Leaderboard

And violence.

Does that high velocity spin produce an event horizon?

Are YOU ok with it? It’s not baseless at all. And the plane doesn’t stay in service when it leaves office it goes to his library He has launched his own cryptocurrencies -two of them - is heavily invested in crypto firms and has ordered the US treasury to hold crypto reserves. He’s somehow made $3 BILLION in crypto over the last 6 months its 40% of his wealth now. The guy is as dirty as they come

The Libs do whatever they want now, the MSM will say it's because he's being heroic. This "elbow's up" BS is the new covid... The media will back every ridiculous thing the Libs do and that will be the excuse that keeps on excusing.

"Budgets? We don't need no stinking budgets!" It makes sense from a completely fascist POV: if his budget gets defeated in the HoC it's considered a vote of no confidence (I read that somewhere), triggering an election, and he's gonna run a deficit so bloated that it makes Whoopi look anorexic.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-won-t-table-budget-1.7534962 Like WHAT the actual EFF?!?! This guy's whole stick was that we were in massive crisis mode and we need a plan desperately and he's the guy with the plan And now he's not even going to table a budget until next year? What the hell is that? What happened to the most serious crisis of our time? This guy is a total fraud and the stupidest half of Canada fell for it. I cannot believe he's not even going to table a freaking budget. He's got no plan and he's just going to carry on that way.

https://www.newsweek.com/james-comey-deletes-post-depicting-8647-after-backlash-online-2073031 Does Comey belong in jail for a death threat? I say throw him in a cage. Death threats are very illegal.

The SCOTUS is just ruling on whether or not a federal judge that is assigned a region of the country has the right to issue a national injunction. It seems to me, that the most appropriate source of a nation wide injunction would come from the SCOTUS. Judge shopping by choosing regions with friendly judges all the way up to the federal level to get a nation wide injunction is an end around play. Rather than relying on the merits of the case, they relied on the loyalty of the the left. If the SCOTUS is reasonable, they will limit nationwide injunctions to SCOTUS. As for the 14th amendment and birthright citizenship, there is no birthright citizenship for visitors. Here is the relevant text of the 14th: The first sentence is what the EO that POTUS signed, is all about. In it's original intent, people that were born here and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, would become citizens. The word "and' is vitally important. It delineates that just being born with in the boundaries of the United States is not a qualification. One must be born AND "subject to the jurisdiction" of the Untied States. "Subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" is where those that suppo rt birthrights for everyone have tried to change the meaning of the Amendment. "Subject to the jurisdiction" has been redefined to mean anyone that must follow our laws. Their belief is that jurisdiction has to do with legal matters. That isn't true. Jurisdiction means: "2a: the authority of a sovereign power to govern or legislate." The federal government and the state have no authority to govern or legislate people that do not live here. While they are here, they have to obey our laws. That is why they call it the "law of the land" and not the "law of the people". To finish defining the phrase, Subject (in this context) means: (2): one who lives in the territory of, enjoys the protection of, and owes allegiance to a sovereign power or state. A foreign national, that has no right to live in the United States, would not fit into this definition. We can look to two examples in history (at the time) that add context: Indians and Mexicans in Texas. Indians that lived in tribes and did not consider themselves part of the United States, did not enjoy birthright citizenship. The same was true for Mexicans. They were given a choice when Texas joined the United States. They could leave or they could stay and become citizens. They were not, automatically, given citizenship for being born. The second half of the citizenship clauses establishes that the United States determines who is a citizen and who is not. "Birthright" is specifically listed as a privilege and not a right. This was intended to prevent slave states from attempting to remove citizenship via legislation. In short, the 14th does not give all persons born within our borders citizenship. It does give all persons born to citizens and legal residents ( as defined by the immigration statutes).

Calling it out with what exactly? I've yet to see you post anything that even resembles a factual or historical counterpoint. Denial and accusations are all you've ever brought to these discussions.

We are living in a pretty much communist country where it can take months or even years to get permits to get things done here in Canada. The amount of rules and regulations and taxes pretty much makes it almost impossible to try and get anything going here in Canada. With the Indians and the environmentalists, the NDP socialists and the leftist lieberals, all four would prefer to get in the way instead of out of the way. I am amazed that we can still get things done with all of the obstacles put in front of developers. Canada was once a free enterprise and capitalist country but it ain't no more, pardner. We all now pretty much live in a communist like anti-growth utopia. I am amazed that Canada has not gone bankrupt already. But at the rate that the lieberal government keeps borrowing billions from the banksters, it should not take that much longer. What a country. In Canada, refugees come first, Canadians come last. One Syrian family of four can cost the Canadian taxpayer tens of thousands of our tax dollars to keep them fed, clothed and housed with a few bucks for spending money. And that is just one refugee family. Imagine doing the same thing for hundreds of thousands of new immigrants and refugees every year? And then we wonder as to why Canada is pretty much broke. But we have four more years of this chit to put up with thanks to the insane lieberal imbeciles that put in the lieberals once again. Canada is so bloody doomed.

They're awed at his obvious descent into dementia shown by his rambling speeches, malicious diatribes and endorsement of terror supporting non democratic rulers and the outright corruption and disregard of anything America ever stood for on his current self-serving jaunt through the desert. Only the dimmest of Magatts see otherwise.

How do they vote today? Duh.🙄 Again who did David Duke endorse? And who wouldn't reject that endorsement.

Seems like you and the Hodad have fallen under the influence of a Kerr black hole.

Quite true. But the elite globalists liberals believe in tearing down borders and creating a one world system where everyone can move and live wherever they wish. If you read between the lines of the U.N. social development goals, you can conclude that they wish to create that kind of world. They believe the way to end world poverty and solve all the world's problems is to just have one world government and redistribute the wealth to everyone. This of course would make everyone equal in poverty. Such a system is completely flawed and against human nature. Such a system does not respect individual initiative, work, or private property. Nobody would want to work for one thing. Why work if the system is going to give you everything? That's the flaw with Socialism and Communism and the U.N. thinking. But they want everyone to bow to them as the great benefactors and caretakers of humanity.

Which makes perfect sense. In woke world, ALL 7+ billion of earth's inhabitants have a right to be here, right now. That is why their opinion needs to be thrown out.

This forum is an excellent place to meet i-d-i-ots like CumFux and fling insults left and right. Marvelous! I wish we had a large set of appropriate emoticons to go with that. 😁

Dumbest take yet. Who did white supremacists, white nationalists and neo nazis vote for? Who did David Duke endorse? Who's droning on about replacement theory and white genocide? Who has dinner with Nick Fuentes. If you see a swastika or a confederate flag, do you know how that person votes? Of course you do. Jeebus. You don't even believe what you're saying. You just say it anyway.

You are a stone cold liar. Comey did no such thing. Not even remotely. No one is above the law, but there is nothing whatsoever wrong with 8647. There is no threat there of any kind, let alone assassination. You're "finishing it"? GTFO.🤣

A. 7 out of 195 is objectively excellent, and objectively not terrible. Jeebus. B. Again, you lump, it's not a ranking of economies, but of recoveries. C. I bet you're a solid middle of the pack among your colleagues. Bless the Opportunity Fund. D. To correct someone, you'd have to first be correct about something, and that seems wildly out of reach. Your "evidence" for a bad Biden economy is a ranking (that was misapplied in the first place) and says the Biden economy is top 4%. 🤪 But as always, you'll keep digging.

The Democrats always try to whitewash history. Sad.

It's rather concerning that someone like Comey is so enthrall by hatred, that he'd sit on a beach and write 8647 in shells in the sand...the take a picture and post it. This is where his idle mind is while relaxing on a beach? Yes he needs to be made an example of. This insanity needs to end.

Demographics is destiny

It should be up to the Democrats to pay reparations if any were to be paid out. Republicans didn't want Jim Crow whereas Democrats did. Duh

Yup. It's become obvious that the party of compassion is also the party of assassination. What a bunch of f*cking hypocrites.

This made-up story about it being a threat is just the latest bit of fiction from you bed wetters. There nothing even vaguely threatening about it. And when you all started boo-hooing over about it, Comey was quick to clarify. So wipe your crocodile tears and un-clutch your pearls. I'm no Comey fan--it's very likely his fault that Trump won in the first place--but I wholeheartedly agree that we should throw the crook out.

I got the point dead on, you realize what you said was stupid, now you're embarrassed and trying to retcon a new meaning to what you said. Like I've said before I'm sure you slay them on the elementary school playgrounds at recess I have known many, some well, but anybody can learn their track record and their job performance. It's not radically complicated What you're saying is it's not difficult to know people. My god you're useless Twat

Once again more than you. In fact i continued to read to the point where you said it doesn't matter to you. So again i was right, you don't care about accountability. Especially when it's liberal. You don't want transparency. Producing a budget and having the watchdog comment on it at the end of the year is transparency. It's one of the most important of all the transparancies - seeing whether the spending of public taxpayer money was done within accordance of a plan and whether it was successful. It's always fun pointing out what a hypocritical liar you are You literally just admitted transparancy "Doesn't affect your life" and you don't care about it. Ahhh ... you mean because all the left wing supporters voted for the liberals. Otherwise it would have been a cpc majority. Sure. You kept the liberals in this time, well done. But we knew you supported them all along.

Vile man

He should be more harshly punished for this because he is far more aware of how pictures a d videos like that can incite violence than the average person. Further, the fact that there were two (very public) assasination attempts makes what he did even more aggregious.

Oh my God! I don't even know who my neighbors are after 15 years, don't know those I work with for over 10 years... I don't sleep with them. In some cases you may even sleep with someone and still not know who they are. What is your problem?

I noted this too. ===== In Carney's mind, he has a majority. (He has the NDP locked down for 18 months at least.)

Our country is an absolute joke. Parliament has been shut down since late fall of 2024.

No, you overreacting, victim-complex-having clown. https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/eighty-six-meaning-origin What to Know Eighty-six is slang meaning "to throw out," "to get rid of," or "to refuse service to." It comes from 1930s soda-counter slang meaning that an item was sold out. There is varying anecdotal evidence about why the term eighty-six was used, but the most common theory is that it is rhyming slang for nix. ... Shift to Verb Usage In the 1950s the word underwent some functional shift, and began to be used as a verb. The initial meaning as a verb was “to refuse to serve a customer,” and later took on the slightly extended meaning of “to get rid of; to throw out.” The word was especially used in reference to refusing further bar service to inebriates. Can we 86 this dumb thread already?

Thats quit the build up for only one mistake....Get ready for it was your quote right...everyone was ready for this Got ya moment only to be let down.... weeks before you accused me of not even reading the book, Well this week we went from the book was nothing more than a bunch of conspiracies' theories' to now it has one mistake factual error....to which you've thrown out the entire book....You make it sound like i intentional went out of my way to deceive you, or something.... Book has 388 pages, you've managed to pick out one mistake,in all that.... Man your good, have you really got anything else.....any ways i did purchase the book with the intent of getting to know your hero and what drives him. But then again nobody is as perfect as you are, must have holes in your hands ands feet. I also like to remind you, that you constantly posted on here about Justin mishandling of the budget, and our economy, Yet you voted for the liberals thinking that Carney can be the only one to save us as HE is a banker....You also knew he was going to spend north of 123 bil this year in campaign promises, and another 5-600 bil over the next 5 years in what he calls investments...Way more than justin ever spent....I guess all the economic training you claim you have has left the building,i mean liberals can't be wrong 4 terms in a row can they.... PS thanks for the source....at least we have that to fall back on...

🤣 so true

Dear Ms. Lee, Up yours you dumb b1tch. Do you even realize that your trillion would come at the expense of Afro-Americans as well? Your logic and your hair-doo need the immediate attention of sound reconstruction. You want money for something nobody alive today had any part in. It is actually quite possible that you have some Caucasian DNA floating about inside you, just waiting to burst forth. Wouldn't that be special... You and that bald-headed effigy from a horror movie, Ayanna Presley, should both consider new careers that don't involve public exposure. But for now, I'll just laugh at you and your... Brilliance... Yours Truly, N.

Crows are the smartest birds. Your subconscious really farked you on that one. Meanwhile, you have to settle for being chickenshit.

Well yes they should have given a date, even if the rationale is that we're in turbulent times blah blah blah blah blah.

ROFLMAO!!! "ELBOWS UP" You dumb fcks have been had-and-a-half.

we know. But but but trump you see..... Importing massive numbers of people in excess of how many homes we build and putting more roadblocks in front of home building Importing massive numbers of people in excess of how many homes we build and putting more roadblocks in front of home building Because what they're doing about it is Importing massive numbers of people in excess of how many homes we build and putting more roadblocks in front of home building Counting it's gov't subsidy.

Well damn, that’s an image I didn’t need with my morning coffee

It may not build homes, but it certainly can produce red tape and taxes that jack up these prices...not just at the federal level but all the way down the line...everyone has got their hands out from the banks to lawyers, to Service NB , everyone has got to be paid thousands of dollars....

But they are the ones importing 1,000,000 new Canadians each year. You see no connection?

Oh F off with the bullshit. The federal govt does not build houses. Developers mainly do, and if you read headlines the last few days, in Vancouver they're abandoning condos and apartments to build Hotels where the profit margins and rate of return for buyers is the highest. You want govt to slap up Soviet style blockhouses or 'project' tenements like some cities in the USA? Didn't think so. Or turn farmland into townhouses and build up the sides of Mt Seymour, Grouse and Cypress Bowl? How about some sensible suggestions they could do rather than whine endlessly about what they didn't do before or listing your own home for an affordable price, say 1/5th it's assessed value? It's a market and Mr Capitalist wants communist solutions?

And yet Palestinians are still raped tortured and murdered anyway. There's plenty of moral equivalency and you are simply in denial. You still haven't commented on the Westbank, why is that? I can only assume from your silence you do after all is said and done support the ongoing dispossession subjugation and oppression of Palestinians that started 100 years ago. Hamas has no legitimacy. And speaking of ruses note that people who often point out that Hamas was elected do so to justify the slaughter of Gazans. This completely ignores the fact there hasn't been an election in Gaza in 2 decades. It should also be noted that investigations into the abuse of Palestinians human rights reported several instances of Palestinians being tortured and murdered at the hands of Hamas as well as Israelis. I'm reminded of reports that Zionist terrorists sometimes murdered Jews that got in their way. So why did Netanyahu support Hamas? To undermine support for two states from Hamas' Palestinian opposition. Is that why you support Hamas?

I have a fair bit of experience with this topic. The collection, transportation and reprocessing infrastructure isn't there and if it was possible to be significantly successful (and it is not) the costs would be many times that of the original product. The big deal is we would still HAVE the damned plastics - and whenever and wherever they exist, they deliver a wide range of "forever chemicals" into not just our environment but our own bodies. The only solution is to stop using them completely. Fortunately, the technology exists and is well proven to make replacement resins that can and SHOULD be disposed of by directly passing into soils as they can be a tremendous soil nutrient - able to repair some of the damage we have done to our soils. It would require effectively washing of content remainents that are toxiins on their own - and this can most effectively be done by placing the full life cycle costs and responsibilities on the original packager. This can be very effectively done by a deposit/return mechanism to get the container back to its source by "flowing backwards" through the distribution system. The latter has been done with incredible success in some jurisdictions with aluminum drink cans and others with lubricating oil, containers and filters. The one that is widespread in visibility but seldom achieving stated goals is used tires. The market for ground rubber compressed into floor mats and curb stops is saturated - but new tech is around that can take it back to the OEM as re-useable feedstock.

I love the idea. It's an America first move, and I love it. Also, anything we can do to expose illegal aliens and get them deported is always a good strategy.

I appreciate you bringing up such an intriguing topic for discussion. Room temperature superconductivity has been a holy grail in the realm of physics for decades, offering immense promise for revolutionizing various industries. Imagine the possibilities if we could achieve superconductivity at everyday temperatures, where electrical currents flow endlessly without any resistance. It could pave the way for groundbreaking advancements in technology, from more efficient power transmission to ultra-fast computing.