Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/12/2025 in all areas

  1. 6 people are charged in a Texas elections investigation involving ‘vote harvesting’ Two stories here: A) Dems are running around saying there is no election fraud and then dems are caught committing election fraud. Ballot harvesting is illegal in Texas because it is well known that ballot harvesters would ditch votes if they disagreed with them. This was very common in retirement homes where harvesters would bring ballots, watch the elderly sign the ballot and then toss the ballots that they didn't want cast. B ) Notice how the AP just ignores party affiliation in the title. They wouldn't do that if these were Republicans.
    3 points
  2. This is the thing that the left seems to be skipping over that is worth repeating several times until they get it. Deportation is not a punishment. They're not being banished, they're being removed from the country where they were illegally present This is not a punitive measure, nobody is saying that such and such must be punished, deport them! They just don't belong here in the first place. It's like asking a trespasser to leave your property. Asking them to leave isn't the punishment, they just don't have a lawful right to be there and you're asking them to correct that. When we talk about trials and so on and so forth usually we're discussing someone's punishment. If we can prove a crime then we're allowed to punish them but you're not allowed to punish them until you prove the crime But this isn't a punishment. There is no need to prove a crime. If they cannot demonstrate lawful reason to be within the country then they are simply removed and that is not inappropriate. If they feel that they have been removed unfairly they can always file outside of the country to the appropriate agencies for remedy. But you don't need a trial or to prove that a crime has taken place in order to remove someone from a place that they have no lawful right to be
    3 points
  3. Good God, pretending to be Conservatives and belittling the King's reading of the Throne Speech. It's a goddam honour for us and for the King to do on his first showing in Canada. It's also a thunb to stick in Trump's eye to show we're not some 51st state candidate. Imagine that - a head of state with a sense of decency, duty, and honour rather than accepting bribes of jet planes, wanting to rid habeas corpus, belittling universities, and demanding nations bend to his will. Who's the real King and who's the tyrant?
    3 points
  4. Trump Administration Reaches Trade Deal With China in Geneva We don't know the details. But, apparently, China has agreed to a trade deal.
    2 points
  5. Aside from the laughable idea that you'd look for "truth" at the Heritage Foundation, that's podcast from June 2022. That's your answer to actual data and reporting from The Economist?
    2 points
  6. A. Vote harvesting is not election fraud. It is sometimes a crime though. and election crimes are real (just look at the sitting president) but in-person voter fraud (the non-issue that the voter suppression party uses to justify a crusade for voter ID) is virtually nonexistent. B. Your dumb victimhood narrative is pure nonsense. Oh, and who made the initial accusation in this case? Another Democrat. C. This kind of petty election shenanigan is really only relevant in penny ante races where a few votes can make a meaningful difference. D. Paxton is the grossest of political creatures, and has himself been accused of, indicted on and suspended for multiple felonies. Very low confidence that any of this is real. Talk to us when he gets a conviction. All of this intense right-wing noise about voter fraud, ballot harvesting, illegals voting, double voting etc. exists for one reason: to undermine Americans' confidence in our democratic systems. That's it. It's not based in any way, shape or form on reality. It's not based on evidence--indeed, there is none. They simply know that if they create fear and mistrust it will divide Americans and pave the way for authoritarianism to "save" our country from a mysterious "other."
    2 points
  7. Translation: "I have no real argument because everyone already knows the facts and voted for Trump. So I'll fall back on the ol' NAZI theme and act like I know something."
    2 points
  8. You've managed to overlook ANOTHER mess made by Trump which crashed the stock market this time but enriched a few of his insider trader friends. 🤮 Joe Biden NEVER acted so recklessly with the economy as his plaything.
    2 points
  9. No evidence of ^this. ZERO. But speaking of payoffs, Qatar is ready to grease Trump palms BIG TIME. Must be close to a $B 🤮 The Guardian Trump reportedly prepared to accept ‘palace in the sky’ as gift from Qatar 9 hours ago ABC News Trump administration poised to accept 'palace in the sky' as a gift for Trump from Qatar: Sources 4 hours ago Trump plans to accept 747 from Qatar to use as Air Force One, source says Australian Broadcasting Corporati
    2 points
  10. Wow. Your TDS is so bad that you just wished death on your wife. Classy.
    2 points
  11. Poilievre rejects severance offered to defeated MPs after losing Ontario riding - The Globe and Mail If a sitting MP is defeated they have a right to Severance. And there is no requirement to pay it back if they seek re-election elsewhere Pierre is entitled to receive $154,850 in Severance because he lost his riding. He is perfectly eligible for that and MPS get that all the time. There's no requirement to repay it if he runs somewhere else. But instead of demanding that he's entitled to his entitlements he's refusing to take it knowing that he doesn't tend to run again and expects to be back in the house and feels it would be inappropriate to keep the money I rather doubt you'd see a liberal doing that
    1 point
  12. WTF are you whining about now, dummy? Do you remember when Carney was the unelected PM or not?
    1 point
  13. What is worse is that some of them seem to thing and want for him to come back and live life with his family as an American, like some kind of fairy tale ending or something. The outcome of this doesn't change. He is going back to El Salvador. Even the folks screaming about due process... so, what, he comes back, remains detained until he has his order revoked saying he can't be deported to El Salvador because it is safe to go home. Like... the outcome is going to be the same here no matter what, so what is the point now?
    1 point
  14. The jabs didn't go through the full trial process, dummy. They were only approved on an "emergency basis". People had to sign a waiver to take them, remember?
    1 point
  15. He/She/They is just mad 'cause the Republicans are taking away his reborn slavery.
    1 point
  16. A good look at the clown show south of them has made them think a monarch as head of state might not be such a bad idea after all.
    1 point
  17. Though Trump is problematic for various reasons, credit must be given to him for putting a stop to an insane cultural revolution in the West that was judging and hiring/admitting people to jobs and higher education in the basis of race instead of merit, that was teaching kids in schools that they could pick and change their gender without concern or parental involvement, that thugs could enter the U.S. and expand the cartel without consequence, as young people died of fentanyl overdose in staggering numbers, that allowed homeless to take up residence in parks and set up encampments in the middle of downtown streets in places like Portland and San Francisco, that encouraged irresponsible government spending on ridiculous programs as the government teetered on bankruptcy. America needed a Trump type to correct course. I agree it has had its excesses, and the tariff scheme probably won’t have the desired effect MAGA hoped it would, though again, something needed to be done about trade imbalances and countries that freeloaded on America for defence, like Canada. Poilievre basically wanted to see Canada in a position of strength in this new world order after nine years of irresponsible overspending, activist government that empowered forces intent on bringing down the Canadian nation state, both internationally (UN, China, US) and domestically (radical left climate, LGBTQ, and Indigenous activists to name a few), and mass immigration that has overrun our services and housing, but also run traditional Canadian founding cultures out of town. The Canada of today is simply a less desirable place to live and work than it was a decade ago under the Conservatives. We earn less, feel more ashamed, feel like foreigners in the cities, and feel like we as citizens aren’t capable of thinking for ourselves because we’ve been told government knows best. A vote for the Liberals was not a vote to fix this situation but merely a vote to hear more anti-American, anti-Trump rhetoric to make us feel better about ourselves as we continue to seek concessions from the U.S. Carney isn’t lifting any regulations. He’s promising more spending. Well he won the election, so now all we can hope for is that this guy actually does some things that correct course and bring back prosperity. The identity politics and climate fear porn are probably here to stay under Carney.
    1 point
  18. Quebec sovereigntists are flipping out but that was a given. The BQ lost seats in the last election.
    1 point
  19. So Trump might accept an airplane for the country and that's proof of some evil? https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-how-joe-biden-received-laundered-china-money/ Here’s how Joe Biden benefited from his family’s shady deal with CEFC, a Chinese Communist Party linked company. It all began with a shakedown in the summer of 2017, when Hunter Biden sent a message to his CEFC associate demanding a $10 million capital payment. As Hunter Biden extorted this associate, Hunter claimed he was sitting with his father and that the Biden network would turn on his associate if he didn’t pony up the money. The extortion scheme worked. Days later, $5,000,000 flowed in from a Chinese affiliate of CEFC. Over the following three weeks, Biden family members made a series of complicated financial transactions to hide the source of the China money. Here’s how that happened: First, Northern International Capital, a Chinese company associated with CEFC, wired $5,000,000 to Hudson West III, a joint venture established by Hunter Biden and a CEFC associate. Then, Hudson West III sent $400,000 to an entity owned and controlled by Hunter Biden. Next, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall Group, a company owned by Joe Biden’s brother James and sister-in-law Sara Biden. Sara Biden then withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group. Later the same day, she deposited it into her and James Biden’s personal checking account. A few days later, Sara Biden cut a check to Joe Biden for $40,000. The memo line of the check said, “loan repayment.” We previously exposed a $200,000 payment James made to his brother Joe that came from funds provided by a now bankrupt health care company called Americore. Like the payment to Joe from Americore funds, it’s certainly plausible that this payment where James and Sara used funds from China was indeed a loan repayment to Joe. But even if this $40,000 check was a loan repayment from James Biden, it still shows how Joe benefited from his family cashing in on his name – with money from China no less. Without his family peddling his name and his son threatening a CEFC associate with consequences that he said Joe Biden knew about, James wouldn’t have had the money to write the $40,000 check to his brother Joe. It’s also worth remembering that Biden family efforts to secure millions from this Chinese company began when Joe Biden was still Vice President.
    1 point
  20. Which is exactly what illegal alien criminals and terrorists deserve.
    1 point
  21. Here's the problem of conservative movement that often leads it to maga-style cultism. In a modern prosperous and advanced society, it fails to envision, explain and defend a social project that is inspirational and captivating. So they either embrace the general idea and thrust of progress, inclusive and compassionate society and work on some aspect of it (many countries in Europe); or invariably reduced to the role of barking, an attack dog that is necessary as oversight in the society but damages their collective psyche, where they eventually see every act as an attack on their "values" and the only point of politics in gaining the power. Conservatives have to think about it now, because in their current state, maga isnt' that far away. And for the country as a whole, we quite urgently need a meaningful change in politics, to avoid inevitable and catastrophic polarization that is written on the wall. When and if maga wins, it's nothing short of a catastrophe for the society. And quite possibly, irreversible too.
    1 point
  22. What others did is not relevant. For sure PP has not scored any points with me on this one. What I would believe is something that affects my life in a positive way, not his life in supposedly a negative way!
    1 point
  23. -> Not the full context of what he was saying ->OK, drastic measures to fix the millions upon millions of illegal immigrants Biden let in ->No, it will go to his library, not to him personally -> It was not a "world" feature, but a gulf connected to America, and the rest of the world can call it whatever they want. This direction was well within the Executive Branch's powers over the Department of the Interior. The House passed a bill to support this and it is off to the Senate, so not Unilateral either. -> The parade is for the Army's 250th birthday. If you are so concerned about BS, start by addressing your own.
    1 point
  24. He didn't just predict a conservative win...he predicted a conservative majority. That Kool-Aid is mighty potent. Reality bends to his desires.
    1 point
  25. Smart move on Carney's part. The first time the Monarch has opened parliament since the seventies. What a contrast to the orange buffoon down south.
    1 point
  26. Do you truly believe that?? What do you expect him to say??? The conservative kool aid must taste good LOL How? Exactly? Well, he is a relatively new member of parliament representing his riding by a landslide and potentially a long career ahead of him and he steps away for a leader that actually lives over 3000 kms away from the riding?? yeah, my crystal ball is broken too. Like I said, this is the first time I could not vote conservative. Yes, it was my choice.
    1 point
  27. Schumer: "Putting profits over people's lives" 😂 'Cause that's so much better/worse than putting DEI status above people's lives"
    1 point
  28. This guy is a Marxist lieberal traitor to Canada. Anyone who voted for the globalist Marxist lieberal party in the last election, is a traitor to Canada. When it came to corruption, stealing, cheating and lying on top of putting a Marxist globalist party in power once again that believes in more taxes, more government and less freedom makes them a traitor to Canada. What makes this imbecile so stupid as to think that Canada is better off being woke and broke. One thing i picked up at Global Affairs Canada was that you and me the taxpayer has sent off $193 million of our tax dollars to help promote gender equality in Africa. What a bloody waste of our tax dollars. I could careless as to promoting gender equality in Africa. And there are thousands more Marxist like programs and agendas in the form of foreign aid to help the rest of the world. It needs to end now. But that will be hard to do seeing that we have millions of Canadian lieberal imbeciles like barquintin around that believe in trying to help the rest of the world and the hell with Canada. Imagine if we could keep the billions of our tax dollars in foreign aid here in Canada to help our own people. Barquintin is a sick and insane lieberal that needs big time conservative help. We now have four more years of his ilk and this is why i have given up on Canada because the insanity in this country will only get worse under globalist Corney. Corney despises Canada and Canadians. Corney is all in for a one world WEF globalist government. 🤮
    1 point
  29. Sorry, lefties, I don't have an X-rated version of that, but I'm sure that one of you clowns will have it.
    1 point
  30. Is that your weasel way of admitting that you severely dishonestly presented the information? LOLOL TRUMP IS BANNING HABEUS CORPUS!!!! (reality: trump may ask congress to suspend it in accordance with the constitution in a specific circumstance). For people like you, the truth is never enough. You've always got to add the lies and backspin.
    1 point
  31. $1.2 to 1.5$ million thrown away right after an election sounds like an abuse of the process, an insult to the citizens and disrespect of democracy. Should CPC find a more credible face to represent it, not to mention "honor" - or continue its slide into a local variant of maga? The clock is ticking on the answer.
    1 point
  32. Just imagine the nuclear fallout from the usual suspects if Poilievre had invited Charles. There would need to be a 25 mile no go zone around this board.
    1 point
  33. The King is our head of state. His function as King of Canada is completely separate from his function as King of the UK. It's clearly spelled out in our constitution. Same as Australia and New Zealand. It's odd and it's unique but having a non political head of state, separate from government is a good thing in my opinion. Having Charles open Parliament will send a reminder to Trump and Americans how we are different and why.
    1 point
  34. As far as not attacking enough it would have made zero difference in why I did not vote for him. If he attacked the media he would have been seen as even closer to Trump than Canadians thought; again a bad thing for him. It would take conservatives to stop being conservatives in order to sway my vote their way.
    1 point
  35. Did the vaxxines really save lives and end the pandemic? There is meager scientific evidence that vaxxines reduced c0v1d infections or deaths. To the contrary, there is abundance evidence that mass vaccination had only brief efficacy against c0v1d, including the now undeniable fact, summarized in the February issue of the European Journal of Epidemiology that "Countries with a higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COV-19 cases per 1 million people." Consistent with this now global problem, US deaths in 2022 were - after mass vaxxing - higher than they were in 2020, prior to vaxxing. Although the average death from c0v1d early in the pandemic was 82 (with 4 comorbidities), Aegon Insurance reported in 2021 a rise of 40% in deaths for people under 65, "the highest percentage in any quarter since the pandemic began." Because this truth has not been reported by corporate media, it's understandable that you might find it surprising or unbelievable. Nonetheless, it is true. And it's a global problem that is continuing. In addition to the charts below, S. Korea, Australia, Canada and the US all report similar statistics. The tendency of COV vaxxines to INCREASE illness and mortality is a predictable outcome of the well-documented phenomenon of vaccine induced "pathogenic priming". Pfizer’s own data, which they attempted to keep from the public for 75 years, suggests that for every COVID death that the vaccine averts, it will, over time, kill four additional people from cardiac arrest. This means that vaccinated individuals then become more likely to suffer from COVID infections, hospitalizations, and deaths than unvaccinated individuals. Which is exactly what the world's top epidemiologists, vaccinologists and immunologists were trying to warn about, but **THIS** guy shut them down: Anthony Fauci - June 9, 2021: "Attacks on me, are quite frankly, attacks on science. So if you are trying to get at me.....you are really attacking not only Dr. Anthony Fauci, you are attacking science." It should have troubled people that the US's leading public health technocrat would utter such a narcissistic and scientifically absurd statement. Compare that statement to the new NIH director, Dr. Jay Battacharya: "Science should be an engine for knowledge and freedom, not something that stands on top of society and says 'You must do this, or else!'"
    1 point
  36. Men are toxic and shouldn't go to school. They should stay home and have babies and cook dinner.
    1 point
  37. I disagree. The reason men are dropping college classes is because they are being told how toxic they are with their "masculinity". They hear how patriarchal societies are evil and oppressive. How much stupidity do they think men are going to put up with?
    1 point
  38. Consensus by force and censorship is not consensus.
    1 point
  39. DR. PRASAD'S SUBSTACK TODAY: If public health wants to regain trust, it has to take an honest assessment of what it got right and got wrong. It can’t celebrate errors. Sadly, it appears that public health is not interested in that task. Take a look. Walensky wins the Fauci award?! Wow. Here is just a short list of what each of them got wrong Walensky: When she was in Brookline, she advocated for school reopening, but when appointed by President Biden, who campaigned on the idea that schools were dangerous, she reversed that stance. She met privately and discussed CDC guidance with the teachers unions. She was dishonest about myocarditis. There is no way this was true by the end of April 2021. The Israelis reported a rate of 1 in 3000 by February, and the EMA would soon confirm the safety signal. Once she accepted myocarditis exists, she made no effort to lower it. No trials of spaced doses, lower or omitted doses. She lied constantly about the evidence for masking. She lied to congress stating there was not equipoise for a trial testing if masking worked in children. This was clearly false given that the European CDC and CDC had divergent recommendations— and member states had a range of policies (e.g. Sweden never masked <12, US masked 2+). A divergence of practice is the definition of equipoise. Walensky supported vaccine mandates, which were unethical, as COVID vaccines had never established a third party benefit. Walensky pushed vaccines in people who had COVID— a strategy that may even be harmful. Walensky pushed boosters in low risk populations, a decision that led to the resignation of Gruber/ Krause at FDA. Walensky’s communication on TV was a constant mess of flip flopping and insecurity; she was a notoriously bad communicator. She even hired an outside consulting firm to help her communications, using taxpayer money. What did she get right? I am actually not sure. I suppose she was correct that COVID is caused by a virus and that many vitamins don’t work— facts that a high schooler would know— so she got the bare minimum right. But on any policy decisions, particularly those that used the force of the state, she got it wrong. She famously refused to throw away 6ft of social distancing (a distance pulled from someone’s ass), when when we begged her to do so, as it was stopping school reopening. More on what she got wrong here. And she gets the Fauci award. What did Fauci get wrong? Fauci was of course initially told the truth that multiple RCTs of community masking showed it didn’t help, then he lied about it. He never opposed masking 2 year olds. He exaggerated the risk to kids. He opposed DeSantis in spring 2020 when DeSantis wanted to reopen schools. Fauci was wrong about giving 2 doses to fewer people over 1 dose to more people. Fauci was wrong to not meet with and discuss different ideas with the authors of Great Barrington Declaration. Fauci was wrong about double masking. Fauci was wrong about vaccine mandates and ignoring natural immunity. Fauci was wrong about boosters for young people, vaccines for people who already had COVID. Most notably, Fauci appears to have used Gmail to evade federal FOIA laws to conceal NIAID’s role in funding the laboratory in Wuhan to conduct gain of function research in sars-coronaviruses. Public health has a choice. It could actually aspire to have dialog and discussion and pursue the truth, or it could keep promoting the people who were wrong. If it continues to do the latter, I suspect trust will continue to fall. If I were giving out awards, I would give Rochelle Wallensky the Fauci award for clever and effective propaganda at a time of crisis that polarized a nation and undermined faith in science.
    1 point
  40. I'm not sure why this is so hard for some to figure out. It is a fact that we were lied to about the injection staying in the arm. The LNP's take the spike protein and the junk DNA fragments all over the body and right into your cell's nuclei. That means they will damage any number of bodily systems. It will be different for each person. It's why this injection has such a wide variety of adverse events - cardio, immune issues, hemo (blood clots), neuro, etc. More than any other vaccine in human history. This thread is a cumulative compilation of the science and effects of an experimental injection forced on billions of people, as it progresses. Perhaps if you're having trouble understanding, go back and read the thread.
    1 point
  41. The only thing that's a "miracle" about this injection is that it's a miracle anyone survives it. Adverse events following COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: A systematic review of cardiovascular complication, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia - PubMed Results: A total of 81 articles analyzed confirmed cardiovascular complications post-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in 17,636 individuals and reported 284 deaths with any mRNA vaccine. Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination - PubMed Here, we report that several months after the second vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were increasingly composed of noninflammatory IgG4, which were further boosted by a third mRNA vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 variant breakthrough infections. IgG4 antibodies among all spike-specific IgG antibodies rose, on average, from 0.04% shortly after the second vaccination to 19.27% late after the third vaccination. COVID vaccine's hot problems: erratic serious blood clotting, ill-defined prion-like reactogenicity of the spike, unclear roles of other factors - PubMed (Prion diseases are like Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, which was rare and almost 100% fatal. If you check the "worthless" VAERS database, CJD cases exploded after the covid injections. This study, and the others I've posted, shows the mechanism for why this happens.) Soon after the large scale release of these vaccines, a cluster of first-dose immunized patients was underscored because of the following: abrupt onset of clinical signs in a week of the vaccine, including fever, severe headache, and abdominal colicky pain;5 detection either at the cerebral sinuses or at deep abdominal vessels of redundant amyloid-like material judged unusual for a common thrombotic deposition. Thus, we have envisaged two equivalent yet different ways of COVID-19 nucleic-acid based vaccines to induce uncontrolled blood clotting. We emphasize that this idea was developed independently and without each other knowledge. Both constructs emphasize the possible role of the spike, a highly reactive possibly prion protein. This ability of the virus and/or an ill-effective therapy to exert a “disease mimicry” is again an appalling feature of this agent.
    1 point
  42. https://twitter.com/llexxiiiiiiii/status/1844945241033539720?t=MXJI2hdvrP79d9luhhafOw&s=19
    1 point
  43. Shouldn't this be going the OTHER way?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...