Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/21/2024 in all areas

  1. more ouch for the GOP investigation into the Bidens... again, Russia! Russia! Russia! attempting to help the Trump win an election. DOJ filing says FBI informant told investigators he got Hunter Biden dirt from Russian officials "During his custodial interview on February 14, Smirnov admitted that officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story about Businessperson 1,” the filing reads. Businessperson 1 is Hunter Biden." the fact that the GOP would even consider raw intelligence information from Smirnov show how partisan and open to foreign influence Jordan and Comer are on this file.
    3 points
  2. Trudeau has only served himself. Everything is about him . . .
    3 points
  3. Retirement means having worked for a living. Trudeau does not fit that definition.
    3 points
  4. Trudeau is not Putin. He doesn't murder political opponents. But Trudeau isn't an ethical politician, he did hardly anything against Chinese election interference that benefited his power until it went public and then he tried to block any investigation, his punishment of JWR's whistleblowing of his own corruption was abhorrent, the minor crimes the freedom convoy committed (illegally parking in the street, noise nuisances, blocking a bridge) does not legitimize his abuse of power by using the Emergencies Act. Putin is much worse than Trudeau, but they're both power-hungry and controlling narcissists who punish dissent and don't respect democracy. They lie constantly and don't want to be held accountable for anything. People who generally support either of them are crappy people in my estimation.
    3 points
  5. It's still mindboggling that in this age, with all the information at their fingertips and with no overwhelming reason like the debilitating recession last century, seemingly intelligent folks choose to turn their brains off, consciously and deliberately, and follow dumb, patently deceptive preachings a bombastic lying buffoon against all the facts and evidence from the reality. How do they get to it? What's the benefit, in mindless jumping and cheering? And they used to praise themselves on being critical and independent. Astounding. Just wow.
    3 points
  6. The resident leftists here have no clue how many crimes the FBI committed and how many lies they told during the witch hunt. In order to understand just how corrupt the FBI actually are, a thorough understanding of this topic is necessary. To this day there are a lot of politically involved Americans who don't even know that anyone from the FBI was convicted of crimes during the witch hunt. Some of them spent thousands of hours watching collusion investigation coverage on TV, reading about it in the papers, digging around to read articles/watch videos online, talking about it with friends/acquaintances/colleagues etc, and talking on social media and in online forums like this one. Yet after all of those thousands of hours devouring all the information that they could find regarding this topic, the most significant aspect of the entire story, and in fact maybe the biggest story since 9/11 or Pearl Harbour, is completely unknown to them: the FBI was outed as a criminal enterprise. The few leftists who are somewhat in the know will contend that 'only one minor crime was committed - by one guy - and that was the extent of it': no one else was aware or involved and it was just a tiny crime, made ok by the fact that it was committed with the very best of intentions... Real PG-13 stuff, right? "The hero of our story really really felt like the president was guilty and he just wanted to renew the warrant to spy on him. Honist injun!" I should cut those guys some slack, because the majority of leftists are oblivious to the topic of FBI crimes during the investigation, but the "teensy bit guilty for altering evidence and providing it to a judge" narrative is farcical and every adult worth talking to understands that implicitly without the need for further explanation. But there's a lot more splainin' and a lot more evidence that can be considered, and it's important to plumb the depths of the FBI's corruption. 1) When you consider the fact that the FBI never acquired any evidence at all that Trump colluded with Russia, the whole premise of renewing the warrants was moot to begin with because subsequent renewals depend on actual success from the earlier warrants. A warrant that yields no new evidence is not supposed to be renewed at all, regardless of whether or not the FBI still maintains their earlier lies by omission. The FBI's lies by omission include, but are not limited to: [<-- click link] There were "no fewer than 10 instances, starting as early as 2009, in which top officials at FBI headquarters came to possess evidence that Page was acting on behalf of the CIA and the FBI itself, yet hid this exculpatory evidence from a secret federal surveillance court. the FBI’s entire "Crossfire Hurricane” investigative team — including its leader, Peter Strzok – ignored several warnings that Page was assisting the good guys. Instead of following the law and reporting this history of cooperation to the FISA court – which spoke to Page’s loyalty and innocence – the team portrayed his contacts with Russian intelligence officers as evidence he was helping the bad guys. There's a lot to unpack there: The entire Crossfire Hurricane team was aware that page was a CIA/FBI asset, not just Clinesmith 4 senior FBI officials all sign off on the authenticity of the evidence that is submitted to the FISA court for the initial application and all subsequent renewals. All of those people knew that Page was an asset, they all omitted all evidence of that, so they were all guilty of lying by omission to the FISA court. It was a crime every single time they did it, and the warrant was given out 4 times For the FBI to invent their own false, nefarious motives for Page's acts and convey that information to a 3rd party is known as "the lie of fabrication", which is the worst type of lying of all: it displays willfullness and malicious intent when, in instances like this, it is done to incriminate someone. So not only were FBI members guilty of lying by omission, they were also guilty of fabricating, which is an important distinction in sentencing because the intent is unambiguous. Comey's knowledge/involvement/participation in the crimes: From the article linked above: Sept. 25 [2016]: Enraged by the story, Page sends FBI Director James Comey a letter denying contacts with sanctioned Russian officials and requests an interview with agents to clear his name. He also reminds Comey of his decades-long record of cooperation with both “the FBI and CIA." Comey shares the letter with Strzok and others on the Crossfire team, but does not respond to Page. Oct. 21: The FBI withholds the exculpatory information from the FISA court and the court approves the [FIRST] FISA warrant to secretly collect Page’s emails and text messages – past and present – and record his phone conversations. Signed by Comey, the warrant application omits Page’s prior historical contacts and relationship with the CIA. It also leaves out the fact that Page previously cooperated with the FBI to help put away a Russian spy. Now you know that Comey himself knew prior to the FIRST warrant application to the FISA court. The crimes were not just committed on the 4th application, THE FBI'S WHOLE INVESTIGATION WAS BASED ON LIES RIGHT FROM THE VERY START. The crimes were not limited to Clinesmith at all, far from it. The crimes were committed jointly by every single agent from Comey right on down through all of the senior leadership of the FBI. Just for the sake of clarity, I'm going to mention one more lie here, which speaks to the legitimacy of the whole operation, but not necessarily to the FBI... July: Page travels to Moscow to give an economic speech at a college where President Obama previously spoke. Steele drafts a memo falsely claiming Page met with Kremlin officials during his trip as part of a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Steele begins feeding his dossier to the FBI. So there's another lie right at the heart of the story, this one by agent Steele [formerly of Mi6]. It's important to know that the dossier was full of lies, not just the FBIs story, but I won't blame this part on the FBI. Again, this is just here to underline how false the witch hunt narrative was from every direction. Bottom line: Comey, Strzok and others at the very top of the FBI all participated in lying about Carter Page to the FISA court. That's several FBI agents all committing crimes x 4 warrant applications (the original FISA warrant plus 3 renewals). It's not "one small crime, and just a clerical error at that", it's systemic, willfull lies and fabrications all throughout the agency that were put on paper and submitted to the FISA court. That whole pattern of lies and deception was distilled into one conviction which resulted in probation for a lawyer who didn't even lose his license. THE FBI IS KNOWN TO HAVE SEVERAL HIGH-RANKING AGENTS WHO COMMITTED DOZENS OF CRIMES YET ONLY ONE PERSON FACED ONE SINGLE INDICTMENT, - WHICH LED TO A SUCCESSFUL CONVICTION - RESULTING IN 0 MINUTES OF JAIL TIME AND NO OTHER FORM OF PUNISHMENT. We all know why exactly one person was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge on a very serious offence and didn't get any jail time or lose his license. This is the exact same sweethheart deal that the DOJ gave to Ray Epps... Epps got to plead guilty to a lesser charge than the crime he actually committed and was only sentenced to probation. THE FBI IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, PERIOD. END OF STORY.
    2 points
  7. Including today's announcements, whatever of them may be true. None of it amounts to anything, but it is fun to watch rage-a-roni call us child pornographers for bringing this up.
    2 points
  8. Stop answering your own question. Here's another one - which appears to be real. Pierre - MILES AHEAD IN THE POLLS - decides to side with the 15% of Canadians who think that trans people should be banned from bathrooms. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-ban-trans-women-sports-bathrooms-1.7120972
    2 points
  9. No... it's completely logical that because I don't want to scan my driver's license to a porn site to watch, I have NEVER HEARD OF A PG 18 film.
    2 points
  10. They'll wait for as long as possible to call the election. Spring doubtful
    2 points
  11. Like knowingly driving the price of food and shelter to the point where many canadians can't afford it and can't care for their families properly with his money and immigration policies. Or did you think that a couple thousand new rental units within 3 years in a province where he's importing tens of thousands of new residents annually was some sort of altruistic gesture. Worth noting btw - that this was PP's idea, he and the conservatives said this precise plan was one of the things they'd do if they got in, and eby ran with it (who can blame him, i'ts a good idea) and trudeau's just jumping on the bandwagon by spending other people's money and riding on the coattails of others. The cpc deserve credit for proposing the idea the ndp deserve credit for implementing the idea, trudeau deserves nothing for showing up at the end with other people's cash for the photo op.
    2 points
  12. People who draw comparisons between Trudeau and Putin are being lazy thinkers, in my estimation. Acknowledging that Putin is "much worse" is a pretty flimsy qualification whilst trying to say they're similar. "Yeah, like, Putin's critics all fall out of balconies, get shot on the streets, die of nerve agent and radioactive poisons, or their plans hit the ground prematurely, but Justin Trudeau demoted JWR from her cabinet position!" Oooof.
    2 points
  13. Canada is largely a Roman Catholic country. And we get along.
    2 points
  14. Caswell tried to portray himself as a knowledgeable, skilled in penmanship individual He failed miserably with his first post as the TDS shone brightly nullifying the attempt and was called out on it. Recovery mode is also a failure. TDS overrides many people's reasoning.
    2 points
  15. Since we don't have access to the books, we only have the ridiculousness of these products to gauge. How well is fundraising is doing. The sillier the product, the more money he needs. Gold basketball shoes is definitely a new high low. The thing that makes this guy so intriguing, is the imagination can never predict the next step. Will it be frozen TV dinners? Will it be wigs? Will it be dog food?
    2 points
  16. Interesting that many of the countries ranked above us are regarded as socialist by the North American right.
    2 points
  17. The people that defend Putin have been manipulated by Trump and the pro-Trump media pundits to support him, even though he's been aggressively anti-West for decades. Trump likes him because Putin helped get him elected and they're both narcissistic domineering bullies.
    2 points
  18. He made no attempt to difuse the peaceful protest. He hid out and chirped insults . . . like the gutless dork he is. Cut it any way you want herbie, Trudeau just doesn't have the depth to deal with anything other than photo op's and sparkle socks.
    2 points
  19. For many Americans, this will be a wrong comparison. Navalny is dead. Yet, what Putin did to Navalny is what Biden is doing to Trump.
    1 point
  20. Putin jails his political opponents - and then, he kills them. This is Iran; North Korea. So why do some Conservatives tacitly admire him? ("genius": and the resounding silence). Why wouldn't they want to stand up to him? Astounding. Perplexing. And shameful. There are no words that can explain and excuse this. Disgusting too.
    1 point
  21. You don’t make any sense, and your point has nothing to do with this subject. The lead Congressional prosecution witness for Biden’s impeachment has been indicted for lying in the matter, and he’s confessed that he was fed the lie by the Russian intelligence service. IOW, Putin got the U.S. Congress to attempt an impeachment of the President of the U.S. pretty embarrassing, MAGA.
    1 point
  22. no, we're not to conclude that the FBI is a criminal enterprise. there are thousands of people in this organization who are doing amazing work all the time... as soon as the crimes of the political class are involved then we should avoid calling their actions political. the political class should be squeaky clean. they should not be breaking laws. and if the FBI should always be on a "witch hunt"... because all police work is a "witch hunt". its because criminals don't run to the law to confess their crimes. the traditional GOP, the party of "law and order" would never claim that the FBI were corrupt. but the MAGA crowd do because the people who tell them what they think are corrupt.
    1 point
  23. No sh1t, Dick Tracey. Thanks for getting something right for once. Exactly. "We don't really feel like prosecuting the people who are committing crimes for us." That's on P1 of the Banana Republican Constitution/toilet roll. That's P1 of the Demi Manifesto. I gotta admit, you've made a lot of progress in those books, considering how low your IQ is. Oh, I'm pretty sure that the DOJ ran a big enough smear campaign to get an impeachment started, even though they had to commit a buttload of crimes in the process. There's no blanket statement for every police interaction, stupid. In the case of the FBI/DOJ, there's clearly a case of widespread, systemic, politically motivated corruption. Don't bother hauling out the dictionary to look up those big words, none of them are on P1, aardvark. (You can look that last one up, it's sure to be on P1. See how nice I am to you, even though you're just a slimy little shitheel with no redeeming qualities? Thanks in advance for your kind reply, dummy)
    1 point
  24. There was more to my position than that. No I'd put it that way too. There'd be a lot less need to repeat ourselves around here if you did a better job of understanding English.
    1 point
  25. But they do it anyways, so why the f*ck are you even bringing this bullshit up?
    1 point
  26. I thought we all just bought Playboy for the articles.
    1 point
  27. It's usually a consequence of poor political planning for dealing with what is or was. I'm pretty sure more than a few military planners have wondered what if politicians could have done a better job.
    1 point
  28. No - they have to go into the woman's restroom. This guy will be legally required to use the little girls room at the showing of the Frozen & Encanto Disney on Ice show at the Calgary Saddledome, when your niece goes in alone... HEY LADY !!!
    1 point
  29. We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it. -- Nancy Pelosi / the Left
    1 point
  30. The only existing treatment that successfully corrects this situation is gender reassignment surgery. Nobody in Canada can have GRS until they reach the age of majority, usually 18 or 19. Children can live as the gender they need to transition to, but they cannot have the surgery until they are legally an adult. I believe the question of puberty blockers requires a physician to sign off on it. They are not something you can just buy over the counter in Sobey's.
    1 point
  31. It's possible someone could have their genitals removed and still feel as much like a man and of course could continue to present as such. It really depends on the individual, which is why a blanket statement like " Its physically impossible to change genders. Period." is incorrect. And of course there's a difference between gender identity (how one feels), gender expression (how one presents) and gender perception (how one is preceived).
    1 point
  32. Simple answer: content farms are using generative AI like ChatGPT to flood the internet with garbage SEO content and Google can't keep up. link
    1 point
  33. The same thing is happening in Ukraine and the leftists won't acknowledge it: Zelenski banned opposition parties and seized control of all of the media outlets. Is what's happening in the US any different? Leftists want to cancel Trump, Fox News, and they love it when the NYPost gets banned from Twitter, or actual humans het kicked off of social media for talking about the BSL4 lab, etc... A USA without Fox & Trump, and where leftists can lie on social media 24/7 while the truth gets cancelled, is no different from Nazi Germany or Nazi Ukraine. The only difference is "but, but, but we like Biden and Zelenski and we don't like Hitler". The truth is that "with the benefit of hindsight they don't like Hitler", but they don't notice when they're cheering on the exact same seizure of authoritarian control. History has shown us that the types of people who want to consolidate power like that aren't benevolent.
    1 point
  34. The entire democrat party is a f*cking menace and they're getting bolder by the day. It won't be too long before these monsters arrest minors (like this girl in the video) for not subjecting themselves on demand.
    1 point
  35. Nah. I mean you can make the argument that mother Teresa was self serving because it made her happy to see the kids survive but it's not really an accurate statement. Some people do have a desire to contribute and understand that we have a duty to the greater community and that by contributing and serving others we can serve ourselves as well. Compared to those who ONLY think of their own benefit. There's a difference. Trudeau frequently takes actions that are harmful to Canada for his own betterment and doesn't bat an eye.
    1 point
  36. I think so too. I don't think the NDP Is in a hurry for an election either. They may lose some seats if one is called early. Even if the coalition deal falls apart, the NDP will probably still support the government to avoid an election as long as possible.
    1 point
  37. I have a different view, of course. I think Prime Minister Trudeau will stay put until the end. He has no incentive to go early because no matter when the ballots are counted, he will lose. Mr. Poilieve has such a big lead, it would be almost impossible for him to lose. The result is not an indication of how much voters want Mr. Poilievre, but rather how much they want a change. In Canada, we do not vote for someone. We vote against someone. Prime Minister Trudeau has nothing to lose by staying on as long as possible and get his 10 years in. The only opposition party that would benifit from an election is the CPC. If the NDP jetison the agreement, either they, or the Bloc, will continue to keep the grits in power. They will want to delay the CPC from forming a government as long as possible. Mr. Poilievre should savour these last few months in opposition. The fun ends when he receives the instruments of office and a tsunami of reality lands on him. Mr. Trudeau, on the other hand, can begin to relax and prepare for retirement.
    1 point
  38. FAR from it. Trump violated US laws to serve HIS self-interests and undermine democracy that's in the Constitution. Navalny ONLY campaigned against Putin and exposed his kleptocracy. Putin did to Navalny what Trump TRIED to do to Biden (except for the jailing and killing part). However, Trump is promising to do the jailing part if he is re-elected. Yours is a HUGE false equivalence. 🤮
    1 point
  39. That’s right, moonbox, You’re nothing but a drive by. You’ve got nothing to refute the argument so you try to change the subject instead. And NATO knows that Russia isn’t collapsing, almost 2 years after you started this thread about Russia collapsing. Otherwise they wouldn’t be suggesting a new Russian attack.
    1 point
  40. Yes, everyone else is emotional here, not the smooth-brain spamming caps and exclamation marks. 🤡
    1 point
  41. That unsubstantiated diatribe smacks of extreme desperation, poor punctuation and overcooked sprouts.
    1 point
  42. Hell most haven't for a long time now. Just...push that emotional button and watch the Libbie hoards respond. "AHHH!!! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!!!" I swear Sharkman, these freaks are all in for a bloody stroke. And those who perpetuate this obscenity? This social panic? Need to be treated like the abusive sell-outs they are.
    1 point
  43. The US only boasts 23rd place. Thank Trudeau for that too I guess - cancellation by association.
    1 point
  44. Wow, your intense logic and clear grasp of the issues have won me over. There are stupider posters on this site but sometimes you REALLY make them work for it. If you don't have something more intelligent than a grade 3 pupil could offer then best to stay quiet and not highlight it. Nothing has changed. What did you THINK had changed? There's no such thing as terrorists any more? We don't use airplanes anymore? For that matter russian bombers buzz our borders regularly. You figure putin's a nice guy, we can trust him? And just a reminder - the US had never had such a threat either till suddenly it did. Do you have some evidence that it couldn't? Seems to me i've heard tell of people shooting down planes and drones with missile defense systems before.... ask your buddy putin that you trust so much about that Canada needs to be able to defend itself. That is the very first and foremost job of a sovereign nation. it is CLEAR that there are threats, your pretending otherwise is just silly. So if you're going to make an argument that we don't need such defenses you'll have to do better than 'Uuuuuuhhh You livvin i da past DERP"
    1 point
  45. This is a 17’th century debate, the sort of thing deranged dinosaurs like Ian Paisley used to go in for.
    1 point
  46. They have 5th floor windows in Russian jails too?
    1 point
  47. It's unfortunate that dental care wasn't rolled in with healthcare right from the get go. Internationally, health policy analysts are often surprised that Canada’s national system of health insurance (Medicare) does not include dental care. http://www.ncohr-rcrsb.ca/knowledge-sharing/working-paper-series/content/quinonez.pdf
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...