories/canadas-middle-class-now-worlds-richest-study-suggests/article18090490/

You missed the point, not surprising. Maybe the moderator can delete this again, for no reason, maybe your misunderstanding needs defending, im not sure.

Yea, Canada, as bad as France, leading klan conventions, you really ought to be ashamed of yourself. Your deeply disturbing.

The msm in this country is dominated by the cbc, they make things news, they are completely in the tank for the liberals, always are.

Wow, talk about sensitive.