Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/13/2024 in all areas

  1. Those aren't my words. They are he's. She says it was her fault. Trump said she was responsible for security and that he informally offered 10,000 troops and this video confirms that she knew she should have taken him up on that offer.
    4 points
  2. “The report from the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), a key Canadian intelligence oversight body, says there were "two specific instances where [People's Republic of China] officials allegedly interfered in the leadership races of the Conservative Party of Canada." Most of the details regarding the allegations in the NSICOP report have been redacted.“ https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7223518 There are probably a lot of juicy bits in the redacted material. But it’s time for the Canadian media to revisit the 2022 CPC leadership race. Because there should have been more contestants than the official number allowed. 3 applicants were disqualified who had similar platforms to Poilievre, and no doubt would have divided his support. The reasons given for disqualification were nonsense. That race was dirty. Look up G. Abraham. Its said that Poilievre won’t even read the report. Where there is smoke, there usually is fire.
    3 points
  3. Throw them in here. Could be fun. I'll start:
    2 points
  4. Amazing how everyone else is corrupt merely by saying so, yet someone repeatedly convicted for corruption is claimed to be persecuted. They are because someone said so. They aren't if proven so.
    2 points
  5. Your conspiracy theory is all around us, but evidence of crime is nonexistent. Hunter has been convicted of breaking a law republicans call unconstitutional. Not that I care.
    2 points
  6. I'm not here to wrestle with your confirmation bias, cultist. The information is all around you, you just refuse to see it, even when Politico finally says it. What are you gonna do when CNN finally has to admit it? And Rachel Maddow? And, God forbid, other cultists here? Just know that at some point in time, even Beave will acknowledge it. But truth comes slowly to you guys. It's only salacious gossip that you're quick to learn.
    2 points
  7. It's circular, self-reinforcing reasoning. Ukraine can successfully (and has successfully) resisted Russia with outside support. It's not really capable of doing it without. Arguing against supporting Ukraine is setting the conditions for them to fail, and the Putin boosters and the clownosphere are pretending that the results are the same either way. They're not. When folks say, "I just want peace," that's really just a dog whistle for "abandon Ukraine - let Putin have whatever he wants and reward his naked aggression. "
    2 points
  8. This isn't simply one "conflict of interest". This isn't simply "Joe was involved after he left gov't". Joe was inextricably linked to every aspect of Hunter's inappropriate deals with the Chinese gov't and Burisma's corrupt CEO, both during and after his term as VP. Politico just admitted that the whole body of evidence that now exists clearly ties Joe to all of the things that he was so desperate to deny in 2019. Joe knew how important it was to create & maintain the illusion that he was neither aware of nor involved in Hunter's inappropriate activity with foreign adversaries. That's why he lied so forcefully and so often about his knowledge and involvement. Just remember that a couple years ago the Biden family's/your argument was "No one has proof that Joe knew what Hunter was up to! NOTHING AT ALL! IT NEVER HAPPENED!" Joe was quite rude to anyone who asked him about it. That's why the picture of Joe, Hunter and Devon Archer golfing together was such a big deal when it first came out. It suddenly became harder to believe that Joe knew nothing of Hunter's shady dealings when Joe was out golfing with Hunter's main partner in crime. Now we know that Joe was lying, and that we was not only involved in Hunter's corruption, he was an active participant in it, AND he was even getting his staffers/advisers involved. Joe was using the weight of the VPOTUS office to create wealth for his own family, not for the good of the USA. Conservatives have been aware of all this for 4 years now, but up until Politico admitted to it, left-wing news outlets were all holding the line at "Joe was uninvolved". What we're talking about here is Politco's admission that Joe Biden is the biggest liar in America, and that he was completely involved in all of Hunter's deals, including with the Chinese gov't.
    2 points
  9. You people have been brainwashed, duped, and lied to. Now all you can do is mindlessly parrot what you have been told. "A January 6 committee staffer asked Ornato, “When it comes to the National Guard statement about having 10,000 troops or any other number of troops, do you recall any discussion prior to the 6th about whether and how many National Guard troops to deploy on January 6th?” Ornato surprised the committee by noting he did recall a conversation between Meadows and Bowser: “He was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed,” Ornato told investigators." "Meadows “wanted to know if she need any more guardsmen,” Ornato testified. “And I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, ‘The president wants to make sure that you have enough.’ You know, ‘He is willing to ask for 10,000.’ I remember that number. Now that you said it, it reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350 or so for intersection control, and those types of things not in the law enforcement capacity at the time.” Ornato was correct. Bowser declined the offer, asking only for a few hundred National Guard and requiring them to serve in a very limited capacity. " https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/chairman-loudermilk-publishes-never-before-released-anthony-ornato-transcribed-interview
    2 points
  10. Only AFTER Garland decides to prosecute himself for contempt. LMAO Contempt for not releasing the audio of Biden's testimony so RepubliCONS can use it in campaign ads is a complete joke.
    2 points
  11. This is, by far and away, the main reason I do not want Palestinians in my country. They have a history of celebrating attacks on Israel and America. On September 11, Palestinians were dancing on the street, singling, giving out candy and food. It was like a national holiday when the planes hit the Twin Towers in Palestine. It was not even 2 hours since the massacre of October 7, and on dozens of bridges over freeways in Toronto, Palestinians were waving flags, and dancing in the streets, as Hamas raped and murdered women and children. As someone said earlier, Canada should not only refuse entry to all Palestinians, but look for the troublemakers demonstrating on University campuses, and deport them all.
    2 points
  12. Glad you're keeping up. Good job. Good to hear. You had me worried for a second. Or those who commit violence. You can't pin point where I said its justified. The whole thread is watching. I will wait. Or is this a classic you bailing out, again. Pointing to something as a matter of fact isn't okaying it, just like being asexual doesn't mean I can't have sex and have kids. 🤪
    1 point
  13. I think it's more amazing how selectively you've summarized the timeline and details. 😑 Let me fill in the blanks for you: You're right. It was over 3 hours. 👍
    1 point
  14. Hey! Don't interrupt the voices in his head while they're talking.
    1 point
  15. I do. You're wrong. I don't think a guy who identifies as "asexual" should be throwing around terms like "perfectly normal".
    1 point
  16. He did the right thing. He campaigned against her overtly corrupt personality and then didn't do anything about it when she was relegated to irrelevant. Is he saying that he never said that? Meh. Ok. Biden says he was a civil rights leader when he wasn't, claims he was a professor when he wasn't, won't acknowledge his granddaughter, said he attendend like 5 different ethnic churches every Sunday (even the ones that met on saturday) and so on. Saying a politician lied is like saying a fish drank water. What I care about is actions. Trump did not resort to banana republic tactics and Biden did. Trump had a good economy, Biden doesn't. Trump didn't start any new wars, Biden can't stop wars from starting. Trump slowed illegal immigration, Biden set new records. Trump slowed regulatory growth, Biden will regulate anything. The choice is clear. Either vote for the guy that has nothing good to run on or vote for the guy that is a bombastic jackass that got the job done.
    1 point
  17. 1. I think it comes from this "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." in the modern context. 2. You can make the case for it but that ship sailed when the legal frameworks in the west were established. Instead, focus on non-sectarian morality that applies to all. 3. They lead but the people choose to follow or not.
    1 point
  18. Wow. The left can't meme
    1 point
  19. It's all crystal clear, when you make up your own facts! It's always eye-opening to see an actual crazy person try to process information.
    1 point
  20. Nope, he just ranted and raved, told them the election was stolen, that they needed to fight and that their democracy was being taken away from them when the reality was that he'd just lost and he's too much of a fragile narcissist to admit it. What happened at the Capitol had nothing to do with him...totally...for sure...😑
    1 point
  21. If it's a crime to support and promote genocide, you're guilty.
    1 point
  22. 1 point
  23. Exactly. Sorry, but if you tell me there are billions of genders but can't even name 10, and grow angry when pressed--sorry, but your stance is full of caca. This is what they are teaching kids. Making many more question their gender. This isn't a win, it's disturbing as it will have the unintended consequence of having perfectly normal kids mutilate their bodies, and then deeply regret it once at an age to understand such repercussions.
    1 point
  24. Actually, yeah they are nearly just that. Once the executive has claimed privilege over those conversations Congress would need an extraordinary court case to pry them loose. And with the transcripts already available, that certainly won't happen.DOA.
    1 point
  25. If she is still this dominant, I wouldn't be surprised if she was.
    1 point
  26. "we"? LMAO You're an lDIOT.
    1 point
  27. Biden isn't being subpoenaed. Duh ^BULLSHIT. There was NO substantive editing and you have ZERO evidence there was.
    1 point
  28. Trump and his cronies set the precedent for that. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-failed-comply-with-jan-6-committee-subpoena-panel-says-2022-11-14/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/07/us/politics/jan-6-subpoenas.html If the transcript is public, what is being withheld?
    1 point
  29. Right, right, the jews made them do that to the jews. IT's not "always something" with you. It's always "Someone else". You support the people who committed the october 7 attacks because THEY didn't do it - the iranians did, plus the jews FORCED them to. You defend the explusion of jews as being 'fair' because the jews made it fair for them to do so somehow. It's not the Palestinians fault they voted in hamas and still support hamas although you didn't mention who's fault it actually is now that i think about it. Harper? There is one group who's responsible for what's happening to the gazans now and that's the gazans. You constantly point the finger everywhere except where it belongs and then expect people to take the argument seriously.
    1 point
  30. Executive privilege... for what? They are not magic words that are simply uttered and make everything OK.
    1 point
  31. UN reports exhonerates trudeau and Polievre's honorable defense of israel in the face of sadistic Palestinian terrorists.
    1 point
  32. The US entering the war changed the outcome, and allowed the Americans to defeat the Japanese Empire in the Pacific, and make it possible for the Allies to invade Nazi occupied land by invading Italy in 1943, and then D-Day in 1944. OK, there are several things incorrect about this statement: 1. In 1943. Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill first got together in a conference to decide how to end the war, and what to do with Germany once the Nazis were defeated. After the battle of Stalingrad ended in February 1943, it was obvious that the Germans were going to lose the war. 2. Germany invaded Russia in June 1941. By 1944, Hitler was a complete drug addict, knowing that it was only a matter of time before the Russians and Allies defeated the Nazis. Peace was not possible after 1942, as Russia and the US would have flatly rejected anything other than unconditional surrender. 3. The War in Europe had been over for months when the Americans deployed nuclear weapons. The US decided on using nukes against the Japanese, since they had recaptured all the land outside Japan, and knew the Japanese would fight tooth and nail on their island, which would have resulted in massive American deaths. The Americans correctly thought that if they used nuclear weapons on two Japanese cities, it would avert any battle on mainland Japan. Japan was NOT speaking to Russia about a peace deal in 1945. Where do you come up with this nonsense? He is referring to real history, not imaginary history. The United States now has a military 1,000 times stronger than the one that fought in WWII. They are also easily the undisputed most powerful nation on earth. Not even close. Japan attacked a more powerful enemy, and paid the price. Japan was the aggressor. Ukraine has been victim of Russian aggression for over 500 years, and this is just the latest incident of the Russians invading their country. First off, the United States, did indeed rule over Japan for years. It may not have been a technical occupation, but there remains to this day US military bases in Japan and Germany. America helped rebuild Japan and Germany, into democratic nations that had similar values and principles. Ukraine can indeed still win the war with Russia if NATO gave the Ukrainians unlimited military weapons, and gave the green light to hit St.Petersburg and Moscow, where all the wealthy Russians live. Well what would you do in his situation? He is the leader of the country, and realises that a Russian victory would not only mean persecution for all Ukrainians in annexed territory, but his own possible demise. It's not like if a peace deal is signed, the Russians would give Ukrainians in Russian annexed territory full civil rights. It's obvious from the atrocities committed by Russia, that they would likely seek a terrible revenge on all Ukrainians. People care, because it is the right thing to do. I cannot remember in my lifetime, a military conflict being so black and white, with Russia being the aggressors, and Ukraine being victimised by Russian expansion. This happened in Georgia not too long ago. When you see the school bully physically assaulting students, and making threats against them, do you root him on too?
    1 point
  33. The typical KJP press conference is a 2 parts of I don't knows and 1 part awful attempts at spin. She should of expected that question considering Hunter was just convicted.
    1 point
  34. No...you are the joke. Pelosi deserves to be hauled in and dragged through the mud in public...at very least.
    1 point
  35. Every individual is free to celebrate Pride. Governments and public schools probably shouldn't be pushing it. If students want to celebrate it they have the right.
    1 point
  36. On the one hand you're deeply insane and on the other you have the most dogshit taste in music I've ever seen, just the sound of people farting into a sack of rats.
    1 point
  37. Which reminds me... why do they have RIB FEST at the same time as Burning Man ??
    1 point
  38. Why I don't trust the Legacy media as far as I can throw them: 👇 CTV article: Response from one of the doctors maligned in the article: If you follow my posts, you'll recognize Dr. Speicher as the Canadian virologist who confirmed the DNA contamination in the jabs.
    1 point
  39. You're not making ANY SENSE. Have you been drinking? LMAO
    1 point
  40. Pretty sad. The mandates were all based on his "science" and none of it existed. He upended everyone's lives, destroyed the economy, traumatized children. For what? For what? We can never let them do this to us again.
    1 point
  41. Enjoy this clip of Congressman Dr. Rich McCormack (R-Ga), who treated covid patients through the pandemic and then ran for Congress, delivered a stirring speech and throwing Fauci’s words on vaccine mandates right in his ugly rat face:
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...