Derek 2.0

He stated, and you quoted: Clearly referencing the use of deadly force in the above passage.......your reply: So how is the members description of deadly force "loosey goosey"?

Sure, but BC2004 was commenting on the use of deadly force.......you implied his description was wrong.....how is it wrong?

FTFY

How so? The description is apt with the use of deadly force.

Don't forget, she also challenged Hillary.....

Agreed 100%.........And most calibers used by police are not indicative of “stopping power”, with a preference given to higher capacity magazines that fit flush to the gun and in turn holster.

One shot, one kill only happens in the movies: ........The police are trained to continue to shoot until the target stops moving.

I wouldn’t know how to answer that specifically, each new riding will include a given portion of the previous riding, and in some case, including portions of a different riding……. I would assume if you were so inclined, you could compare current and future riding boundaries.

That a given stance by the Party/Government might not be inclusive of the individual membership……..on this issue, specifically the Libertarian wing of the party……….. My questioning of the LPC view, to clarify if the Trudeau Liberals are facing an inverted approach to the mater….Namely the membership generally favouring “medically-assisted death”, with the Leadership showing reservations to campaigning on it.

Of existing Tory MPs, that are not retiring, off the top of my head, I can only think of two members bounced (Eve Adams & Rob Anders)........with that, I believe Anders plans to run in a different, new/vacated riding.....

I think you've stated the position of the Government quite clearly........what is clear as mud, is the Liberal Party of Canada's position going into 2015.......why the confusion among the Trudeau LPC?

How does that differ to past Liberal Governments? Have not prior Governments held shared policies with our neighbour to the South and largest trading partner? Again, what specifically has the Harper Government done to increase the potential threat to Canadians traveling abroad?

You brought up the apparent incumbent advantage………..it would seem, due to redistricting, the apparent “incumbent advantage” would be negated in most races.

If Mackay’s comment represents the Harper Government’s stance, which represents the LPC…….Trudeau’s comment or the Party resolution?

Why would I do that? I've already stated this quirk of retirements as insignificant.

It represents it no more, or less, than the Trudeau quote you provided...

targeted tax cuts, tax cuts and some tax cuts targeted at the suburban middle class....and maybe a few more tax cuts.

And the same meme: http://youtu.be/_Swr-vs9mqo

What is the difference in foreign policy between the current Government and the previous Liberal Government that has caused Canadians to be identified as Americans?

How many of the 18 are leaving safe Tory seats or hail from a riding that will redistricted?

The BCTF hasn't done likewise?

Hey outside of Pot laws, the Liberals have yet to state what they would actually do different then the current Government....

Sure it is, but your inference with a couple of select quotes, demonstrates no consensus amongst the two parties that have a chance to actually change the laws.

And again several years ago when a Bloc member put forth a private members bill.