Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/19/2024 in all areas

  1. So now that we proved your source is completely bullshit, lets go back to the issue. The claim was made that forcing people to get vaxxed was 'not worht it', and your reply was that "MILLIONS' would die otherwise. And you claim there's no evidence that's untrue. So. lets start with your own failed 'research'. They took a model that assumed everyone in canada who was vaccine hesitant or adverse did not get the vaccine. that's not accurate - many hesitant did after being forced but THEY assume nobody did. It's grossly unrealistically high. And they put the number of people dead by that gross exagerration at 2800 people. 2800. Not "Millions". That's in a grossly exaggerated model that doesn't even take into account age. That's a "Worst possible case" kind of thing. So your own post shows that it was NO WHERE NEAR 'millions". It wasn't even hundreds of thousands. It wasn't evne tens of thousands. How stupid are you to post the proof you're worng? There are plenty of other sources too. For example - consider the graph below. From January to about june vaccinations were slowly rolling out - remembering it was a month beteween first jab and second jab when you were actually immunized so the people getting thier first jab in april for example wouldn't have been immunized till somewhere in may or june. So lets look at the impact in deaths over that time. the vaccine SHOULD have meant deaths would go down as more and more people got vaccinated if it worked as you say. Whopsie doodle - they don't. The increase stays in pretty much a flat line all the way along, regardless of what percent of the population is vaccinated. Next up - the point of immunization was to get 'herd immunity' - that magic point where we have enough people immune that the disease won't spread rapidly. The world health org put that at 70 percent. ( https://www.who.int/news/item/23-12-2021-achieving-70-covid-19-immunization-coverage-by-mid-2022_) But - while they note that getting there with vaccines is better than just letting people get infected - the infected are just as immune. A large percent of the people who did not get vaxxed got covid and lived. They are the 'naturally vaxxed'. A high percent of at risk people would have been vaccinated by choice. The people who didn't would mostly have been low risk. And they would have caught the illness (and did) and would have been no different than a vaccinated person. Look at the number of cases over time - those people are all 'vaccinated' wether they got a shot or not, So the evidence is clear. there would NOT have been 'millions of deaths" as you claimed if we had allowed people to choose. You were completely full of shit - i'm right again and you once again posted your own proof that i'm right with your 'report'. Gotcha Oh - and finally, A Johns Hopkins study says 'ill-founded' COVID lockdowns did more harm than good https://health.wusf.usf.edu/health-news-florida/2022-02-02/a-johns-hopkins-study-says-ill-founded-lockdowns-did-little-to-limit-covid-deaths LOL -have a nice day
    3 points
  2. ALL innocent people should try to stave off banana courts until they can find suitable recourse. Trump is doing the right thing.
    3 points
  3. Well not without overheating his processor, no.. And you have to take into account the very small 'hard drive'.
    3 points
  4. Why does this bother you? Half of the Libbies are Jew haters.
    3 points
  5. Exactly. The better conclusion is that the things you're attributing to vaccine have nothing at all to do with protein spikes. You might as well be blaming fluoride, chemtrails or whatever you had for breakfast that day.
    2 points
  6. Major advertisers have abandoned X in droves.
    2 points
  7. It is interesting how they (the most passionate of internet forum posters) truly do think that they are making widespread, tangible impact. When you point out that the forum is very small and very obscure they go apoplectic about how they will not bow down to the man and that I (or you) have my head in the sand. Nothing stated on here ever is read by true decision makers so no matter how well reasoned, passionate, etc. it may be.. it is for nothing.
    2 points
  8. Keep in mind that the majority of people who are reading/loving Hitler's screed are muslims. Mein Kampf was never banned in the ME and has always been popular there. Hitler is old news, anyways. There's a new breed of hate-mongers who are just as bad:
    2 points
  9. But that isnt true: Joe Biden believes that his uncle may have been eaten by cannibals after his plane was “shot down” over Papua New Guinea during the Second World War. The US president’s theory is, however, contradicted by official war records of 2nd Lieut Ambrose J Finnegan’s death, which suggest that his aircraft suffered engine failure over the Pacific in 1944 and that he did not survive the crash. This is his personality, though. Joe has to make everything about him. When he walks into the room, he grew up with people just like the people in the room. Remember when he grew up on the black church, loved with Puerto Ricans, was jealous of all the people with Polish names, almost lost his house to fire as he told the Maui residents. It is always about him. Watch the video to see how out of touch with reality he is:
    2 points
  10. You're just pissed off because woke fascists aren't running Twitter anymore. Get over it, Adolph.
    2 points
  11. I doubt it. He was overheard telling the drapes that growing up his mother was a venetian blind so he understands what it's like to be disabled.
    2 points
  12. She needs to go. But what can you expect from her? She was an activist, and that's the only reason she was made governor general. Well, and being a native.
    2 points
  13. Yes, that was my point - there is much newer research on this. Seems it's you it's stuck in the past. Why are you against doing studies on these jabs?
    1 point
  14. You dead horse floggers are still stuck in the past science has moved on to more important things.
    1 point
  15. You really are a joke. You're rooting for a man to win the presidency who quite literally tried to illegally seize power in defiance of a democratic election. And then you turn around and pretend that "the left" is the clear and present threat to democracy. lol "The only thing that can save us is swastikas in the public square! That's the only way we can be free. Bless Elon Musk!"
    1 point
  16. Did you know that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to make Moderna’s and Pfizer’s shots were re-purposed to serve as vaccine platforms? They were originally intended to be a delivery mechanism for drugs and/or gene therapies. The reason LNPs were rejected as a platform, is that the LNPs were toxic if administered multiple times. And treatment of cancers and other diseases with LNPs required multi-dosing protocols. For this reason, several companies abandoned the use of LNPs. But Moderna decided to change course and use LNPs as a vaccine delivery system. Why? Because they understood that an ideal vaccine is one that requires a single dose. Here is Health Canada’s official definition of an ideal vaccine here: So, problem solved. A good LNP-based vaccine would require only a single dose. No multi-dosing = none of the toxicities known to be associated with multiple administrations of LNPs. Compare to Stéphane Bancel's comments, CEO of Moderna, which was published on September 13, 2016. Note his serious concerns about the LNPs that his company is using: “Delivery – actually getting RNA into cells – has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years. Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche.” It's not just the spike protein (which there is no mechanism in the jabs to stop your body from producing) that is toxic. The LNPs are, as well. (But I'm sure it's just the breakfast food thing that eyeball thinks.) You can go see it on their website. It's the JCCF - the lawyers who won the Emergency Act case against Trudeau.
    1 point
  17. I knew you'd resort to this, especially after you countered it with a study that was done in the US and Europe. You knew that but you're such a shameless hypocritical troll you simply don't care.
    1 point
  18. First, I know you have problems with sources and citations in general, but an MS word doc from some random unpublished source is about as bad as they come. Opening MS Word docs on random websites is like digital Darwinism.
    1 point
  19. That's already been determined by YOU, comrade. I'm just here to acknowledge your devotion to woke leftism.
    1 point
  20. Eyeball doesn't have to post the study. He posted an article referencing it along with its conclusions. You posting the actual study doesn't change those conclusions, nor does your clueless, 10-IQ critique of it. The absurd comedy of an angry, uneducated and no-life clown like you pretending you can highlight flaws in a 260+ page research study's methodology is top KEK.
    1 point
  21. Also campaign finance violations since those payoffs were clearly campaign related and NOT REPORTED AS SUCH.
    1 point
  22. You don't get to make up your own definition of "woke," shithead Musk is running the show at X not "lefts" Duh
    1 point
  23. free speech does not mean free from consequences. Fine... tell the world that you think Hitler was correct. If the world does not agree with you then you have to deal with that. A lot of folks confuse being accepted with free speech. Just because the world does not agree with what you said does not mean that you were barred from voicing that unpopular opinion.
    1 point
  24. Hyperbole much? This sounds more like a case of a glacier telling another glacier to pick up the pace a little. I suppose I can see how a bankster that's horizontally integrated with the fossil fuel industry might throw a little wrench like this into the works to help push the agenda but it would sure be a petty way of doing so. Has it really come to that, seriously?
    1 point
  25. Even if data is incomplete.. that does not tell you that crime is up or down. I am ok with incomplete. I am not one to fill in the blanks.
    1 point
  26. Au contraire, I know exactly what is up. I am far form ignorant. I read and I pay attention and I know not to push on a pull door. The thing with me and clearly not you, is that I am OK. Not worried and not stressing about things totally out of my control. But hey, it is good there are stressed out folks like you to make the rest of us look normal. Think about it, really think, you are flying of whatever end you are on and I am not. Who gains? Who is farther ahead? Who is affecting the situation? Who is making change? Oh? None of us? Neither you or I....well it must be a tie game then eh? LOL You don't win and I am not even playing LOL
    1 point
  27. I don't think he's able to assimilate new information. He's still spewing long debunked propaganda from the beginning of covid. Either he's being deliberately deceptive or is truly so mentally deficient that he cannot comprehend anything new.
    1 point
  28. Um…no. There are too many unanswered questions. Here are just a few little gems: Why were Chinese scientists working on gain of function viruses at a Canadian bio lab, bringing the research and viruses to Wuhan, and sharing information with members of the Communist Party of China? Why was countervailing evidence on vaccines actively suppressed by media at government behest? When the counter evidence seemed to be true, the language government and media used to describe it changed from misinformation to malinformation, basically information they didn’t like or that disagreed with official narratives. Why were vaccines mandated, especially during the Omicron spread when it was clear that getting Omicron was about as safe and effective against getting further Covid as getting the vaccine? Why are governments able to redact information from being shared with the public when it’s clear that it was government actions that were the greatest threat to national security? Why was the bio lab Covid leak origin of Covid-19 idea actively suppressed? What exactly was being created in our bio labs? Clearly it’s not a secret to our foreign adversaries, so Canadians deserve to know. Why weren’t the non-Covid impacts of lockdowns, mandates and restrictions taken into greater account? Why was the Emergencies Act imposed on peaceful protests? Why were bank accounts frozen? Why does Canada sign onto pandemic and other treaties with international bodies without parliamentary debate or accountability? Damn right we have questions. I don’t want to re-live that nightmare. It wouldn’t take long to come up with a lot more questions, but if even these ones could be satisfactorily answered I would take my bat home.
    1 point
  29. Good point. Fox. May I add 1 more thing? "You don't fight nazi or ANY RACIAL SUPREMACIST ideas by burying them."
    1 point
  30. You don't. You didn't just now either. LOL - well you're a m0ron but you're a consistent one I posted several data sources and a study on TOP of posting the study that eyeball referenced but didn't actually provide - which proved him wrong in any case And once again - in the face of solid evidence all you can do is have a hissy fit i mean we both know you didn't actually read any of the data - anything more than two sentences and you start crying and holding your head Sorry kiddo , If we had not forced vaccinations and allowed people to choose there would not have been 'Millions more deaths". I doubt there would have been any. Well you called it
    1 point
  31. You don't. You didn't just now either. You just linked the report that eyeball had already referenced, and then just spun out and dissembled with your usual worthless bullshitting. You talking about the errors in a study is comical considering your absence of relevant (or seemingly any) training and experience. All you ever have is longwinded bloviating and puking on your keyboard. Nobody can use more words to say less of substance than you.
    1 point
  32. A strong conventional NATO will make that less likely because it will deter Russia from attacking with conventional forces and make it less likely that NATO would have to use them. Being weak in any area does not make you more secure. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wayne-eyre-bill-blair-armed-forces-recruitment-1.7177911 We might end up with a bunch of new equipment and no one to operate it.
    1 point
  33. The problem with free speech is that someone might say something you don't like, Accepting that free speech is necessary and desirable in a free and democratic society means accepting that and not looking at it as a bad thing. The commies in 1920's used violence and intimidation to attempt to deplatform and repress nazi speech. But that only made the nazi's stronger. "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still". You don't fight nazi or white supremicist ideas by burying them, You do it by exposing them to sunlight. Then you can present your own thoughts.
    1 point
  34. Oh i'm aware - i mean he posted proof that HE was wrong without realizing it, clearly there's a comprehension problem at work there And As we know - moonbox's brains start melting with anything more than 2 sentances. But i know. And you know. And intelligent people who come along and read it will know. Those two are just the comic relief so it doesn't really matter - if i let their stupidity be a reason not to post i'd never post anything here
    1 point
  35. This truly is the only criteria, and have a pulse, other than the diploma.
    1 point
  36. No one had to be forced to take the polio vaccine for obvious reasons. The whole 'covid and vaccines' scenario was so dodgy for so many reasons that they had no choice but force people to take it. For most people, they were standing on a perfectly fine ship, getting forced into a life raft.
    1 point
  37. When this muppet references “evidence”, he’s really just referencing his imagination. Nobody is more allergic to citation or references on this cite than him. 🤡
    1 point
  38. Not by scientists. There isn't a reputable scientific/medical institute or university anywhere on the planet that references that hooey. And I doubt real Nazis will be any more pleased that you're associating them with retards than when they're being associated with Trudeau.
    1 point
  39. That'll be the day, you people have been shooting your silly mouths off about 2nd Amendment folks for years and notwithstanding the odd fed up mass shooter...it's been like crickets.
    1 point
  40. I meant a vaccine to protect you guys from us. Your jab will be like that treatment for fleas where you need to be bitten for it to work. It is what it is.
    1 point
  41. Someone should tell Herbie that his hero Carl Marx was pro-gun and a racist.
    1 point
  42. Sounds like your toddler is smarter than you.
    1 point
  43. Yeah...no one was talking about small areas. The atmosphere is the whole thing. Not some little subsect. But I see who you are now. You are someone that doesn't have a grip on reality and will do or say anything to hold onto this liberal fantasy world you "live" in.
    1 point
  44. Good ol' part-time jobs and public-sector jobs to the rescue. Somehow the Dems just haven't gotten the recipe for 'spending their way to wealth' right just yet.
    1 point
  45. Ooh ee ooh ah ah Foxy say bwana's medicine is evil. Cut off that arm.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...